AAPL vs FKWL vs FOXX Stock Comparison

Apple, Franklin Wireless and Foxx Development Holdings Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (LIF) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
AAPL Apple Inc.
$344.17 +3.2% 1M +27.4% 1Y
Market cap
$5.04T
P/E
38.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$478.83B
Div. yield
–
Smartphones and Wearables Technology
8 wins
FKWL Franklin Wireless Corp
$2.23 -2.6% 1M -55.9% 1Y
Market cap
$24.75M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$36.51M
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Apple leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Apple 8, Foxx Development Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAAPLFKWLFOXXLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.04T $24.75M $13.02M AAPL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 38.1x -5.2x -0.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 34.8x 55.8x — AAPL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +15.1% -20.8% -20.2% AAPL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 27.6% -13.0% -100.2% AAPL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 68.3% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.1x — 0.0x FOXX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +27.4% -55.9% -47.4% AAPL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +17.9%/yr -15.7%/yr — AAPL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.0% 32.7% 148.5% AAPL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 51/100 37/100 15/100 AAPL

Percentile Scorecard

AAPLFKWLFOXX

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAAPLFKWLFOXX
Valuation 15 #95 of 112 29 #80 of 112 19 #91 of 112
Growth 55 #49 of 108 1 #107 of 108 10 #97 of 108
Profitability 95 #6 of 104 16 #88 of 104 19 #84 of 104
Financial Health 35 #76 of 116 64 #42 of 116 10 #105 of 116
Shareholder Returns 56 #37 of 83 73 #23 of 83 –
Overall 51 37 15
  • AAPL ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • FKWL ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • FOXX ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAAPLFKWLFOXXSPY
1 month +3.2%-2.6%-22.4% -5.9%
3 months +10.2%-1.8%-26.4% -4.6%
6 months +19.7%-35.5%-61.3% +0.2%
Year to date +26.6%-49.0%-60.3% +7.5%
1 year +27.4%-55.9%-47.4% +8.2%
3 years +92.0%-23.9%-83.2% +68.3%
3 years, per year +24.3%-8.7%-44.9% +19.0%
5 years +127.5%-57.3%— +56.5%
5 years, per year +17.9%-15.7%— +9.4%
10 years +1,164.9%-4.3%— +251.5%
10 years, per year +28.9%-0.4%— +13.4%

Risk

MeasureAAPLFKWLFOXXSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.0%32.7%148.5% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 25.0%36.6%129.5% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.58-0.260.68 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.10-1.71-0.32 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.4%-69.5%-87.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.5%-56.9%-69.8% -5.9%
52-week high $349.51$5.18$6.09 $779.14
52-week low $246.63$2.12$1.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAAPLFKWLFOXX
P/E now vs peer median 38.2xmedian 25.2x -5.5xmedian 25.2x -0.2xmedian 25.2x
P/S now vs peer median 10.4xmedian 2.4x 0.7xmedian 2.4x 0.2xmedian 2.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 29.3xmedian 16.2x —median 16.2x -0.3xmedian 16.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 36.8xmedian 23.4x -4.2xmedian 23.4x -32.5xmedian 23.4x
P/B now vs peer median 44.6xmedian 2.3x 0.9xmedian 2.3x -0.2xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 2.82median 0.98 0.30median 0.98 —median 0.98

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAAPLFKWLFOXX
Revenue $478.83B $36.51M $52.58M
Gross profit $233.60B $6.26M $1.69M
Operating income $158.06B -$2.68M -$43.90M
Net income $132.18B -$6.92M -$52.69M
Free cash flow $136.06B -$6.33M -$400.00K
R&D $45.77B $3.23M $2.93M
EPS (diluted) $8.98 $-0.40 $-7.61
Cash & equivalents $36.31B – $1.47M
Total debt $80.11B – $77.85K
Shares (diluted) 14.72B 11.78M 6.92M
Enterprise value $4.78T -$99.08M $5.10M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAAPLFKWLFOXX
P/E 38.2x -5.5x -0.2x
P/FCF 36.8x -4.2x -32.5x
P/Operating cash flow 34.5x -4.2x -32.5x
P/S 10.4x 0.7x 0.2x
P/B 44.6x 0.9x -0.2x
P/Tangible book 44.6x 0.9x -0.2x
EV/EBITDA 29.3x – -0.3x
EV/EBIT 31.8x -2.9x -0.3x
EV/Revenue 10.5x 0.2x 0.2x
EV/FCF 36.9x -1.2x -29.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 34.6x -1.2x -29.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.82 0.30 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAAPLFKWLFOXX
Revenue growth (1Y) 15.1% -20.8% -20.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.7% -7.4% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 19.7% -21.0% -64.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.4% -3.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 18.8% 6.5% -352.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 11.4% -4.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) 18.0% -4,827% -484.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 10.9% -32.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) 20.3% -1,851% -418.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 13.5% -18.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 30.2% -441.4% 93.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.5% -49.6% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 37.8% -449.2% 94.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 11.0% -48.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAAPLFKWLFOXX
Gross margin 48.8% 17.1% 3.2%
EBITDA margin 35.8% – -83.4%
Operating margin 33.0% -7.3% -83.5%
Pretax margin 33.3% -19.3% -100.2%
Net margin 27.6% -13.0% -100.2%
FCF margin 28.4% -17.3% -0.8%
Operating cash flow margin 30.3% -17.2% -0.8%
Return on equity 120.4% -20.7% –
Return on assets 33.6% -14.3% -200.8%
Return on invested capital 68.3% – –
Return on capital employed 70.6% -8.1% –
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.8x 2.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 0.9x 0.0x
Stock comp / revenue 2.9% – 2.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAAPLFKWLFOXX
Debt / assets 19.8% – 0.3%
Debt / equity 0.7x – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.1x – 0.0x
Debt / FCF 0.6x – -0.2x
Liabilities / assets 72.3% 34.2% 333.4%
Equity / assets 27.7% 65.8% -233.4%
Interest coverage – – -5.0x
Current ratio 1.0x 2.7x 0.3x
Quick ratio 0.8x 1.4x 0.2x
Cash ratio 0.3x 1.2x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 12.79 2.84 -9.56

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAAPLFKWLFOXX
Dividend yield 0.3% 1.8% –
Net buyback yield 1.7% – –
Shareholder yield 2.0% 1.8% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAAPLFKWLFOXX
Forward P/E 34.8xFY2027 55.8xFY2027 –
EPS, next fiscal year $9.90FY2027 $0.04FY2027 –
EPS growth, next FY +10.2%FY2027 – –
EPS growth, the year after +3.0% -50.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $548.93BFY2027 $46.08MFY2027 –
Revenue growth, next FY +14.6%FY2027 +26.2%FY2027 –
Revenue growth, the year after +6.8% +19.3% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAAPLFKWLFOXX
Held by institutions 66.0% 13.1% 1.0%
Institutions holding 6,136 19 10
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.6% +38.6% +10.8%
Institutions buying 2,803 9 5
Institutions selling 2,930 3 2
Buyers to sellers 0.96 3.00 2.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AAPLFKWLFOXX
AAPL 1.00 0.01 0.07
FKWL 0.01 1.00 0.02
FOXX 0.07 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AAPL, FKWL and FOXX?

Apple (AAPL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Apple (AAPL) $5.04T, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) $24.75M, Foxx Development Holdings (FOXX) $13.02M.

Which company is growing faster?

Apple (AAPL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Apple (AAPL) +15.1%, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) -20.8%, Foxx Development Holdings (FOXX) -20.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Apple (AAPL) has the highest net margin (Apple (AAPL) 27.6%, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) -13.0%, Foxx Development Holdings (FOXX) -100.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Apple (AAPL) returned the most: Apple (AAPL) +27.4%, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) -55.9%, Foxx Development Holdings (FOXX) -47.4%. Over five years, Apple (AAPL) compounded fastest (Apple (AAPL) +17.9%/yr, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) -15.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Apple (AAPL) has been the steadiest (Apple (AAPL) 25.0%, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) 32.7%, Foxx Development Holdings (FOXX) 148.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AAPL, FKWL and FOXX?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Apple (AAPL) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.