AESI vs GMTL vs SQM Stock Comparison

Atlas Energy Solutions, Guardian Metal Resources and Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (EAF) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile 8). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAESIGMTLSQMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.17B $275.68M $16.83B SQM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -9.9x -29.9x 12.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 8.5x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -8.1% — +59.0% SQM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -11.1% — 20.6% SQM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -3.4% — 22.8% SQM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 9.9x — 0.2x SQM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -15.5% — +36.0% SQM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — +2.3%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 67.2% 90.8% 47.3% SQM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 27/100 — 69/100 SQM

Percentile Scorecard

AESIGMTLSQM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAESIGMTLSQM
Valuation 58 #69 of 162 31 #112 of 162 81 #32 of 162
Growth 6 #138 of 147 – 62 #56 of 147
Profitability 31 #84 of 122 – 81 #24 of 122
Financial Health 14 #141 of 164 95 #9 of 164 32 #112 of 164
Shareholder Returns – – 90 #12 of 107
Overall 27 – 69
  • AESI ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • GMTL ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • SQM ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAESIGMTLSQMSPY
1 month -27.2%-49.1%-9.7% -0.2%
3 months -17.5%-47.7%-9.8% +3.9%
6 months -47.0%-72.5%-32.5% +8.2%
Year to date -3.7%—-12.3% +12.9%
1 year -15.5%—+36.0% +12.3%
3 years -52.1%—+18.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year -21.8%—+5.7% +23.3%
5 years ——+11.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year ——+2.3% +10.9%
10 years ——+104.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year ——+7.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureAESIGMTLSQMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 67.2%90.8%47.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 74.5%91.2%43.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.862.280.98 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.23—0.76 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.6%-76.4%-73.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -54.1%-74.9%-36.7% -1.2%
52-week high $19.75$20.64$95.31 $779.14
52-week low $8.10$4.88$44.36 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAESIGMTLSQM
P/E now vs peer median -9.6xmedian 13.3x -29.9xmedian 13.3x 12.4xmedian 13.3x
P/S now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 3.2x —median 3.2x 2.6xmedian 3.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 21.5xmedian 7.3x —median 7.3x 5.1xmedian 7.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -6.2xmedian 14.7x -49.8xmedian 14.7x —median 14.7x
P/B now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 2.2x 3.2xmedian 2.2x 2.0xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.30median 0.31 —median 0.31 -0.79median 0.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAESIGMTLSQM
Revenue $1.07B – $6.73B
Gross profit $76.19M – $2.83B
Operating income -$88.46M – $3.11B
Net income -$118.33M – $1.39B
Free cash flow -$184.12M – –
EPS (diluted) $-0.95 – $4.86
Cash & equivalents – $52.46M $3.38B
Total debt $966.72M – $19.72B
Shares (diluted) 124.94M 57.79M 285.64M
Enterprise value $1.17B $275.68M $3.48B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAESIGMTLSQM
P/E -9.6x -29.9x 12.4x
P/FCF -6.2x -49.8x –
P/Operating cash flow 20.8x – –
P/S 1.1x – 2.6x
P/B 1.0x 3.2x 2.0x
P/Tangible book 1.2x 5.7x 2.0x
EV/EBITDA 21.5x – 5.1x
EV/EBIT -23.7x – 5.8x
EV/Revenue 2.0x – 2.7x
EV/FCF -11.4x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 38.5x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.30 – -0.79

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAESIGMTLSQM
Revenue growth (1Y) -8.1% – 59.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 20.7% – -4.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -63.6% – 150.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -38.0% – -9.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -229.1% – 134.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -32.2% – -17.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -946.3% – 190.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -34.8% – -7.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -937.6% – 190.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -32.5% – -15.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -77.0% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -915.6% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAESIGMTLSQM
Gross margin 7.1% – 42.1%
EBITDA margin 9.2% – 52.7%
Operating margin -8.3% – 46.2%
Pretax margin -14.8% – 36.6%
Net margin -11.1% – 20.6%
FCF margin -17.2% – –
Operating cash flow margin 5.1% – –
Return on equity -10.4% – 16.4%
Return on assets -4.9% – 8.6%
Return on invested capital -3.4% – 22.8%
Return on capital employed -4.1% – 23.4%
Asset turnover 0.4x – 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.5x – –
Stock comp / revenue 3.3% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAESIGMTLSQM
Debt / assets 37.8% – 31.3%
Debt / equity 0.9x – 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 9.9x – 0.2x
Debt / FCF -5.3x – –
Liabilities / assets 56.4% 3.7% 47.9%
Equity / assets 43.6% 96.3% 52.1%
Interest coverage – – 15.3x
Current ratio 1.8x 15.3x 2.6x
Quick ratio – 14.8x 1.8x
Cash ratio – 14.4x 1.5x
Altman Z-score 0.81 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAESIGMTLSQM
Dividend yield – – 4.0%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% – 4.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAESIGMTLSQM
Forward P/E – – 8.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.92FY2026 $-0.25FY2027 $7.12FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +245.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – -2.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.05BFY2026 $0.00FY2027 $8.37BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -4.3%FY2026 – +82.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +31.7% – +2.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAESIGMTLSQM
Held by institutions 84.6% 10.6% 13.4%
Institutions holding 286 47 316
Change in shares held, QoQ +17.8% +16.7% -3.0%
Institutions buying 170 36 166
Institutions selling 72 10 100
Buyers to sellers 2.36 3.60 1.66

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AESIGMTLSQM
AESI 1.00 0.16 0.06
GMTL 0.16 1.00 0.21
SQM 0.06 0.21 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AESI, GMTL and SQM?

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Atlas Energy Solutions (AESI) $1.17B, Guardian Metal Resources (GMTL) $275.68M, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) $16.83B.

Which company is growing faster?

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Atlas Energy Solutions (AESI) -8.1%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) +59.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) has the highest net margin (Atlas Energy Solutions (AESI) -11.1%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 20.6%). On return on invested capital, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) leads (Atlas Energy Solutions (AESI) -3.4%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 22.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) returned the most: Atlas Energy Solutions (AESI) -15.5%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) +36.0%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) has been the steadiest (Atlas Energy Solutions (AESI) 67.2%, Guardian Metal Resources (GMTL) 90.8%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 47.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AESI, GMTL and SQM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.