AESI vs MTX vs LOGC Stock Comparison

Atlas Energy Solutions, Minerals Technologies and ContextLogic Holdings Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (EAF) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MTX Minerals Technologies Inc
$62.97 -5.7% 1M +2.4% 1Y
Market cap
$1.94B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.15B
Div. yield
0.01%
Industrial Minerals Basic Materials
5 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Minerals Technologies leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Minerals Technologies 5, ContextLogic Holdings 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAESIMTXLOGCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.12B $1.94B $697.03M MTX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -9.5x -28.9x -303.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 10.3x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -8.1% +4.1% +20.3% LOGC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -11.1% -3.1% -2.9% LOGC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -3.4% -0.9% — MTX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 9.9x 9.4x 6.0x LOGC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -18.3% +2.4% +95.9% LOGC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -2.3%/yr -37.3%/yr MTX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 67.1% 25.9% 27.4% MTX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 27/100 49/100 29/100 MTX

Percentile Scorecard

AESIMTXLOGC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAESIMTXLOGC
Valuation 58 #69 of 162 80 #34 of 162 44 #92 of 162
Growth 6 #138 of 147 27 #107 of 147 10 #133 of 147
Profitability 31 #84 of 122 40 #74 of 122 38 #76 of 122
Financial Health 14 #143 of 166 16 #140 of 166 28 #120 of 166
Shareholder Returns – 82 #20 of 107 28 #77 of 107
Overall 27 49 29
  • AESI ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • MTX ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • LOGC ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAESIMTXLOGCSPY
1 month -24.8%-5.7%+1.6% -1.0%
3 months -27.6%-15.5%+62.4% +2.9%
6 months -47.0%-12.4%+74.5% +6.4%
Year to date -8.2%+3.3%+100.3% +11.4%
1 year -18.3%+2.4%+95.9% +13.1%
3 years -56.8%+22.7%+282.4% +79.4%
3 years, per year -24.4%+7.1%+56.4% +21.5%
5 years —-11.0%-90.3% +67.7%
5 years, per year —-2.3%-37.3% +10.9%
10 years —-6.9%— +255.2%
10 years, per year —-0.7%— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureAESIMTXLOGCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 67.1%25.9%27.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 74.1%25.5%25.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.850.580.32 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.270.093.50 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.6%-42.7%-97.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -56.2%-24.0%-0.2% -2.5%
52-week high $19.75$82.84$15.21 $779.14
52-week low $8.10$55.09$7.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAESIMTXLOGC
P/E now vs peer median -9.1xmedian 12.7x -29.1xmedian 12.7x -301.9xmedian 12.7x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 3.1x 0.9xmedian 3.1x 8.7xmedian 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 21.0xmedian 6.9x 39.3xmedian 6.9x 27.0xmedian 6.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -5.9xmedian 15.1x 16.3xmedian 15.1x -15.9xmedian 15.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 2.1x 1.2xmedian 2.1x 0.9xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.28median 0.27 0.73median 0.27 —median 0.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAESIMTXLOGC
Revenue $1.07B $2.15B $79.50M
Gross profit $76.19M $526.40M $41.90M
Operating income -$88.46M -$28.70M -$9.90M
Net income -$118.33M -$62.60M -$300.00K
Free cash flow -$184.12M $120.30M -$43.60M
R&D – $23.40M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.95 $-2.16 $-0.05
Cash & equivalents – $342.20M $11.00M
Total debt $966.72M $3.87B –
Shares (diluted) 124.94M 31.10M 45.74M
Enterprise value $1.12B $612.55M $304.23M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAESIMTXLOGC
P/E -9.1x -29.1x -301.9x
P/FCF -5.9x 16.3x -15.9x
P/Operating cash flow 19.8x 8.5x -17.5x
P/S 1.0x 0.9x 8.7x
P/B 1.0x 1.2x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 1.1x 1.4x 1.9x
EV/EBITDA 21.0x 39.3x 27.0x
EV/EBIT -23.2x -89.6x -90.4x
EV/Revenue 1.9x 1.2x 11.3x
EV/FCF -11.1x 21.4x -20.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 37.5x 11.2x -22.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.28 0.73 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAESIMTXLOGC
Revenue growth (1Y) -8.1% 4.1% 20.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 20.7% 0.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -63.6% 0.4% 63.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -38.0% 4.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -229.1% -138.2% -186.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -32.2% -29.1% –
Net income growth (1Y) -946.3% -1,198% -106.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -34.8% -37.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) -937.6% -3,351% -129.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -32.5% -39.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -77.0% 21.9% -590.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 14.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -915.6% 35.6% -1,218%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 23.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAESIMTXLOGC
Gross margin 7.1% 24.5% 52.7%
EBITDA margin 9.2% 3.0% 41.8%
Operating margin -8.3% -1.3% -12.5%
Pretax margin -14.8% -3.8% -19.6%
Net margin -11.1% -3.1% -2.9%
FCF margin -17.2% 5.6% -54.8%
Operating cash flow margin 5.1% 10.7% -49.9%
Return on equity -10.4% -3.8% -2.1%
Return on assets -4.9% -1.8% -1.6%
Return on invested capital -3.4% -0.9% –
Return on capital employed -4.1% -1.1% -1.0%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.6x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.5x -3.7x 132.3x
Stock comp / revenue 3.3% – 14.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAESIMTXLOGC
Debt / assets 37.8% 27.4% 21.8%
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.6x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 9.9x 9.4x 6.0x
Debt / FCF -5.3x 8.0x -4.9x
Liabilities / assets 56.4% 54.9% 24.0%
Equity / assets 43.6% 45.1% 76.0%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.8x 1.4x 1.9x
Quick ratio – 0.9x 1.2x
Cash ratio – 0.4x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 0.79 2.25 -2.97

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAESIMTXLOGC
Dividend yield – 0.8% –
Net buyback yield – 1.2% -3.7%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 1.9% -3.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – -23.5% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 12.2% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 7.3% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 31.3% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAESIMTXLOGC
Forward P/E – 10.3xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.91FY2026 $6.14FY2026 $-0.17FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +11.2%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +9.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.05BFY2026 $2.33BFY2026 $0.00FY2025
Revenue growth, next FY -4.3%FY2026 +12.3%FY2026 -100.0%FY2025
Revenue growth, the year after +31.7% +3.8% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAESIMTXLOGC
Held by institutions 84.6% 100.0% –
Institutions holding 286 292 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +17.8% +2.6% –
Institutions buying 170 176 –
Institutions selling 72 69 –
Buyers to sellers 2.36 2.55 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AESIMTXLOGC
AESI 1.00 0.08 0.11
MTX 0.08 1.00 0.07
LOGC 0.11 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AESI, MTX and LOGC?

Minerals Technologies (MTX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Atlas Energy Solutions (AESI) $1.12B, Minerals Technologies (MTX) $1.94B, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) $697.03M.

Which company is growing faster?

ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Atlas Energy Solutions (AESI) -8.1%, Minerals Technologies (MTX) +4.1%, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) +20.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) has the highest net margin (Atlas Energy Solutions (AESI) -11.1%, Minerals Technologies (MTX) -3.1%, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) -2.9%). On return on invested capital, Minerals Technologies (MTX) leads (Atlas Energy Solutions (AESI) -3.4%, Minerals Technologies (MTX) -0.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) returned the most: Atlas Energy Solutions (AESI) -18.3%, Minerals Technologies (MTX) +2.4%, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) +95.9%. Over five years, Minerals Technologies (MTX) compounded fastest (Minerals Technologies (MTX) -2.3%/yr, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) -37.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Atlas Energy Solutions (AESI) 0.00%, Minerals Technologies (MTX) 0.01%, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) 0.00%. Atlas Energy Solutions (AESI) and ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Minerals Technologies (MTX) has been the steadiest (Atlas Energy Solutions (AESI) 67.1%, Minerals Technologies (MTX) 25.9%, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) 27.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AESI, MTX and LOGC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Minerals Technologies (MTX) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.