AMT vs JLL vs ZG Stock Comparison

American Tower, Jones Lang Lasalle and Zillow Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CCI) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
AMT American Tower Corp /Ma/
$193.90 +17.7% 1M +8.1% 1Y
Market cap
$90.02B
P/E
27.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.01B
Div. yield
–
Tower REITs Real Estate
3 wins
JLL Jones Lang Lasalle Inc
$375.18 +23.6% 1M +30.4% 1Y
Market cap
$17.24B
P/E
15.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$28.20B
Div. yield
–
Commercial Real Estate Services Real Estate
5 wins
ZG Zillow Group, Inc.
$31.21 +10.0% 1M -55.5% 1Y
Market cap
$6.87B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.86B
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Software Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Jones Lang Lasalle leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Jones Lang Lasalle 5, American Tower 3, Zillow 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAMTJLLZGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $90.02B $17.24B $6.87B AMT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 27.2x 15.7x -60.8x JLL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 28.8x 15.3x 13.3x ZG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.3% +11.4% +15.1% ZG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 30.1% 3.9% -4.0% AMT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.1% 11.7% -3.1% JLL
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 5.1x 0.8x -2.3x ZG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +8.1% +30.4% -55.5% JLL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -6.9%/yr +7.0%/yr -14.0%/yr JLL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 28.5% 38.5% 53.4% AMT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 61/100 69/100 63/100 JLL

Percentile Scorecard

AMTJLLZG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAMTJLLZG
Valuation 50 #6 of 11 82 #4 of 18 66 #31 of 89
Growth 89 #2 of 10 93 #2 of 16 36 #53 of 82
Profitability 67 #4 of 10 87 #3 of 16 46 #43 of 78
Financial Health 40 #7 of 11 56 #8 of 17 70 #29 of 95
Shareholder Returns – 29 #6 of 8 96 #3 of 55
Overall 61 69 63
  • AMT ranked among 11 companies in Infrastructure REITs
  • JLL ranked among 19 companies in Real Estate Services
  • ZG ranked among 98 companies in Vertical Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAMTJLLZGSPY
1 month +17.7%+23.6%+10.0% -5.9%
3 months +13.2%+3.2%-7.6% -4.6%
6 months +7.9%+14.4%-29.1% +0.2%
Year to date +10.4%+11.5%-54.3% +7.5%
1 year +8.1%+30.4%-55.5% +8.2%
3 years +3.9%+153.4%-13.3% +68.3%
3 years, per year +1.3%+36.4%-4.7% +19.0%
5 years -30.2%+40.2%-52.8% +56.5%
5 years, per year -6.9%+7.0%-14.0% +9.4%
10 years +71.6%+313.4%-7.9% +251.5%
10 years, per year +5.6%+15.3%-0.8% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureAMTJLLZGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 28.5%38.5%53.4% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 28.4%38.0%57.1% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.000.951.31 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.280.79-1.04 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -46.1%-55.5%-68.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -0.5%-4.5%-57.8% -5.9%
52-week high $194.90$392.79$73.87 $779.14
52-week low $161.11$280.16$27.70 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAMTJLLZG
P/E now vs peer median 27.2xmedian 25.1x 15.7xmedian 28.6x -62.2xmedian 42.4x
P/S now vs peer median 8.2xmedian 6.5x 0.6xmedian 0.6x 2.5xmedian 2.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.9xmedian 17.9x 10.6xmedian 10.6x 49.1xmedian 17.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 22.7xmedian 19.1x 15.5xmedian 14.1x 22.5xmedian 21.5x
P/B now vs peer median 9.2xmedian 2.3x 2.2xmedian 2.1x 1.7xmedian 1.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.41median 0.67 0.22median 0.51 -6.67median 1.51

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAMTJLLZG
Revenue $11.01B $28.20B $2.86B
Gross profit $10.87B – $2.07B
Operating income $4.94B $1.39B -$146.00M
Net income $3.38B $1.09B -$113.00M
Free cash flow $3.96B $1.11B $313.00M
R&D – – $610.00M
EPS (diluted) $7.11 $23.47 $-0.50
Cash & equivalents $1.87B $514.30M $602.00M
Total debt $37.58B $1.96B $392.00M
Shares (diluted) 465.76M 46.69M 225.31M
Enterprise value $83.30B $15.23B $3.41B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAMTJLLZG
P/E 27.2x 15.7x -62.2x
P/FCF 22.7x 15.5x 22.5x
P/Operating cash flow 15.8x 12.7x 15.8x
P/S 8.2x 0.6x 2.5x
P/B 9.2x 2.2x 1.7x
P/Tangible book -22.8x 2.4x 1.8x
EV/EBITDA 17.9x 10.6x 49.1x
EV/EBIT 25.5x 13.3x -46.1x
EV/Revenue 11.4x 0.7x 2.4x
EV/FCF 31.7x 16.8x 21.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 22.0x 13.7x 15.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.41 0.22 -6.67

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAMTJLLZG
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.3% 11.4% 15.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.2% 11.2% 14.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.7% – 11.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 6.0% – 11.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 3.6% 44.5% -58.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 16.9% 37.1% 16.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 12.0% 73.0% -253.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 74.5% 68.3% 10.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 13.6% 79.7% -301.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 66.9% 70.8% 9.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 9.0% 22.1% 6.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 6.2% 44.6% 8.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 7.3% 21.6% 12.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 11.8% 66.4% 12.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAMTJLLZG
Gross margin 98.7% – 72.5%
EBITDA margin 63.6% 6.2% 4.8%
Operating margin 44.8% 4.9% -5.1%
Pretax margin 35.3% 4.8% -3.7%
Net margin 30.1% 3.9% -4.0%
FCF margin 36.0% 3.9% 11.0%
Operating cash flow margin 51.8% 4.8% 15.6%
Return on equity 33.8% 14.2% -2.6%
Return on assets 5.4% 6.1% -2.1%
Return on invested capital 9.1% 11.7% -3.1%
Return on capital employed 9.1% 13.6% -3.4%
Asset turnover 0.2x 1.6x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 1.2x -3.9x
Stock comp / revenue 1.4% – 12.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAMTJLLZG
Debt / assets 59.7% 10.7% 7.4%
Debt / equity 3.8x 0.3x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 5.1x 0.8x -2.3x
Debt / FCF 9.5x 1.8x 1.3x
Liabilities / assets 84.5% 57.2% 20.6%
Equity / assets 15.5% 42.8% 79.4%
Interest coverage 3.5x – -7.0x
Current ratio 0.4x 1.1x 1.8x
Quick ratio 0.3x 0.4x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.1x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 1.22 3.44 3.95

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAMTJLLZG
Dividend yield 3.6% – –
Net buyback yield 0.9% 3.7% 14.8%
Shareholder yield 4.6% 3.7% 14.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAMTJLLZG
Forward P/E 28.8xFY2026 15.3xFY2026 13.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.74FY2026 $24.52FY2026 $2.34FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +24.8%FY2026 +30.4%FY2026 +42.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -1.5% +12.4% +26.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $11.52BFY2026 $30.79BFY2026 $3.04BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +8.3%FY2026 +17.9%FY2026 +17.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.9% +3.2% +11.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAMTJLLZG
Held by institutions 94.4% 93.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 1,747 664 264
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.5% +0.2% +0.1%
Institutions buying 860 320 125
Institutions selling 659 264 98
Buyers to sellers 1.31 1.21 1.28

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AMTJLLZG
AMT 1.00 0.07 0.18
JLL 0.07 1.00 0.56
ZG 0.18 0.56 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AMT, JLL and ZG?

American Tower (AMT) is the largest by market capitalisation: American Tower (AMT) $90.02B, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) $17.24B, Zillow (ZG) $6.87B.

Which stock is cheaper, AMT, JLL and ZG?

Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (American Tower (AMT) 27.2x, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) 15.7x, Zillow (ZG) -60.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Zillow (ZG) is cheapest (American Tower (AMT) 28.8x, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) 15.3x, Zillow (ZG) 13.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Zillow (ZG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: American Tower (AMT) +5.3%, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) +11.4%, Zillow (ZG) +15.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

American Tower (AMT) has the highest net margin (American Tower (AMT) 30.1%, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) 3.9%, Zillow (ZG) -4.0%). On return on invested capital, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) leads (American Tower (AMT) 9.1%, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) 11.7%, Zillow (ZG) -3.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) returned the most: American Tower (AMT) +8.1%, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) +30.4%, Zillow (ZG) -55.5%. Over five years, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) compounded fastest (American Tower (AMT) -6.9%/yr, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) +7.0%/yr, Zillow (ZG) -14.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, American Tower (AMT) has been the steadiest (American Tower (AMT) 28.5%, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) 38.5%, Zillow (ZG) 53.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AMT, JLL and ZG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.