AFRM vs ATMP vs HTT Stock Comparison

Affirm Holdings, Barclays Bank and High Templar Tech Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SYF) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
AFRM Affirm Holdings, Inc.
$69.49 -2.8% 1M -7.8% 1Y
Market cap
$24.36B
P/E
12.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.26B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
1 win
ATMP Barclays Bank Plc
$36.13 +3.5% 1M +30.3% 1Y
Market cap
$10.26B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
3 wins
HTT High Templar Tech Ltd
$1.90 -20.8% 1M -57.2% 1Y
Market cap
$820.37M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Barclays Bank leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Barclays Bank 3, Affirm Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAFRMATMPHTTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $24.36B $10.26B $820.37M AFRM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.6x — — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 37.2x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +32.2% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 45.3% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.6% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.3x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -7.8% +30.3% -57.2% ATMP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -14.4%/yr +16.4%/yr +1.8%/yr ATMP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 59.7% 16.1% 56.9% ATMP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

AFRMATMPHTT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAFRMATMPHTT
Valuation 34 #113 of 170 – –
Growth 99 #3 of 160 – –
Profitability 65 #53 of 149 – –
Financial Health 61 #63 of 158 51 #101 of 203 93 #12 of 158
Shareholder Returns 13 #118 of 135 91 #32 of 342 –
Overall 54 – –
  • AFRM ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • ATMP ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • HTT ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAFRMATMPHTTSPY
1 month -2.8%+3.5%-20.8% -0.8%
3 months -4.9%+0.8%-21.5% +3.5%
6 months +6.7%+7.7%-21.8% +7.0%
Year to date -6.6%+25.6%-46.5% +12.2%
1 year -7.8%+30.3%-57.2% +13.0%
3 years +310.5%+74.5%+5.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year +60.2%+20.4%+1.8% +23.1%
5 years -54.0%+113.1%+9.2% +68.6%
5 years, per year -14.4%+16.4%+1.8% +11.0%
10 years —+58.5%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —+4.7%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureAFRMATMPHTTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 59.7%16.1%56.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 58.3%16.6%59.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.60-0.191.15 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.131.88-1.01 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -94.7%-23.0%-64.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.0%-3.1%-61.6% -1.8%
52-week high $85.78$37.29$4.95 $779.14
52-week low $42.53$27.56$1.90 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAFRMATMPHTT
P/E now vs peer median 12.1xmedian 11.0x —median 12.1x —median 11.0x
P/S now vs peer median 5.5xmedian 2.6x —median 3.4x —median 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 33.6xmedian 13.1x —median 5.0x —median 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 23.6xmedian 6.9x —median 11.0x —median 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 0.7x 0.2xmedian 1.2x 0.5xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.22median 0.32 —median 1.36 —median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAFRMATMPHTT
Revenue $4.26B – –
Operating income $416.98M – –
Net income $1.93B – –
Free cash flow $992.63M – –
EPS (diluted) $5.53 – –
Cash & equivalents $1.63B $303.23B $561.74M
Total debt $10.58B $116.64M $879.65M
Shares (diluted) 348.85M 337.58M 500.73M
Enterprise value $18.05B -$1.32T -$2.21B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAFRMATMPHTT
P/E 12.1x – –
P/FCF 23.6x – –
P/Operating cash flow 19.0x – –
P/S 5.5x – –
P/B 4.3x 0.2x 0.5x
P/Tangible book 4.3x 0.2x 0.5x
EV/EBITDA 33.6x – –
EV/EBIT 60.3x – –
EV/Revenue 5.9x – –
EV/FCF 25.3x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 20.4x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.22 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAFRMATMPHTT
Revenue growth (1Y) 32.2% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 39.0% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 577.8% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 32.9% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 3,598% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 58.2% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 3,515% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 54.1% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 55.1% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 365.8% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 65.0% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 123.3% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAFRMATMPHTT
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 17.6% – –
Operating margin 9.8% – –
Pretax margin 11.6% – –
Net margin 45.3% – –
FCF margin 23.3% – –
Operating cash flow margin 28.9% – –
Return on equity 41.6% – –
Return on assets 13.3% – –
Return on invested capital 5.6% – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.3x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.6x – –
Stock comp / revenue 7.2% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAFRMATMPHTT
Debt / assets 21.1% 0.0% 16.0%
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.0x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.3x – –
Debt / FCF 3.4x – –
Liabilities / assets 65.3% 95.5% 21.2%
Equity / assets 34.7% 4.5% 78.8%
Interest coverage 0.9x – –
Current ratio – – 4.8x
Quick ratio – – 2.4x
Cash ratio – – 2.4x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAFRMATMPHTT
Dividend yield – 4.4% –
Net buyback yield -0.7% – –
Shareholder yield -0.7% 4.4% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAFRMATMPHTT
Forward P/E 37.2xFY2027 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.87FY2027 – $-0.04FY2024
EPS growth, next FY -66.2%FY2027 – -233.3%FY2024
EPS growth, the year after +44.4% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.23BFY2027 – $47.00MFY2024
Revenue growth, next FY +22.7%FY2027 – +164.2%FY2024
Revenue growth, the year after +24.0% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAFRMATMPHTT
Held by institutions 77.1% – 2.2%
Institutions holding 658 – 42
Change in shares held, QoQ +8.1% – -26.1%
Institutions buying 401 – 14
Institutions selling 173 – 21
Buyers to sellers 2.32 – 0.67

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AFRMATMPHTT
AFRM 1.00 -0.17 0.26
ATMP -0.17 1.00 -0.14
HTT 0.26 -0.14 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AFRM, ATMP and HTT?

Affirm Holdings (AFRM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Affirm Holdings (AFRM) $24.36B, Barclays Bank (ATMP) $10.26B, High Templar Tech (HTT) $820.37M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Barclays Bank (ATMP) returned the most: Affirm Holdings (AFRM) -7.8%, Barclays Bank (ATMP) +30.3%, High Templar Tech (HTT) -57.2%. Over five years, Barclays Bank (ATMP) compounded fastest (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) -14.4%/yr, Barclays Bank (ATMP) +16.4%/yr, High Templar Tech (HTT) +1.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Barclays Bank (ATMP) has been the steadiest (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 59.7%, Barclays Bank (ATMP) 16.1%, High Templar Tech (HTT) 56.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AFRM, ATMP and HTT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Barclays Bank (ATMP) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.