AMAT vs ASML vs ONTO Stock Comparison

Applied Materials, Asml Holding and Onto Innovation Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ACLS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
AMAT Applied Materials Inc /De
$421.66 -17.6% 1M +78.9% 1Y
Market cap
$334.63B
P/E
36.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$30.84B
Div. yield
0.47%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
4 wins
ASML Asml Holding Nv
$1,675.70 -8.7% 1M +56.5% 1Y
Market cap
$645.84B
P/E
59.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.62B
Div. yield
0.56%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
4 wins
ONTO Onto Innovation Inc.
$221.78 -27.2% 1M +61.8% 1Y
Market cap
$10.87B
P/E
82.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.12B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Asml Holding leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Asml Holding 4, Applied Materials 4, Onto Innovation 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAMATASMLONTOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $334.63B $645.84B $10.87B ASML
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.1x 59.5x 82.6x AMAT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 31.2x 35.2x 26.3x ONTO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.8% +22.9% +8.1% ASML
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 30.1% 29.1% 11.8% AMAT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 25.3% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.3x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.47% 0.56% — ASML
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +78.9% +56.5% +61.8% AMAT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +25.3%/yr +15.6%/yr +22.9%/yr AMAT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 60.6% 46.8% 72.1% ASML
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 45/100 59/100 ONTO

Percentile Scorecard

AMATASMLONTO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAMATASMLONTO
Valuation 50 #48 of 94 16 #79 of 94 57 #41 of 94
Growth 45 #51 of 92 79 #20 of 92 32 #63 of 92
Profitability 89 #11 of 88 79 #19 of 88 56 #39 of 88
Financial Health 48 #50 of 96 14 #83 of 96 56 #43 of 96
Shareholder Returns 49 #37 of 72 37 #46 of 72 94 #5 of 72
Overall 56 45 59
  • AMAT ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • ASML ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • ONTO ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAMATASMLONTOSPY
1 month -17.6%-8.7%-27.2% +0.7%
3 months -16.0%+1.5%-11.4% +3.7%
6 months +6.9%+16.4%-24.8% +7.1%
Year to date +64.1%+56.6%+40.5% +12.8%
1 year +78.9%+56.5%+61.8% +11.9%
3 years +221.8%+184.6%+98.0% +85.2%
3 years, per year +47.7%+41.7%+25.6% +22.8%
5 years +208.6%+106.1%+180.0% +67.6%
5 years, per year +25.3%+15.6%+22.9% +10.9%
10 years +1,371.2%+1,488.9%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +30.9%+31.9%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureAMATASMLONTOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 60.6%46.8%72.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 62.4%46.6%72.9% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.782.273.18 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.301.210.86 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -55.4%-56.9%-62.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -41.7%-15.8%-41.4% -1.2%
52-week high $723.00$1,989.44$378.45 $779.14
52-week low $220.23$966.57$124.09 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAMATASMLONTO
P/E now vs peer median 36.1xmedian 46.4x 59.5xmedian 46.4x 82.6xmedian 46.4x
P/S now vs peer median 10.9xmedian 7.8x 17.2xmedian 7.8x 9.7xmedian 7.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 34.3xmedian 27.5x —median 27.5x 41.2xmedian 27.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 59.5xmedian 40.1x 51.6xmedian 40.1x 43.1xmedian 40.1x
P/B now vs peer median 13.1xmedian 4.7x 28.0xmedian 4.7x 5.7xmedian 4.7x
PEG now vs peer median 2.43median 2.10 2.46median 2.10 -9.39median 2.10

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAMATASMLONTO
Revenue $30.84B $37.62B $1.12B
Gross profit $15.23B $19.58B $564.06M
Operating income $9.14B – $134.61M
Net income $9.27B – $132.61M
Free cash flow $5.62B – $252.47M
R&D $3.97B – $142.63M
EPS (diluted) $11.58 $28.13 $2.67
Cash & equivalents $7.04B $15.17B $1.25B
Total debt $26.11B $5.16B –
Shares (diluted) 800.00M 388.90M 49.68M
Enterprise value $300.07B $601.53B $6.71B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAMATASMLONTO
P/E 36.1x 59.5x 82.6x
P/FCF 59.5x 51.6x 43.1x
P/Operating cash flow 39.9x – 40.8x
P/S 10.9x 17.2x 9.7x
P/B 13.1x 28.0x 5.7x
P/Tangible book 13.2x 28.8x 6.5x
EV/EBITDA 34.3x – 41.2x
EV/EBIT 36.3x – 66.8x
EV/Revenue 10.8x 16.9x 8.0x
EV/FCF 59.0x – 35.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 39.5x – 33.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.43 2.46 -9.39

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAMATASMLONTO
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.8% 22.9% 8.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.1% 19.4% 7.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 9.8% 24.9% 5.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.3% 20.6% 5.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 6.0% – -29.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 6.0% – -8.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 35.6% – -33.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.9% – -8.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 36.0% 35.2% -34.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 14.9% 24.2% -8.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 9.0% – -2.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.6% – 17.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -3.4% – 5.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -7.0% – 22.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAMATASMLONTO
Gross margin 49.4% 52.0% 50.4%
EBITDA margin 31.4% – 19.5%
Operating margin 29.6% – 12.0%
Pretax margin 34.8% – 14.1%
Net margin 30.1% 29.1% 11.8%
FCF margin 18.2% – 22.5%
Operating cash flow margin 27.2% – 23.8%
Return on equity 37.4% – 6.5%
Return on assets 22.1% – 4.4%
Return on invested capital 25.3% – –
Return on capital employed 29.0% – 4.8%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.7x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x – 2.0x
Stock comp / revenue 2.3% – 2.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAMATASMLONTO
Debt / assets 15.0% 8.7% –
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.3x – –
Debt / FCF 1.2x – –
Liabilities / assets 41.1% 61.2% 48.0%
Equity / assets 58.9% 38.8% 52.0%
Interest coverage 33.0x – –
Current ratio 2.4x 1.3x 9.7x
Quick ratio 1.6x 0.7x 8.2x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.5x 6.9x
Altman Z-score 15.00 – 5.18

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAMATASMLONTO
Dividend yield 0.5% 0.6% –
Net buyback yield 0.6% – 1.7%
Shareholder yield 1.0% 0.6% 1.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAMATASMLONTO
Forward P/E 31.2xFY2026 35.2xFY2026 26.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $13.50FY2026 $47.62FY2026 $8.42FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +43.3%FY2026 +61.2%FY2026 +70.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +32.7% +42.0% +43.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $32.74BFY2026 $47.18BFY2026 $1.37BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.4%FY2026 +20.9%FY2026 +35.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +38.2% +42.9% +41.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAMATASMLONTO
Held by institutions 83.6% 19.8% 98.3%
Institutions holding 3,507 2,494 689
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.0% +8.0% +2.3%
Institutions buying 1,790 1,360 376
Institutions selling 1,350 783 232
Buyers to sellers 1.33 1.74 1.62

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AMATASMLONTO
AMAT 1.00 0.81 0.85
ASML 0.81 1.00 0.74
ONTO 0.85 0.74 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AMAT, ASML and ONTO?

Asml Holding (ASML) is the largest by market capitalisation: Applied Materials (AMAT) $334.63B, Asml Holding (ASML) $645.84B, Onto Innovation (ONTO) $10.87B.

Which stock is cheaper, AMAT, ASML and ONTO?

Applied Materials (AMAT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Applied Materials (AMAT) 36.1x, Asml Holding (ASML) 59.5x, Onto Innovation (ONTO) 82.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Onto Innovation (ONTO) is cheapest (Applied Materials (AMAT) 31.2x, Asml Holding (ASML) 35.2x, Onto Innovation (ONTO) 26.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Asml Holding (ASML) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Applied Materials (AMAT) +7.8%, Asml Holding (ASML) +22.9%, Onto Innovation (ONTO) +8.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Applied Materials (AMAT) has the highest net margin (Applied Materials (AMAT) 30.1%, Asml Holding (ASML) 29.1%, Onto Innovation (ONTO) 11.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Applied Materials (AMAT) returned the most: Applied Materials (AMAT) +78.9%, Asml Holding (ASML) +56.5%, Onto Innovation (ONTO) +61.8%. Over five years, Applied Materials (AMAT) compounded fastest (Applied Materials (AMAT) +25.3%/yr, Asml Holding (ASML) +15.6%/yr, Onto Innovation (ONTO) +22.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Asml Holding (ASML) has the highest dividend yield: Applied Materials (AMAT) 0.47%, Asml Holding (ASML) 0.56%. Onto Innovation (ONTO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Asml Holding (ASML) has been the steadiest (Applied Materials (AMAT) 60.6%, Asml Holding (ASML) 46.8%, Onto Innovation (ONTO) 72.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AMAT, ASML and ONTO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Asml Holding (ASML) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.