AMR vs HCC vs ARLP Stock Comparison

Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Warrior Met Coal and Alliance Resource Partners Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (NC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Warrior Met Coal leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Warrior Met Coal 6, Alliance Resource Partners 4, Alpha Metallurgical Resources 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAMRHCCARLPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.95B $4.29B $3.25B HCC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -42.3x 19.6x 12.2x ARLP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 11.7x 10.1x ARLP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -12.9% +37.5% -5.1% HCC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -2.2% 13.0% 12.3% HCC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -1.9% 9.2% 12.9% ARLP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.7x -0.4x 0.7x AMR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -16.2% +16.2% +4.7% HCC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +20.6%/yr +28.7%/yr +17.6%/yr HCC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 56.3% 51.2% 21.0% ARLP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 67/100 85/100 66/100 HCC

Percentile Scorecard

AMRHCCARLP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAMRHCCARLP
Valuation 82 #5 of 23 73 #7 of 23 91 #3 of 23
Growth 35 #14 of 21 90 #3 of 21 60 #9 of 21
Profitability 74 #6 of 20 90 #3 of 20 95 #2 of 20
Financial Health 77 #6 of 23 86 #4 of 23 18 #19 of 23
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 67 85 66
  • AMR ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium
  • HCC ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium
  • ARLP ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAMRHCCARLPSPY
1 month -11.1%-9.7%+6.5% -2.0%
3 months +8.4%-1.0%+1.6% -2.2%
6 months -19.2%-6.8%-0.2% +4.2%
Year to date -23.8%-8.4%+12.5% +10.6%
1 year -16.2%+16.2%+4.7% +10.4%
3 years -30.7%+63.5%+8.9% +73.6%
3 years, per year -11.5%+17.8%+2.9% +20.2%
5 years +155.0%+252.1%+124.9% +61.6%
5 years, per year +20.6%+28.7%+17.6% +10.1%
10 years ——+11.7% +261.3%
10 years, per year ——+1.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureAMRHCCARLPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 56.3%51.2%21.0% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.6%47.1%19.9% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.530.39-0.12 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.290.320.23 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -77.5%-45.6%-35.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -39.0%-26.8%-9.9% -3.2%
52-week high $249.65$110.28$28.99 $779.14
52-week low $137.33$64.82$23.10 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAMRHCCARLP
P/E now vs peer median -42.0xmedian 25.3x 19.4xmedian 25.3x 12.6xmedian 25.3x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 6.1x 2.5xmedian 6.1x 1.5xmedian 6.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.2xmedian 12.6x 9.3xmedian 12.6x 6.0xmedian 12.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1,330xmedian 9.5x -93.3xmedian 9.5x 9.4xmedian 9.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.1x 1.9xmedian 1.1x 1.9xmedian 1.1x
PEG now vs peer median 1.54median 44.09 -0.87median 44.09 -0.43median 44.09

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAMRHCCARLP
Revenue $2.07B $1.68B $2.17B
Gross profit $206.89M $540.14M $775.00M
Operating income -$44.78M $229.26M $319.75M
Net income -$46.07M $219.33M $272.96M
Free cash flow -$1.45M -$45.68M $357.09M
EPS (diluted) $-3.62 $4.15 $2.07
Cash & equivalents $307.60M $302.35M $111.19M
Total debt $11.40M $154.59M $579.59M
Shares (diluted) 12.71M 52.87M 128.66M
Enterprise value $371.51M $2.99B $2.94B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAMRHCCARLP
P/E -42.0x 19.4x 12.6x
P/FCF -1,330x -93.3x 9.4x
P/Operating cash flow 14.0x 14.1x 5.5x
P/S 0.9x 2.5x 1.5x
P/B 1.3x 1.9x 1.9x
P/Tangible book 1.3x 1.9x 1.9x
EV/EBITDA 13.2x 9.3x 6.0x
EV/EBIT -35.8x 17.9x 12.0x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 2.4x 1.8x
EV/FCF -1,105x -89.7x 10.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.6x 13.6x 6.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.54 -0.87 -0.43

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAMRHCCARLP
Revenue growth (1Y) -12.9% 37.5% -5.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -15.8% 1.1% -6.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -16.4% 86.2% 4.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -44.9% -11.4% -12.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -101.5% 808.1% 6.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -26.9% -24.9% -26.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -23.8% 443.7% 13.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -27.0% -22.0% -28.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -27.1% 441.1% 12.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -27.2% -22.4% -29.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -56.9% 82.8% -9.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -51.0% -26.5% -16.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -100.8% 83.3% 12.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -26.0% -28.5% -18.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAMRHCCARLP
Gross margin 10.0% 32.1% 35.6%
EBITDA margin 5.9% 26.3% 29.3%
Operating margin -2.2% 13.6% 14.7%
Pretax margin -3.4% 13.6% 13.4%
Net margin -2.2% 13.0% 12.3%
FCF margin -0.1% -2.7% 16.4%
Operating cash flow margin 6.7% 17.9% 28.2%
Return on equity -3.1% 9.8% 15.3%
Return on assets -2.0% 7.7% 9.4%
Return on invested capital -1.9% 9.2% 12.9%
Return on capital employed -2.2% 8.7% 12.3%
Asset turnover 0.9x 0.6x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -3.0x 1.4x 2.2x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 1.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAMRHCCARLP
Debt / assets 0.5% 5.3% 19.7%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.1x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA -2.7x -0.4x 0.7x
Debt / FCF -7.8x -3.4x 1.6x
Liabilities / assets 33.6% 21.0% 39.3%
Equity / assets 66.4% 79.0% 60.7%
Interest coverage -13.6x 17.1x 6.9x
Current ratio 3.4x 3.9x 1.8x
Quick ratio 2.2x 2.5x 1.1x
Cash ratio 1.3x 1.4x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 3.99 6.30 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAMRHCCARLP
Dividend yield – 0.4% 9.2%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 0.4% 9.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAMRHCCARLP
Forward P/E – 11.7xFY2026 10.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-1.44FY2026 $6.91FY2026 $2.59FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +533.9%FY2026 +7.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +35.0% +7.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.26BFY2026 $2.11BFY2026 $2.37BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.0%FY2026 +60.9%FY2026 +8.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +18.2% +4.2% -8.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAMRHCCARLP
Held by institutions 87.7% 96.7% 15.3%
Institutions holding 255 345 173
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.2% +3.1% -11.7%
Institutions buying 115 188 75
Institutions selling 91 114 41
Buyers to sellers 1.26 1.65 1.83

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AMRHCCARLP
AMR 1.00 0.71 0.33
HCC 0.71 1.00 0.36
ARLP 0.33 0.36 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AMR, HCC and ARLP?

Warrior Met Coal (HCC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) $1.95B, Warrior Met Coal (HCC) $4.29B, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) $3.25B.

Which stock is cheaper, AMR, HCC and ARLP?

Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) -42.3x, Warrior Met Coal (HCC) 19.6x, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) 12.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) is cheapest (Warrior Met Coal (HCC) 11.7x, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) 10.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Warrior Met Coal (HCC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) -12.9%, Warrior Met Coal (HCC) +37.5%, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) -5.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Warrior Met Coal (HCC) has the highest net margin (Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) -2.2%, Warrior Met Coal (HCC) 13.0%, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) 12.3%). On return on invested capital, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) leads (Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) -1.9%, Warrior Met Coal (HCC) 9.2%, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) 12.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Warrior Met Coal (HCC) returned the most: Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) -16.2%, Warrior Met Coal (HCC) +16.2%, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) +4.7%. Over five years, Warrior Met Coal (HCC) compounded fastest (Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) +20.6%/yr, Warrior Met Coal (HCC) +28.7%/yr, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) +17.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) has been the steadiest (Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) 56.3%, Warrior Met Coal (HCC) 51.2%, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) 21.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AMR, HCC and ARLP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Warrior Met Coal (HCC) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.