AISP vs GRRR vs ITMSF Stock Comparison

Airship AI Holdings, Gorilla Technology and Intermap Technologies Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ROC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Gorilla Technology leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Gorilla Technology 3, Airship AI Holdings 3, Intermap Technologies 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAISPGRRRITMSFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $78.68M $204.70M $34.05M GRRR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 3.0x -4.1x -3.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 27.5x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +32.2% +50.4% -66.2% GRRR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 144.6% -35.4% -147.8% AISP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -2.9% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.1x 1.8x ITMSF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -57.6% -49.8% -74.8% GRRR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -26.1%/yr -39.0%/yr -4.7%/yr ITMSF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 78.6% 87.3% 84.7% AISP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 40/100 26/100 AISP

Percentile Scorecard

AISPGRRRITMSF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAISPGRRRITMSF
Valuation 61 #49 of 124 46 #68 of 124 19 #101 of 124
Growth 84 #19 of 113 73 #31 of 113 1 #112 of 113
Profitability 43 #63 of 110 32 #75 of 110 20 #88 of 110
Financial Health 34 #85 of 129 40 #78 of 129 64 #47 of 129
Shareholder Returns 9 #61 of 67 8 #62 of 67 –
Overall 46 40 26
  • AISP ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • GRRR ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • ITMSF ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAISPGRRRITMSFSPY
1 month +18.7%-39.7%-14.1% -0.8%
3 months +9.6%-30.3%-22.5% +3.5%
6 months -9.2%-34.5%-62.8% +7.0%
Year to date -25.3%-22.6%-59.6% +12.2%
1 year -57.6%-49.8%-74.8% +13.0%
3 years -79.7%+4.1%+37.5% +86.3%
3 years, per year -41.2%+1.3%+11.2% +23.1%
5 years -77.9%-91.5%-21.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year -26.1%-39.0%-4.7% +11.0%
10 years ——-21.4% +258.0%
10 years, per year ——-2.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureAISPGRRRITMSFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 78.6%87.3%84.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 72.7%93.2%99.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.532.640.86 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.73-0.57-0.88 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -87.6%-99.4%-78.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -56.5%-61.2%-73.7% -1.8%
52-week high $4.96$21.78$2.09 $779.14
52-week low $1.71$7.44$0.54 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAISPGRRRITMSF
P/E now vs peer median 2.8xmedian 38.1x -3.8xmedian 38.1x -3.5xmedian 38.1x
P/S now vs peer median 4.1xmedian 4.3x 1.6xmedian 4.3x 6.0xmedian 4.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 35.4x -2.3xmedian 35.4x -2.8xmedian 35.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -21.2xmedian 27.1x -33.4xmedian 27.1x -4.6xmedian 27.1x
P/B now vs peer median -8.6xmedian 3.4x 1.3xmedian 3.4x 2.3xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.04median 1.27 —median 1.27 —median 1.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAISPGRRRITMSF
Revenue $18.15M $140.40M $6.65M
Gross profit $10.19M $24.27M –
Operating income -$6.55M -$51.78M -$9.75M
Net income $26.24M -$51.45M -$9.82M
Free cash flow -$3.51M -$6.62M -$8.57M
R&D $3.31M $4.02M –
EPS (diluted) $0.76 $-2.23 $-0.16
Cash & equivalents $12.37M $179.36M $16.18M
Total debt – $6.95B $1.65M
Shares (diluted) 34.44M 22.25M 61.80M
Enterprise value $36.25M -$286.74M -$49.72M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAISPGRRRITMSF
P/E 2.8x -3.8x -3.5x
P/FCF -21.2x -33.4x -4.6x
P/Operating cash flow -21.2x -10.8x -5.6x
P/S 4.1x 1.6x 6.0x
P/B -8.6x 1.3x 2.3x
P/Tangible book -8.6x 1.3x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA – -2.3x -2.8x
EV/EBIT -9.5x -2.2x -2.5x
EV/Revenue 3.4x 0.8x 3.6x
EV/FCF -17.7x -17.4x -2.8x
EV/Operating cash flow -17.7x -5.6x -3.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.04 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAISPGRRRITMSF
Revenue growth (1Y) 32.2% 50.4% -66.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 42.4% -26.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 3.9% 33.4% -1,317%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 2.1% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 159.6% 34.1% -1,584%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 62.4% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 155.2% 68.5% -1,313%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 68.4% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 44.1% 33.7% -365.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.7% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 44.1% 78.9% -216.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.7% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAISPGRRRITMSF
Gross margin 56.2% 17.3% –
EBITDA margin – -36.2% -128.3%
Operating margin -36.1% -36.9% -146.6%
Pretax margin -36.1% -32.9% -152.3%
Net margin 144.6% -35.4% -147.8%
FCF margin -19.3% -4.7% -129.0%
Operating cash flow margin -19.3% -14.6% -107.7%
Return on equity – -29.1% -51.9%
Return on assets -35.5% -15.7% -36.5%
Return on invested capital – -2.9% –
Return on capital employed -50.0% -30.8% -45.5%
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.4x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.1x 0.4x 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue 13.5% – 9.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAISPGRRRITMSF
Debt / assets – 18.8% 1.6%
Debt / equity – 0.4x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.1x 1.8x
Debt / FCF – -11.1x 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 148.6% 56.2% 32.0%
Equity / assets -48.6% 43.8% 68.0%
Interest coverage – -21.8x -180.5x
Current ratio 3.2x 2.2x 3.3x
Quick ratio 3.0x 2.1x 3.2x
Cash ratio 2.3x 1.2x 2.9x
Altman Z-score -1.56 0.37 -11.00

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAISPGRRRITMSF
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -12.9% -13.4% –
Shareholder yield -12.9% -13.4% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAISPGRRRITMSF
Forward P/E – – 27.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.06FY2026 $-2.61FY2026 $0.02FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -107.9%FY2026 -396.6%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – – +350.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $28.14MFY2026 $201.05MFY2026 $32.39MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +83.7%FY2026 +98.4%FY2026 +205.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +36.3% +217.5% +29.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAISPGRRRITMSF
Held by institutions 14.5% 26.6% –
Institutions holding 79 71 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -29.3% +79.3% –
Institutions buying 41 50 –
Institutions selling 27 13 –
Buyers to sellers 1.52 3.85 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AISPGRRRITMSF
AISP 1.00 0.43 0.20
GRRR 0.43 1.00 0.09
ITMSF 0.20 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AISP, GRRR and ITMSF?

Gorilla Technology (GRRR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Airship AI Holdings (AISP) $78.68M, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) $204.70M, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) $34.05M.

Which company is growing faster?

Gorilla Technology (GRRR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Airship AI Holdings (AISP) +32.2%, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) +50.4%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -66.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Airship AI Holdings (AISP) has the highest net margin (Airship AI Holdings (AISP) 144.6%, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) -35.4%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -147.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Gorilla Technology (GRRR) returned the most: Airship AI Holdings (AISP) -57.6%, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) -49.8%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -74.8%. Over five years, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) compounded fastest (Airship AI Holdings (AISP) -26.1%/yr, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) -39.0%/yr, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -4.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Airship AI Holdings (AISP) has been the steadiest (Airship AI Holdings (AISP) 78.6%, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) 87.3%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) 84.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AISP, GRRR and ITMSF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.