ARMK vs CXW vs RPT Stock Comparison

Aramark, CoreCivic and Rithm Property Trust Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FSV) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ARMK Aramark
$52.34 -5.2% 1M +38.9% 1Y
Market cap
$13.79B
P/E
36.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$19.85B
Div. yield
0.92%
Facility Services Industrials
2 wins
CXW CoreCivic, Inc.
$30.54 -9.5% 1M +65.7% 1Y
Market cap
$3.02B
P/E
23.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.48B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
5 wins
RPT Rithm Property Trust Inc.
$11.17 +1.8% 1M -22.8% 1Y
Market cap
$88.35M
P/E
72.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$19.55M
Div. yield
16.11%
Specialty REITs Real Estate
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

CoreCivic leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (CoreCivic 5, Rithm Property Trust 5, Aramark 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionARMKCXWRPTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $13.79B $3.02B $88.35M ARMK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.0x 23.6x 72.6x CXW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.3x 1.8x — CXW
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.0% +24.3% +137.6% RPT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.9% 5.1% 6.2% RPT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.8% 6.6% 10.5% RPT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.1x 3.2x — CXW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.92% 0.00% 16.11% RPT
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +38.9% +65.7% -22.8% CXW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.9%/yr +26.1%/yr -33.8%/yr CXW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 27.0% 41.9% 37.9% ARMK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 54/100 62/100 RPT

Percentile Scorecard

ARMKCXWRPT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisARMKCXWRPT
Valuation 47 #61 of 114 49 #59 of 114 41 #87 of 146
Growth 86 #15 of 98 47 #52 of 98 95 #8 of 145
Profitability 48 #50 of 95 52 #46 of 95 23 #109 of 141
Financial Health 21 #100 of 126 39 #77 of 126 55 #66 of 146
Shareholder Returns 35 #46 of 70 84 #12 of 70 95 #8 of 136
Overall 47 54 62
  • ARMK ranked among 131 companies in Business Services
  • CXW ranked among 131 companies in Business Services
  • RPT ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodARMKCXWRPTSPY
1 month -5.2%-9.5%+1.8% -1.0%
3 months -8.0%-2.2%-9.8% -0.4%
6 months +14.3%+44.3%-24.3% +4.5%
Year to date +42.0%+59.8%-32.6% +12.4%
1 year +38.9%+65.7%-22.8% +13.6%
3 years +84.6%+129.6%-58.3% +76.4%
3 years, per year +22.7%+32.0%-25.3% +20.8%
5 years +33.3%+219.1%-87.3% +63.7%
5 years, per year +5.9%+26.1%-33.8% +10.4%
10 years +44.8%+109.8%-85.7% +267.7%
10 years, per year +3.8%+7.7%-17.7% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureARMKCXWRPTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 27.0%41.9%37.9% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.6%43.5%37.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.610.340.42 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.441.57-0.60 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -46.4%-39.7%-88.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -16.1%-14.0%-37.5% -1.6%
52-week high $62.39$35.53$17.88 $779.14
52-week low $36.04$16.13$10.41 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleARMKCXWRPT
P/E now vs peer median 36.0xmedian 23.0x 23.6xmedian 23.0x 72.6xmedian 26.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 0.9x 1.2xmedian 0.9x 4.5xmedian 4.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.0xmedian 12.1x 11.0xmedian 12.1x —median 14.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 31.9xmedian 15.8x 52.7xmedian 15.8x -6.9xmedian 22.1x
P/B now vs peer median 4.1xmedian 2.4x 2.1xmedian 2.4x 0.3xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median -3.08median 1.13 3.33median 1.13 2.75median 2.01

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsARMKCXWRPT
Revenue $19.85B $2.48B $19.55M
Gross profit $1.69B – –
Operating income $870.70M – –
Net income $382.71M $127.90M $6.37M
Free cash flow $432.81M $57.32M -$12.80M
EPS (diluted) $1.43 $1.29 $0.15
Cash & equivalents $499.43M $108.93M $45.25M
Total debt $6.13B $1.35B $109.15M
Shares (diluted) 268.54M 98.89M 7.86M
Enterprise value $11.81B $2.55B -$768.15M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricARMKCXWRPT
P/E 36.0x 23.6x 72.6x
P/FCF 31.9x 52.7x -6.9x
P/Operating cash flow 15.1x 15.1x -6.9x
P/S 0.7x 1.2x 4.5x
P/B 4.1x 2.1x 0.3x
P/Tangible book 9.4x 2.1x 0.3x
EV/EBITDA 14.0x 11.0x –
EV/EBIT 22.3x 17.2x 2.2x
EV/Revenue 1.0x 1.7x 4.8x
EV/FCF 44.9x 74.3x -7.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 21.3x 21.3x -7.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -3.08 3.33 2.75

Growth

14 metrics
MetricARMKCXWRPT
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.0% 24.3% 137.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 13.3% 10.2% 53.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.6% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 25.2% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.8% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 30.2% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 5.8% 22.9% 58,009%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -11.1% 2.2% 30.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 4.6% 35.1% 165.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -11.7% 7.1% 26.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 18.7% -26.4% -29.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 68.3% 2.6% 30.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 54.2% -66.4% -29.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 77.8% -19.8% 30.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricARMKCXWRPT
Gross margin 8.5% – –
EBITDA margin 7.0% 15.6% –
Operating margin 4.4% – –
Pretax margin 2.6% 7.0% 32.1%
Net margin 1.9% 5.1% 6.2%
FCF margin 2.2% 2.3% -65.5%
Operating cash flow margin 4.6% 8.1% -65.5%
Return on equity 11.5% 9.0% 2.2%
Return on assets 2.8% 3.7% 0.7%
Return on invested capital 6.8% 6.6% 10.5%
Return on capital employed 8.0% 8.5% –
Asset turnover 1.4x 0.7x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.4x 1.6x -2.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.3% 1.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricARMKCXWRPT
Debt / assets 43.9% 39.0% 11.3%
Debt / equity 1.8x 0.9x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.1x 3.2x –
Debt / FCF 14.2x 23.5x -8.5x
Liabilities / assets 75.7% 58.4% 70.2%
Equity / assets 24.3% 41.6% 29.8%
Interest coverage – 3.3x 1.2x
Current ratio 1.3x 1.3x –
Quick ratio 1.0x 1.1x –
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.2x –
Altman Z-score 2.55 1.89 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricARMKCXWRPT
Dividend yield 0.9% – 16.1%
Net buyback yield 0.3% 6.3% 0.3%
Shareholder yield 1.3% 6.3% 16.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) 32.0% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 28.3% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 12.9% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 2.3% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusARMKCXWRPT
Forward P/E 24.3xFY2026 1.8xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $2.15FY2026 $16.94FY2026 $-0.06FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +16.8%FY2026 +1,468.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +21.9% -85.4% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $21.42BFY2026 $2.85BFY2026 $28.82MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.7%FY2026 +29.1%FY2026 +64.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -4.7% -0.2% +13.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersARMKCXWRPT
Held by institutions 99.0% 87.5% 63.8%
Institutions holding 545 278 52
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.1% +0.2% -9.0%
Institutions buying 321 155 24
Institutions selling 157 86 21
Buyers to sellers 2.04 1.80 1.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ARMKCXWRPT
ARMK 1.00 0.16 0.12
CXW 0.16 1.00 0.06
RPT 0.12 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ARMK, CXW and RPT?

Aramark (ARMK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Aramark (ARMK) $13.79B, CoreCivic (CXW) $3.02B, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) $88.35M.

Which stock is cheaper, ARMK, CXW and RPT?

CoreCivic (CXW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Aramark (ARMK) 36.0x, CoreCivic (CXW) 23.6x, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) 72.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, CoreCivic (CXW) is cheapest (Aramark (ARMK) 24.3x, CoreCivic (CXW) 1.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Rithm Property Trust (RPT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Aramark (ARMK) +11.0%, CoreCivic (CXW) +24.3%, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) +137.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Rithm Property Trust (RPT) has the highest net margin (Aramark (ARMK) 1.9%, CoreCivic (CXW) 5.1%, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) 6.2%). On return on invested capital, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) leads (Aramark (ARMK) 6.8%, CoreCivic (CXW) 6.6%, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) 10.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year CoreCivic (CXW) returned the most: Aramark (ARMK) +38.9%, CoreCivic (CXW) +65.7%, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) -22.8%. Over five years, CoreCivic (CXW) compounded fastest (Aramark (ARMK) +5.9%/yr, CoreCivic (CXW) +26.1%/yr, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) -33.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Rithm Property Trust (RPT) has the highest dividend yield: Aramark (ARMK) 0.92%, CoreCivic (CXW) 0.00%, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) 16.11%. CoreCivic (CXW) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Aramark (ARMK) has been the steadiest (Aramark (ARMK) 27.0%, CoreCivic (CXW) 41.9%, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) 37.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ARMK, CXW and RPT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, CoreCivic (CXW) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.