AAQL vs GRND vs SNAP Stock Comparison

Antiaging Quantum Living, Grindr and Snap Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (META) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GRND Grindr Inc.
$12.98 -16.8% 1M -7.6% 1Y
Market cap
$2.26B
P/E
23.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$509.82M
Div. yield
–
Social Media Technology
6 wins
SNAP Snap Inc
$5.95 +14.0% 1M -23.1% 1Y
Market cap
$9.37B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$6.35B
Div. yield
–
Social Media Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Grindr leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Grindr 6, Snap 2, Antiaging Quantum Living 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAAQLGRNDSNAPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $17.48M $2.26B $9.37B SNAP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -17.1x 23.7x -30.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 22.0x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +62.4% +32.4% +12.6% AAQL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -69.4% 18.7% -4.9% GRND
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 30.4% -5.8% GRND
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.4x 2.4x -5.9x SNAP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -48.5% -7.6% -23.1% GRND
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.5%/yr +5.1%/yr -35.3%/yr GRND
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 120.5% 44.8% 58.3% GRND
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 17/100 68/100 56/100 GRND

Percentile Scorecard

AAQLGRNDSNAP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAAQLGRNDSNAP
Valuation 12 #146 of 166 56 #73 of 166 45 #92 of 166
Growth 36 #97 of 152 97 #5 of 152 87 #21 of 152
Profitability 10 #137 of 152 95 #9 of 152 36 #98 of 152
Financial Health 11 #159 of 179 23 #138 of 179 42 #105 of 179
Shareholder Returns – 69 #30 of 94 73 #26 of 94
Overall 17 68 56
  • AAQL ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • GRND ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • SNAP ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAAQLGRNDSNAPSPY
1 month -12.1%-16.8%+14.0% +0.9%
3 months -16.4%-24.6%+25.5% +5.9%
6 months -17.7%-2.3%-0.5% +8.5%
Year to date -15.0%-4.1%-26.3% +13.3%
1 year -48.5%-7.6%-23.1% +12.4%
3 years -53.6%+121.1%-36.0% +88.1%
3 years, per year -22.6%+30.3%-13.8% +23.5%
5 years +24.4%+28.0%-88.7% +68.2%
5 years, per year +4.5%+5.1%-35.3% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureAAQLGRNDSNAPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 120.5%44.8%58.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 451.4%45.3%58.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.170.372.20 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.40-0.17-0.40 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -76.5%-87.3%-92.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -49.0%-27.7%-34.5% -0.9%
52-week high $1.00$17.95$9.09 $779.14
52-week low $0.51$9.85$3.93 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAAQLGRNDSNAP
P/E now vs peer median -17.1xmedian 16.8x 24.0xmedian 16.8x -31.8xmedian 16.8x
P/S now vs peer median 11.9xmedian 1.4x 4.4xmedian 1.4x 1.6xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -19.6xmedian 13.9x 16.8xmedian 13.9x -75.1xmedian 13.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -28.2xmedian 11.4x 14.6xmedian 11.4x 14.6xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median -17.6xmedian 1.8x -192.2xmedian 1.8x 5.3xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 0.10median 0.36 0.19median 0.36 -0.81median 0.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAAQLGRNDSNAP
Revenue $1.47M $509.82M $6.35B
Gross profit $780.28K $382.05M $3.64B
Operating income -$1.02M $151.78M -$323.82M
Net income -$1.02M $95.59M -$311.24M
Free cash flow -$619.31K $154.02M $705.55M
R&D – $61.94M $1.95B
EPS (diluted) $-0.03 $0.53 $-0.19
Cash & equivalents $608.10K $6.50M $958.85M
Total debt $3.49M $386.32M $3.53B
Shares (diluted) 34.28M 178.96M 1.66B
Enterprise value $14.98M $2.14B -$2.04B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAAQLGRNDSNAP
P/E -17.1x 24.0x -31.8x
P/FCF -28.2x 14.6x 14.6x
P/Operating cash flow -38.2x 14.6x 11.2x
P/S 11.9x 4.4x 1.6x
P/B -17.6x -192.2x 5.3x
P/Tangible book -17.6x -29.1x 5.6x
EV/EBITDA -19.6x 16.8x -75.1x
EV/EBIT -17.5x 17.4x -34.4x
EV/Revenue 12.1x 5.2x 1.8x
EV/FCF -28.8x 17.1x 15.8x
EV/Operating cash flow -39.0x 17.1x 12.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.10 0.19 -0.81

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAAQLGRNDSNAP
Revenue growth (1Y) 62.4% 32.4% 12.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 391.6% 31.9% 12.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 69.1% 33.5% 20.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 297.7% 32.6% 11.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -42.8% 54.1% 50.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -182.5% 74.0% 39.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -59.8% 272.2% 43.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -182.7% 126.6% 38.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -39.9% 292.3% 42.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -170.4% 125.0% 39.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 47.4% 28.8% 56.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -107.1% 60.2% 54.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 30.6% 29.3% 79.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -129.0% 60.4% 105.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAAQLGRNDSNAP
Gross margin 53.0% 74.9% 57.3%
EBITDA margin -61.8% 30.8% -2.3%
Operating margin -69.3% 29.8% -5.1%
Pretax margin -68.7% 24.4% -4.9%
Net margin -69.4% 18.7% -4.9%
FCF margin -42.0% 30.2% 11.1%
Operating cash flow margin -31.1% 30.3% 14.5%
Return on equity – – -15.5%
Return on assets -41.1% 20.5% -4.2%
Return on invested capital – 30.4% -5.8%
Return on capital employed – 39.7% -5.3%
Asset turnover 0.6x 1.1x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x 1.6x -3.0x
Stock comp / revenue – 12.3% 16.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAAQLGRNDSNAP
Debt / assets 30.3% 83.5% 47.3%
Debt / equity -1.0x -32.9x 1.8x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.4x 2.4x -5.9x
Debt / FCF -1.6x 2.5x 5.0x
Liabilities / assets 130.5% 102.5% 74.2%
Equity / assets -30.5% -2.5% 25.8%
Interest coverage – – -2.2x
Current ratio 0.8x 1.1x 2.9x
Quick ratio 0.5x 0.9x 2.7x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.1x 1.9x
Altman Z-score 0.61 4.90 -0.51

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAAQLGRNDSNAP
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 7.0% 8.3%
Shareholder yield – 7.0% 8.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAAQLGRNDSNAP
Forward P/E – 22.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.59FY2026 $-0.05FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +28.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +44.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $561.84MFY2026 $7.07BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +27.7%FY2026 +19.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +18.6% -0.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAAQLGRNDSNAP
Held by institutions – 22.9% 37.8%
Institutions holding – 180 534
Change in shares held, QoQ – +15.7% -2.3%
Institutions buying – 98 254
Institutions selling – 54 177
Buyers to sellers – 1.81 1.44

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AAQLGRNDSNAP
AAQL 1.00 -0.03 0.03
GRND -0.03 1.00 0.31
SNAP 0.03 0.31 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AAQL, GRND and SNAP?

Snap (SNAP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) $17.48M, Grindr (GRND) $2.26B, Snap (SNAP) $9.37B.

Which company is growing faster?

Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) +62.4%, Grindr (GRND) +32.4%, Snap (SNAP) +12.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Grindr (GRND) has the highest net margin (Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) -69.4%, Grindr (GRND) 18.7%, Snap (SNAP) -4.9%). On return on invested capital, Grindr (GRND) leads (Grindr (GRND) 30.4%, Snap (SNAP) -5.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Grindr (GRND) returned the most: Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) -48.5%, Grindr (GRND) -7.6%, Snap (SNAP) -23.1%. Over five years, Grindr (GRND) compounded fastest (Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) +4.5%/yr, Grindr (GRND) +5.1%/yr, Snap (SNAP) -35.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Grindr (GRND) has been the steadiest (Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) 120.5%, Grindr (GRND) 44.8%, Snap (SNAP) 58.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AAQL, GRND and SNAP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Grindr (GRND) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.