AAPL vs GRMN vs MSFT Stock Comparison

Apple, Garmin and Microsoft Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (DAO) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
AAPL Apple Inc.
$348.91 +5.9% 1M +29.4% 1Y
Market cap
$5.10T
P/E
39.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$466.82B
Div. yield
0.30%
Smartphones and Wearables Technology
5 wins
GRMN Garmin Ltd
$280.12 -3.4% 1M +27.6% 1Y
Market cap
$54.00B
P/E
26.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.89B
Div. yield
1.39%
Smartphones and Wearables Technology
2 wins
MSFT Microsoft Corp
$530.14 +4.2% 1M -2.1% 1Y
Market cap
$3.94T
P/E
27.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$346.45B
Div. yield
0.69%
Cloud Platforms Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Apple leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Apple 5, Microsoft 5, Garmin 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAAPLGRMNMSFTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.10T $54.00B $3.94T AAPL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 39.7x 26.8x 27.6x GRMN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 37.8x 28.5x 26.0x MSFT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.2% +13.6% +17.9% MSFT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 27.6% 25.6% 41.2% MSFT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 66.9% — 26.5% AAPL
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.1x — -0.1x MSFT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.30% 1.39% 0.69% GRMN
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +29.4% +27.6% -2.1% AAPL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +18.4%/yr +14.3%/yr +9.8%/yr AAPL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 24.2% 32.5% 32.6% AAPL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 70/100 80/100 MSFT

Percentile Scorecard

AAPLGRMNMSFT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAAPLGRMNMSFT
Valuation 24 #85 of 112 51 #55 of 112 60 #16 of 38
Growth 65 #39 of 108 71 #32 of 108 74 #10 of 36
Profitability 96 #5 of 104 90 #11 of 104 97 #2 of 34
Financial Health 34 #77 of 116 81 #23 of 116 83 #7 of 37
Shareholder Returns 55 #36 of 78 57 #34 of 78 84 #4 of 20
Overall 55 70 80
  • AAPL ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • GRMN ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • MSFT ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAAPLGRMNMSFTSPY
1 month +5.9%-3.4%+4.2% +0.7%
3 months +4.6%-5.9%+17.5% +3.7%
6 months +28.6%+11.5%+30.0% +7.1%
Year to date +28.3%+38.1%+9.6% +12.8%
1 year +29.4%+27.6%-2.1% +11.9%
3 years +104.9%+176.6%+57.2% +85.2%
3 years, per year +27.0%+40.4%+16.3% +22.8%
5 years +132.9%+95.1%+59.9% +67.6%
5 years, per year +18.4%+14.3%+9.8% +10.9%
10 years +1,127.3%+485.2%+785.5% +262.0%
10 years, per year +28.5%+19.3%+24.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureAAPLGRMNMSFTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 24.2%32.5%32.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.8%27.3%30.7% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.550.910.99 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.210.85-0.06 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.4%-46.4%-37.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-10.6%-2.4% -1.2%
52-week high $348.91$313.16$543.45 $779.14
52-week low $246.63$187.10$352.83 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAAPLGRMNMSFT
P/E now vs peer median 39.7xmedian 32.9x 26.8xmedian 32.9x 27.6xmedian 27.6x
P/S now vs peer median 10.9xmedian 2.9x 6.8xmedian 2.9x 11.4xmedian 4.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 30.5xmedian 20.0x 20.9xmedian 20.0x 19.0xmedian 25.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 37.3xmedian 30.2x 36.8xmedian 30.2x 65.7xmedian 15.4x
P/B now vs peer median 47.4xmedian 2.9x 5.7xmedian 2.9x 8.4xmedian 4.1x
PEG now vs peer median 2.96median 1.08 1.10median 1.08 1.21median 0.80

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAAPLGRMNMSFT
Revenue $466.82B $7.89B $346.45B
Gross profit $227.12B $4.82B $234.39B
Operating income $154.86B $2.27B $163.19B
Net income $128.93B $2.02B $142.63B
Free cash flow $136.68B $1.47B $59.96B
R&D $42.90B $1.21B $36.46B
EPS (diluted) $8.76 $10.42 $19.16
Cash & equivalents $39.54B $2.04B $20.28B
Total debt $84.34B – $35.48B
Shares (diluted) 14.71B 193.62M 7.45B
Enterprise value $4.84T $43.55B $3.87T

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAAPLGRMNMSFT
P/E 39.7x 26.8x 27.6x
P/FCF 37.3x 36.8x 65.7x
P/Operating cash flow 34.7x 28.6x 20.1x
P/S 10.9x 6.8x 11.4x
P/B 47.4x 5.7x 8.4x
P/Tangible book 62.1x 5.8x 8.7x
EV/EBITDA 30.5x 20.9x 19.0x
EV/EBIT 33.1x 22.7x 23.9x
EV/Revenue 11.0x 6.5x 11.3x
EV/FCF 37.5x 35.2x 65.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 34.9x 27.4x 20.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.96 1.10 1.21

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAAPLGRMNMSFT
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.2% 13.6% 17.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.7% 16.0% 16.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 19.1% 18.2% 16.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 10.8% 18.7% 15.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 18.9% 27.8% 20.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 11.3% 30.7% 20.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 29.9% 28.4% 36.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 10.8% 24.7% 22.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 31.9% 28.4% 36.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 13.4% 24.3% 22.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 35.1% 20.7% 33.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.1% 13.8% 27.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 42.1% 10.2% -23.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.6% 11.0% -1.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAAPLGRMNMSFT
Gross margin 48.7% 61.1% 67.7%
EBITDA margin 36.0% 31.3% 59.3%
Operating margin 33.2% 28.8% 47.1%
Pretax margin 33.4% 30.7% 51.3%
Net margin 27.6% 25.6% 41.2%
FCF margin 29.3% 18.6% 17.3%
Operating cash flow margin 31.4% 23.9% 56.5%
Return on equity 120.5% 21.7% 31.2%
Return on assets 34.2% 17.2% 18.6%
Return on invested capital 66.9% – 26.5%
Return on capital employed 68.0% 23.7% 26.5%
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.7x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 0.9x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 2.9% 2.2% 3.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAAPLGRMNMSFT
Debt / assets 22.0% – 4.6%
Debt / equity 0.8x – 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.1x – -0.1x
Debt / FCF 0.6x – 0.6x
Liabilities / assets 71.9% 20.4% 39.6%
Equity / assets 28.1% 79.6% 60.4%
Interest coverage – – 50.6x
Current ratio 1.0x 3.0x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.8x 1.6x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.4x 1.1x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 13.69 15.87 9.47

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAAPLGRMNMSFT
Dividend yield 0.3% 1.4% 0.7%
Net buyback yield 1.6% -0.1% 0.5%
Shareholder yield 1.9% 1.3% 1.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 19.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 45.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 9.5%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 10.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAAPLGRMNMSFT
Forward P/E 37.8xFY2026 28.5xFY2026 26.0xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $9.22FY2026 $9.83FY2026 $20.39FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +23.6%FY2026 +14.8%FY2026 +18.0%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +8.6% +10.0% +11.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $464.04BFY2026 $8.56BFY2026 $402.39BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +11.5%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026 +21.3%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +17.8% +1.9% +12.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAAPLGRMNMSFT
Held by institutions 66.0% 56.7% 73.9%
Institutions holding 6,130 1,000 6,231
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.6% +1.1% +3.3%
Institutions buying 2,800 500 3,435
Institutions selling 2,927 347 2,426
Buyers to sellers 0.96 1.44 1.42

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AAPLGRMNMSFT
AAPL 1.00 0.15 0.11
GRMN 0.15 1.00 0.11
MSFT 0.11 0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AAPL, GRMN and MSFT?

Apple (AAPL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Apple (AAPL) $5.10T, Garmin (GRMN) $54.00B, Microsoft (MSFT) $3.94T.

Which stock is cheaper, AAPL, GRMN and MSFT?

Garmin (GRMN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Apple (AAPL) 39.7x, Garmin (GRMN) 26.8x, Microsoft (MSFT) 27.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Microsoft (MSFT) is cheapest (Apple (AAPL) 37.8x, Garmin (GRMN) 28.5x, Microsoft (MSFT) 26.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Microsoft (MSFT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Apple (AAPL) +14.2%, Garmin (GRMN) +13.6%, Microsoft (MSFT) +17.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Microsoft (MSFT) has the highest net margin (Apple (AAPL) 27.6%, Garmin (GRMN) 25.6%, Microsoft (MSFT) 41.2%). On return on invested capital, Apple (AAPL) leads (Apple (AAPL) 66.9%, Microsoft (MSFT) 26.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Apple (AAPL) returned the most: Apple (AAPL) +29.4%, Garmin (GRMN) +27.6%, Microsoft (MSFT) -2.1%. Over five years, Apple (AAPL) compounded fastest (Apple (AAPL) +18.4%/yr, Garmin (GRMN) +14.3%/yr, Microsoft (MSFT) +9.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Garmin (GRMN) has the highest dividend yield: Apple (AAPL) 0.30%, Garmin (GRMN) 1.39%, Microsoft (MSFT) 0.69%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Apple (AAPL) has been the steadiest (Apple (AAPL) 24.2%, Garmin (GRMN) 32.5%, Microsoft (MSFT) 32.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AAPL, GRMN and MSFT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Apple (AAPL) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.