AMXOF vs CHT vs KT Stock Comparison

America Movil Sab De Cv, Chunghwa Telecom and Kt Prices as of Oct 30, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AMXOF America Movil Sab De Cv/
$1.26 +13.5% 1M +10.5% 1Y
Market cap
$3.80B
P/E
0.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$68.86B
Div. yield
42.06%
Wireless Carriers Communication Services
5 wins
CHT Chunghwa Telecom Co Ltd
$48.92 +6.0% 1M +14.9% 1Y
Market cap
$37.95B
P/E
28.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.90B
Div. yield
3.29%
Wireless Carriers Communication Services
5 wins
KT Kt Corp
$17.35 -8.3% 1M -6.5% 1Y
Market cap
$8.37B
P/E
6.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$19.92B
Div. yield
4.67%
Wireless Carriers Communication Services
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Chunghwa Telecom leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Chunghwa Telecom 5, America Movil Sab De Cv 5, Kt 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAMXOFCHTKTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.80B $37.95B $8.37B CHT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 0.6x 28.3x 6.9x AMXOF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 0.7x 28.6x 8.4x AMXOF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +15.6% +8.3% +2.7% AMXOF
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.5% 17.0% 6.1% CHT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 10.7% 8.3% CHT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 42.06% 3.29% 4.67% AMXOF
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +10.5% +14.9% -6.5% CHT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.6%/yr +4.4%/yr +6.0%/yr KT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 45.5% 13.9% 22.7% CHT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 91/100 52/100 71/100 AMXOF

Percentile Scorecard

AMXOFCHTKT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAMXOFCHTKT
Valuation – 23 #38 of 49 88 #7 of 49
Growth 96 #3 of 47 50 #24 of 47 74 #13 of 47
Profitability 91 #5 of 46 53 #22 of 46 62 #18 of 46
Financial Health – 94 #4 of 49 71 #15 of 49
Shareholder Returns 86 #6 of 37 42 #22 of 37 58 #16 of 37
Overall 91 52 71
  • AMXOF ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications
  • CHT ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications
  • KT ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAMXOFCHTKTSPY
1 month +13.5%+6.0%-8.3% -2.3%
3 months +1.6%+15.4%-5.6% -0.7%
6 months +2.4%+14.2%-18.1% +4.8%
Year to date +22.3%+17.3%-8.5% +10.3%
1 year +10.5%+14.9%-6.5% +10.3%
3 years +34.0%+34.0%+36.2% +73.0%
3 years, per year +10.3%+10.3%+10.9% +20.1%
5 years +31.3%+23.8%+33.7% +61.9%
5 years, per year +5.6%+4.4%+6.0% +10.1%
10 years +106.6%+44.4%+9.5% +258.6%
10 years, per year +7.5%+3.7%+0.9% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureAMXOFCHTKTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 45.5%13.9%22.7% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 97.0%14.8%23.9% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.070.080.45 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.231.07-0.28 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -83.6%-26.5%-31.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -10.6%-0.2%-29.3% -3.5%
52-week high $1.41$49.01$24.54 $779.14
52-week low $0.99$40.74$16.79 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAMXOFCHTKT
P/E now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 11.7x 28.3xmedian 11.7x 6.9xmedian 11.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 1.1x 4.8xmedian 1.1x 0.4xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 6.7x —median 6.7x —median 6.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 5.9x 60.7xmedian 5.9x 8.2xmedian 5.9x
P/B now vs peer median —median 1.4x 3.3xmedian 1.4x 0.7xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.13median 0.24 2.11median 0.24 0.99median 0.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAMXOFCHTKT
Revenue $68.86B $7.90B $19.92B
Gross profit $50.11B $2.88B –
Operating income $35.97B $1.61B $1.79B
Net income $27.02B $1.34B $1.29B
Free cash flow $15.71B $625.04M $1.02B
R&D – $144.76M –
EPS (diluted) $1.65 $1.72 $2.50
Cash & equivalents – $1.32B $2.44B
Total debt – $184.96M $8.95B
Shares (diluted) 3.96B 777.60M 486.18M
Enterprise value -$23.98B $30.44B -$4.63B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAMXOFCHTKT
P/E 0.6x 28.3x 6.9x
P/FCF 0.2x 60.7x 8.2x
P/Operating cash flow 0.1x – 2.4x
P/S 0.1x 4.8x 0.4x
P/B – 3.3x 0.7x
P/Tangible book – 3.3x 0.7x
EV/EBITDA 0.0x – –
EV/EBIT 0.0x 22.2x 7.7x
EV/Revenue 0.0x 4.5x 0.7x
EV/FCF -0.1x 56.9x 13.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 0.0x – 4.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.13 2.11 0.99

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAMXOFCHTKT
Revenue growth (1Y) 15.6% 8.3% 2.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 13.7% 3.2% 9.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 25.8% 7.9% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 19.7% 2.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 202.6% 6.9% 263.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 55.0% 1.1% 13.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 23.5% 8.2% 28.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 86.9% -0.8% -3.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 47.1% 52.6% 246.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 4.6% 13.5% 7.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 92.2% – -6.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 7.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 92.8% -11.2% -38.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 88.2% 2.4% 33.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAMXOFCHTKT
Gross margin 72.8% 36.5% –
EBITDA margin 70.7% – –
Operating margin 52.2% 20.3% 9.0%
Pretax margin 47.1% 21.0% 8.5%
Net margin 9.5% 17.0% 6.1%
FCF margin 22.8% 7.9% 5.1%
Operating cash flow margin 38.0% – 17.5%
Return on equity – 11.3% 11.2%
Return on assets 6.4% 1.9% 4.3%
Return on invested capital – 10.7% 8.3%
Return on capital employed – 2.4% 8.1%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.1x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x – 2.7x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAMXOFCHTKT
Debt / assets – 1.1% 29.9%
Debt / equity – 0.0x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – 0.3x 8.8x
Liabilities / assets – 34.0% 59.1%
Equity / assets – 66.0% 40.9%
Interest coverage 10.4x 144.6x 3.3x
Current ratio – 1.2x 1.2x
Quick ratio – 1.0x 1.3x
Cash ratio – 0.7x 0.4x
Altman Z-score – 6.07 1.69

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAMXOFCHTKT
Dividend yield 42.1% 3.3% 4.7%
Net buyback yield – – 2.0%
Shareholder yield 42.1% 3.3% 6.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) 6.8% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 11.6% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.8% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAMXOFCHTKT
Forward P/E 0.7xFY2026 28.6xFY2026 8.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.73FY2026 $1.71FY2026 $2.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +21.0%FY2026 +8.2%FY2026 -12.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +13.9% +3.5% +11.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $53.98BFY2026 $7.63BFY2026 $21.09BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.1%FY2026 +2.1%FY2026 +8.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +9.1% +12.1% -7.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAMXOFCHTKT
Held by institutions – 2.6% 34.8%
Institutions holding – 218 244
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.3% +8.3%
Institutions buying – 136 135
Institutions selling – 47 78
Buyers to sellers – 2.89 1.73

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AMXOFCHTKT
AMXOF 1.00 0.08 -0.08
CHT 0.08 1.00 0.07
KT -0.08 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AMXOF, CHT and KT?

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) is the largest by market capitalisation: America Movil Sab De Cv (AMXOF) $3.80B, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) $37.95B, Kt (KT) $8.37B.

Which stock is cheaper, AMXOF, CHT and KT?

America Movil Sab De Cv (AMXOF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (America Movil Sab De Cv (AMXOF) 0.6x, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 28.3x, Kt (KT) 6.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, America Movil Sab De Cv (AMXOF) is cheapest (America Movil Sab De Cv (AMXOF) 0.7x, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 28.6x, Kt (KT) 8.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

America Movil Sab De Cv (AMXOF) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: America Movil Sab De Cv (AMXOF) +15.6%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) +8.3%, Kt (KT) +2.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) has the highest net margin (America Movil Sab De Cv (AMXOF) 9.5%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 17.0%, Kt (KT) 6.1%). On return on invested capital, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) leads (Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 10.7%, Kt (KT) 8.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) returned the most: America Movil Sab De Cv (AMXOF) +10.5%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) +14.9%, Kt (KT) -6.5%. Over five years, Kt (KT) compounded fastest (America Movil Sab De Cv (AMXOF) +5.6%/yr, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) +4.4%/yr, Kt (KT) +6.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

America Movil Sab De Cv (AMXOF) has the highest dividend yield: America Movil Sab De Cv (AMXOF) 42.06%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 3.29%, Kt (KT) 4.67%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) has been the steadiest (America Movil Sab De Cv (AMXOF) 45.5%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 13.9%, Kt (KT) 22.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AMXOF, CHT and KT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.