ALVO vs BGM vs PMHS Stock Comparison

Alvotech, Bgm and Polomar Health Services Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ALVO Alvotech
$4.89 -17.4% 1M -38.1% 1Y
Market cap
$1.53B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$105.94M
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
4 wins
BGM BGM Group Ltd.
$8.93 +3,472.0% 1M -3.7% 1Y
Market cap
$33.71M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Alvotech leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Alvotech 4, Polomar Health Services 3, Bgm 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionALVOBGMPMHSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.53B $33.71M $3.96M ALVO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -5.4x — -0.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -74.3% — +7,688.8% PMHS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -248.0% — -301.1% ALVO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.4% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 13.1x — -7.2x PMHS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -38.1% -3.7% -30.0% BGM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -13.2%/yr — -74.0%/yr ALVO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 81.7% 379.7% 419.1% ALVO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 — 53/100 PMHS

Percentile Scorecard

ALVOBGMPMHS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisALVOBGMPMHS
Valuation 72 #173 of 624 – 85 #94 of 624
Growth 34 #395 of 601 – 61 #238 of 601
Profitability 69 #170 of 541 – 62 #208 of 541
Financial Health 15 #549 of 647 60 #258 of 647 3 #625 of 647
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 48 – 53
  • ALVO ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • BGM ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • PMHS ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodALVOBGMPMHSSPY
1 month -17.4%+3,472.0%-17.6% +0.7%
3 months +37.0%+3,207.4%+75.0% +3.7%
6 months +46.4%+2,947.8%+16.7% +7.1%
Year to date -4.7%+142.0%-82.5% +12.8%
1 year -38.1%-3.7%-30.0% +11.9%
3 years -43.8%—-89.2% +85.2%
3 years, per year -17.5%—-52.4% +22.8%
5 years -50.6%—-99.9% +67.6%
5 years, per year -13.2%—-74.0% +10.9%
10 years ——-96.5% +262.0%
10 years, per year ——-28.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureALVOBGMPMHSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 81.7%379.7%419.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 86.0%158.2%901.0% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.751.770.22 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.47-0.01-0.07 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.6%-98.5%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -38.1%-16.9%-82.5% -1.2%
52-week high $7.90$10.75$0.80 $779.14
52-week low $3.00$0.24$0.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleALVOBGMPMHS
P/E now vs peer median -5.4xmedian 17.8x —median 17.8x -0.4xmedian 17.8x
P/S now vs peer median 14.4xmedian 9.1x —median 9.1x 1.2xmedian 9.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 30.3xmedian 15.0x —median 15.0x -53.2xmedian 15.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -5.8xmedian 21.7x —median 21.7x -569.2xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median -8.0xmedian 2.2x 0.1xmedian 2.2x -3.7xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.22median 0.35 —median 0.35 —median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsALVOBGMPMHS
Revenue $105.94M – $3.17M
Gross profit $7.66M – $1.94M
Operating income $47.54M – -$9.36M
Net income -$179.60M – -$9.46M
Free cash flow -$261.39M – -$6.96K
R&D $46.37M – –
EPS (diluted) $-0.90 – $-0.34
Cash & equivalents $142.80M $11.52M $178.87K
Total debt $1.31B $8.25M $3.73M
Shares (diluted) 291.34M 3.78M 28.06M
Enterprise value $1.09B -$19.80M $3.52M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricALVOBGMPMHS
P/E -5.4x – -0.4x
P/FCF -5.8x – -569.2x
P/Operating cash flow -7.7x – -569.2x
P/S 14.4x – 1.2x
P/B -8.0x 0.1x -3.7x
P/Tangible book -4.6x 0.1x -3.7x
EV/EBITDA 30.3x – -53.2x
EV/EBIT 56.6x – -0.5x
EV/Revenue 25.4x – 1.4x
EV/FCF -10.3x – -657.7x
EV/Operating cash flow -13.5x – -657.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.22 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricALVOBGMPMHS
Revenue growth (1Y) -74.3% – 7,689%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 104.2% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -95.0% – 7,674%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 27.6% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -13.3% – -385.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 28.9% – -200.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -383.6% – -361.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 24.4% – -201.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -481.6% – -358.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 24.6% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -367.1% – 99.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.8% – 67.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -113.0% – 99.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.6% – 67.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricALVOBGMPMHS
Gross margin 7.2% – 61.1%
EBITDA margin 83.9% – -2.7%
Operating margin 44.9% – -295.0%
Pretax margin -62.1% – -298.3%
Net margin -248.0% – -301.1%
FCF margin -246.7% – -0.2%
Operating cash flow margin -187.6% – -0.2%
Return on equity – – –
Return on assets -17.5% – -1,422%
Return on invested capital 4.4% – –
Return on capital employed 4.1% – –
Asset turnover 0.1x – 4.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x – 0.0x
Stock comp / revenue 8.7% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricALVOBGMPMHS
Debt / assets 82.3% 0.2% 97.6%
Debt / equity -6.8x 0.0x -0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 13.1x – -7.2x
Debt / FCF -5.0x – -114.3x
Liabilities / assets 112.1% 8.4% 229.7%
Equity / assets -12.1% 91.6% -129.7%
Interest coverage 0.8x – -90.3x
Current ratio 1.6x 1.3x –
Quick ratio 1.1x 0.4x –
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.3x –
Altman Z-score -1.34 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricALVOBGMPMHS
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 0.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusALVOBGMPMHS
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.01FY2026 – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $556.32MFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY -6.2%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after +23.2% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersALVOBGMPMHS
Held by institutions 14.7% – –
Institutions holding 72 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +152.4% – –
Institutions buying 44 – –
Institutions selling 17 – –
Buyers to sellers 2.59 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ALVOBGMPMHS
ALVO 1.00 -0.02 -0.07
BGM -0.02 1.00 -0.04
PMHS -0.07 -0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ALVO, BGM and PMHS?

Alvotech (ALVO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Alvotech (ALVO) $1.53B, Bgm (BGM) $33.71M, Polomar Health Services (PMHS) $3.96M.

Which company is growing faster?

Polomar Health Services (PMHS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Alvotech (ALVO) -74.3%, Polomar Health Services (PMHS) +7,688.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Alvotech (ALVO) has the highest net margin (Alvotech (ALVO) -248.0%, Polomar Health Services (PMHS) -301.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bgm (BGM) returned the most: Alvotech (ALVO) -38.1%, Bgm (BGM) -3.7%, Polomar Health Services (PMHS) -30.0%. Over five years, Alvotech (ALVO) compounded fastest (Alvotech (ALVO) -13.2%/yr, Polomar Health Services (PMHS) -74.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Alvotech (ALVO) has been the steadiest (Alvotech (ALVO) 81.7%, Bgm (BGM) 379.7%, Polomar Health Services (PMHS) 419.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ALVO, BGM and PMHS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Alvotech (ALVO) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.