AMAT vs ONTO vs LRCX Stock Comparison

Applied Materials, Onto Innovation and Lam Research Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ACLS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
AMAT Applied Materials Inc /De
$369.40 -31.9% 1M +60.5% 1Y
Market cap
$259.42B
P/E
28.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$30.84B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
4 wins
ONTO Onto Innovation Inc.
$184.75 -43.2% 1M +43.1% 1Y
Market cap
$7.85B
P/E
59.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.12B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
LRCX Lam Research Corp
$221.43 -36.0% 1M +42.1% 1Y
Market cap
$240.00B
P/E
28.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$26.13B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
7 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Lam Research leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Lam Research 7, Applied Materials 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAMATONTOLRCXLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $259.42B $7.85B $240.00B AMAT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.0x 59.2x 28.4x AMAT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.4x 21.9x 21.9x LRCX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.8% +8.1% +33.4% LRCX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 30.1% 11.8% 32.3% LRCX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 25.3% — 49.6% LRCX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.3x — -0.4x LRCX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +60.5% +43.1% +42.1% AMAT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +19.2%/yr +14.8%/yr +29.4%/yr LRCX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 61.3% 73.7% 66.2% AMAT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 59/100 69/100 LRCX

Percentile Scorecard

AMATONTOLRCX

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAMATONTOLRCX
Valuation 54 #44 of 94 62 #36 of 94 52 #46 of 94
Growth 40 #56 of 92 30 #65 of 92 84 #16 of 92
Profitability 89 #11 of 90 54 #42 of 90 96 #5 of 90
Financial Health 49 #52 of 101 56 #45 of 101 47 #54 of 101
Shareholder Returns 55 #36 of 79 95 #5 of 79 65 #28 of 79
Overall 57 59 69
  • AMAT ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • ONTO ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • LRCX ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAMATONTOLRCXSPY
1 month -31.9%-43.2%-36.0% -1.0%
3 months -30.9%-33.0%-28.0% -0.4%
6 months -13.8%-37.2%-25.5% +4.5%
Year to date +43.7%+17.0%+29.4% +12.4%
1 year +60.5%+43.1%+42.1% +13.6%
3 years +164.3%+55.4%+249.2% +76.4%
3 years, per year +38.3%+15.8%+51.8% +20.8%
5 years +141.0%+99.1%+262.5% +63.7%
5 years, per year +19.2%+14.8%+29.4% +10.4%
10 years +1,209.0%—+2,230.8% +267.7%
10 years, per year +29.3%—+37.0% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureAMATONTOLRCXSPY
Volatility, 1Y 61.3%73.7%66.2% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 63.6%75.9%66.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.763.153.22 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.990.580.64 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -55.4%-62.8%-56.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -48.9%-51.2%-48.9% -1.6%
52-week high $723.00$378.45$433.33 $779.14
52-week low $220.23$124.09$139.59 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAMATONTOLRCX
P/E now vs peer median 31.7xmedian 40.5x 68.8xmedian 40.5x 32.8xmedian 40.5x
P/S now vs peer median 9.5xmedian 6.5x 8.1xmedian 6.5x 10.6xmedian 6.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 30.0xmedian 24.9x 32.9xmedian 24.9x 27.0xmedian 24.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 52.1xmedian 36.9x 35.9xmedian 36.9x 42.3xmedian 36.9x
P/B now vs peer median 11.4xmedian 3.9x 4.7xmedian 3.9x 19.9xmedian 3.9x
PEG now vs peer median 2.13median 1.85 -7.82median 1.85 1.05median 1.85

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAMATONTOLRCX
Revenue $30.84B $1.12B $26.13B
Gross profit $15.23B $564.06M $13.34B
Operating income $9.14B $134.61M $9.65B
Net income $9.27B $132.61M $8.45B
Free cash flow $5.62B $252.47M $6.54B
R&D $3.97B $142.63M $2.47B
EPS (diluted) $11.58 $2.67 $6.73
Cash & equivalents $7.04B $1.25B $7.44B
Total debt $6.54B – $3.74B
Shares (diluted) 800.00M 49.68M 1.26B
Enterprise value $224.86B $3.69B $216.05B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAMATONTOLRCX
P/E 31.7x 68.8x 32.8x
P/FCF 52.1x 35.9x 42.3x
P/Operating cash flow 34.9x 34.0x 36.5x
P/S 9.5x 8.1x 10.6x
P/B 11.4x 4.7x 19.9x
P/Tangible book 11.6x 5.4x 19.9x
EV/EBITDA 30.0x 32.9x 27.0x
EV/EBIT 31.8x 53.3x 28.3x
EV/Revenue 9.4x 6.4x 10.4x
EV/FCF 51.7x 28.4x 41.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 34.6x 27.0x 36.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.13 -7.82 1.05

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAMATONTOLRCX
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.8% 8.1% 33.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.1% 7.7% 18.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 9.8% 5.6% 38.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.3% 5.4% 23.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 6.0% -29.5% 49.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 6.0% -8.3% 29.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 35.6% -33.7% 45.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.9% -8.6% 28.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 36.0% -34.5% 47.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 14.9% -8.8% 31.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 9.0% -2.5% 18.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.6% 17.7% 15.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -3.4% 5.9% 17.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -7.0% 22.0% 13.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAMATONTOLRCX
Gross margin 49.4% 50.4% 51.1%
EBITDA margin 31.4% 19.5% 38.7%
Operating margin 29.6% 12.0% 37.0%
Pretax margin 34.8% 14.1% 37.2%
Net margin 30.1% 11.8% 32.3%
FCF margin 18.2% 22.5% 25.0%
Operating cash flow margin 27.2% 23.8% 29.0%
Return on equity 37.4% 6.5% 64.1%
Return on assets 22.1% 4.4% 33.9%
Return on invested capital 25.3% – 49.6%
Return on capital employed 29.0% 4.8% 54.8%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.4x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 2.0x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue 2.3% 2.8% 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAMATONTOLRCX
Debt / assets 15.0% – 14.2%
Debt / equity 0.3x – 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.3x – -0.4x
Debt / FCF 1.2x – 0.6x
Liabilities / assets 41.1% 48.0% 47.2%
Equity / assets 58.9% 52.0% 52.8%
Interest coverage 33.0x – –
Current ratio 2.4x 9.7x 2.5x
Quick ratio 1.6x 8.2x 1.8x
Cash ratio 0.9x 6.9x 1.0x
Altman Z-score 13.61 4.57 18.01

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAMATONTOLRCX
Dividend yield 0.5% – 0.5%
Net buyback yield 0.6% 2.1% 1.3%
Shareholder yield 1.2% 2.1% 1.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAMATONTOLRCX
Forward P/E 27.4xFY2026 21.9xFY2026 21.9xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $13.50FY2026 $8.42FY2026 $10.12FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +43.3%FY2026 +70.4%FY2026 +73.9%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +32.7% +43.5% +12.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $32.74BFY2026 $1.37BFY2026 $32.96BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +15.4%FY2026 +35.5%FY2026 +41.9%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +38.2% +41.1% +25.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAMATONTOLRCX
Held by institutions 83.6% 98.3% 85.6%
Institutions holding 3,510 690 3,137
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.0% +2.3% +6.2%
Institutions buying 1,791 376 1,701
Institutions selling 1,352 232 1,163
Buyers to sellers 1.32 1.62 1.46

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AMATONTOLRCX
AMAT 1.00 0.85 0.91
ONTO 0.85 1.00 0.84
LRCX 0.91 0.84 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AMAT, ONTO and LRCX?

Applied Materials (AMAT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Applied Materials (AMAT) $259.42B, Onto Innovation (ONTO) $7.85B, Lam Research (LRCX) $240.00B.

Which stock is cheaper, AMAT, ONTO and LRCX?

Applied Materials (AMAT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Applied Materials (AMAT) 28.0x, Onto Innovation (ONTO) 59.2x, Lam Research (LRCX) 28.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Lam Research (LRCX) is cheapest (Applied Materials (AMAT) 27.4x, Onto Innovation (ONTO) 21.9x, Lam Research (LRCX) 21.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lam Research (LRCX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Applied Materials (AMAT) +7.8%, Onto Innovation (ONTO) +8.1%, Lam Research (LRCX) +33.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lam Research (LRCX) has the highest net margin (Applied Materials (AMAT) 30.1%, Onto Innovation (ONTO) 11.8%, Lam Research (LRCX) 32.3%). On return on invested capital, Lam Research (LRCX) leads (Applied Materials (AMAT) 25.3%, Lam Research (LRCX) 49.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Applied Materials (AMAT) returned the most: Applied Materials (AMAT) +60.5%, Onto Innovation (ONTO) +43.1%, Lam Research (LRCX) +42.1%. Over five years, Lam Research (LRCX) compounded fastest (Applied Materials (AMAT) +19.2%/yr, Onto Innovation (ONTO) +14.8%/yr, Lam Research (LRCX) +29.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Applied Materials (AMAT) has been the steadiest (Applied Materials (AMAT) 61.3%, Onto Innovation (ONTO) 73.7%, Lam Research (LRCX) 66.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AMAT, ONTO and LRCX?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lam Research (LRCX) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.