AEC vs CCJ vs NNE Stock Comparison

Anfield Energy, Cameco and Nano Nuclear Energy Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AEC Anfield Energy Inc.
$2.78 -23.6% 1M -63.7% 1Y
Market cap
$45.87M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.19M
Div. yield
–
Uranium Energy
1 win
CCJ Cameco Corp
$79.07 -10.2% 1M -10.3% 1Y
Market cap
$35.90B
P/E
47.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.73B
Div. yield
–
Uranium Energy
6 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Cameco leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Cameco 6, Anfield Energy 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAECCCJNNELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $45.87M $35.90B $638.10M CCJ
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -2.2x 47.7x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 72.5x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +16.0% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1,743.6% 27.6% — CCJ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.5x -0.1x — AEC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -63.7% -10.3% -73.3% CCJ
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -21.0%/yr +25.5%/yr — CCJ
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 80.6% 54.5% 89.4% CCJ
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 5/100 81/100 — CCJ

Percentile Scorecard

AECCCJNNE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAECCCJNNE
Valuation 0 #23 of 23 55 #11 of 23 –
Growth 15 #18 of 21 100 #1 of 21 –
Profitability 0 #18 of 18 100 #1 of 18 –
Financial Health 5 #21 of 22 71 #7 of 22 –
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 5 81 –
  • AEC ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium
  • CCJ ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium
  • NNE ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAECCCJNNESPY
1 month -23.6%-10.2%-30.2% -0.8%
3 months -38.4%-11.5%-29.4% +3.5%
6 months -48.5%-35.8%-54.0% +7.0%
Year to date -45.8%-13.6%-50.6% +12.2%
1 year -63.7%-10.3%-73.3% +13.0%
3 years -38.2%+108.5%— +86.3%
3 years, per year -14.8%+27.8%— +23.1%
5 years -69.1%+210.7%— +68.6%
5 years, per year -21.0%+25.5%— +11.0%
10 years -96.3%+895.8%— +258.0%
10 years, per year -28.1%+25.8%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureAECCCJNNESPY
Volatility, 1Y 80.6%54.5%89.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 79.5%50.1%87.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.472.374.10 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.79-0.19-0.82 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -75.0%-41.4%-79.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -70.9%-41.0%-75.2% -1.8%
52-week high $9.56$134.09$47.83 $779.14
52-week low $2.78$78.61$11.86 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAECCCJNNE
P/E now vs peer median -2.1xmedian 26.7x 45.7xmedian 26.7x —median 26.7x
P/S now vs peer median 36.1xmedian 6.7x 12.6xmedian 6.7x 127.9xmedian 6.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2.9xmedian 28.0x 42.8xmedian 28.0x —median 28.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -3.6xmedian 10.1x 44.7xmedian 10.1x —median 10.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 1.2x 6.8xmedian 1.2x —median 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 45.36 —median 45.36 —median 45.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAECCCJNNE
Revenue $1.19M $2.73B –
Operating income -$17.90M $649.76M –
Net income -$20.72M $753.00M –
Free cash flow -$12.00M – –
R&D $8.34M – –
EPS (diluted) $-1.34 $1.73 –
Cash & equivalents $1.27M $814.08M $298.47M
Total debt $35.69M $4.09B –
Shares (diluted) 15.45M 435.58M 52.35M
Enterprise value $30.67M $32.49B -$651.64M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAECCCJNNE
P/E -2.1x 45.7x –
P/FCF -3.6x 44.7x –
P/Operating cash flow -3.4x – –
P/S 36.1x 12.6x 127.9x
P/B 1.2x 6.8x –
P/Tangible book 1.3x 6.9x –
EV/EBITDA -2.9x 42.8x –
EV/EBIT -2.9x 52.9x –
EV/Revenue 43.2x 12.6x –
EV/FCF -4.3x – –
EV/Operating cash flow -4.1x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAECCCJNNE
Revenue growth (1Y) – 16.0% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -112.8% 40.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -111.1% 156.7% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – –
EPS growth (1Y) -85.8% 218.3% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAECCCJNNE
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin -1,497% 29.4% –
Operating margin -1,507% 23.8% –
Pretax margin -1,640% 16.4% –
Net margin -1,744% 27.6% –
FCF margin -1,010% – –
Operating cash flow margin -1,066% – –
Return on equity -56.1% – –
Return on assets -30.7% – –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -27.8% – –
Asset turnover 0.0x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.6x – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAECCCJNNE
Debt / assets 14.4% 11.0% –
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.5x -0.1x –
Debt / FCF -0.8x – –
Liabilities / assets 48.3% 33.0% –
Equity / assets 51.7% 67.0% –
Interest coverage – 21.4x –
Current ratio 0.9x 2.5x –
Quick ratio 0.4x 1.5x –
Cash ratio 0.4x 1.1x –
Altman Z-score -1.83 9.65 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAECCCJNNE
Dividend yield – 0.3% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 0.3% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAECCCJNNE
Forward P/E – 72.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $1.09FY2026 $-0.76FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +3.8%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +75.2% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $2.31BFY2026 $1.84MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -9.1%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +15.9% +313.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAECCCJNNE
Held by institutions 10.6% 63.3% 42.6%
Institutions holding 25 1,027 236
Change in shares held, QoQ -18.7% +4.0% -0.8%
Institutions buying 9 506 128
Institutions selling 7 341 54
Buyers to sellers 1.29 1.48 2.37

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AECCCJNNE
AEC 1.00 0.62 0.51
CCJ 0.62 1.00 0.66
NNE 0.51 0.66 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AEC, CCJ and NNE?

Cameco (CCJ) is the largest by market capitalisation: Anfield Energy (AEC) $45.87M, Cameco (CCJ) $35.90B, Nano Nuclear Energy (NNE) $638.10M.

Which company is more profitable?

Cameco (CCJ) has the highest net margin (Anfield Energy (AEC) -1,743.6%, Cameco (CCJ) 27.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cameco (CCJ) returned the most: Anfield Energy (AEC) -63.7%, Cameco (CCJ) -10.3%, Nano Nuclear Energy (NNE) -73.3%. Over five years, Cameco (CCJ) compounded fastest (Anfield Energy (AEC) -21.0%/yr, Cameco (CCJ) +25.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cameco (CCJ) has been the steadiest (Anfield Energy (AEC) 80.6%, Cameco (CCJ) 54.5%, Nano Nuclear Energy (NNE) 89.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AEC, CCJ and NNE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cameco (CCJ) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.