ALOY vs HUCK vs MSTR Stock Comparison

Realloys, Huckleberry.ai and Strategy Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (NIQ) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ALOY Realloys Inc.
$6.05 -25.5% 1M -26.8% 1Y
Market cap
$413.87M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.84M
Div. yield
–
Analytics and BI Technology
2 wins
HUCK Huckleberry.ai, Inc.
$3.01 -5.9% 1M -78.4% 1Y
Market cap
$142.83M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$315.21M
Div. yield
–
Analytics and BI Technology
2 wins
MSTR Strategy Inc
$135.63 -15.2% 1M -48.8% 1Y
Market cap
$56.92B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$495.08M
Div. yield
–
Analytics and BI Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Strategy leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Strategy 4, Realloys 2, Huckleberry.ai 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionALOYHUCKMSTRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $413.87M $142.83M $56.92B MSTR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -2.7x -3.4x -3.8x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 43.0x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +69.5% -1.0% +4.2% ALOY
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -5,469.6% -13.4% -3,008.3% HUCK
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — -27.6% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 67.5x 0.0x MSTR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -26.8% -78.4% -48.8% ALOY
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -25.1%/yr -49.3%/yr +11.1%/yr MSTR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 129.9% 100.9% 81.0% MSTR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 22/100 26/100 25/100 HUCK

Percentile Scorecard

ALOYHUCKMSTR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisALOYHUCKMSTR
Valuation 10 #90 of 100 34 #66 of 100 14 #86 of 100
Growth 3 #96 of 99 35 #65 of 99 10 #89 of 99
Profitability 2 #94 of 96 37 #61 of 96 11 #86 of 96
Financial Health 89 #13 of 112 5 #106 of 112 87 #15 of 112
Shareholder Returns 6 #63 of 67 17 #56 of 67 3 #65 of 67
Overall 22 26 25
  • ALOY ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • HUCK ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • MSTR ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodALOYHUCKMSTRSPY
1 month -25.5%-5.9%-15.2% -2.0%
3 months -44.5%-21.6%+38.9% -2.2%
6 months -35.8%-22.2%-27.4% +4.2%
Year to date -25.3%-64.3%-10.7% +10.6%
1 year -26.8%-78.4%-48.8% +10.4%
3 years +238.0%-65.4%+198.7% +73.6%
3 years, per year +50.1%-29.8%+44.1% +20.2%
5 years -76.4%-96.7%+69.5% +61.6%
5 years, per year -25.1%-49.3%+11.1% +10.1%
10 years -81.7%—+617.6% +261.3%
10 years, per year -15.6%—+21.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureALOYHUCKMSTRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 129.9%100.9%81.0% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 120.0%108.2%74.9% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.872.143.14 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.21-0.78-0.60 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.0%-97.8%-84.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -76.6%-78.4%-48.8% -3.2%
52-week high $25.88$13.93$264.67 $779.14
52-week low $6.05$2.00$82.31 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleALOYHUCKMSTR
P/E now vs peer median -2.4xmedian 27.1x -3.3xmedian 27.1x -3.6xmedian 27.1x
P/S now vs peer median 146.8xmedian 2.8x 0.4xmedian 2.8x 110.2xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 16.6x 146.7xmedian 16.6x -2.9xmedian 16.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -20.6xmedian 15.7x -15.0xmedian 15.7x -4,904xmedian 15.7x
P/B now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 2.8x -0.7xmedian 2.8x 1.0xmedian 2.8x
PEG now vs peer median 0.03median 0.87 -0.12median 0.87 0.01median 0.87

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsALOYHUCKMSTR
Revenue $2.84M $315.21M $495.08M
Gross profit $1.64M $237.80M $335.84M
Operating income -$126.46M -$30.85M -$19.34B
Net income -$145.86M -$42.15M -$13.67B
Free cash flow -$20.20M -$8.79M -$11.13M
R&D $272.70K $74.68M $94.59M
EPS (diluted) $-2.50 $-0.92 $-34.79
Cash & equivalents – $25.10M $2.50B
Total debt $44.00K $137.24M $6.72B
Shares (diluted) 62.14M 46.00M 428.05M
Enterprise value $413.87M -$12.19M $44.06B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricALOYHUCKMSTR
P/E -2.4x -3.3x -3.6x
P/FCF -20.6x -15.0x -4,904x
P/Operating cash flow -20.6x -220.7x -7,412x
P/S 146.8x 0.4x 110.2x
P/B 2.2x -0.7x 1.0x
P/Tangible book 2.2x -0.7x -3.5x
EV/EBITDA – 146.7x -2.9x
EV/EBIT -3.3x -7.9x -2.9x
EV/Revenue 146.8x 0.8x 111.9x
EV/FCF -20.6x -27.7x -4,977x
EV/Operating cash flow -20.6x -408.5x -7,522x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.03 -0.12 0.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricALOYHUCKMSTR
Revenue growth (1Y) 69.5% -1.0% 4.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -10.0% -0.3% -0.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 77.8% 0.1% 0.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -6.6% -0.7% -5.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -3,631% 31.3% -276.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -180.4% 22.0% -317.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -2,472% 45.6% -272.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -193.2% 20.5% -435.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -1,717% 51.9% -242.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -78.5% 26.9% -284.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -2,700% -123.5% 88.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -59.6% 57.6% -3.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -2,665% -17.9% 84.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -59.3% 22.6% -4.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricALOYHUCKMSTR
Gross margin 57.7% 75.4% 67.8%
EBITDA margin – 0.5% -3,893%
Operating margin -4,460% -9.8% -3,906%
Pretax margin -4,472% -12.8% -3,879%
Net margin -5,470% -13.4% -3,008%
FCF margin -712.5% -2.8% -2.2%
Operating cash flow margin -711.7% -0.2% -1.5%
Return on equity -86.8% – -31.7%
Return on assets -74.5% -22.7% -21.1%
Return on invested capital – – -27.6%
Return on capital employed -76.6% – -30.5%
Asset turnover 0.0x 1.7x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.1x 0.0x 0.0x
Stock comp / revenue 4,064% 16.2% 10.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricALOYHUCKMSTR
Debt / assets 0.0% 78.4% 8.7%
Debt / equity 0.0x -0.7x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 67.5x 0.0x
Debt / FCF 0.0x -15.6x -603.5x
Liabilities / assets 9.1% 207.1% 28.1%
Equity / assets 90.9% -107.1% 71.9%
Interest coverage -610.9x – –
Current ratio 30.7x 0.3x 4.0x
Quick ratio – 0.2x 4.0x
Cash ratio – 0.1x 3.9x
Altman Z-score 10.40 -12.87 0.83

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricALOYHUCKMSTR
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -35.0% -0.7% -49.1%
Shareholder yield -35.0% -0.7% -49.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusALOYHUCKMSTR
Forward P/E – 43.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.44FY2024 $0.07FY2026 $-18.79FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -28.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.78MFY2026 $301.44MFY2026 $465.93MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.7%FY2026 -5.5%FY2026 -2.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1,181.5% -1.9% +14.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersALOYHUCKMSTR
Held by institutions 32.1% – 59.5%
Institutions holding 106 – 854
Change in shares held, QoQ +711.9% – +9.6%
Institutions buying 96 – 474
Institutions selling 10 – 266
Buyers to sellers 9.60 – 1.78

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ALOYHUCKMSTR
ALOY 1.00 0.03 0.15
HUCK 0.03 1.00 0.21
MSTR 0.15 0.21 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ALOY, HUCK and MSTR?

Strategy (MSTR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Realloys (ALOY) $413.87M, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) $142.83M, Strategy (MSTR) $56.92B.

Which company is growing faster?

Realloys (ALOY) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Realloys (ALOY) +69.5%, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -1.0%, Strategy (MSTR) +4.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) has the highest net margin (Realloys (ALOY) -5,469.6%, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -13.4%, Strategy (MSTR) -3,008.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Realloys (ALOY) returned the most: Realloys (ALOY) -26.8%, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -78.4%, Strategy (MSTR) -48.8%. Over five years, Strategy (MSTR) compounded fastest (Realloys (ALOY) -25.1%/yr, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -49.3%/yr, Strategy (MSTR) +11.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Strategy (MSTR) has been the steadiest (Realloys (ALOY) 129.9%, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) 100.9%, Strategy (MSTR) 81.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ALOY, HUCK and MSTR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Strategy (MSTR) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.