ALAB vs AVGO vs MSFT Stock Comparison

Astera Labs, Broadcom and Microsoft Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (AMD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ALAB Astera Labs, Inc.
$297.20 -15.4% 1M +76.6% 1Y
Market cap
$51.56B
P/E
138.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.20B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology
2 wins
AVGO Broadcom Inc.
$351.81 +0.6% 1M -5.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.68T
P/E
43.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$89.10B
Div. yield
0.74%
Semiconductor Design Technology
3 wins
MSFT Microsoft Corp
$531.01 +4.3% 1M -2.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.94T
P/E
27.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$346.45B
Div. yield
0.69%
Cloud Platforms Technology
7 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Microsoft leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Microsoft 7, Broadcom 3, Astera Labs 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionALABAVGOMSFTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $51.56B $1.68T $3.94T MSFT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 138.7x 43.8x 27.6x MSFT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 79.7x 32.0x 26.0x MSFT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +98.5% +48.7% +17.9% ALAB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 30.7% 42.9% 41.2% AVGO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 26.0% 26.5% MSFT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.7x -0.1x MSFT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.74% 0.69% AVGO
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +76.6% -5.7% -2.0% ALAB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +46.0%/yr +9.9%/yr AVGO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 98.9% 46.4% 32.6% MSFT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 62/100 65/100 79/100 MSFT

Percentile Scorecard

ALABAVGOMSFT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisALABAVGOMSFT
Valuation 9 #86 of 94 44 #53 of 94 60 #16 of 38
Growth 91 #9 of 92 92 #8 of 92 77 #9 of 36
Profitability 79 #20 of 90 94 #6 of 90 97 #2 of 34
Financial Health 92 #9 of 99 34 #66 of 99 84 #7 of 38
Shareholder Returns 38 #46 of 73 60 #30 of 73 80 #5 of 21
Overall 62 65 79
  • ALAB ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • AVGO ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • MSFT ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodALABAVGOMSFTSPY
1 month -15.4%+0.6%+4.3% +0.9%
3 months +19.0%-5.0%+36.0% +5.9%
6 months +51.0%-13.2%+25.1% +8.5%
Year to date +78.6%+1.6%+9.8% +13.3%
1 year +76.6%-5.7%-2.0% +12.4%
3 years —+319.6%+61.0% +88.1%
3 years, per year —+61.3%+17.2% +23.5%
5 years —+561.7%+60.1% +68.2%
5 years, per year —+46.0%+9.9% +11.0%
10 years —+1,978.0%+786.9% +263.4%
10 years, per year —+35.5%+24.4% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureALABAVGOMSFTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 98.9%46.4%32.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 101.4%48.6%30.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.922.170.99 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.78-0.12-0.06 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -63.7%-41.5%-37.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -38.5%-26.9%-2.3% -0.9%
52-week high $483.02$481.57$543.45 $779.14
52-week low $100.27$293.41$352.83 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleALABAVGOMSFT
P/E now vs peer median 138.7xmedian 46.0x 43.8xmedian 46.0x 27.6xmedian 27.6x
P/S now vs peer median 42.9xmedian 7.9x 18.8xmedian 7.9x 11.4xmedian 4.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 176.3xmedian 28.3x 33.1xmedian 28.3x 19.1xmedian 24.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 186.4xmedian 41.4x 42.6xmedian 41.4x 65.8xmedian 15.0x
P/B now vs peer median 29.9xmedian 4.6x 16.8xmedian 4.6x 8.4xmedian 4.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 2.30 1.29median 2.30 1.21median 0.38

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsALABAVGOMSFT
Revenue $1.20B $89.10B $346.45B
Gross profit $903.00M $61.28B $234.39B
Operating income $273.45M $42.81B $163.19B
Net income $369.49M $38.27B $142.63B
Free cash flow $276.68M $39.40B $59.96B
R&D $434.25M $11.84B $36.46B
EPS (diluted) $2.02 $7.83 $19.16
Cash & equivalents $111.45M $23.98B $20.28B
Total debt – $59.42B $35.48B
Shares (diluted) 183.34M 4.89B 7.45B
Enterprise value $46.80B $1.61T $3.88T

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricALABAVGOMSFT
P/E 138.7x 43.8x 27.6x
P/FCF 186.4x 42.6x 65.8x
P/Operating cash flow 153.6x 41.3x 20.1x
P/S 42.9x 18.8x 11.4x
P/B 29.9x 16.8x 8.4x
P/Tangible book 29.9x 22.9x 8.7x
EV/EBITDA 176.3x 33.1x 19.1x
EV/EBIT 184.0x 40.1x 24.0x
EV/Revenue 41.9x 19.2x 11.3x
EV/FCF 181.8x 43.5x 65.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 149.9x 42.2x 20.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.29 1.21

Growth

14 metrics
MetricALABAVGOMSFT
Revenue growth (1Y) 98.5% 48.7% 17.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 36.0% 16.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 97.5% 53.0% 16.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 36.3% 15.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 546.3% 89.4% 20.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 39.0% 20.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 268.9% 102.1% 36.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 40.1% 22.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 258.4% 101.0% 36.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 34.1% 22.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 34.8% 59.8% 33.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 31.6% 27.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 31.5% 58.1% -23.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 31.4% -1.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricALABAVGOMSFT
Gross margin 75.1% 68.8% 67.7%
EBITDA margin 23.7% 58.2% 59.3%
Operating margin 22.8% 48.0% 47.1%
Pretax margin 26.8% 45.4% 51.3%
Net margin 30.7% 42.9% 41.2%
FCF margin 23.0% 44.2% 17.3%
Operating cash flow margin 27.9% 45.6% 56.5%
Return on equity 23.0% 40.8% 31.2%
Return on assets 20.6% 20.8% 18.6%
Return on invested capital – 26.0% 26.5%
Return on capital employed 16.8% 26.3% 26.5%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.5x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 1.1x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 16.2% 9.5% 3.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricALABAVGOMSFT
Debt / assets – 31.6% 4.6%
Debt / equity – 0.6x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.7x -0.1x
Debt / FCF – 1.5x 0.6x
Liabilities / assets 10.7% 47.0% 39.6%
Equity / assets 89.3% 53.0% 60.4%
Interest coverage – 13.7x 50.6x
Current ratio 10.1x 2.5x 1.2x
Quick ratio 8.8x 2.2x 0.8x
Cash ratio 7.6x 1.2x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 152.51 12.98 9.49

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricALABAVGOMSFT
Dividend yield – 0.7% 0.7%
Net buyback yield 0.0% 0.5% 0.5%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 1.2% 1.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 19.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 45.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 9.5%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 10.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusALABAVGOMSFT
Forward P/E 79.7xFY2026 32.0xFY2026 26.0xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $3.73FY2026 $11.01FY2026 $20.39FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +102.7%FY2026 +61.4%FY2026 +18.0%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +64.9% +68.8% +11.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.01BFY2026 $102.00BFY2026 $402.39BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +135.3%FY2026 +59.7%FY2026 +21.3%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +46.5% +61.2% +12.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersALABAVGOMSFT
Held by institutions 73.6% 78.1% 73.9%
Institutions holding 986 4,799 6,230
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.8% +3.7% +3.3%
Institutions buying 660 2,638 3,434
Institutions selling 253 1,842 2,426
Buyers to sellers 2.61 1.43 1.42

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ALABAVGOMSFT
ALAB 1.00 0.54 0.17
AVGO 0.54 1.00 0.20
MSFT 0.17 0.20 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ALAB, AVGO and MSFT?

Microsoft (MSFT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Astera Labs (ALAB) $51.56B, Broadcom (AVGO) $1.68T, Microsoft (MSFT) $3.94T.

Which stock is cheaper, ALAB, AVGO and MSFT?

Microsoft (MSFT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Astera Labs (ALAB) 138.7x, Broadcom (AVGO) 43.8x, Microsoft (MSFT) 27.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Microsoft (MSFT) is cheapest (Astera Labs (ALAB) 79.7x, Broadcom (AVGO) 32.0x, Microsoft (MSFT) 26.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Astera Labs (ALAB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Astera Labs (ALAB) +98.5%, Broadcom (AVGO) +48.7%, Microsoft (MSFT) +17.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Broadcom (AVGO) has the highest net margin (Astera Labs (ALAB) 30.7%, Broadcom (AVGO) 42.9%, Microsoft (MSFT) 41.2%). On return on invested capital, Microsoft (MSFT) leads (Broadcom (AVGO) 26.0%, Microsoft (MSFT) 26.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Astera Labs (ALAB) returned the most: Astera Labs (ALAB) +76.6%, Broadcom (AVGO) -5.7%, Microsoft (MSFT) -2.0%. Over five years, Broadcom (AVGO) compounded fastest (Broadcom (AVGO) +46.0%/yr, Microsoft (MSFT) +9.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Broadcom (AVGO) has the highest dividend yield: Astera Labs (ALAB) 0.00%, Broadcom (AVGO) 0.74%, Microsoft (MSFT) 0.69%. Astera Labs (ALAB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Microsoft (MSFT) has been the steadiest (Astera Labs (ALAB) 98.9%, Broadcom (AVGO) 46.4%, Microsoft (MSFT) 32.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ALAB, AVGO and MSFT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Microsoft (MSFT) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.