ALVO vs BGM vs PMHS Stock Comparison

Alvotech, Bgm and Polomar Health Services Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (TEVA) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ALVO Alvotech
$4.67 -23.6% 1M -3.3% 1Y
Market cap
$1.46B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$105.94M
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
4 wins
BGM BGM Group Ltd.
$9.54 +2.9% 1M -1.0% 1Y
Market cap
$36.02M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Alvotech leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Alvotech 4, Polomar Health Services 3, Bgm 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionALVOBGMPMHSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.46B $36.02M $5.37M ALVO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -5.1x — -0.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -74.3% — +7,688.8% PMHS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -248.0% — -301.1% ALVO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.4% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.7x — -7.2x PMHS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -3.3% -1.0% -5.0% BGM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -14.0%/yr — -74.0%/yr ALVO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 70.2% 379.7% 419.8% ALVO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 — 52/100 PMHS

Percentile Scorecard

ALVOBGMPMHS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisALVOBGMPMHS
Valuation 74 #166 of 634 – 84 #100 of 634
Growth 36 #391 of 607 – 60 #241 of 607
Profitability 66 #193 of 557 – 62 #215 of 557
Financial Health 16 #547 of 654 59 #266 of 654 3 #633 of 654
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 48 – 52
  • ALVO ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • BGM ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • PMHS ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodALVOBGMPMHSSPY
1 month -23.6%+2.9%+58.3% -1.0%
3 months +24.2%+3,080.0%+26.7% -0.4%
6 months +30.8%+3,148.2%+58.3% +4.5%
Year to date -9.0%+158.5%-76.3% +12.4%
1 year -3.3%-1.0%-5.0% +13.6%
3 years -47.4%—-71.2% +76.4%
3 years, per year -19.3%—-34.0% +20.8%
5 years -52.8%—-99.9% +63.7%
5 years, per year -14.0%—-74.0% +10.4%
10 years ——-95.3% +267.7%
10 years, per year ——-26.3% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureALVOBGMPMHSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 70.2%379.7%419.8% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 63.2%158.8%901.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.841.650.04 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.050.00-0.01 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.6%-98.5%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -24.1%-11.3%-76.3% -1.6%
52-week high $6.15$10.75$0.80 $779.14
52-week low $3.00$0.24$0.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleALVOBGMPMHS
P/E now vs peer median -5.1xmedian 18.0x —median 18.0x -0.6xmedian 18.0x
P/S now vs peer median 13.8xmedian 9.1x —median 9.1x 1.7xmedian 9.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.6xmedian 16.2x —median 16.2x -69.7xmedian 16.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -5.6xmedian 21.7x —median 21.7x -772.5xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median -7.6xmedian 2.2x 0.1xmedian 2.2x -5.1xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.15median 0.38 —median 0.38 —median 0.38

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsALVOBGMPMHS
Revenue $105.94M – $3.17M
Gross profit $7.66M – $1.94M
Operating income $47.54M – -$9.36M
Net income -$179.60M – -$9.46M
Free cash flow -$261.39M – -$6.96K
R&D $46.37M – –
EPS (diluted) $-0.90 – $-0.34
Cash & equivalents $142.80M $11.52M $178.87K
Total debt $1.31B $1.08M $794.79K
Shares (diluted) 291.34M 3.78M 28.06M
Enterprise value $1.02B -$17.50M $4.94M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricALVOBGMPMHS
P/E -5.1x – -0.6x
P/FCF -5.6x – -772.5x
P/Operating cash flow -7.3x – -772.5x
P/S 13.8x – 1.7x
P/B -7.6x 0.1x -5.1x
P/Tangible book -4.4x 0.1x -5.1x
EV/EBITDA 10.6x – -69.7x
EV/EBIT 55.1x – -0.6x
EV/Revenue 24.7x – 1.9x
EV/FCF -10.0x – -861.0x
EV/Operating cash flow -13.2x – -861.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.15 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricALVOBGMPMHS
Revenue growth (1Y) -74.3% – 7,689%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 104.2% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -95.0% – 7,674%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 27.2% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -13.3% – -385.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 27.6% – -200.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -383.6% – -361.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 24.4% – -201.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -481.6% – -358.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 33.6% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -367.1% – 99.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.8% – 67.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -113.0% – 99.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.6% – 67.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricALVOBGMPMHS
Gross margin 7.2% – 61.1%
EBITDA margin 233.8% – -2.7%
Operating margin 44.9% – -295.0%
Pretax margin -62.1% – -298.3%
Net margin -248.0% – -301.1%
FCF margin -246.7% – -0.2%
Operating cash flow margin -187.6% – -0.2%
Return on equity – – –
Return on assets -17.5% – -1,422%
Return on invested capital 4.4% – –
Return on capital employed 4.1% – –
Asset turnover 0.1x – 4.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x – 0.0x
Stock comp / revenue 8.7% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricALVOBGMPMHS
Debt / assets 82.3% 0.2% 97.6%
Debt / equity -6.8x 0.0x -0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.7x – -7.2x
Debt / FCF -5.0x – -114.3x
Liabilities / assets 112.1% 8.4% 229.7%
Equity / assets -12.1% 91.6% -129.7%
Interest coverage 0.8x – -90.3x
Current ratio 1.6x 1.3x –
Quick ratio 1.1x 0.4x –
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.3x –
Altman Z-score -1.36 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricALVOBGMPMHS
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 0.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusALVOBGMPMHS
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.01FY2026 – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $556.32MFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY -6.2%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after +23.2% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersALVOBGMPMHS
Held by institutions 14.7% – –
Institutions holding 72 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +152.4% – –
Institutions buying 44 – –
Institutions selling 17 – –
Buyers to sellers 2.59 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ALVOBGMPMHS
ALVO 1.00 -0.03 -0.09
BGM -0.03 1.00 -0.04
PMHS -0.09 -0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ALVO, BGM and PMHS?

Alvotech (ALVO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Alvotech (ALVO) $1.46B, Bgm (BGM) $36.02M, Polomar Health Services (PMHS) $5.37M.

Which company is growing faster?

Polomar Health Services (PMHS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Alvotech (ALVO) -74.3%, Polomar Health Services (PMHS) +7,688.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Alvotech (ALVO) has the highest net margin (Alvotech (ALVO) -248.0%, Polomar Health Services (PMHS) -301.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bgm (BGM) returned the most: Alvotech (ALVO) -3.3%, Bgm (BGM) -1.0%, Polomar Health Services (PMHS) -5.0%. Over five years, Alvotech (ALVO) compounded fastest (Alvotech (ALVO) -14.0%/yr, Polomar Health Services (PMHS) -74.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Alvotech (ALVO) has been the steadiest (Alvotech (ALVO) 70.2%, Bgm (BGM) 379.7%, Polomar Health Services (PMHS) 419.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ALVO, BGM and PMHS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Alvotech (ALVO) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.