ALAB vs QCOM vs LSCC Stock Comparison

Astera Labs, Qualcomm and Lattice Semiconductor Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MPWR) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ALAB Astera Labs, Inc.
$297.20 -15.4% 1M +76.6% 1Y
Market cap
$49.76B
P/E
134.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.20B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology
3 wins
QCOM Qualcomm Inc/De
$182.97 -2.4% 1M +1.1% 1Y
Market cap
$195.05B
P/E
21.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$44.07B
Div. yield
0.02%
Semiconductor Design Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Qualcomm leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Qualcomm 5, Astera Labs 3, Lattice Semiconductor 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionALABQCOMLSCCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $49.76B $195.05B $14.09B QCOM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 134.7x 21.1x 387.9x QCOM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 79.7x 17.0x 46.7x QCOM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +98.5% +1.9% +33.3% ALAB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 30.7% 21.0% 5.6% ALAB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 20.5% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.4x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +76.6% +1.1% +45.0% ALAB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +6.6%/yr +8.5%/yr LSCC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 98.9% 52.9% 62.4% QCOM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 62/100 62/100 49/100 QCOM

Percentile Scorecard

ALABQCOMLSCC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisALABQCOMLSCC
Valuation 9 #86 of 94 80 #20 of 94 19 #76 of 94
Growth 91 #9 of 92 32 #63 of 92 37 #58 of 92
Profitability 79 #20 of 90 87 #13 of 90 66 #31 of 90
Financial Health 92 #9 of 99 29 #71 of 99 61 #39 of 99
Shareholder Returns 38 #46 of 73 82 #14 of 73 63 #28 of 73
Overall 62 62 49
  • ALAB ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • QCOM ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • LSCC ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodALABQCOMLSCCSPY
1 month -15.4%-2.4%-16.0% +0.9%
3 months +19.0%+17.5%-7.8% +5.9%
6 months +51.0%+17.3%-9.9% +8.5%
Year to date +78.6%+7.0%+41.6% +13.3%
1 year +76.6%+1.1%+45.0% +12.4%
3 years —+71.9%+48.5% +88.1%
3 years, per year —+19.8%+14.1% +23.5%
5 years —+37.5%+50.0% +68.2%
5 years, per year —+6.6%+8.5% +11.0%
10 years —+167.5%+1,619.0% +263.4%
10 years, per year —+10.3%+32.9% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureALABQCOMLSCCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 98.9%52.9%62.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 101.4%52.3%62.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.922.083.09 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.780.020.72 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -63.7%-45.6%-61.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -38.5%-27.1%-32.9% -0.9%
52-week high $483.02$251.02$155.27 $779.14
52-week low $100.27$124.07$61.73 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleALABQCOMLSCC
P/E now vs peer median 138.7xmedian 46.0x 20.9xmedian 46.0x 393.0xmedian 46.0x
P/S now vs peer median 42.9xmedian 7.9x 4.4xmedian 7.9x 21.9xmedian 7.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 176.3xmedian 28.3x 16.8xmedian 28.3x 166.3xmedian 28.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 186.4xmedian 41.4x 18.6xmedian 41.4x 71.8xmedian 41.4x
P/B now vs peer median 29.9xmedian 4.6x 7.0xmedian 4.6x 18.1xmedian 4.6x
PEG now vs peer median —median 2.30 5.02median 2.30 -8.96median 2.30

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsALABQCOMLSCC
Revenue $1.20B $44.07B $651.12M
Gross profit $903.00M $23.90B $449.43M
Operating income $273.45M $10.22B $47.97M
Net income $369.49M $9.26B $36.33M
Free cash flow $276.68M $10.42B $199.01M
R&D $434.25M $9.89B $218.13M
EPS (diluted) $2.02 $8.66 $0.26
Cash & equivalents $111.45M $4.53B $173.31M
Total debt – $12.78B –
Shares (diluted) 183.34M 1.07B 140.23M
Enterprise value $45.00B $154.97B $13.52B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricALABQCOMLSCC
P/E 138.7x 20.9x 393.0x
P/FCF 186.4x 18.6x 71.8x
P/Operating cash flow 153.6x 15.6x 58.8x
P/S 42.9x 4.4x 21.9x
P/B 29.9x 7.0x 18.1x
P/Tangible book 29.9x 7.4x 18.6x
EV/EBITDA 176.3x 16.8x 166.3x
EV/EBIT 184.0x 19.4x 294.3x
EV/Revenue 41.9x 4.5x 21.7x
EV/FCF 181.8x 19.0x 70.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 149.9x 16.0x 58.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 5.02 -8.96

Growth

14 metrics
MetricALABQCOMLSCC
Revenue growth (1Y) 98.5% 1.9% 33.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 4.5% -3.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 97.5% -0.8% 37.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 3.2% -3.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 546.3% -15.0% 585.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 0.6% -39.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 268.9% -20.0% 14.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 2.4% -43.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 258.4% -17.8% 12.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 4.2% -43.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 34.8% -2.1% 52.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 12.7% -2.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 31.5% -10.4% 48.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 14.9% -5.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricALABQCOMLSCC
Gross margin 75.1% 54.2% 69.0%
EBITDA margin 23.7% 26.8% 13.0%
Operating margin 22.8% 23.2% 7.4%
Pretax margin 26.8% 25.4% 6.9%
Net margin 30.7% 21.0% 5.6%
FCF margin 23.0% 23.6% 30.6%
Operating cash flow margin 27.9% 28.1% 37.4%
Return on equity 23.0% 33.7% 4.8%
Return on assets 20.6% 16.2% 3.9%
Return on invested capital – 20.5% –
Return on capital employed 16.8% 22.3% 6.1%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.8x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 1.3x 6.7x
Stock comp / revenue 16.2% 7.4% 18.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricALABQCOMLSCC
Debt / assets – 22.3% –
Debt / equity – 0.5x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.4x –
Debt / FCF – 1.2x –
Liabilities / assets 10.7% 51.8% 19.3%
Equity / assets 89.3% 48.2% 80.7%
Interest coverage – 14.8x –
Current ratio 10.1x 2.0x 3.0x
Quick ratio 8.8x 1.1x 2.0x
Cash ratio 7.6x 0.7x 1.2x
Altman Z-score 152.51 6.17 47.00

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricALABQCOMLSCC
Dividend yield – 2.0% –
Net buyback yield 0.0% 4.6% 0.2%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 6.5% 0.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 41.3% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 36.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 0.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusALABQCOMLSCC
Forward P/E 79.7xFY2026 17.0xFY2026 46.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.73FY2026 $10.79FY2026 $2.23FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +102.7%FY2026 -10.3%FY2026 +112.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +64.9% -3.0% +44.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.01BFY2026 $45.55BFY2026 $861.15MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +135.3%FY2026 +3.2%FY2026 +64.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +46.5% -5.0% +48.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersALABQCOMLSCC
Held by institutions 73.6% 79.7% 100.0%
Institutions holding 986 3,031 604
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.8% +2.8% -0.5%
Institutions buying 660 1,417 354
Institutions selling 253 1,333 181
Buyers to sellers 2.61 1.06 1.96

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ALABQCOMLSCC
ALAB 1.00 0.33 0.53
QCOM 0.33 1.00 0.46
LSCC 0.53 0.46 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ALAB, QCOM and LSCC?

Qualcomm (QCOM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Astera Labs (ALAB) $49.76B, Qualcomm (QCOM) $195.05B, Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) $14.09B.

Which stock is cheaper, ALAB, QCOM and LSCC?

Qualcomm (QCOM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Astera Labs (ALAB) 134.7x, Qualcomm (QCOM) 21.1x, Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) 387.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Qualcomm (QCOM) is cheapest (Astera Labs (ALAB) 79.7x, Qualcomm (QCOM) 17.0x, Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) 46.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Astera Labs (ALAB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Astera Labs (ALAB) +98.5%, Qualcomm (QCOM) +1.9%, Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) +33.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Astera Labs (ALAB) has the highest net margin (Astera Labs (ALAB) 30.7%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 21.0%, Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) 5.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Astera Labs (ALAB) returned the most: Astera Labs (ALAB) +76.6%, Qualcomm (QCOM) +1.1%, Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) +45.0%. Over five years, Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) compounded fastest (Qualcomm (QCOM) +6.6%/yr, Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) +8.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Astera Labs (ALAB) 0.00%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 0.02%, Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) 0.00%. Astera Labs (ALAB) and Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Qualcomm (QCOM) has been the steadiest (Astera Labs (ALAB) 98.9%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 52.9%, Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) 62.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ALAB, QCOM and LSCC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Qualcomm (QCOM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.