AFRM vs FCFS vs SMFG Stock Comparison

Affirm Holdings, FirstCash Holdings and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Prices as of Nov 6, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SLM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
AFRM Affirm Holdings, Inc.
$68.11 -9.6% 1M +3.3% 1Y
Market cap
$23.27B
P/E
11.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.59B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
4 wins
FCFS FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
$185.67 -11.4% 1M +14.7% 1Y
Market cap
$7.99B
P/E
19.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.29B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Sumitomo Mitsui Financial 5, Affirm Holdings 4, FirstCash Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAFRMFCFSSMFGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $23.27B $7.99B $89.74B SMFG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.6x 19.7x -2.0x AFRM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 37.3x 16.4x 11.7x SMFG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +32.7% +22.9% +7.2% AFRM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 43.9% 9.5% -42.9% AFRM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.2% 8.7% -0.9% FCFS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.9x 3.3x — AFRM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +3.3% +14.7% +42.5% SMFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -16.2%/yr +16.5%/yr +28.3%/yr SMFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 59.6% 36.9% 29.8% SMFG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 58/100 19/100 FCFS

Percentile Scorecard

AFRMFCFSSMFG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAFRMFCFSSMFG
Valuation 32 #115 of 168 44 #94 of 168 47 #193 of 360
Growth 97 #6 of 163 75 #42 of 163 24 #262 of 344
Profitability 64 #56 of 154 75 #39 of 154 14 #298 of 345
Financial Health 66 #56 of 161 67 #54 of 161 3 #329 of 339
Shareholder Returns 13 #118 of 136 27 #99 of 136 8 #323 of 352
Overall 54 58 19
  • AFRM ranked among 173 companies in Lending and Credit
  • FCFS ranked among 173 companies in Lending and Credit
  • SMFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAFRMFCFSSMFGSPY
1 month -9.6%-11.4%-8.2% -5.4%
3 months -9.5%-8.3%-9.5% -4.9%
6 months +6.4%-18.5%+8.8% -0.3%
Year to date -8.5%+16.5%+20.6% +7.8%
1 year +3.3%+14.7%+42.5% +9.7%
3 years +208.3%+70.6%+140.2% +68.3%
3 years, per year +45.6%+19.5%+33.9% +19.0%
5 years -58.5%+114.8%+247.0% +57.0%
5 years, per year -16.2%+16.5%+28.3% +9.4%
10 years —+308.5%+247.0% +252.6%
10 years, per year —+15.1%+13.3% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureAFRMFCFSSMFGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 59.6%36.9%29.8% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 58.1%40.9%28.7% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.450.751.13 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.050.401.43 0.72
Max drawdown, 5Y -94.5%-30.3%-30.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -20.6%-21.5%-15.4% -5.6%
52-week high $85.78$236.43$27.55 $779.14
52-week low $42.53$148.05$16.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAFRMFCFSSMFG
P/E now vs peer median 11.8xmedian 11.9x 19.9xmedian 11.9x -2.0xmedian 12.3x
P/S now vs peer median 5.1xmedian 2.7x 1.9xmedian 2.7x 0.9xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 27.3xmedian 12.1x 15.0xmedian 12.1x —median 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 28.9xmedian 5.4x 15.5xmedian 5.4x —median 10.6x
P/B now vs peer median 4.1xmedian 0.7x 3.5xmedian 0.7x 1.2xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.20median 0.34 0.87median 0.34 0.08median 1.29

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAFRMFCFSSMFG
Revenue $4.59B $4.29B $102.83B
Gross profit – $2.15B $67.73B
Operating income $540.37M $553.59M -$30.78B
Net income $2.01B $406.49M $11.49B
Free cash flow $816.99M $518.18M –
EPS (diluted) $5.72 $9.38 $-11.47
Cash & equivalents $2.07B $203.16M –
Total debt $2.90B $2.45B $102.00B
Shares (diluted) 351.78M 43.34M 3.84B
Enterprise value $16.32B $7.36B -$1.27T

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAFRMFCFSSMFG
P/E 11.8x 19.9x -2.0x
P/FCF 28.9x 15.5x –
P/Operating cash flow 22.2x 11.8x –
P/S 5.1x 1.9x 0.9x
P/B 4.1x 3.5x 1.2x
P/Tangible book 4.1x 3.9x 1.2x
EV/EBITDA 27.3x 15.0x –
EV/EBIT 45.2x 18.6x -35.0x
EV/Revenue 5.3x 2.4x 0.8x
EV/FCF 29.9x 19.9x –
EV/Operating cash flow 23.0x 15.2x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.20 0.87 0.08

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAFRMFCFSSMFG
Revenue growth (1Y) 32.7% 22.9% 7.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 38.6% 12.0% 14.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 23.3% 12.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 14.4% 5.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 395.7% 33.6% -32.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 35.4% 22.3% -75.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 763.7% 31.2% 823.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 61.6% 20.9% 4.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 755.1% 34.7% 15.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 57.7% 22.8% -25.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 9.5% 17.6% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 160.9% 13.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 6.2% 14.7% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 143.6% 8.8% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAFRMFCFSSMFG
Gross margin – 50.2% 65.9%
EBITDA margin 19.5% 16.0% –
Operating margin 11.8% 12.9% -29.9%
Pretax margin 13.4% 12.9% 14.7%
Net margin 43.9% 9.5% -42.9%
FCF margin 17.8% 12.1% –
Operating cash flow margin 23.2% 15.8% –
Return on equity 35.8% 17.7% 13.3%
Return on assets 12.5% 7.4% 0.6%
Return on invested capital 6.2% 8.7% -0.9%
Return on capital employed – 10.9% –
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.8x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.5x 1.7x –
Stock comp / revenue 6.0% 0.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAFRMFCFSSMFG
Debt / assets 17.6% 44.0% 5.0%
Debt / equity 0.5x 1.1x 1.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.9x 3.3x –
Debt / FCF 3.6x 4.7x –
Liabilities / assets 65.1% 59.1% 96.4%
Equity / assets 34.9% 40.9% 3.6%
Interest coverage 1.1x 3.9x -0.1x
Current ratio – 4.8x –
Quick ratio – 0.5x –
Cash ratio – 0.5x –
Altman Z-score – 3.40 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAFRMFCFSSMFG
Dividend yield – 0.9% 1.2%
Net buyback yield -0.3% 3.4% –
Shareholder yield -0.3% 4.3% 1.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAFRMFCFSSMFG
Forward P/E 37.3xFY2027 16.4xFY2026 11.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.87FY2027 $11.43FY2026 $2.00FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -66.2%FY2027 +30.5%FY2026 +28.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +44.9% +8.7% +2.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.23BFY2027 $4.25BFY2026 $34.01BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +22.7%FY2027 +16.2%FY2026 -50.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +24.2% +2.9% +14.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAFRMFCFSSMFG
Held by institutions 77.1% 97.2% 3.5%
Institutions holding 660 502 461
Change in shares held, QoQ +8.1% +2.9% +7.9%
Institutions buying 403 255 291
Institutions selling 173 166 93
Buyers to sellers 2.33 1.54 3.13

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AFRMFCFSSMFG
AFRM 1.00 0.13 0.16
FCFS 0.13 1.00 0.19
SMFG 0.16 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AFRM, FCFS and SMFG?

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Affirm Holdings (AFRM) $23.27B, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) $7.99B, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) $89.74B.

Which stock is cheaper, AFRM, FCFS and SMFG?

Affirm Holdings (AFRM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 11.6x, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 19.7x, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) -2.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) is cheapest (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 37.3x, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 16.4x, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) 11.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Affirm Holdings (AFRM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Affirm Holdings (AFRM) +32.7%, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) +22.9%, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) +7.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Affirm Holdings (AFRM) has the highest net margin (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 43.9%, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 9.5%, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) -42.9%). On return on invested capital, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) leads (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 6.2%, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 8.7%, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) -0.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) returned the most: Affirm Holdings (AFRM) +3.3%, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) +14.7%, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) +42.5%. Over five years, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) compounded fastest (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) -16.2%/yr, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) +16.5%/yr, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) +28.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) has been the steadiest (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 59.6%, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 36.9%, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) 29.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AFRM, FCFS and SMFG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.