AMBA vs OUST vs WRD Stock Comparison

Ambarella, Ouster and WeRide Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (QCOM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
AMBA Ambarella Inc
$66.82 -8.1% 1M -22.0% 1Y
Market cap
$2.95B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$417.80M
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology
2 wins
OUST Ouster, Inc.
$29.71 -32.0% 1M -17.0% 1Y
Market cap
$2.16B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$204.91M
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
2 wins
WRD WeRide Inc.
$4.18 -24.4% 1M -60.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.34B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$92.10M
Div. yield
–
Autonomous Driving Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

WeRide leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (WeRide 3, Ambarella 2, Ouster 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAMBAOUSTWRDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.95B $2.16B $1.34B AMBA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -52.4x -40.5x -6.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 86.8x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.0% +62.8% +244.8% WRD
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -13.5% -26.0% -243.6% AMBA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — -24.9% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -22.0% -17.0% -60.7% OUST
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -18.1%/yr -14.4%/yr — OUST
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 74.6% 102.2% 60.2% WRD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 40/100 44/100 70/100 WRD

Percentile Scorecard

AMBAOUSTWRD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAMBAOUSTWRD
Valuation 31 #66 of 95 11 #99 of 111 58 #6 of 13
Growth 55 #42 of 93 82 #20 of 108 91 #2 of 12
Profitability 26 #68 of 91 14 #90 of 104 82 #3 of 12
Financial Health 59 #42 of 101 88 #15 of 115 50 #7 of 13
Shareholder Returns 31 #52 of 75 24 #62 of 81 –
Overall 40 44 70
  • AMBA ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • OUST ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • WRD ranked among 14 companies in Robotics and Automation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAMBAOUSTWRDSPY
1 month -8.1%-32.0%-24.4% -0.8%
3 months -2.1%-15.5%-25.8% +3.5%
6 months +3.0%+10.4%-48.8% +7.0%
Year to date -5.7%+37.3%-51.8% +12.2%
1 year -22.0%-17.0%-60.7% +13.0%
3 years +42.8%+683.9%— +86.3%
3 years, per year +12.6%+98.7%— +23.1%
5 years -63.2%-54.1%— +68.6%
5 years, per year -18.1%-14.4%— +11.0%
10 years +6.9%—— +258.0%
10 years, per year +0.7%—— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureAMBAOUSTWRDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 74.6%102.2%60.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 79.6%100.6%63.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.614.572.25 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.29-0.17-1.01 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -81.7%-95.8%-89.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -30.0%-52.5%-64.3% -1.8%
52-week high $95.51$62.52$11.72 $779.14
52-week low $48.65$16.63$4.08 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAMBAOUSTWRD
P/E now vs peer median -52.2xmedian 42.1x -36.8xmedian 32.0x -5.8x
P/S now vs peer median 7.1xmedian 7.1x 9.9xmedian 2.8x 14.0xmedian 17.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -72.0xmedian 27.5x -33.8xmedian 19.4x —
P/FCF now vs peer median 303.4xmedian 37.2x -24.7xmedian 29.0x —median 14.0x
P/B now vs peer median 4.8xmedian 4.2x 5.5xmedian 2.9x 1.4xmedian 1.0x
PEG now vs peer median -2.66median 2.23 -0.65median 1.13 —

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAMBAOUSTWRD
Revenue $417.80M $204.91M $92.10M
Gross profit $244.50M $101.63M $39.20M
Operating income -$62.24M -$62.60M -$260.29M
Net income -$56.32M -$53.33M -$237.93M
Free cash flow $9.72M -$82.47M –
R&D $228.69M $68.46M $219.70M
EPS (diluted) $-1.28 $-0.81 –
Cash & equivalents $101.85M $91.76M $629.27M
Total debt – – $194.84M
Shares (diluted) 44.01M 65.99M –
Enterprise value $1.79B $1.27B -$1.70B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAMBAOUSTWRD
P/E -52.2x -36.8x -5.8x
P/FCF 303.4x -24.7x –
P/Operating cash flow 107.9x -37.8x –
P/S 7.1x 9.9x 14.0x
P/B 4.8x 5.5x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 5.2x 6.0x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA -72.0x -33.8x –
EV/EBIT -43.0x -28.3x -2.7x
EV/Revenue 6.4x 8.7x 7.5x
EV/FCF 275.4x -21.5x –
EV/Operating cash flow 98.0x -33.0x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.66 -0.65 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAMBAOUSTWRD
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.0% 62.8% 244.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.9% 51.6% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 17.4% 90.8% 142.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.3% 166.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 36.9% 39.7% -22.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 18.4% 45.1% –
Net income growth (1Y) 36.4% 42.0% 29.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 16.9% 48.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) 38.6% 52.1% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 19.6% 56.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -47.8% -329.9% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.3% 27.6% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -73.7% -416.3% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -5.8% 17.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAMBAOUSTWRD
Gross margin 58.5% 49.6% 42.6%
EBITDA margin -8.9% -25.6% –
Operating margin -14.9% -30.6% -282.6%
Pretax margin -12.9% -25.5% -258.0%
Net margin -13.5% -26.0% -243.6%
FCF margin 2.3% -40.2% –
Operating cash flow margin 6.5% -26.3% –
Return on equity -9.2% -16.5% -24.1%
Return on assets -7.2% -12.5% -20.5%
Return on invested capital – – -24.9%
Return on capital employed -9.6% -18.1% -26.6%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.5x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.5x 1.0x –
Stock comp / revenue 21.9% 18.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAMBAOUSTWRD
Debt / assets – – 6.3%
Debt / equity – – 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 20.5% 21.8% 17.5%
Equity / assets 79.5% 78.2% 82.5%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 2.8x 4.2x 5.4x
Quick ratio 2.2x 3.5x 4.0x
Cash ratio 2.0x 3.1x 3.7x
Altman Z-score 11.10 9.48 2.03

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAMBAOUSTWRD
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -0.1% -6.9% –
Shareholder yield -0.1% -6.9% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAMBAOUSTWRD
Forward P/E 86.8xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.77FY2026 $-0.27FY2026 $-0.62FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +24.2%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +40.3% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $454.23MFY2026 $229.51MFY2026 $149.56MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +16.3%FY2026 +35.5%FY2026 +52.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.4% +36.6% +88.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAMBAOUSTWRD
Held by institutions 81.7% 53.9% 26.0%
Institutions holding 337 330 110
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.5% +19.0% -1.2%
Institutions buying 203 233 51
Institutions selling 89 66 35
Buyers to sellers 2.28 3.53 1.46

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AMBAOUSTWRD
AMBA 1.00 0.47 0.28
OUST 0.47 1.00 0.41
WRD 0.28 0.41 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AMBA, OUST and WRD?

Ambarella (AMBA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ambarella (AMBA) $2.95B, Ouster (OUST) $2.16B, WeRide (WRD) $1.34B.

Which company is growing faster?

WeRide (WRD) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ambarella (AMBA) +20.0%, Ouster (OUST) +62.8%, WeRide (WRD) +244.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ambarella (AMBA) has the highest net margin (Ambarella (AMBA) -13.5%, Ouster (OUST) -26.0%, WeRide (WRD) -243.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ouster (OUST) returned the most: Ambarella (AMBA) -22.0%, Ouster (OUST) -17.0%, WeRide (WRD) -60.7%. Over five years, Ouster (OUST) compounded fastest (Ambarella (AMBA) -18.1%/yr, Ouster (OUST) -14.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, WeRide (WRD) has been the steadiest (Ambarella (AMBA) 74.6%, Ouster (OUST) 102.2%, WeRide (WRD) 60.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AMBA, OUST and WRD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, WeRide (WRD) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.