AISP vs PL vs HOLO Stock Comparison

Airship AI Holdings, Planet Labs PBC and MicroCloud Hologram Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (GRRR) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
PL Planet Labs PBC
$13.41 -18.1% 1M +3.6% 1Y
Market cap
$4.95B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$378.28M
Div. yield
–
Computer Vision Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Planet Labs PBC leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Planet Labs PBC 4, Airship AI Holdings 2, MicroCloud Hologram 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAISPPLHOLOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $74.21M $4.95B $15.35M PL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 2.8x -13.8x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +32.2% +44.1% — PL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 144.6% -95.1% — AISP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -56.9% +3.6% -73.0% PL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -26.0%/yr +6.1%/yr -89.2%/yr PL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 78.5% 91.6% 67.2% HOLO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 37/100 — AISP

Percentile Scorecard

AISPPLHOLO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAISPPLHOLO
Valuation 61 #49 of 124 38 #77 of 124 –
Growth 84 #19 of 113 46 #62 of 113 –
Profitability 43 #63 of 110 38 #69 of 110 –
Financial Health 34 #85 of 129 45 #71 of 129 99 #2 of 129
Shareholder Returns 10 #61 of 68 16 #57 of 68 –
Overall 47 37 –
  • AISP ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • PL ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • HOLO ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAISPPLHOLOSPY
1 month +11.3%-18.1%-31.8% -1.0%
3 months +7.5%-34.5%-24.2% +2.9%
6 months -14.3%-62.2%-39.6% +6.4%
Year to date -25.3%-32.0%-56.1% +11.4%
1 year -56.9%+3.6%-73.0% +13.1%
3 years -80.0%+518.0%-100.0% +79.4%
3 years, per year -41.6%+83.6%-93.4% +21.5%
5 years -77.8%+34.2%-100.0% +67.7%
5 years, per year -26.0%+6.1%-89.2% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureAISPPLHOLOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 78.5%91.6%67.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 72.5%82.0%74.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.502.612.45 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.720.04-1.09 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -87.6%-85.7%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -57.6%-73.9%-74.6% -2.5%
52-week high $5.09$51.40$4.57 $779.14
52-week low $1.71$11.16$1.16 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAISPPLHOLO
P/E now vs peer median 2.8xmedian 37.4x -13.4xmedian 37.4x —median 37.4x
P/S now vs peer median 4.1xmedian 4.4x 12.9xmedian 4.4x —median 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 35.0x -66.1xmedian 35.0x —median 35.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -21.2xmedian 27.2x 197.7xmedian 27.2x —median 27.2x
P/B now vs peer median -8.6xmedian 3.4x 8.6xmedian 3.4x 0.0xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.04median 1.27 0.60median 1.27 —median 1.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAISPPLHOLO
Revenue $18.15M $378.28M –
Gross profit $10.19M $209.65M –
Operating income -$6.55M -$102.74M –
Net income $26.24M -$359.87M –
Free cash flow -$3.51M $24.67M –
R&D $3.31M $128.10M –
EPS (diluted) $0.76 $-1.00 –
Cash & equivalents $12.37M $415.13M $110.42M
Total debt – – $1.87M
Shares (diluted) 34.44M 359.59M 13.18M
Enterprise value $31.77M $2.04B -$2.17B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAISPPLHOLO
P/E 2.8x -13.4x –
P/FCF -21.2x 197.7x –
P/Operating cash flow -21.2x 41.5x –
P/S 4.1x 12.9x –
P/B -8.6x 8.6x 0.0x
P/Tangible book -8.6x 9.1x 0.0x
EV/EBITDA – -66.1x –
EV/EBIT -9.5x -39.0x –
EV/Revenue 3.4x 10.6x –
EV/FCF -17.7x 162.6x –
EV/Operating cash flow -17.7x 34.1x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.04 0.60 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAISPPLHOLO
Revenue growth (1Y) 32.2% 44.1% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 21.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 42.4% 35.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 24.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 3.9% -24.2% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 2.1% 16.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) 159.6% -297.8% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 62.4% -33.7% –
EPS growth (1Y) 155.2% -236.5% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 68.4% -22.3% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 44.1% 41.9% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.7% 55.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 44.1% -30.0% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.7% 31.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAISPPLHOLO
Gross margin 56.2% 55.4% –
EBITDA margin – -16.0% –
Operating margin -36.1% -27.2% –
Pretax margin -36.1% -93.8% –
Net margin 144.6% -95.1% –
FCF margin -19.3% 6.5% –
Operating cash flow margin -19.3% 31.1% –
Return on equity – -71.4% –
Return on assets -35.5% -26.8% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -50.0% -10.4% –
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.3x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.1x -0.3x –
Stock comp / revenue 13.5% 16.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAISPPLHOLO
Debt / assets – – 0.0%
Debt / equity – – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 148.6% 60.6% 2.9%
Equity / assets -48.6% 39.4% 97.1%
Interest coverage – -18.7x –
Current ratio 3.2x 2.8x 34.6x
Quick ratio 3.0x 2.6x 107.3x
Cash ratio 2.3x 2.5x 107.0x
Altman Z-score -1.56 2.38 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAISPPLHOLO
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -12.9% -5.4% –
Shareholder yield -12.9% -5.4% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAISPPLHOLO
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.06FY2026 $-0.05FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY -107.9%FY2026 – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $28.14MFY2026 $413.72MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +83.7%FY2026 +34.4%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +36.3% +41.2% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAISPPLHOLO
Held by institutions 14.5% 74.2% 3.0%
Institutions holding 79 480 16
Change in shares held, QoQ -29.3% +6.1% +135.7%
Institutions buying 41 270 11
Institutions selling 27 161 0
Buyers to sellers 1.52 1.68 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AISPPLHOLO
AISP 1.00 0.33 0.50
PL 0.33 1.00 0.32
HOLO 0.50 0.32 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AISP, PL and HOLO?

Planet Labs PBC (PL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Airship AI Holdings (AISP) $74.21M, Planet Labs PBC (PL) $4.95B, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) $15.35M.

Which company is growing faster?

Planet Labs PBC (PL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Airship AI Holdings (AISP) +32.2%, Planet Labs PBC (PL) +44.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Airship AI Holdings (AISP) has the highest net margin (Airship AI Holdings (AISP) 144.6%, Planet Labs PBC (PL) -95.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Planet Labs PBC (PL) returned the most: Airship AI Holdings (AISP) -56.9%, Planet Labs PBC (PL) +3.6%, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) -73.0%. Over five years, Planet Labs PBC (PL) compounded fastest (Airship AI Holdings (AISP) -26.0%/yr, Planet Labs PBC (PL) +6.1%/yr, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) -89.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) has been the steadiest (Airship AI Holdings (AISP) 78.5%, Planet Labs PBC (PL) 91.6%, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) 67.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AISP, PL and HOLO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Planet Labs PBC (PL) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.