ARMK vs IRM vs CTAS Stock Comparison

Aramark, Iron Mountain and Cintas Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FSV) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ARMK Aramark
$56.02 +2.9% 1M +43.3% 1Y
Market cap
$14.11B
P/E
36.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$19.85B
Div. yield
0.01%
Facility Services Industrials
3 wins
IRM Iron Mountain Inc
$118.43 +6.3% 1M +16.9% 1Y
Market cap
$34.52B
P/E
82.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.56B
Div. yield
0.03%
Facility Services Industrials
3 wins
CTAS Cintas Corp
$218.07 +10.3% 1M +18.6% 1Y
Market cap
$88.02B
P/E
42.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.56B
Div. yield
0.01%
Facility Services Industrials
6 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Cintas leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Cintas 6, Aramark 3, Iron Mountain 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionARMKIRMCTASLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $14.11B $34.52B $88.02B CTAS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.8x 82.5x 42.7x ARMK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 26.1x 51.0x 37.3x ARMK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.0% +17.4% +9.5% IRM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.9% 5.5% 17.8% CTAS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.8% 7.6% 28.2% CTAS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.1x 6.7x 0.7x CTAS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.03% 0.01% IRM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +43.3% +16.9% +18.6% ARMK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +9.0%/yr +21.0%/yr +15.0%/yr IRM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 26.5% 33.2% 23.7% CTAS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 47/100 61/100 CTAS

Percentile Scorecard

ARMKIRMCTAS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisARMKIRMCTAS
Valuation 46 #62 of 113 20 #91 of 113 21 #90 of 113
Growth 85 #15 of 96 91 #10 of 96 73 #27 of 96
Profitability 44 #51 of 91 67 #31 of 91 99 #2 of 91
Financial Health 19 #99 of 122 8 #112 of 122 69 #38 of 122
Shareholder Returns 32 #45 of 66 51 #33 of 66 43 #38 of 66
Overall 45 47 61
  • ARMK ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • IRM ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • CTAS ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodARMKIRMCTASSPY
1 month +2.9%+6.3%+10.3% +0.7%
3 months -2.2%-5.0%+5.5% +3.7%
6 months +22.6%-6.0%+24.8% +7.1%
Year to date +52.0%+42.8%+16.0% +12.8%
1 year +43.3%+16.9%+18.6% +11.9%
3 years +109.3%+103.2%+73.5% +85.2%
3 years, per year +27.9%+26.7%+20.2% +22.8%
5 years +53.6%+159.5%+101.4% +67.6%
5 years, per year +9.0%+21.0%+15.0% +10.9%
10 years +52.1%+260.7%+723.4% +262.0%
10 years, per year +4.3%+13.7%+23.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureARMKIRMCTASSPY
Volatility, 1Y 26.5%33.2%23.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 23.4%34.3%23.9% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.631.160.10 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.630.510.78 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -46.4%-40.0%-28.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -10.2%-11.0%-3.5% -1.2%
52-week high $62.39$133.06$225.93 $779.14
52-week low $36.04$78.86$163.55 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleARMKIRMCTAS
P/E now vs peer median 38.6xmedian 21.9x 84.2xmedian 21.9x 42.3xmedian 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 0.9x 4.7xmedian 0.9x 7.5xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.7xmedian 11.9x 20.6xmedian 11.9x 27.8xmedian 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 34.1xmedian 14.4x -71.8xmedian 14.4x 42.8xmedian 14.4x
P/B now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 2.4x -27.5xmedian 2.4x 16.7xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median -3.29median 0.97 32.23median 0.97 2.79median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsARMKIRMCTAS
Revenue $19.85B $7.56B $11.56B
Gross profit $1.69B $4.10B $5.89B
Operating income $870.70M $1.42B $2.70B
Net income $382.71M $434.46M $2.06B
Free cash flow $432.81M -$490.92M $2.03B
EPS (diluted) $1.43 $1.40 $5.10
Cash & equivalents $499.43M $204.79M $243.60M
Total debt $6.13B $17.35B $2.43B
Shares (diluted) 268.54M 299.85M 404.29M
Enterprise value $12.06B $33.72B $87.11B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricARMKIRMCTAS
P/E 38.6x 84.2x 42.3x
P/FCF 34.1x -71.8x 42.8x
P/Operating cash flow 16.2x 21.3x 35.8x
P/S 0.7x 4.7x 7.5x
P/B 4.3x -27.5x 16.7x
P/Tangible book 10.0x -14.0x 17.7x
EV/EBITDA 14.7x 20.6x 27.8x
EV/EBIT 23.4x 36.9x 33.1x
EV/Revenue 1.0x 6.9x 7.7x
EV/FCF 47.1x -106.7x 43.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 22.4x 31.7x 36.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -3.29 32.23 2.79

Growth

14 metrics
MetricARMKIRMCTAS
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.0% 17.4% 9.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 13.3% 13.0% 8.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.6% 13.5% 11.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 25.2% 11.1% 11.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.8% 35.4% 11.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 30.2% 12.8% 13.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 5.8% 867.3% 11.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -11.1% 4.1% 14.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 4.6% 897.5% 12.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -11.7% 2.6% 15.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 18.7% 31.7% 14.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 68.3% 17.2% 14.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 54.2% 50.3% 19.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 77.8% -60.8% 17.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricARMKIRMCTAS
Gross margin 8.5% 54.2% 51.0%
EBITDA margin 7.0% 33.6% 27.8%
Operating margin 4.4% 18.8% 23.4%
Pretax margin 2.6% 6.7% 22.5%
Net margin 1.9% 5.5% 17.8%
FCF margin 2.2% -6.5% 17.6%
Operating cash flow margin 4.6% 21.9% 21.1%
Return on equity 11.5% – 39.8%
Return on assets 2.8% 2.0% 19.5%
Return on invested capital 6.8% 7.6% 28.2%
Return on capital employed 8.0% 7.5% 34.2%
Asset turnover 1.4x 0.3x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.4x 3.8x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 0.3% 1.8% 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricARMKIRMCTAS
Debt / assets 43.9% 79.0% 22.8%
Debt / equity 1.8x -13.5x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.1x 6.7x 0.7x
Debt / FCF 14.2x -35.3x 1.2x
Liabilities / assets 75.7% 105.8% 51.1%
Equity / assets 24.3% -5.8% 48.9%
Interest coverage – – 25.3x
Current ratio 1.3x 0.7x 1.5x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.6x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.1x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 2.60 1.79 13.42

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricARMKIRMCTAS
Dividend yield 0.9% 2.9% 0.9%
Net buyback yield 0.3% – 1.1%
Shareholder yield 1.2% 2.9% 2.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 32.0% 229.5% 35.2%
Payout ratio (FCF) 28.3% -203.1% 35.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) 12.9% 16.5% 14.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 2.3% 11.1% 15.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusARMKIRMCTAS
Forward P/E 26.1xFY2026 51.0xFY2026 37.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.15FY2026 $2.32FY2026 $5.85FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +16.8%FY2026 +9.4%FY2026 +18.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +21.9% +28.0% +10.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $21.42BFY2026 $8.36BFY2026 $12.98BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.7%FY2026 +21.1%FY2026 +15.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -4.7% +2.2% +6.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersARMKIRMCTAS
Held by institutions 99.0% 86.2% 67.6%
Institutions holding 545 1,162 1,432
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.1% +1.9% +6.4%
Institutions buying 321 599 659
Institutions selling 157 377 576
Buyers to sellers 2.04 1.59 1.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ARMKIRMCTAS
ARMK 1.00 0.20 0.26
IRM 0.20 1.00 -0.01
CTAS 0.26 -0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ARMK, IRM and CTAS?

Cintas (CTAS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Aramark (ARMK) $14.11B, Iron Mountain (IRM) $34.52B, Cintas (CTAS) $88.02B.

Which stock is cheaper, ARMK, IRM and CTAS?

Aramark (ARMK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Aramark (ARMK) 36.8x, Iron Mountain (IRM) 82.5x, Cintas (CTAS) 42.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Aramark (ARMK) is cheapest (Aramark (ARMK) 26.1x, Iron Mountain (IRM) 51.0x, Cintas (CTAS) 37.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Iron Mountain (IRM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Aramark (ARMK) +11.0%, Iron Mountain (IRM) +17.4%, Cintas (CTAS) +9.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cintas (CTAS) has the highest net margin (Aramark (ARMK) 1.9%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 5.5%, Cintas (CTAS) 17.8%). On return on invested capital, Cintas (CTAS) leads (Aramark (ARMK) 6.8%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 7.6%, Cintas (CTAS) 28.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Aramark (ARMK) returned the most: Aramark (ARMK) +43.3%, Iron Mountain (IRM) +16.9%, Cintas (CTAS) +18.6%. Over five years, Iron Mountain (IRM) compounded fastest (Aramark (ARMK) +9.0%/yr, Iron Mountain (IRM) +21.0%/yr, Cintas (CTAS) +15.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Iron Mountain (IRM) has the highest dividend yield: Aramark (ARMK) 0.01%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 0.03%, Cintas (CTAS) 0.01%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cintas (CTAS) has been the steadiest (Aramark (ARMK) 26.5%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 33.2%, Cintas (CTAS) 23.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ARMK, IRM and CTAS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cintas (CTAS) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.