ALVO vs GRML vs AMPH Stock Comparison

Alvotech, Greenland Mines and Amphastar Pharmaceuticals Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FENC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ALVO Alvotech
$4.55 -25.9% 1M -6.8% 1Y
Market cap
$1.38B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$105.94M
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
1 win
GRML Greenland Mines Ltd
$3.57 -44.0% 1M +656.0% 1Y
Market cap
$9.54M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Amphastar Pharmaceuticals leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Amphastar Pharmaceuticals 7, Alvotech 1, Greenland Mines 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionALVOGRMLAMPHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.38B $9.54M $1.20B ALVO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -5.3x -0.4x 12.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 9.0x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -74.3% — +3.1% AMPH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -248.0% — 13.3% AMPH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.4% — 7.6% AMPH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.7x — 1.9x AMPH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -6.8% +656.0% +9.3% GRML
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -14.4%/yr — +6.6%/yr AMPH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 70.2% 445.3% 54.4% AMPH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 38/100 73/100 AMPH

Percentile Scorecard

ALVOGRMLAMPH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisALVOGRMLAMPH
Valuation 74 #163 of 634 40 #381 of 634 98 #11 of 634
Growth 36 #391 of 608 2 #596 of 608 40 #368 of 608
Profitability 64 #199 of 557 68 #181 of 557 88 #69 of 557
Financial Health 17 #543 of 654 79 #141 of 654 40 #396 of 654
Shareholder Returns – 2 #396 of 403 99 #5 of 403
Overall 48 38 73
  • ALVO ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • GRML ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • AMPH ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodALVOGRMLAMPHSPY
1 month -25.9%-44.0%+6.8% -5.9%
3 months +19.7%+1,883.3%+39.6% -4.6%
6 months +42.2%+618.5%+15.1% +0.2%
Year to date -11.3%+1,135.3%+3.3% +7.5%
1 year -6.8%+656.0%+9.3% +8.2%
3 years -47.2%-66.6%-40.9% +68.3%
3 years, per year -19.2%-30.7%-16.1% +19.0%
5 years -54.0%—+37.7% +56.5%
5 years, per year -14.4%—+6.6% +9.4%
10 years ——+59.5% +251.5%
10 years, per year ——+4.8% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureALVOGRMLAMPHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 70.2%445.3%54.4% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 63.1%160.6%66.5% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.812.740.55 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.101.470.17 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.6%-99.0%-74.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.0%-76.0%-5.9% -5.9%
52-week high $6.15$14.89$29.40 $779.14
52-week low $3.00$0.17$16.87 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleALVOGRMLAMPH
P/E now vs peer median -5.0xmedian 17.8x -0.4xmedian 17.8x 11.9xmedian 17.8x
P/S now vs peer median 13.4xmedian 8.1x —median 8.1x 1.6xmedian 8.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.4xmedian 15.7x —median 15.7x 7.7xmedian 15.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -5.4xmedian 21.0x -0.6xmedian 21.0x 8.5xmedian 21.0x
P/B now vs peer median -7.4xmedian 2.0x 0.2xmedian 2.0x 1.4xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median -0.15median 0.36 0.01median 0.36 -3.81median 0.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsALVOGRMLAMPH
Revenue $105.94M – $745.79M
Gross profit $7.66M – $349.09M
Operating income $47.54M -$18.67M $139.74M
Net income -$179.60M -$21.77M $98.96M
Free cash flow -$261.39M -$14.22M $139.02M
R&D $46.37M $1.28M $92.29M
EPS (diluted) $-0.90 $-8.60 $2.28
Cash & equivalents $142.80M $9.34M $204.59M
Total debt $1.31B $298.00K $613.00M
Shares (diluted) 291.34M 2.53M 43.38M
Enterprise value $947.19M -$24.33M $109.04M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricALVOGRMLAMPH
P/E -5.0x -0.4x 11.9x
P/FCF -5.4x -0.6x 8.5x
P/Operating cash flow -7.1x -0.6x 6.7x
P/S 13.4x – 1.6x
P/B -7.4x 0.2x 1.4x
P/Tangible book -4.3x 1.0x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 10.4x – 7.7x
EV/EBIT 54.3x 0.0x 11.2x
EV/Revenue 24.4x – 2.1x
EV/FCF -9.9x 0.0x 11.2x
EV/Operating cash flow -13.0x 0.0x 8.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.15 0.01 -3.81

Growth

14 metrics
MetricALVOGRMLAMPH
Revenue growth (1Y) -74.3% – 3.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 104.2% – 7.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -95.0% – -2.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 27.2% – 2.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -13.3% -127.6% -6.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 27.6% -166.2% -8.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -383.6% -91.7% -11.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 24.4% -125.4% -9.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -481.6% 48.6% -2.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 33.6% -48.2% -3.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -367.1% -158.2% 15.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.8% -236.9% 0.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -113.0% -158.2% 22.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.6% -236.9% -0.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricALVOGRMLAMPH
Gross margin 7.2% – 46.8%
EBITDA margin 233.8% – 27.1%
Operating margin 44.9% – 18.7%
Pretax margin -62.1% – 17.4%
Net margin -248.0% – 13.3%
FCF margin -246.7% – 18.6%
Operating cash flow margin -187.6% – 23.5%
Return on equity – -39.8% 12.5%
Return on assets -17.5% -34.9% 5.7%
Return on invested capital 4.4% – 7.6%
Return on capital employed 4.1% -30.5% 9.0%
Asset turnover 0.1x – 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 0.7x 1.8x
Stock comp / revenue 8.7% – 4.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricALVOGRMLAMPH
Debt / assets 82.3% 0.5% 35.8%
Debt / equity -6.8x 0.0x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.7x – 1.9x
Debt / FCF -5.0x 0.0x 4.4x
Liabilities / assets 112.1% 10.9% 52.4%
Equity / assets -12.1% 89.1% 47.6%
Interest coverage 0.8x -2,872x 5.3x
Current ratio 1.6x 10.1x 3.3x
Quick ratio 1.1x 7.7x 2.3x
Cash ratio 0.4x 7.7x 1.3x
Altman Z-score -1.38 – 2.40

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricALVOGRMLAMPH
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -80.3% 7.8%
Shareholder yield – -80.3% 7.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusALVOGRMLAMPH
Forward P/E – – 9.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.01FY2026 – $3.09FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – -4.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +9.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $556.32MFY2026 – $790.23MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -6.2%FY2026 – +9.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +23.2% – -5.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersALVOGRMLAMPH
Held by institutions 14.7% 12.0% 64.8%
Institutions holding 72 47 209
Change in shares held, QoQ +152.4% +96.3% -11.7%
Institutions buying 44 34 96
Institutions selling 17 2 74
Buyers to sellers 2.59 17.00 1.30

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ALVOGRMLAMPH
ALVO 1.00 0.24 0.13
GRML 0.24 1.00 0.02
AMPH 0.13 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ALVO, GRML and AMPH?

Alvotech (ALVO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Alvotech (ALVO) $1.38B, Greenland Mines (GRML) $9.54M, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) $1.20B.

Which company is growing faster?

Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Alvotech (ALVO) -74.3%, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) +3.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) has the highest net margin (Alvotech (ALVO) -248.0%, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) 13.3%). On return on invested capital, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) leads (Alvotech (ALVO) 4.4%, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) 7.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Greenland Mines (GRML) returned the most: Alvotech (ALVO) -6.8%, Greenland Mines (GRML) +656.0%, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) +9.3%. Over five years, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) compounded fastest (Alvotech (ALVO) -14.4%/yr, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) +6.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) has been the steadiest (Alvotech (ALVO) 70.2%, Greenland Mines (GRML) 445.3%, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) 54.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ALVO, GRML and AMPH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.