AFRM vs HTT vs WF Stock Comparison

Affirm Holdings, High Templar Tech and Woori Financial Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BFH) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
AFRM Affirm Holdings, Inc.
$69.49 -2.8% 1M -7.8% 1Y
Market cap
$24.36B
P/E
12.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.26B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
4 wins
HTT High Templar Tech Ltd
$1.90 -20.8% 1M -57.2% 1Y
Market cap
$820.37M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
WF Woori Financial Group Inc.
$65.81 -15.5% 1M +21.8% 1Y
Market cap
$15.93B
P/E
7.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.77B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
7 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Woori Financial leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Woori Financial 7, Affirm Holdings 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAFRMHTTWFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $24.36B $820.37M $15.93B AFRM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.6x — 7.0x WF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 37.2x — 6.8x WF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +32.2% — -82.4% AFRM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 45.3% — 128.3% WF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.6% — 2.5% AFRM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.3x — -1.3x WF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -7.8% -57.2% +21.8% WF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -14.4%/yr +1.8%/yr +14.2%/yr WF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 59.7% 56.9% 36.2% WF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 — 54/100 AFRM

Percentile Scorecard

AFRMHTTWF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAFRMHTTWF
Valuation 34 #113 of 170 – 86 #51 of 362
Growth 99 #3 of 160 – 13 #193 of 221
Profitability 65 #53 of 149 – 75 #50 of 200
Financial Health 61 #63 of 158 93 #12 of 158 6 #191 of 203
Shareholder Returns 13 #118 of 135 – 90 #34 of 342
Overall 54 – 54
  • AFRM ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • HTT ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • WF ranked among 370 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAFRMHTTWFSPY
1 month -2.8%-20.8%-15.5% -0.8%
3 months -4.9%-21.5%-2.6% +3.5%
6 months +6.7%-21.8%-2.5% +7.0%
Year to date -6.6%-46.5%+11.9% +12.2%
1 year -7.8%-57.2%+21.8% +13.0%
3 years +310.5%+5.6%+151.1% +86.3%
3 years, per year +60.2%+1.8%+35.9% +23.1%
5 years -54.0%+9.2%+94.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year -14.4%+1.8%+14.2% +11.0%
10 years ——+99.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year ——+7.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureAFRMHTTWFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 59.7%56.9%36.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 58.3%59.8%35.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.601.151.21 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.13-1.010.60 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -94.7%-64.4%-43.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.0%-61.6%-22.1% -1.8%
52-week high $85.78$4.95$84.47 $779.14
52-week low $42.53$1.90$53.04 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAFRMHTTWF
P/E now vs peer median 12.1xmedian 11.0x —median 11.0x 7.1xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 5.5xmedian 2.6x —median 2.6x 9.1xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 33.6xmedian 13.1x —median 13.1x 3.3xmedian 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 23.6xmedian 6.9x —median 6.9x 2.7xmedian 11.0x
P/B now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 0.7x 0.5xmedian 0.7x 0.6xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.22median 0.32 —median 0.32 60.64median 1.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAFRMHTTWF
Revenue $4.26B – $1.77B
Operating income $416.98M – $2.69B
Net income $1.93B – $2.07B
Free cash flow $992.63M – $5.99B
EPS (diluted) $5.53 – $8.16
Cash & equivalents $1.63B $561.74M $24.81B
Total debt $10.58B $879.65M $276.55B
Shares (diluted) 348.85M 500.73M 278.06M
Enterprise value $18.05B -$2.21B -$298.57B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAFRMHTTWF
P/E 12.1x – 7.1x
P/FCF 23.6x – 2.7x
P/Operating cash flow 19.0x – 2.6x
P/S 5.5x – 9.1x
P/B 4.3x 0.5x 0.6x
P/Tangible book 4.3x 0.5x 0.6x
EV/EBITDA 33.6x – 3.3x
EV/EBIT 60.3x – 4.3x
EV/Revenue 5.9x – 6.6x
EV/FCF 25.3x – 1.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 20.4x – 1.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.22 – 60.64

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAFRMHTTWF
Revenue growth (1Y) 32.2% – -82.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 39.0% – -43.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 577.8% – -3.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 32.9% – -5.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 3,598% – -13.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 58.2% – -8.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 3,515% – 8.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 54.1% – 0.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 55.1% – 188.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 365.8% – -23.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 65.0% – 185.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 123.3% – -24.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAFRMHTTWF
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 17.6% – 201.2%
Operating margin 9.8% – 152.3%
Pretax margin 11.6% – 168.4%
Net margin 45.3% – 128.3%
FCF margin 23.3% – 338.7%
Operating cash flow margin 28.9% – 351.5%
Return on equity 41.6% – 9.3%
Return on assets 13.3% – 0.6%
Return on invested capital 5.6% – 2.5%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.3x – 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.6x – 3.0x
Stock comp / revenue 7.2% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAFRMHTTWF
Debt / assets 21.1% 16.0% 18.1%
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.2x 2.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.3x – -1.3x
Debt / FCF 3.4x – 12.4x
Liabilities / assets 65.3% 21.2% 93.6%
Equity / assets 34.7% 78.8% 6.4%
Interest coverage 0.9x – 0.3x
Current ratio – 4.8x –
Quick ratio – 2.4x –
Cash ratio – 2.4x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAFRMHTTWF
Dividend yield – – 4.4%
Net buyback yield -0.7% – –
Shareholder yield -0.7% – 4.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAFRMHTTWF
Forward P/E 37.2xFY2027 – 6.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.87FY2027 $-0.04FY2024 $9.72FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -66.2%FY2027 -233.3%FY2024 +13.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +44.4% – +0.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.23BFY2027 $47.00MFY2024 $8.16BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +22.7%FY2027 +164.2%FY2024 +10.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +24.0% – +4.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAFRMHTTWF
Held by institutions 77.1% 2.2% 4.5%
Institutions holding 658 42 200
Change in shares held, QoQ +8.1% -26.1% +29.0%
Institutions buying 401 14 146
Institutions selling 173 21 28
Buyers to sellers 2.32 0.67 5.21

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AFRMHTTWF
AFRM 1.00 0.26 0.19
HTT 0.26 1.00 0.15
WF 0.19 0.15 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AFRM, HTT and WF?

Affirm Holdings (AFRM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Affirm Holdings (AFRM) $24.36B, High Templar Tech (HTT) $820.37M, Woori Financial (WF) $15.93B.

Which stock is cheaper, AFRM, HTT and WF?

Woori Financial (WF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 12.6x, Woori Financial (WF) 7.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Woori Financial (WF) is cheapest (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 37.2x, Woori Financial (WF) 6.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Affirm Holdings (AFRM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Affirm Holdings (AFRM) +32.2%, Woori Financial (WF) -82.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Woori Financial (WF) has the highest net margin (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 45.3%, Woori Financial (WF) 128.3%). On return on invested capital, Affirm Holdings (AFRM) leads (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 5.6%, Woori Financial (WF) 2.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Woori Financial (WF) returned the most: Affirm Holdings (AFRM) -7.8%, High Templar Tech (HTT) -57.2%, Woori Financial (WF) +21.8%. Over five years, Woori Financial (WF) compounded fastest (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) -14.4%/yr, High Templar Tech (HTT) +1.8%/yr, Woori Financial (WF) +14.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Woori Financial (WF) has been the steadiest (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 59.7%, High Templar Tech (HTT) 56.9%, Woori Financial (WF) 36.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AFRM, HTT and WF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Woori Financial (WF) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.