AISP vs HOLO vs WIMI Stock Comparison

Airship AI Holdings, MicroCloud Hologram and WiMi Hologram Cloud Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ROC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Airship AI Holdings leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Airship AI Holdings 3, MicroCloud Hologram 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAISPHOLOWIMILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $77.65M $16.01M $3.45M AISP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 3.0x — — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 0.2x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +32.2% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 144.6% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -53.8% -73.7% -87.2% AISP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -25.2%/yr -89.2%/yr -58.9%/yr AISP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 78.7% 67.1% 70.6% HOLO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

AISPHOLOWIMI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAISPHOLOWIMI
Valuation 59 #51 of 124 – –
Growth 84 #19 of 113 – –
Profitability 44 #62 of 109 – –
Financial Health 35 #83 of 127 99 #2 of 127 79 #27 of 127
Shareholder Returns 9 #59 of 65 – –
Overall 46 – –
  • AISP ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • HOLO ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • WIMI ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAISPHOLOWIMISPY
1 month +25.8%-28.1%-35.4% -0.2%
3 months +18.7%-25.9%-55.3% +3.9%
6 months +1.8%-28.1%-70.2% +8.2%
Year to date -20.8%-54.5%-78.5% +12.9%
1 year -53.8%-73.7%-87.2% +12.3%
3 years -78.5%-100.0%-91.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year -40.1%-93.6%-56.1% +23.3%
5 years -76.6%-100.0%-98.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year -25.2%-89.2%-58.9% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureAISPHOLOWIMISPY
Volatility, 1Y 78.7%67.1%70.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 72.7%74.3%74.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.542.442.16 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.68-1.10-1.23 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -87.6%-100.0%-99.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -53.8%-73.7%-87.2% -1.2%
52-week high $4.96$4.57$3.98 $779.14
52-week low $1.71$1.16$0.51 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAISPHOLOWIMI
P/E now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 38.6x —median 38.6x —median 38.6x
P/S now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 4.4x —median 4.4x —median 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 34.5x —median 34.5x —median 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -22.5xmedian 29.4x —median 29.4x —median 29.4x
P/B now vs peer median -9.1xmedian 3.3x 0.0xmedian 3.3x 0.0xmedian 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.04median 1.28 —median 1.28 —median 1.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAISPHOLOWIMI
Revenue $18.15M – –
Gross profit $10.19M – –
Operating income -$6.55M – –
Net income $26.24M – –
Free cash flow -$3.51M – –
R&D $3.31M – –
EPS (diluted) $0.76 – –
Cash & equivalents $12.37M $110.42M $198.36M
Total debt – $1.87M $108.20M
Shares (diluted) 34.44M 13.18M 9.71M
Enterprise value $35.21M -$2.17B -$1.65B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAISPHOLOWIMI
P/E 3.0x – –
P/FCF -22.5x – –
P/Operating cash flow -22.5x – –
P/S 4.3x – –
P/B -9.1x 0.0x 0.0x
P/Tangible book -9.1x 0.0x 0.0x
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT -10.2x – –
EV/Revenue 3.7x – –
EV/FCF -19.0x – –
EV/Operating cash flow -19.0x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.04 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAISPHOLOWIMI
Revenue growth (1Y) 32.2% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 42.4% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 3.9% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 2.1% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 159.6% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 62.4% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 155.2% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 68.4% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 44.1% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.7% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 44.1% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.7% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAISPHOLOWIMI
Gross margin 56.2% – –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin -36.1% – –
Pretax margin -36.1% – –
Net margin 144.6% – –
FCF margin -19.3% – –
Operating cash flow margin -19.3% – –
Return on equity – – –
Return on assets -35.5% – –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -50.0% – –
Asset turnover 1.0x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.1x – –
Stock comp / revenue 13.5% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAISPHOLOWIMI
Debt / assets – 0.0% 5.5%
Debt / equity – 0.0x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 148.6% 2.9% 28.1%
Equity / assets -48.6% 97.1% 71.9%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 3.2x 34.6x 3.6x
Quick ratio 3.0x 107.3x 3.4x
Cash ratio 2.3x 107.0x 3.4x
Altman Z-score -1.46 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAISPHOLOWIMI
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -12.2% – –
Shareholder yield -12.2% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAISPHOLOWIMI
Forward P/E – – 0.2xFY2023
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.06FY2026 – $2.31FY2023
EPS growth, next FY -107.9%FY2026 – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $28.14MFY2026 – $270.18MFY2023
Revenue growth, next FY +83.7%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after +36.3% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAISPHOLOWIMI
Held by institutions 14.5% 3.0% –
Institutions holding 79 16 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -29.3% +135.7% –
Institutions buying 41 11 –
Institutions selling 27 0 –
Buyers to sellers 1.52 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AISPHOLOWIMI
AISP 1.00 0.50 0.32
HOLO 0.50 1.00 0.47
WIMI 0.32 0.47 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AISP, HOLO and WIMI?

Airship AI Holdings (AISP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Airship AI Holdings (AISP) $77.65M, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) $16.01M, WiMi Hologram Cloud (WIMI) $3.45M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Airship AI Holdings (AISP) returned the most: Airship AI Holdings (AISP) -53.8%, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) -73.7%, WiMi Hologram Cloud (WIMI) -87.2%. Over five years, Airship AI Holdings (AISP) compounded fastest (Airship AI Holdings (AISP) -25.2%/yr, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) -89.2%/yr, WiMi Hologram Cloud (WIMI) -58.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) has been the steadiest (Airship AI Holdings (AISP) 78.7%, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) 67.1%, WiMi Hologram Cloud (WIMI) 70.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AISP, HOLO and WIMI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Airship AI Holdings (AISP) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.