XCF Global SAFX

NASDAQ SAFX

$0.08 -0.01 (-11.11%)

At close: Nov 10, 2026 · 4:00 PM EST

XCF Global (SAFX) stock price is $0.08, down 11.11% on the day, as of Nov 10, 2026. It has a market cap of $31.56Mn, and is classified in the Biofuels industry (Energy sector).

Key Stats

Market Cap31.56 Mn

P/E-0.47

FCF (Yr)-19.64 Mn

ROA (Yr)-17.54

EV to EBIT-0.67

Net Income (Yr)74.00 Mn

Enterprise Value29.15 Mn

Add ratio to table…

About

XCF Global, Inc. is a publicly traded renewable fuels company specializing in the production of sustainable aviation fuel, or SAF, and other renewable fuels. Operating in the fast-growing renewable energy sector, the company focuses on converting waste- and residue-based feedstocks, such as waste oils, fats, and agricultural residues, into low-carbon fuels that reduce greenhouse gas emissions. XCF Global is committed to decarbonizing the aviation industry by scaling production of SAF, which can be blended with conventional jet fuel without requiring modifications to existing aircraft or infrastructure. The company currently owns and operates production facilities in Nevada, Florida, and North Carolina, with plans to expand its portfolio of SAF and renewable fuel plants nationwide.

XCF Global generates revenue primarily through the sale of renewable fuels, including SAF, renewable diesel, and renewable naphtha. The company sells both neat, or unblended, SAF and blended SAF, which combines neat SAF with conventional jet fuel at varying ratios. Revenue is derived from offtake agreements with energy companies, fuel wholesalers, airlines, and fixed-base operators. The company’s current production facility in Reno, Nevada, operates under a supply and offtake agreement with Phillips 66, which purchases 100% of the renewable fuels produced at the facility. Pricing is based on current market indices for renewable fuels, adjusted for transportation, logistics, and tax-based credits. The company also benefits from federal and state tax credits, including the Clean Fuel Production Tax Credit, which provides up to $1.75 per gallon for SAF, depending on the fuel’s carbon intensity.

The company operates through a single integrated business model focused on renewable fuel production.

Renewable Fuel Production: This segment involves the acquisition, pretreatment, and hydrotreatment of waste- and residue-based feedstocks to produce SAF, renewable diesel, and renewable naphtha. The company employs the hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids, or HEFA, pathway, a proven technology that refines feedstocks into renewable fuels through hydrogenation and isomerization. XCF Global’s production facilities are designed to handle a variety of feedstocks, providing flexibility in sourcing and reducing supply chain risks. The company’s flagship facility in Reno, Nevada, is expected to reach nameplate production capacity of 38 million gallons of neat SAF annually by the second quarter of 2026, with additional facilities planned to increase total production to 80 million gallons per year by 2028.

XCF Global holds a strategic position in the renewable fuels industry, particularly within the SAF market, which is driven by regulatory support, industry demand, and sustainability commitments. The company is one of the few publicly traded renewable fuels companies in the United States primarily focused on SAF, distinguishing itself from competitors that are predominantly legacy crude oil refiners or diversified energy companies. Key competitors include Gevo, Inc., LanzaJet, Inc., Montana Renewables, and Neste Oyi, all of which produce SAF or renewable diesel using various production pathways. XCF Global’s competitive advantages include its early-mover status, with commercial SAF production expected to begin in 2026, and its use of proven HEFA technology, which offers lower capital costs and reliable feedstock versatility. The company’s modular facility design allows for rapid replication and expansion, further enhancing its ability to scale production in line with growing demand. Additionally, XCF Global benefits from government incentives, such as tax credits and grants, which support the development and adoption of SAF.

XCF Global’s customer base primarily consists of energy companies, fuel wholesalers, airlines, and fixed-base operators. The company’s current production facility in Reno, Nevada, operates under a long-term supply and offtake agreement with Phillips 66, which purchases 100% of the renewable fuels produced at the facility. This agreement covers feedstock supply and the sale of SAF, renewable diesel, and renewable naphtha, providing a stable revenue stream for the company. While XCF Global does not currently have additional offtake agreements in place for its planned facilities, management is engaged in discussions with multiple potential partners, including airlines and fuel distributors, to secure long-term contracts for SAF and other renewable fuels. The company’s ability to deliver both neat and blended SAF positions it to serve a broad range of customers seeking to reduce their carbon footprint in the aviation sector.

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case

The core bullish thesis for SAFX hinges on the successful integration of three complementary businesses creating a vertically integrated sustainable aviation fuel platform with significant scale potential. XCF brings its 38 million gallon per year permitted nameplate capacity at the New Rise Reno facility, which is positioned as an early mover among large-scale SAF producers in North America, providing immediate production infrastructure. DevvStream contributes critical environmental asset development capabilities, including carbon credit generation and monetization, which can dramatically improve the unit economics of SAF production by monetizing the low-carbon attributes that are increasingly valuable to airlines seeking compliance with CORSIA and other decarbonization mandates. Southern adds technology diversification through its biomass-to-fuels expertise, targeting carbon-negative SAF and green methanol production with integrated carbon capture, allowing the combined entity to offer a broader portfolio of low-carbon products beyond traditional SAF. This integration creates a moat by controlling the full value chain from feedstock to fuel production to environmental attribute monetization, reducing reliance on volatile spot markets for carbon credits and enabling long-term offtake agreements at premium prices. The platform’s ability to compete globally without subsidies, as explicitly stated by Southern’s CEO, suggests a structural cost advantage derived from integrated operations and technology differentiation, which could allow SAFX to capture market share from incumbent fossil fuel providers as aviation decarbonization accelerates. The $10 million already invested by XCF into the New Rise Reno facility conversion demonstrates tangible progress toward commercial SAF production and blending capacity, de-risking near-term execution while positioning the asset for rapid scale-up once the merger closes and financing is secured. The targeted operational milestones of over $1 billion in annualized fuel-related revenues and $100 million in minimum annualized EBITDA are ambitious but credible given the combined scale, particularly if Southern successfully secures the up to $400 million in bond financing earmarked for infrastructure expansion, which would enable significant capacity additions beyond the current Reno footprint. Crucially, the market may be underestimating the strategic value of embedding SMR nuclear power into the platform as discussed in both releases—a potential game-changer for powering energy-intensive eSAF production and AI data centers with zero-emission electricity, thereby enhancing the carbon intensity score of the fuels and unlocking additional premium pricing tiers in markets with stringent low-carbon fuel standards like California’s LCFS or the EU’s ReFuelEU Aviation initiative.
A second, less apparent bullish factor lies in the regulatory and policy tailwinds that are not fully priced into SAFX’s current valuation but are strongly implied by the transaction structure and management commentary. The aviation industry faces immense pressure to decarbonize, with SAF mandates and blending requirements rapidly expanding globally—from the EU’s ReFuelEU Aviation initiative mandating 2% SAF by 2025 rising to 70% by 2050, to similar frameworks under development in the UK, Canada, and potentially the US under future administrations. SAFX’s integrated model, which couples actual fuel production with verifiable, high-integrity environmental attributes generated and monetized by DevvStream, directly addresses the industry’s pain point of ‘book-and-claim’ skepticism by providing a physical, traceable pathway for emissions reductions that airlines can use for compliance reporting without reputational risk. This is particularly valuable as scrutiny increases over the additionality and permanence of carbon credits; DevvStream’s focus on developed, investment-grade environmental assets could provide SAFX with a trusted, auditable solution that commands a structural premium over generic credits. Furthermore, the emphasis on competing with China without subsidies highlights a potential domestic content advantage—should the US implement Inflation Reduction Act-style production credits or domestic content bonuses for SAF (as discussed in ongoing policy debates), SAFX’s US-based biomass feedstock focus (Southern), production footprint (XCF Reno), and environmental asset integration (DevvStream) could position it to capture significant subsidy dollars while international competitors reliant on imported feedstocks or less transparent accounting face disadvantages. The $10 million facility upgrade funded by an investor specifically targets bringing New Rise Reno into sustained commercial production, which, if successful, would transform XCF from a permitted-but-idle asset into a revenue-generating platform almost immediately post-merger—a near-term catalyst that is often overlooked in favor of longer-term infrastructure dreams. Finally, the leadership team’s repeated emphasis on ‘real operating execution’ and ‘speed-to-market’ suggests a cultural shift away from the perpetual development phase common in clean energy startups toward commercialization, which, if delivered, could rerate the stock from a speculative concept to a tangible infrastructure operator with predictable cash flows.

The core bullish thesis for SAFX hinges on the successful integration of three complementary businesses creating a vertically integrated sustainable aviation fuel platform with significant scale potential. XCF brings its 38 million gallon per year permitted nameplate capacity at the New Rise Reno facility, which is positioned as an early mover among large-scale SAF producers in North America, providing immediate production infrastructure. DevvStream contributes critical environmental asset development capabilities, including carbon credit generation and monetization, which can dramatically improve the unit economics of SAF production by monetizing the low-carbon attributes that are increasingly valuable to airlines seeking compliance with CORSIA and other decarbonization mandates. Southern adds technology diversification through its biomass-to-fuels expertise, targeting carbon-negative SAF and green methanol production with integrated carbon capture, allowing the combined entity to offer a broader portfolio of low-carbon products beyond traditional SAF. This integration creates a moat by controlling the full value chain from feedstock to fuel production to environmental attribute monetization, reducing reliance on volatile spot markets for carbon credits and enabling long-term offtake agreements at premium prices. The platform’s ability to compete globally without subsidies, as explicitly stated by Southern’s CEO, suggests a structural cost advantage derived from integrated operations and technology differentiation, which could allow SAFX to capture market share from incumbent fossil fuel providers as aviation decarbonization accelerates. The $10 million already invested by XCF into the New Rise Reno facility conversion demonstrates tangible progress toward commercial SAF production and blending capacity, de-risking near-term execution while positioning the asset for rapid scale-up once the merger closes and financing is secured. The targeted operational milestones of over $1 billion in annualized fuel-related revenues and $100 million in minimum annualized EBITDA are ambitious but credible given the combined scale, particularly if Southern successfully secures the up to $400 million in bond financing earmarked for infrastructure expansion, which would enable significant capacity additions beyond the current Reno footprint. Crucially, the market may be underestimating the strategic value of embedding SMR nuclear power into the platform as discussed in both releases—a potential game-changer for powering energy-intensive eSAF production and AI data centers with zero-emission electricity, thereby enhancing the carbon intensity score of the fuels and unlocking additional premium pricing tiers in markets with stringent low-carbon fuel standards like California’s LCFS or the EU’s ReFuelEU Aviation initiative.
A second, less apparent bullish factor lies in the regulatory and policy tailwinds that are not fully priced into SAFX’s current valuation but are strongly implied by the transaction structure and management commentary. The aviation industry faces immense pressure to decarbonize, with SAF mandates and blending requirements rapidly expanding globally—from the EU’s ReFuelEU Aviation initiative mandating 2% SAF by 2025 rising to 70% by 2050, to similar frameworks under development in the UK, Canada, and potentially the US under future administrations. SAFX’s integrated model, which couples actual fuel production with verifiable, high-integrity environmental attributes generated and monetized by DevvStream, directly addresses the industry’s pain point of ‘book-and-claim’ skepticism by providing a physical, traceable pathway for emissions reductions that airlines can use for compliance reporting without reputational risk. This is particularly valuable as scrutiny increases over the additionality and permanence of carbon credits; DevvStream’s focus on developed, investment-grade environmental assets could provide SAFX with a trusted, auditable solution that commands a structural premium over generic credits. Furthermore, the emphasis on competing with China without subsidies highlights a potential domestic content advantage—should the US implement Inflation Reduction Act-style production credits or domestic content bonuses for SAF (as discussed in ongoing policy debates), SAFX’s US-based biomass feedstock focus (Southern), production footprint (XCF Reno), and environmental asset integration (DevvStream) could position it to capture significant subsidy dollars while international competitors reliant on imported feedstocks or less transparent accounting face disadvantages. The $10 million facility upgrade funded by an investor specifically targets bringing New Rise Reno into sustained commercial production, which, if successful, would transform XCF from a permitted-but-idle asset into a revenue-generating platform almost immediately post-merger—a near-term catalyst that is often overlooked in favor of longer-term infrastructure dreams. Finally, the leadership team’s repeated emphasis on ‘real operating execution’ and ‘speed-to-market’ suggests a cultural shift away from the perpetual development phase common in clean energy startups toward commercialization, which, if delivered, could rerate the stock from a speculative concept to a tangible infrastructure operator with predictable cash flows.

▼ Bear case

The most significant bearish risk for SAFX is the extraordinary execution complexity and financing risk inherent in the three-way merger, which remains subject to numerous closing conditions that could easily derail or delay the transaction. The business combination is contingent on shareholder approvals from all three entities, SEC registration statement effectiveness on Form S-4, Nasdaq listing approval, completion of financing (including Southern’s up to $400 million bond issuance), plant conversion milestones at New Rise Reno, and the receipt of fairness opinions—each of which represents a potential point of failure. The transcript explicitly warns that the announcement of the term sheet or pursuit of the transaction could disrupt current plans, operations, or relationships, and there is a real risk that negotiations could be delayed, modified, suspended, or terminated due to alleged breaches or differing interpretations of binding provisions, especially given the absence of a definitive agreement at this stage (only a binding term sheet exists). Furthermore, the pro forma ownership structure—66.7% for existing XCF shareholders, 23.3% for Southern, and 10.0% for DevvStream—suggests significant dilution for XCF shareholders if the transaction closes, which may not be fully appreciated by the market given XCF’s current pre-revenue or early-revenue status; the combined entity would need to achieve substantial synergies just to justify the valuation implied by this structure. Southern’s ability to secure the $400 million in bond financing is particularly critical and uncertain, as it depends on state authorization, market appetite for green bonds tied to biomass projects, and favorable terms—failure here would cripple the infrastructure expansion plans that are central to achieving the $1 billion revenue target. Even if the merger closes, XCF’s history of delayed plant conversions and capital overruns (implied by the need for additional investor funding to complete the New Rise Reno upgrades) raises doubts about its capacity to manage the vastly more complex integration of three distinct businesses with different operational models, technologies, and geographies. The cautionary language in both releases is unusually detailed and lengthy, listing 18 specific risk factors ranging from regulatory delays and litigation risks to valuation uncertainty and the explicit admission that the $3.0 billion combined enterprise value objective ‘has not in the past and may never in the future be achieved’—a rare and stark admission of downside potential that management would not include unless they perceived significant hurdles.
Beyond transaction risk, the fundamental economics of sustainable aviation fuel remain deeply challenging and may prevent SAFX from ever achieving profitable scale, regardless of integration success. SAF production is currently 2-4x more expensive than conventional jet fuel due to high feedstock costs, energy-intensive refining pathways (like HEFA or Fischer-Tropsch), and limited economies of scale, meaning the business is critically dependent on sustained policy support—such as blenders’ tax credits, low-carbon fuel standard credits (LCFS), or direct subsidies—to achieve parity with fossil fuels. While the release mentions competing ‘without subsidies,’ this appears aspirational given the current state of technology and feedstock logistics; the reliance on Southern’s pursuit of state-supported bonds implicitly acknowledges that large-scale infrastructure still requires public financing, undermining the no-subsidy claim. The aviation industry’s SAF adoption is also constrained by aircraft fleet turnover rates (typically 20-30 years) and the lack of mandates in many regions, meaning demand growth could be slower and more uneven than anticipated, particularly if global economic headwinds reduce air travel or if airlines prioritize cheaper carbon offsetting over actual fuel blending. DevvStream’s environmental asset monetization, while promising, faces its own headwinds: carbon credit markets are volatile, subject to regulatory shifts (e.g., potential reforms to Article 6 of the Paris Agreement), and increasingly scrutinized for additionality and permanence—especially for nature-based solutions that may dominate DevvStream’s early pipeline—making it difficult to guarantee the stable, high-value revenue stream assumed in the bull case. Furthermore, the platform’s ambition to integrate SMR nuclear power for eSAF production introduces significant technological and regulatory risk; SMRs are not yet commercially deployed at scale in the US, face lengthy licensing timelines with the NRC, and carry substantial capital costs that could divert resources from core fuel operations. If SAFX cannot achieve meaningful scale in SAF production quickly, the fixed costs of maintaining the integrated platform—including the DevvStream carbon management Southern’s technology development teams—could become a persistent drag, trapping the company in a cycle of needing continuous capital infusions to chase scale without ever reaching sustainable profitability, a fate that has befallen numerous advanced biofuels startups over the past decade.

The most significant bearish risk for SAFX is the extraordinary execution complexity and financing risk inherent in the three-way merger, which remains subject to numerous closing conditions that could easily derail or delay the transaction. The business combination is contingent on shareholder approvals from all three entities, SEC registration statement effectiveness on Form S-4, Nasdaq listing approval, completion of financing (including Southern’s up to $400 million bond issuance), plant conversion milestones at New Rise Reno, and the receipt of fairness opinions—each of which represents a potential point of failure. The transcript explicitly warns that the announcement of the term sheet or pursuit of the transaction could disrupt current plans, operations, or relationships, and there is a real risk that negotiations could be delayed, modified, suspended, or terminated due to alleged breaches or differing interpretations of binding provisions, especially given the absence of a definitive agreement at this stage (only a binding term sheet exists). Furthermore, the pro forma ownership structure—66.7% for existing XCF shareholders, 23.3% for Southern, and 10.0% for DevvStream—suggests significant dilution for XCF shareholders if the transaction closes, which may not be fully appreciated by the market given XCF’s current pre-revenue or early-revenue status; the combined entity would need to achieve substantial synergies just to justify the valuation implied by this structure. Southern’s ability to secure the $400 million in bond financing is particularly critical and uncertain, as it depends on state authorization, market appetite for green bonds tied to biomass projects, and favorable terms—failure here would cripple the infrastructure expansion plans that are central to achieving the $1 billion revenue target. Even if the merger closes, XCF’s history of delayed plant conversions and capital overruns (implied by the need for additional investor funding to complete the New Rise Reno upgrades) raises doubts about its capacity to manage the vastly more complex integration of three distinct businesses with different operational models, technologies, and geographies. The cautionary language in both releases is unusually detailed and lengthy, listing 18 specific risk factors ranging from regulatory delays and litigation risks to valuation uncertainty and the explicit admission that the $3.0 billion combined enterprise value objective ‘has not in the past and may never in the future be achieved’—a rare and stark admission of downside potential that management would not include unless they perceived significant hurdles.
Beyond transaction risk, the fundamental economics of sustainable aviation fuel remain deeply challenging and may prevent SAFX from ever achieving profitable scale, regardless of integration success. SAF production is currently 2-4x more expensive than conventional jet fuel due to high feedstock costs, energy-intensive refining pathways (like HEFA or Fischer-Tropsch), and limited economies of scale, meaning the business is critically dependent on sustained policy support—such as blenders’ tax credits, low-carbon fuel standard credits (LCFS), or direct subsidies—to achieve parity with fossil fuels. While the release mentions competing ‘without subsidies,’ this appears aspirational given the current state of technology and feedstock logistics; the reliance on Southern’s pursuit of state-supported bonds implicitly acknowledges that large-scale infrastructure still requires public financing, undermining the no-subsidy claim. The aviation industry’s SAF adoption is also constrained by aircraft fleet turnover rates (typically 20-30 years) and the lack of mandates in many regions, meaning demand growth could be slower and more uneven than anticipated, particularly if global economic headwinds reduce air travel or if airlines prioritize cheaper carbon offsetting over actual fuel blending. DevvStream’s environmental asset monetization, while promising, faces its own headwinds: carbon credit markets are volatile, subject to regulatory shifts (e.g., potential reforms to Article 6 of the Paris Agreement), and increasingly scrutinized for additionality and permanence—especially for nature-based solutions that may dominate DevvStream’s early pipeline—making it difficult to guarantee the stable, high-value revenue stream assumed in the bull case. Furthermore, the platform’s ambition to integrate SMR nuclear power for eSAF production introduces significant technological and regulatory risk; SMRs are not yet commercially deployed at scale in the US, face lengthy licensing timelines with the NRC, and carry substantial capital costs that could divert resources from core fuel operations. If SAFX cannot achieve meaningful scale in SAF production quickly, the fixed costs of maintaining the integrated platform—including the DevvStream carbon management Southern’s technology development teams—could become a persistent drag, trapping the company in a cycle of needing continuous capital infusions to chase scale without ever reaching sustainable profitability, a fate that has befallen numerous advanced biofuels startups over the past decade.

Peer percentiles

How XCF Global ranks

Ranked against the 12 companies in Renewable Fuels58 metrics · as of Nov 11, 2026

Valuation

12 metrics · Lower multiples rank higher; a negative multiple ranks last

P/ENegative earnings −0.47xMedian 11.6x 9^th
P/FCFNegative free cash flow −1.37xMedian 12.1x 9^th
P/Operating cash flowNegative operating cash flow −1.58xMedian 7.11x 1^st
P/S 2.07xMedian 0.90x 13^th
P/B 0.85xMedian 1.01x 63^rd
P/Tangible book 0.85xMedian 1.01x 75^th
EV/EBITDA —Median 10.6x No data —
EV/EBITNegative EBIT −3.62xMedian 31.6x 20^th
EV/Revenue 10.4xMedian 1.64x 1^st
EV/FCFNegative free cash flow −6.88xMedian 13.7x 20^th
EV/Operating cash flowNegative operating cash flow −7.91xMedian 8.85x 10^th
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) —Median 0.13 No data —

Growth

14 metrics · Year-on-year growth and three-year compound annual growth

Revenue growth (1Y) 612%Median 6.3% 99^th
Revenue CAGR (3Y) —Median 1.6% No data —
Gross profit growth (1Y) —Median 103% No data —
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) —Median 50.4% No data —
Operating income growth (1Y) 18.6%Median 34.0% 46^th
Operating income CAGR (3Y) —Median 12.2% No data —
Net income growth (1Y) −170%Median 52.9% 18^th
Net income CAGR (3Y) —Median 2.9% No data —
EPS growth (1Y) −127%Median 61.0% 18^th
EPS CAGR (3Y) —Median 6.2% No data —
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) −62.9%Median 25.8% 1^st
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) —Median 26.3% No data —
Free cash flow growth (1Y) −203%Median 2.2% 9^th
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) —Median 21.7% No data —

Profitability

14 metrics · Margins, returns on capital and the quality of earnings

Gross margin −16.8%Median 24.3% 1^st
EBITDA margin —Median 13.1% No data —
Operating margin −286%Median 0.6% 1^st
Pretax margin −286%Median −16.2% 1^st
Net margin −398%Median −12.5% 1^st
FCF margin −151%Median −14.2% 1^st
Operating cash flow margin −131%Median 14.7% 1^st
Return on equity −140%Median −12.9% 13^th
Return on assets −10.6%Median −10.7% 55^th
Return on invested capital —Median 0.1% No data —
Return on capital employed −27.1%Median −14.6% 44^th
Asset turnover 0.04xMedian 0.42x 1^st
Cash conversion (OCF / net income)Net income is not positive 0.33xMedian 1.10x Not meaningful —
Stock comp / revenue 52.8%Median 2.0% 1^st

Financial Health

11 metrics · Leverage, liquidity and solvency; less debt ranks higher

Debt / assets 30.2%Median 31.1% 63^rd
Debt / equity 3.41xMedian 0.56x Too few peers —
Net debt / EBITDA —Median 3.85x No data —
Debt / FCFFree cash flow is not positive −5.52xMedian 5.39x Not meaningful —
Liabilities / assets 91.1%Median 56.0% 36^th
Equity / assets 8.9%Median 44.0% 36^th
Interest coverage —Median −0.07x No data —
Current ratio 0.05xMedian 2.01x 9^th
Quick ratio 0.01xMedian 1.01x 9^th
Cash ratio 0.00xMedian 0.62x 1^st
Altman Z-score −1.10Median −0.60 38^th

Peer group

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Biofuels

View all peers

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	PLUG	Plug Power Inc	1.92 Bn	-1.62	2.50	1.35 Mn
2	REX	REX AMERICAN RESOURCES Corp	1.32 Bn	10.93	2.01	-
3	GPRE	Green Plains Inc.	0.97 Bn	4.84	0.53	477.73 Mn
4	CLNE	Clean Energy Fuels Corp.	0.40 Bn	-5.31	0.90	216.45 Mn
5	GEVO	Gevo, Inc.	0.34 Bn	-1.81	1.58	167.77 Mn
6	OPAL	OPAL Fuels Inc.	0.23 Bn	12.32	0.68	407.42 Mn
7	MNTK	Montauk Renewables, Inc.	0.17 Bn	21.50	0.90	149.64 Mn
8	SAFX	XCF Global, Inc.	0.03 Bn	-0.47	2.07	127.00 Mn

XCF Global SAFX

About

Investment Thesis

How XCF Global ranks

Valuation

Growth

Profitability

Financial Health

Shareholder Returns

Peer Comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password