Mach Natural Resources MNR

NYSE MNR

$10.74 -0.05 (-0.46%)

As of: Oct 20, 2026 · 11:33 AM EDT

Mach Natural Resources (MNR) stock price is $10.74, down 0.46% on the day, as of Oct 20, 2026. It has a market cap of $1.80Bn and a P/E ratio of 17.84, and is classified in the Oil and Gas Exploration and Production industry (Energy sector).

Key Stats

Market Cap1.80 Bn

P/E17.84

P/S1.33

Div. Yield0.16

Total Debt (Qtr)1.17 Bn

Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)40.70

Add ratio to table…

About

Mach Natural Resources Lp is an independent upstream oil and gas company focused on the acquisition, development, and production of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids reserves in the Anadarko Basin of western Oklahoma and southern Kansas and the Texas panhandle, the San Juan Basin of New Mexico and Colorado, and the Permian Basin of west Texas. The company’s acreage is prospective for multiple formations, including the Oswego, Woodford, Mississippian, Mancos, and Fruitland layers. In addition to its upstream operations, Mach Natural Resources Lp owns an integrated portfolio of midstream assets such as gathering systems, processing plants, and water infrastructure that are directly linked to its production facilities. This integration allows the company to enhance the value of its hydrocarbons, reduce third party costs, and generate additional fee based revenue from third parties. The company emphasizes low declining assets that aim to produce steady cash flow for distribution to its unitholders.

Mach Natural Resources Lp generates the majority of its revenue from the sale of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids produced from its wells. Revenue also includes gains or losses on derivative contracts that the company uses to manage exposure to fluctuating commodity prices. Its midstream assets provide gathering, processing, and water handling services to both its own production and third party operators, generating fee based income. Product sales, primarily of natural gas, contribute an additional stream of revenue. The company reports revenue net of transportation and marketing costs, focusing on the value realized at the point of sale.

Mach Natural Resources Lp operates as an independent exploration and production company within the competitive U. S. onshore oil and gas industry. Its competitive advantages stem from owning midstream infrastructure that is directly linked to its upstream assets, allowing it to capture additional margins, reduce reliance on third party services, and improve price realization. The company’s diversified footprint across three major basins provides operational flexibility and helps mitigate the impact of regional price volatility. Mach Natural Resources Lp focuses on low declining assets that aim to deliver stable production and cash flow over time. The firm uses financial and operational metrics such as net production volumes, realized prices, lease operating expense, Adjusted EBITDA, and cash available for distribution to evaluate performance relative to peers. While specific competitor names are not disclosed in the filing, the company competes with other independent producers that operate in the same basins.

The company’s customer base for its oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids includes energy marketers, utilities, and refiners that purchase these commodities for resale or end use. Its midstream services are offered to third party producers that require gathering, processing, and water handling solutions for their own hydrocarbons. Product sales of natural gas are made to various commercial and industrial customers seeking a reliable fuel source. As part of the IKAV acquisition, Mach Natural Resources Lp assumed a firm sales contract to deliver and sell natural gas at a fixed price of $1.72 per MMBtu through 2030, which it expects to fulfill primarily with its own proved developed reserves. The company also engages in spot market purchases when necessary to meet any shortfall in its delivery commitments.

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case

MNR's strategic pivot toward oil-weighted drilling in the Oswego, Ardmore, Red Fork, and Clear Fork formations represents a significant but underappreciated catalyst for future returns, as management highlighted that at $85 oil, the 2025 Oswego program could generate 145% rates of return, a level that substantially exceeds historical averages and peer benchmarks. This shift is enabled by the company's unique inventory of over 3 million acres acquired during distressed periods, which allows high-return drilling without paying for upside, a competitive advantage that is difficult to replicate. The ability to rapidly reallocate capital between oil and gas based on price signals—demonstrated by moving rigs in 30- to 45-day intervals—provides operational agility that management emphasized as critical to sustaining returns above 80% even amid service cost inflation, a flexibility that is not fully reflected in current market valuations. Furthermore, the San Juan Mancos program's outperformance, with five wells averaging over 12 MMcf per day versus a type curve of 10.6 MMcf per day, indicates that the basin's long-term potential remains intact despite near-term basis weakness, and the 65% volumetric production contract at $1.72 through 2030 provides a stable cash flow floor that reduces downside risk while preserving upside if Western market access improves via LNG expansion or new pipeline infrastructure. The combination of high-conviction oil drilling economics, proven execution in gas assets, and a balance sheet positioned to deleverage to 1x before pursuing accretive acquisitions creates a scenario where distributions can remain industry-leading at 15% yield while reinvestment stays below 50% of operating cash flow, supporting both capital return and modest growth without increasing financial risk.

▼ Bear case

MNR faces material headwinds from persistent oilfield service cost inflation, which management explicitly acknowledged as "bits are going up, steel is going up, labor costs are going up, and fuel surcharges are going up," and warned that such inflation can rapidly erode returns, a risk underscored by the CEO's statement that oilfield services' job is to "get our rates of return down to 20%," implying that current drilling economics could deteriorate faster than anticipated if cost pressures persist, potentially undermining the bullish case for 145% returns in the Oswego program at $85 oil. The company's leverage ratio of approximately 1.3x, while deemed manageable, exceeds its historical comfort level of 1x or below, and management's commitment to deleveraging before pursuing debt-funded acquisitions suggests that growth via M&A is constrained until the ratio improves, limiting a key historical driver of value creation and leaving the company reliant solely on organic drilling, which may not suffice to offset natural decline in legacy assets without increasing reinvestment beyond the 50% of operating cash flow threshold. Furthermore, the San Juan Basin's realized gas prices hovering around $1.00 per Mcf due to weak basis, despite 65% being hedged at $1.72, leaves 35% of volumes exposed to continued low pricing, and the decision to delay Mancos completions until after the first of the year or even 2027 to prioritize higher-return oil projects signals a lack of near-term confidence in gas pricing recovery, which could prolong periods of suboptimal asset utilization and reduce the effectiveness of the basin as a long-term optionality play if Western market access developments fail to materialize on expected timelines. Finally, the distribution strategy, while currently industry-leading at 15% yield, may face pressure if operating cash flow is diverted toward debt reduction to meet the leverage target, as hinted by the CFO's acknowledgment that paying down debt could temporarily reduce yields to 10%, a scenario that contradicts the market's expectation of sustained high payouts and could trigger a reevaluation of the stock's income appeal.

MNR faces material headwinds from persistent oilfield service cost inflation, which management explicitly acknowledged as "bits are going up, steel is going up, labor costs are going up, and fuel surcharges are going up," and warned that such inflation can rapidly erode returns, a risk underscored by the CEO's statement that oilfield services' job is to "get our rates of return down to 20%," implying that current drilling economics could deteriorate faster than anticipated if cost pressures persist, potentially undermining the bullish case for 145% returns in the Oswego program at $85 oil. The company's leverage ratio of approximately 1.3x, while deemed manageable, exceeds its historical comfort level of 1x or below, and management's commitment to deleveraging before pursuing debt-funded acquisitions suggests that growth via M&A is constrained until the ratio improves, limiting a key historical driver of value creation and leaving the company reliant solely on organic drilling, which may not suffice to offset natural decline in legacy assets without increasing reinvestment beyond the 50% of operating cash flow threshold. Furthermore, the San Juan Basin's realized gas prices hovering around $1.00 per Mcf due to weak basis, despite 65% being hedged at $1.72, leaves 35% of volumes exposed to continued low pricing, and the decision to delay Mancos completions until after the first of the year or even 2027 to prioritize higher-return oil projects signals a lack of near-term confidence in gas pricing recovery, which could prolong periods of suboptimal asset utilization and reduce the effectiveness of the basin as a long-term optionality play if Western market access developments fail to materialize on expected timelines. Finally, the distribution strategy, while currently industry-leading at 15% yield, may face pressure if operating cash flow is diverted toward debt reduction to meet the leverage target, as hinted by the CFO's acknowledgment that paying down debt could temporarily reduce yields to 10%, a scenario that contradicts the market's expectation of sustained high payouts and could trigger a reevaluation of the stock's income appeal.

Product and Service Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

History

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

History

Peer percentiles

How Mach Natural Resources ranks

Ranked against the 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream58 metrics · as of Oct 16, 2026

Valuation

12 metrics · Lower multiples rank higher; a negative multiple ranks last

P/E 18.0xMedian 12.3x 57^th
P/FCFNegative free cash flow −6.27xMedian 10.7x 17^th
P/Operating cash flow 3.24xMedian 5.22x 85^th
P/S 1.34xMedian 1.91x 75^th
P/B 0.98xMedian 1.39x 79^th
P/Tangible book 0.98xMedian 1.41x 81^st
EV/EBITDA 5.25xMedian 5.56x 64^th
EV/EBIT 15.1xMedian 11.0x 56^th
EV/Revenue 2.17xMedian 2.46x 60^th
EV/FCFNegative free cash flow −10.2xMedian 13.0x 17^th
EV/Operating cash flow 5.26xMedian 6.57x 74^th
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) —Median 2.18 No data —

Growth

14 metrics · Year-on-year growth and three-year compound annual growth

Revenue growth (1Y) 34.4%Median 8.8% 81^st
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 14.8%Median −2.2% 86^th
Gross profit growth (1Y) 31.2%Median 5.5% 76^th
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 13.5%Median −3.3% 89^th
Operating income growth (1Y) −38.4%Median 8.1% 25^th
Operating income CAGR (3Y) −25.6%Median −18.0% 40^th
Net income growth (1Y) −52.0%Median 10.0% 27^th
Net income CAGR (3Y) −39.9%Median −16.9% 18^th
EPS growth (1Y) −66.2%Median 8.7% 26^th
EPS CAGR (3Y) —Median −19.7% No data —
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 7.9%Median 7.9% 50^th
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) —Median −4.0% No data —
Free cash flow growth (1Y) −567%Median 4.9% 5^th
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) —Median −3.9% No data —

Profitability

14 metrics · Margins, returns on capital and the quality of earnings

Gross margin 83.2%Median 74.2% 62^nd
EBITDA margin 41.4%Median 39.4% 52^nd
Operating margin 14.4%Median 13.5% 51^st
Pretax margin 7.7%Median 8.0% 49^th
Net margin 7.4%Median 8.0% 49^th
FCF margin −21.3%Median 9.7% 25^th
Operating cash flow margin 41.3%Median 38.5% 55^th
Return on equity 5.6%Median 8.4% 45^th
Return on assets 2.8%Median 3.5% 48^th
Return on invested capital —Median 8.8% No data —
Return on capital employed 5.9%Median 6.0% 49^th
Asset turnover 0.37xMedian 0.35x 55^th
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 5.55xMedian 2.09x 92^nd
Stock comp / revenue 0.9%Median 1.6% 68^th

Financial Health

11 metrics · Leverage, liquidity and solvency; less debt ranks higher

Debt / assets 31.8%Median 19.0% 30^th
Debt / equity 0.63xMedian 0.36x 28^th
Net debt / EBITDA 2.02xMedian 0.96x 21^st
Debt / FCFFree cash flow is not positive −4.06xMedian 2.53x Not meaningful —
Liabilities / assets 49.8%Median 48.2% 46^th
Equity / assets 50.2%Median 52.0% 46^th
Interest coverage 2.14xMedian 2.14x 50^th
Current ratio 0.88xMedian 1.04x 39^th
Quick ratio 1.14xMedian 0.88x 66^th
Cash ratio 0.11xMedian 0.32x 29^th
Altman Z-score —Median 1.49 No data —

Peer group

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Oil and Gas Exploration and Production

View all peers

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	XOM	ExxonMobil Holdings Corp	734.52 Bn	22.42	1.99	42.37 Bn
2	CVX	Chevron Corp	438.26 Bn	21.28	2.04	37.08 Bn
3	SHEL	Shell plc	308.53 Bn	12.68	1.82	73.08 Bn
4	TTE	TotalEnergies SE	197.04 Bn	17.52	1.70	62.92 Bn
5	COP	Conocophillips	174.48 Bn	18.80	2.67	23.29 Bn
6	EQNR	Equinor Asa	116.88 Bn	14.57	1.02	24.43 Bn
7	PSX	Phillips 66	114.91 Bn	16.20	0.73	20.57 Bn
8	MNR	Mach Natural Resources Lp	1.80 Bn	17.84	1.33	1.17 Bn