AHRT vs MAC vs KIM Stock Comparison

AH Realty Trust, Macerich and Kimco Realty Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BRX) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MAC Macerich Co
$24.16 +6.7% 1M +34.2% 1Y
Market cap
$6.56B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.01B
Div. yield
0.03%
Retail REITs Real Estate
3 wins
KIM Kimco Realty Corp
$23.70 +5.7% 1M +5.9% 1Y
Market cap
$15.83B
P/E
27.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.19B
Div. yield
0.05%
Retail REITs Real Estate
7 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Kimco Realty leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Kimco Realty 7, Macerich 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAHRTMACKIMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $455.13M $6.56B $15.83B KIM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -9.5x -38.7x 27.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 29.3x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.9% +1.3% +4.4% KIM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -22.4% -16.8% 26.4% KIM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -6.9% 4.2% KIM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 6.9x -31.9x 5.5x MAC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.03% 0.05% KIM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -9.9% +34.2% +5.9% MAC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -15.0%/yr +5.9%/yr +0.8%/yr MAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 28.7% 29.6% 18.1% KIM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 15/100 63/100 KIM

Percentile Scorecard

AHRTMACKIM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAHRTMACKIM
Valuation 83 #26 of 145 1 #143 of 145 47 #77 of 145
Growth 11 #126 of 141 32 #96 of 141 66 #49 of 141
Profitability 22 #105 of 134 9 #122 of 134 75 #34 of 134
Financial Health 29 #98 of 138 23 #107 of 138 62 #53 of 138
Shareholder Returns 96 #6 of 131 10 #118 of 131 64 #48 of 131
Overall 48 15 63
  • AHRT ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • MAC ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • KIM ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAHRTMACKIMSPY
1 month +3.1%+6.7%+5.7% -0.2%
3 months -14.5%-8.9%-9.7% +3.9%
6 months -1.8%+11.1%-0.4% +8.2%
Year to date -8.2%+30.9%+16.9% +12.9%
1 year -9.9%+34.2%+5.9% +12.3%
3 years -38.6%+148.8%+40.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year -15.0%+35.5%+12.0% +23.3%
5 years -55.6%+33.4%+4.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year -15.0%+5.9%+0.8% +10.9%
10 years -54.1%-66.7%-10.3% +261.1%
10 years, per year -7.5%-10.4%-1.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureAHRTMACKIMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 28.7%29.6%18.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 29.3%32.0%17.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.560.630.04 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.351.160.33 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.2%-65.2%-37.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -16.1%-8.9%-10.2% -1.2%
52-week high $7.25$26.52$26.39 $779.14
52-week low $5.15$16.20$19.78 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAHRTMACKIM
P/E now vs peer median -9.6xmedian 26.3x -39.0xmedian 26.3x 27.6xmedian 26.3x
P/S now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 4.0x 6.8xmedian 4.0x 7.3xmedian 4.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.2xmedian 14.4x -79.3xmedian 14.4x 16.5xmedian 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -34.5xmedian 23.3x -36.9xmedian 23.3x 23.3xmedian 23.3x
P/B now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 1.3x 2.4xmedian 1.3x 1.5xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.22median 1.91 2.56median 1.91 2.34median 1.91

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAHRTMACKIM
Revenue $213.90M $1.01B $2.19B
Gross profit – $595.32M –
Operating income $48.47M -$522.95M $788.44M
Net income -$49.88M -$172.33M $613.68M
Free cash flow -$13.16M -$186.19M $681.88M
EPS (diluted) $-0.64 $-0.62 $0.86
Cash & equivalents $20.66M $227.03M $700.38M
Total debt $955.86M $4.85B $8.74B
Shares (diluted) 75.29M 273.72M 671.96M
Enterprise value $318.67M $5.58B $14.59B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAHRTMACKIM
P/E -9.6x -39.0x 27.6x
P/FCF -34.5x -36.9x 23.3x
P/Operating cash flow 5.5x 22.4x 13.5x
P/S 2.1x 6.8x 7.3x
P/B 0.6x 2.4x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 0.6x 2.4x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 10.2x -79.3x 16.5x
EV/EBIT 28.7x -22.0x 30.3x
EV/Revenue 6.5x 11.4x 10.9x
EV/FCF -105.6x -61.7x 35.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 16.7x 37.4x 20.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.22 2.56 2.34

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAHRTMACKIM
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.9% 1.3% 4.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -28.9% 5.1% 7.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 2.7% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 5.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -25.1% -5.4% 8.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -26.6% -8.7% 8.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -309.0% 59.4% 1.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -38.3% -25.9% 14.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -610.4% 61.8% 2.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -43.4% -15.2% 11.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 103.3% -2.3% 10.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -8.0% -5.3% 5.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -64.9% 26.6% 44.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.0% -46.2% 17.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAHRTMACKIM
Gross margin – 59.2% –
EBITDA margin 63.7% -14.4% 66.4%
Operating margin 22.7% -52.0% 36.0%
Pretax margin -6.6% -52.0% 22.9%
Net margin -22.4% -16.8% 26.4%
FCF margin -6.2% -18.5% 31.2%
Operating cash flow margin 38.9% 30.5% 53.9%
Return on equity -6.8% -6.4% 5.9%
Return on assets -2.3% -2.1% 3.1%
Return on invested capital – -6.9% 4.2%
Return on capital employed – – 4.0%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.1x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.7x -1.8x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue 2.2% 2.2% 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAHRTMACKIM
Debt / assets 49.6% 56.9% 43.6%
Debt / equity 1.3x 1.7x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 6.9x -31.9x 5.5x
Debt / FCF -72.7x -26.0x 12.8x
Liabilities / assets 62.9% 65.9% 48.0%
Equity / assets 37.1% 34.1% 52.0%
Interest coverage 0.7x – 2.3x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – 16.3x
Cash ratio – – 10.5x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAHRTMACKIM
Dividend yield 6.9% 2.8% 4.5%
Net buyback yield 7.4% -8.6% 1.0%
Shareholder yield 14.3% -5.8% 5.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – -111.9% 118.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) – -103.6% 106.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 8.8% 3.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 0.4% 7.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAHRTMACKIM
Forward P/E – – 29.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.69FY2026 $-0.17FY2026 $0.81FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – -1.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +7.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $199.97MFY2026 $969.19MFY2026 $2.12BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -25.8%FY2026 -4.0%FY2026 +0.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +10.3% +13.7% +4.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAHRTMACKIM
Held by institutions 75.0% 100.0% 99.4%
Institutions holding 196 350 693
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% +19.5% +1.8%
Institutions buying 93 220 369
Institutions selling 74 79 201
Buyers to sellers 1.26 2.78 1.84

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AHRTMACKIM
AHRT 1.00 0.32 0.35
MAC 0.32 1.00 0.54
KIM 0.35 0.54 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AHRT, MAC and KIM?

Kimco Realty (KIM) is the largest by market capitalisation: AH Realty Trust (AHRT) $455.13M, Macerich (MAC) $6.56B, Kimco Realty (KIM) $15.83B.

Which company is growing faster?

Kimco Realty (KIM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: AH Realty Trust (AHRT) +3.9%, Macerich (MAC) +1.3%, Kimco Realty (KIM) +4.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kimco Realty (KIM) has the highest net margin (AH Realty Trust (AHRT) -22.4%, Macerich (MAC) -16.8%, Kimco Realty (KIM) 26.4%). On return on invested capital, Kimco Realty (KIM) leads (Macerich (MAC) -6.9%, Kimco Realty (KIM) 4.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Macerich (MAC) returned the most: AH Realty Trust (AHRT) -9.9%, Macerich (MAC) +34.2%, Kimco Realty (KIM) +5.9%. Over five years, Macerich (MAC) compounded fastest (AH Realty Trust (AHRT) -15.0%/yr, Macerich (MAC) +5.9%/yr, Kimco Realty (KIM) +0.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Kimco Realty (KIM) has the highest dividend yield: AH Realty Trust (AHRT) 0.00%, Macerich (MAC) 0.03%, Kimco Realty (KIM) 0.05%. AH Realty Trust (AHRT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kimco Realty (KIM) has been the steadiest (AH Realty Trust (AHRT) 28.7%, Macerich (MAC) 29.6%, Kimco Realty (KIM) 18.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AHRT, MAC and KIM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kimco Realty (KIM) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.