Tat Technologies Ltd (TATT) Stock Analysis and Metrics

Tat Technologies

NASDAQ: TATT

$43.87 ▼ -2.09 (-4.55%)

At close: Jul 8, 2026 · 3:59 PM UTC

Financial Ratios

Market Cap624.62 Mn

P/E-19.94

P/S4.54

Div. Yield0.00

ROIC (Qtr)0.00

Total Debt (Qtr)11.21 Mn

Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)-2.36

Add ratio to table…

About

TAT Technologies Ltd. is a leading provider of solutions and services to the commercial and military aerospace and ground defense industries focused mainly on three product areas and services: Thermal Management, Power and Actuation and Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul.

The company generates revenue through the design, development, manufacture, and maintenance, repair, and overhaul of aerospace components and systems. Its primary products include heat transfer solutions such as pre-coolers, heat exchangers, and oil/fuel hydraulic heat exchangers, as well as aviation accessories like pumps and valves. Revenue is also derived from MRO services for auxiliary power units, landing gear, and jet engine components, including turbine vanes and blades, fan blades, and afterburner flaps. Additionally, TAT Technologies Ltd. manufactures coating powders and masking materials for aviation engine applications. The company serves a diverse customer base including commercial airlines, air cargo carriers, maintenance service centers, military forces, and original equipment manufacturers.

The company operates through the following segments:

• OEM of heat transfer solutions and aviation accessories through its Kiryat Gat facility (TAT Israel) focuses on the design, development, and manufacture of heat transfer solutions such as pre-coolers, heat exchangers, and oil/fuel hydraulic heat exchangers used in mechanical and electronic systems on commercial, military, and business aircraft; environmental control and power electronics cooling systems; and various mechanical aircraft accessories such as pumps, valves, and turbine power units. TAT Israel also provides limited MRO services to military customers for aviation accessories and certain heat transfer solutions, including overhaul of emergency power units, hydrazine tanks, jet fuel starters, cooling turbines, and valves for the F-16 fighter aircraft.

• MRO services for heat transfer components and OEM of heat transfer solutions through its Limco subsidiary provides MRO services for heat transfer components such as heat exchangers, oil coolers, pre-coolers, reheaters, condensers, water separators, fuel heaters, evaporators, and ozone converters for airlines, air cargo carriers, maintenance service centers, and the military. Limco also manufactures heat transfer solutions on an OEM basis for commercial, regional, business, and military aviation platforms, including demineralizer systems for U. S. Navy vessels.

• MRO services for aviation components through its Piedmont subsidiary specializes in MRO services for auxiliary power units (APUs), landing gear, and other aircraft components. Piedmont provides comprehensive repair and overhaul services for APU models from Honeywell and landing gear systems for commercial and military aircraft, and offers machining, plating, and grinding (MPG) services as supplementary or stand-alone services.

• Overhaul and coating of jet engine components through its Turbochrome subsidiary provides MRO services for jet engine components such as turbine vanes and blades, compressor vanes and blades, fan blades, and afterburner flaps. Turbochrome also manufactures coating powders for pack cementation aluminide coatings and masking materials for defined areas used in the aviation industry, supplying these to OEMs and maintenance service centers.

TAT Technologies Ltd. holds a strong position in the aerospace and defense industries as a trusted provider of specialized thermal management and MRO solutions. The company competes with OEM service divisions such as Collins Aerospace, Honeywell International, and Safran, as well as independent service providers like AAR Corp and Standard Aero Group. Its competitive advantages stem from long-term customer relationships, proprietary engineering expertise, FAA and EASA certifications, and the ability to offer integrated OEM and MRO services. The company's focus on innovation through its FutureWorks R&D lab in Charlotte, North Carolina, supports development of next-generation thermal management systems for eVTOL and hybrid-electric platforms, reinforcing its market leadership.

TAT Technologies Ltd. serves a global customer base that includes major aircraft manufacturers such as Boeing, Textron Aviation (Cessna), Pilatus Aircraft Ltd, Embraer, Lockheed Martin, and Gulfstream. Defense contractors and system integrators like Liebherr-Aerospace Toulouse S. A., Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, Elbit Systems, Israel Aerospace Industries, Parker Hannifin, Eaton Aerospace, Safran, RTX, and Raytheon-Collins are key customers. The company also supplies the U. S. Air Force, U. S. Army, U. S. Navy, Israeli Air Force, and other international military forces. In the MRO space, customers include airlines such as Air France-KLM, Lufthansa, FedEx, UPS, American Airlines, Delta Airlines, United Airlines, Air Canada Jazz, Republic Airways, DHL, Austrian Airlines, Korean Air, Air India, and Allegiant Air, as well as maintenance service centers like Lufthansa Technik, SR Technics, Delta Tech Ops, ST Aerospace Engineering, and Haeco Americas.

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case

The company ended the first quarter with a record backlog of approximately $580 million reflecting new contract wins across all service lines and indicating that underlying demand remains at historic highs. This backlog represents contracted work that is ready to be converted into revenue as soon as component availability improves meaning the current softness in sales is a timing issue rather than a loss of demand. Management highlighted that a material portion of the $15.5 million of open work orders in APU and Landing Gear could have been shipped in the quarter if parts had been available showing that the deferred volume is substantial and ready to flow. As supply chain constraints ease the backlog will translate into top line growth and provide visibility for sustained revenue expansion throughout the year and beyond.
Gross margin expanded by approximately 80 basis points year over year to 24.4% in the first quarter demonstrating the benefit of operational discipline and cost structure improvements that have been put in place across the business. Management emphasized that even with lower revenue the gross profit increased slightly and the margin expansion reflects ongoing efficiencies in manufacturing and supply chain handling. The company expects gross margin to improve further as revenue picks up and as it continues to monitor expenses closely while maintaining the ability to ramp production when parts arrive. This trend suggests that the market may be underestimating the potential for several percentage points of margin expansion over the next twelve months as operating leverage kicks in.
M&A remains a strategic priority and the company has built a dedicated team with industry relationships and operating experience to source and execute accretive bolt on transactions that fit into the platform and expand the addressable market. The recent environment has seen valuation multiples for comparable aerospace MRO companies come down from earlier highs creating a more favorable pricing landscape for disciplined deals. Management stated that any acquisition will be pursued at a multiple below the company’s current trading level ensuring immediate accretiveness and value creation for shareholders. With a strong balance sheet showing $51.2 million in cash and only $11.2 million in debt the company has the financial flexibility to pursue opportunities without jeopardizing its investment grade credit profile.
The company benefits from a diversified customer base that includes both commercial airlines and defense operators providing a natural hedge against cyclical swings in any single segment. Management noted that demand for MRO services is driven by the need to maintain and extend the service life of existing fleets which is a structural trend rather than a temporary spike. This long term demand driver is supported by aging aircraft fleets globally and by defense budgets that prioritize readiness and sustainment over new procurement. As a result the underlying demand environment is positioned for steady growth independent of short term supply chain fluctuations and offers a durable foundation for future revenue expansion.

The company ended the first quarter with a record backlog of approximately $580 million reflecting new contract wins across all service lines and indicating that underlying demand remains at historic highs. This backlog represents contracted work that is ready to be converted into revenue as soon as component availability improves meaning the current softness in sales is a timing issue rather than a loss of demand. Management highlighted that a material portion of the $15.5 million of open work orders in APU and Landing Gear could have been shipped in the quarter if parts had been available showing that the deferred volume is substantial and ready to flow. As supply chain constraints ease the backlog will translate into top line growth and provide visibility for sustained revenue expansion throughout the year and beyond.
Gross margin expanded by approximately 80 basis points year over year to 24.4% in the first quarter demonstrating the benefit of operational discipline and cost structure improvements that have been put in place across the business. Management emphasized that even with lower revenue the gross profit increased slightly and the margin expansion reflects ongoing efficiencies in manufacturing and supply chain handling. The company expects gross margin to improve further as revenue picks up and as it continues to monitor expenses closely while maintaining the ability to ramp production when parts arrive. This trend suggests that the market may be underestimating the potential for several percentage points of margin expansion over the next twelve months as operating leverage kicks in.
M&A remains a strategic priority and the company has built a dedicated team with industry relationships and operating experience to source and execute accretive bolt on transactions that fit into the platform and expand the addressable market. The recent environment has seen valuation multiples for comparable aerospace MRO companies come down from earlier highs creating a more favorable pricing landscape for disciplined deals. Management stated that any acquisition will be pursued at a multiple below the company’s current trading level ensuring immediate accretiveness and value creation for shareholders. With a strong balance sheet showing $51.2 million in cash and only $11.2 million in debt the company has the financial flexibility to pursue opportunities without jeopardizing its investment grade credit profile.
The company benefits from a diversified customer base that includes both commercial airlines and defense operators providing a natural hedge against cyclical swings in any single segment. Management noted that demand for MRO services is driven by the need to maintain and extend the service life of existing fleets which is a structural trend rather than a temporary spike. This long term demand driver is supported by aging aircraft fleets globally and by defense budgets that prioritize readiness and sustainment over new procurement. As a result the underlying demand environment is positioned for steady growth independent of short term supply chain fluctuations and offers a durable foundation for future revenue expansion.

▼ Bear case

The company acknowledged that a significant portion of its first quarter revenue shortfall stemmed from missing commodity level parts required for final assembly of APU and Landing Gear units and that this issue is not unique to TAT but reflects an industry wide bottleneck. While management expects the supply chain to normalize within a few months they also admitted that the broader environment remains dynamic and they cannot predict the precise pace of recovery meaning the delay could extend beyond the anticipated window. If parts availability does not improve as quickly as hoped the deferred work orders valued at approximately $15.5 million could remain idle longer leading to further revenue postponement and increased carrying costs. This reliance on external suppliers for low cost components creates a vulnerability that could undermine the conversion of the record backlog into sales.
The Landing Gear segment presents a higher risk of conflict because the OEM that supplies the main parts also uses them for its own internal operations raising the possibility that TAT could be deprioritized in allocation decisions. Management acknowledged that there is more risk in Landing Gear than in APU and that they are actively working with the OEM to verify that allocation follows customer needs rather than internal priorities. Should the OEM continue to favor its own shop the availability of critical Landing Gear components could stay constrained longer than expected limiting the company’s ability to convert its backlog in that line. This situation could disproportionately affect overall profitability given that Landing Gear while a smaller portion of the business still contributes to mixed margin profiles and any prolonged shortage would weigh on utilization rates.
Although the company has built a M&A team and outlined a disciplined approach the execution of acquisitions carries inherent risk including integration challenges cultural mismatches and potential overpayment if market multiples rebound unexpectedly. The management team noted that they are not in a rush and will wait for the right target at the right price but this patience could also result in missed opportunities if competitors act more quickly in a recovering market. Furthermore any debt taken on to finance deals could increase leverage and reduce the financial flexibility that currently supports both organic growth and strategic initiatives. The company’s current debt to EBITDA ratio of 0.45 is low but adding acquisition financing could shift the balance and constrain future maneuvering room.
Operating expenses have risen as the company invests in next generation R&D strengthens its organizational structure and builds capabilities for strategic M&A which could pressure profitability if revenue does not accelerate in line with these investments. The management team acknowledged that they are monitoring expenses closely but also noted that they will not harm operational capabilities to ramp production when parts arrive indicating a willingness to sustain higher spending levels. Should the expected recovery in parts supply be delayed the mismatch between higher fixed costs and lower topline could lead to margin contraction and reduced cash flow generation. Additionally any adverse movement in the Israeli shekel against the US dollar could increase the cost of debt service and affect net income given the company’s exposure to foreign exchange fluctuations on its long term loans.

The company acknowledged that a significant portion of its first quarter revenue shortfall stemmed from missing commodity level parts required for final assembly of APU and Landing Gear units and that this issue is not unique to TAT but reflects an industry wide bottleneck. While management expects the supply chain to normalize within a few months they also admitted that the broader environment remains dynamic and they cannot predict the precise pace of recovery meaning the delay could extend beyond the anticipated window. If parts availability does not improve as quickly as hoped the deferred work orders valued at approximately $15.5 million could remain idle longer leading to further revenue postponement and increased carrying costs. This reliance on external suppliers for low cost components creates a vulnerability that could undermine the conversion of the record backlog into sales.
The Landing Gear segment presents a higher risk of conflict because the OEM that supplies the main parts also uses them for its own internal operations raising the possibility that TAT could be deprioritized in allocation decisions. Management acknowledged that there is more risk in Landing Gear than in APU and that they are actively working with the OEM to verify that allocation follows customer needs rather than internal priorities. Should the OEM continue to favor its own shop the availability of critical Landing Gear components could stay constrained longer than expected limiting the company’s ability to convert its backlog in that line. This situation could disproportionately affect overall profitability given that Landing Gear while a smaller portion of the business still contributes to mixed margin profiles and any prolonged shortage would weigh on utilization rates.
Although the company has built a M&A team and outlined a disciplined approach the execution of acquisitions carries inherent risk including integration challenges cultural mismatches and potential overpayment if market multiples rebound unexpectedly. The management team noted that they are not in a rush and will wait for the right target at the right price but this patience could also result in missed opportunities if competitors act more quickly in a recovering market. Furthermore any debt taken on to finance deals could increase leverage and reduce the financial flexibility that currently supports both organic growth and strategic initiatives. The company’s current debt to EBITDA ratio of 0.45 is low but adding acquisition financing could shift the balance and constrain future maneuvering room.
Operating expenses have risen as the company invests in next generation R&D strengthens its organizational structure and builds capabilities for strategic M&A which could pressure profitability if revenue does not accelerate in line with these investments. The management team acknowledged that they are monitoring expenses closely but also noted that they will not harm operational capabilities to ramp production when parts arrive indicating a willingness to sustain higher spending levels. Should the expected recovery in parts supply be delayed the mismatch between higher fixed costs and lower topline could lead to margin contraction and reduced cash flow generation. Additionally any adverse movement in the Israeli shekel against the US dollar could increase the cost of debt service and affect net income given the company’s exposure to foreign exchange fluctuations on its long term loans.

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Aerospace & Defense

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	BA	Boeing Co	1,106.33 Bn	575.32	12.00	47.21 Bn
2	RTX	RTX Corp	258.51 Bn	34.01	2.86	33.20 Bn
3	GD	General Dynamics Corp	174.86 Bn	40.28	3.25	8.01 Bn
4	LMT	Lockheed Martin Corp	119.99 Bn	25.03	1.60	20.70 Bn
5	HWM	Howmet Aerospace Inc.	107.26 Bn	61.54	12.44	4.69 Bn
6	TDG	TransDigm Group INC	76.18 Bn	40.87	8.02	31.28 Bn
7	NOC	Northrop Grumman Corp /De/	73.88 Bn	16.14	1.74	14.41 Bn
8	RKLB	Rocket Lab Corp	60.59 Bn	-331.77	89.15	0.00 Bn

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password