AAPL vs META vs LIF Stock Comparison

Apple, Meta Platforms and Life360 Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (GRMN) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
AAPL Apple Inc.
$347.73 +3.2% 1M +34.0% 1Y
Market cap
$5.04T
P/E
39.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$466.82B
Div. yield
–
Smartphones and Wearables Technology
5 wins
META Meta Platforms, Inc.
$642.62 -13.6% 1M -12.4% 1Y
Market cap
$1.60T
P/E
23.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$228.25B
Div. yield
–
Social Media Technology
4 wins
LIF Life360, Inc.
$45.23 +11.0% 1M -50.5% 1Y
Market cap
$3.57B
P/E
24.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$572.56M
Div. yield
–
AI Platforms Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Apple leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Apple 5, Meta Platforms 4, Life360 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAAPLMETALIFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.04T $1.60T $3.57B AAPL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 39.1x 23.5x 24.2x META
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 37.7x 22.2x 34.3x META
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.2% +27.7% +34.0% LIF
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 27.6% 29.8% 25.7% META
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 66.9% 20.9% — AAPL
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.1x -0.1x — META
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +34.0% -12.4% -50.5% AAPL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +18.5%/yr +14.6%/yr — AAPL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 24.2% 42.9% 77.0% AAPL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 59/100 79/100 LIF

Percentile Scorecard

AAPLMETALIF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAAPLMETALIF
Valuation 23 #86 of 112 39 #102 of 167 71 #37 of 124
Growth 65 #39 of 109 69 #48 of 153 100 #1 of 113
Profitability 95 #6 of 105 93 #12 of 153 70 #34 of 110
Financial Health 33 #79 of 117 66 #61 of 179 75 #33 of 129
Shareholder Returns 53 #39 of 82 29 #67 of 94 –
Overall 54 59 79
  • AAPL ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • META ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • LIF ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAAPLMETALIFSPY
1 month +3.2%-13.6%+11.0% -1.0%
3 months +4.4%+8.0%-7.4% +2.9%
6 months +28.3%-4.8%-1.2% +6.4%
Year to date +27.9%-2.6%-29.5% +11.4%
1 year +34.0%-12.4%-50.5% +13.1%
3 years +100.5%+105.6%— +79.4%
3 years, per year +26.1%+27.2%— +21.5%
5 years +133.9%+98.0%— +67.7%
5 years, per year +18.5%+14.6%— +10.9%
10 years +1,092.9%+386.6%— +255.2%
10 years, per year +28.1%+17.1%— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureAAPLMETALIFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 24.2%42.9%77.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.9%43.3%85.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.571.542.37 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.40-0.29-0.66 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.4%-74.4%-65.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -0.1%-17.4%-54.5% -2.5%
52-week high $348.22$777.59$99.32 $779.14
52-week low $246.63$525.72$38.10 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAAPLMETALIF
P/E now vs peer median 39.5xmedian 31.3x 24.0xmedian 17.5x 24.9xmedian 37.4x
P/S now vs peer median 10.9xmedian 2.6x 7.2xmedian 1.4x 6.4xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 30.4xmedian 19.6x 14.9xmedian 14.9x 129.1xmedian 35.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 37.2xmedian 28.3x 40.0xmedian 11.2x 35.6xmedian 27.2x
P/B now vs peer median 47.2xmedian 2.9x 6.3xmedian 1.7x 6.0xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 2.95median 1.15 0.53median 0.42 0.41median 1.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAAPLMETALIF
Revenue $466.82B $228.25B $572.56M
Gross profit $227.12B $186.59B $444.26M
Operating income $154.86B $86.93B $6.51M
Net income $128.93B $68.10B $147.29M
Free cash flow $136.68B $40.98B $103.24M
R&D $42.90B $71.63B $152.42M
EPS (diluted) $8.76 $26.54 $1.72
Cash & equivalents $39.54B $15.46B $267.06M
Total debt $84.34B $83.66B –
Shares (diluted) 14.71B 2.57B 85.59M
Enterprise value $4.79T $1.30T $2.00B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAAPLMETALIF
P/E 39.5x 24.0x 24.9x
P/FCF 37.2x 40.0x 35.6x
P/Operating cash flow 34.6x 12.6x 35.2x
P/S 10.9x 7.2x 6.4x
P/B 47.2x 6.3x 6.0x
P/Tangible book 61.9x 6.3x 6.9x
EV/EBITDA 30.4x 14.9x 129.1x
EV/EBIT 32.9x 18.8x 523.2x
EV/Revenue 10.9x 7.1x 5.9x
EV/FCF 37.3x 39.8x 33.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 34.8x 12.5x 32.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.95 0.53 0.41

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAAPLMETALIF
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.2% 27.7% 34.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.7% 23.7% 28.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 19.1% 27.3% 34.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 10.8% 25.5% 33.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 18.9% 10.4% 31.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 11.3% 44.7% 28.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 29.9% -4.8% 434.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 10.8% 44.6% 69.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 31.9% -4.6% 427.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 13.4% 45.4% 61.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 35.1% 27.4% 136.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.1% 32.9% 85.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 42.1% -18.3% 144.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.6% 18.9% 84.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAAPLMETALIF
Gross margin 48.7% 81.7% 77.6%
EBITDA margin 36.0% 48.0% 4.6%
Operating margin 33.2% 38.1% 1.1%
Pretax margin 33.4% 38.3% 2.5%
Net margin 27.6% 29.8% 25.7%
FCF margin 29.3% 18.0% 18.0%
Operating cash flow margin 31.4% 57.1% 18.2%
Return on equity 120.5% 27.0% 24.3%
Return on assets 34.2% 16.1% 14.1%
Return on invested capital 66.9% 20.9% –
Return on capital employed 68.0% 23.7% 0.7%
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.5x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 1.9x 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue 2.9% 11.0% 12.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAAPLMETALIF
Debt / assets 22.0% 18.6% –
Debt / equity 0.8x 0.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.1x -0.1x –
Debt / FCF 0.6x 2.0x –
Liabilities / assets 71.9% 41.9% 41.7%
Equity / assets 28.1% 58.1% 58.3%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.0x 2.2x 5.6x
Quick ratio 0.8x 2.0x 3.6x
Cash ratio 0.4x 1.6x 2.5x
Altman Z-score 13.65 7.03 5.98

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAAPLMETALIF
Dividend yield 0.3% 0.3% –
Net buyback yield 1.6% 0.2% –
Shareholder yield 1.9% 0.5% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAAPLMETALIF
Forward P/E 37.7xFY2026 22.2xFY2026 34.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $9.22FY2026 $28.91FY2026 $1.32FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +23.6%FY2026 +23.1%FY2026 -45.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +9.0% +24.5% +25.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $464.03BFY2026 $260.76BFY2026 $718.60MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +11.5%FY2026 +29.8%FY2026 +46.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +18.2% +23.2% +19.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAAPLMETALIF
Held by institutions 66.0% 77.0% 40.8%
Institutions holding 6,126 5,030 205
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.6% +3.6% +4.5%
Institutions buying 2,797 2,679 116
Institutions selling 2,926 1,896 65
Buyers to sellers 0.96 1.41 1.78

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AAPLMETALIF
AAPL 1.00 0.11 0.08
META 0.11 1.00 0.18
LIF 0.08 0.18 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AAPL, META and LIF?

Apple (AAPL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Apple (AAPL) $5.04T, Meta Platforms (META) $1.60T, Life360 (LIF) $3.57B.

Which stock is cheaper, AAPL, META and LIF?

Meta Platforms (META) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Apple (AAPL) 39.1x, Meta Platforms (META) 23.5x, Life360 (LIF) 24.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Meta Platforms (META) is cheapest (Apple (AAPL) 37.7x, Meta Platforms (META) 22.2x, Life360 (LIF) 34.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Life360 (LIF) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Apple (AAPL) +14.2%, Meta Platforms (META) +27.7%, Life360 (LIF) +34.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Meta Platforms (META) has the highest net margin (Apple (AAPL) 27.6%, Meta Platforms (META) 29.8%, Life360 (LIF) 25.7%). On return on invested capital, Apple (AAPL) leads (Apple (AAPL) 66.9%, Meta Platforms (META) 20.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Apple (AAPL) returned the most: Apple (AAPL) +34.0%, Meta Platforms (META) -12.4%, Life360 (LIF) -50.5%. Over five years, Apple (AAPL) compounded fastest (Apple (AAPL) +18.5%/yr, Meta Platforms (META) +14.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Apple (AAPL) has been the steadiest (Apple (AAPL) 24.2%, Meta Platforms (META) 42.9%, Life360 (LIF) 77.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AAPL, META and LIF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Apple (AAPL) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.