KNOT Offshore Partners LP (KNOP) Stock Analysis and Metrics

KNOT Offshore Partners

NYSE: KNOP

$10.22 ▼ -0.21 (-2.01%)

At close: Jul 24, 2026 · 3:59 PM UTC

Financial Ratios

Market Cap348.96 Mn

P/E21.73

P/S0.95

Div. Yield0.03

ROIC (Qtr)0.00

Total Debt (Qtr)928.84 Mn

Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)7.51

Add ratio to table…

About

KNOT Offshore Partners LP is a publicly traded limited partnership formed on February 21, 2013 to own, operate and acquire shuttle tankers under long-term charters of five years or more. It maintains a fleet of nineteen shuttle tankers as of April 17, 2026, serving offshore oil producers by transporting crude oil and condensates from installations to onshore terminals. The partnership operates in the maritime shipping sector, specifically within the specialized niche of shuttle tanker services. Its primary business objective is to generate stable cash flows and provide a sustainable quarterly distribution to unitholders, while pursuing accretive acquisitions of shuttle tankers under long-term charters. To achieve this, KNOT Offshore Partners LP leverages the operational expertise and customer relationships of its sponsor, KNOT, to secure new vessels and extend existing charters.

The partnership generates revenue primarily by charging customers for the hire of its vessels and for ancillary services related to loading, transportation and discharge of crude oil under time charters and, for one vessel, a bareboat charter. Hire rates are typically paid monthly in advance in U. S. dollars and may include fixed amounts, annual escalations or option‑based adjustments to offset operating‑cost inflation. As of April 17, 2026, the majority of its shuttle tankers are employed under time charters with major integrated energy companies, while one vessel operates under a bareboat charter with Shell. In addition, a small portion of revenue historically came from spot voyages, which the partnership utilized in 2024 and 2025 to supplement time‑charter income. Revenue is recognized as the hire accrues, and the partnership also receives reimbursements for certain voyage expenses under specific charter arrangements.

KNOT Offshore Partners LP competes in the highly capital‑intensive shuttle tanker industry, where barriers to entry are high due to the specialized nature of the vessels and the need for long‑term, creditworthy charters. Together with its sponsor KNOT, it ranks as the largest owner of shuttle tankers globally, controlling 28 vessels and having eight newbuilds on order as of September 2025, according to Fearnleys data. The global shuttle tanker fleet comprised 78 vessels with an additional 21 newbuilds on order at that same time, underscoring the consolidated nature of the market. Its principal rivals include Maran Shuttle Tankers (second largest with 18 vessels and three newbuilds), American Eagle Tankers (third with 17 vessels and no newbuilds) and Tsakos Energy Navigation (fourth with six vessels and ten newbuilds on order). The partnership’s competitive advantages stem from its access to KNOT’s operational expertise, established relationships with major oil companies and its ability to secure long‑term, fixed‑rate charters that generate stable cash flows. Furthermore, the partnership benefits from KNOT’s technical management services, which ensure vessel reliability and compliance with stringent safety and environmental standards.

As of April 17, 2026, the partnership’s charterers include Brazil Shipping I Limited (a Shell subsidiary), Equinor ASA, Fronape International Company (a Transpetro subsidiary), Repsol Sinopec Brasil S. A. (combined with Repsol Trading S. A.), Chartering and Shipping Service S. A. (a TotalEnergies subsidiary), Eni Trading and Shipping S.p. A. (an ExxonMobil subsidiary), SeaRiver Maritime LLC (also an ExxonMobil affiliate), Galp Sinopec Brazil Services BV and PetroChina International (America) Inc. Revenue composition for the year ended December 31, 2025 showed that subsidiaries of Shell, Equinor, Eni, Repsol, TotalEnergies and Transpetro accounted for approximately 22%, 15%, 13%, 11%, 11% and 10% of total revenue, respectively, with the remaining share derived from ExxonMobil, Petrorio, KNOT, Galp Sinopec, PetroChina and BP Oil International. The average remaining term of the partnership’s time charters, excluding options, was 2.6 years as of December 31, 2025, while charterholders held options to extend the charters by an additional 4.1 years on average. These figures reflect the partnership’s focus on securing long‑term agreements with creditworthy, integrated energy companies.

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case

KNOP’s recent earnings call revealed significant untapped potential in its growing backlog and stable cash flow profile that the market may be underestimating. The company reported a strong backlog of $858 million in fixed contracts averaging 2.4 years, with additional upside if charter options are exercised—something management explicitly noted is likely given the strength of the current charter market. This backlog, combined with sustained utilization at 97.2% (adjusted for drydocking) and tightening supply-demand fundamentals in key markets like Brazil and the North Sea due to FPSO startups and expansions, creates a durable foundation for predictable cash generation. The market may be overlooking how this structural tailwind in offshore oil logistics—driven by long-term FPSO deployment trends highlighted by Petrobras—could support not just stable earnings but multiple gradual distribution increases over time, especially as the company continues to repay debt at ~$90 million annually while maintaining a conservative leverage profile. Furthermore, the decision to extend the useful life assumption change from 23 to 20 years, while increasing depreciation, was framed as non-cash and not limiting operational life, suggesting the market may be overemphasizing this accounting shift as a detriment when it actually reflects prudent alignment with longer-term vessel utilization trends in a tightening market. The combination of solid liquidity ($140.7 million available), improving charter coverage, and a history of accessing attractive bank finance positions KNOP to capitalize on accretive dropdown opportunities from its sponsor over the next 4–5 years, which could meaningfully rejuvenate and grow the fleet without diluting unitholder value. These factors together suggest the market may be underestimating the durability of KNOP’s cash flows and the potential for sustainable distribution growth beyond the current modest increases.

▼ Bear case

Despite KNOP’s positive commentary, several unspoken risks and evasive answers during the Q&A suggest the market may be ignoring material headwinds that could undermine future performance. Management’s refusal to provide any guidance on distribution growth magnitude—even when pressed by analysts about whether increases would resemble the recent $0.05 per unit hike or be more substantial—reveals a lack of confidence in the sustainability of cash flow generation, despite the strong backlog claims. This evasiveness is particularly concerning given the company’s recent decision to shorten the useful life of its vessels from 23 to 20 years, a move that increases non-cash depreciation and signals either anticipation of earlier obsolescence or reduced confidence in long-term charter demand, especially as the global shuttle tanker fleet faces growing newbuild deliveries that could eventually outpace retirement rates. While management acknowledged tightening markets in Brazil and the North Sea, they offered no concrete view on how geopolitical shifts—such as potential changes in oil sourcing due to Middle East conflict—might alter demand patterns, instead admitting they “do not particularly have a view” on medium-to-long-term implications, which raises questions about strategic preparedness. Additionally, the reliance on dropdown acquisitions from the sponsor as a primary growth lever introduces execution risk, as these transactions depend on sponsor approval, conflicts committee clearance, and attractive pricing—none of which were guaranteed or quantified in the call. The company’s admission that it is repaying debt at ~$90 million per year due to a “depreciating asset base” underscores the capital intensity of maintaining operations, and with two significant debt facilities maturing in late 2026 ($220 million in September and $65 million in October), refinancing risk looms large, especially if market conditions deteriorate. The market may be overlooking how these overlapping risks—aging assets, uncertain distribution sustainability, geopolitical volatility, and refinancing exposure—could converge to pressure distributions and valuation, particularly if charter rate strength proves temporary rather than structural.

Despite KNOP’s positive commentary, several unspoken risks and evasive answers during the Q&A suggest the market may be ignoring material headwinds that could undermine future performance. Management’s refusal to provide any guidance on distribution growth magnitude—even when pressed by analysts about whether increases would resemble the recent $0.05 per unit hike or be more substantial—reveals a lack of confidence in the sustainability of cash flow generation, despite the strong backlog claims. This evasiveness is particularly concerning given the company’s recent decision to shorten the useful life of its vessels from 23 to 20 years, a move that increases non-cash depreciation and signals either anticipation of earlier obsolescence or reduced confidence in long-term charter demand, especially as the global shuttle tanker fleet faces growing newbuild deliveries that could eventually outpace retirement rates. While management acknowledged tightening markets in Brazil and the North Sea, they offered no concrete view on how geopolitical shifts—such as potential changes in oil sourcing due to Middle East conflict—might alter demand patterns, instead admitting they “do not particularly have a view” on medium-to-long-term implications, which raises questions about strategic preparedness. Additionally, the reliance on dropdown acquisitions from the sponsor as a primary growth lever introduces execution risk, as these transactions depend on sponsor approval, conflicts committee clearance, and attractive pricing—none of which were guaranteed or quantified in the call. The company’s admission that it is repaying debt at ~$90 million per year due to a “depreciating asset base” underscores the capital intensity of maintaining operations, and with two significant debt facilities maturing in late 2026 ($220 million in September and $65 million in October), refinancing risk looms large, especially if market conditions deteriorate. The market may be overlooking how these overlapping risks—aging assets, uncertain distribution sustainability, geopolitical volatility, and refinancing exposure—could converge to pressure distributions and valuation, particularly if charter rate strength proves temporary rather than structural.

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Oil & Gas Midstream

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	DHT	DHT Holdings, Inc.	2,970.16 Bn	8,959.91	5,253.98	0.11 Bn
2	FLNG	Flex LNG Ltd.	1,659.01 Bn	18,718.63	4,884.38	1.82 Bn
3	ENB	Enbridge Inc	124.02 Bn	26.47	3.08	78.78 Bn
4	EP-PC	Kinder Morgan, Inc.	112.83 Bn	33.01	6.44	32.06 Bn
5	EPD	Enterprise Products Partners L.P.	83.80 Bn	14.05	1.63	33.91 Bn
6	TRP	Tc Energy Corp	73.34 Bn	29,565.54	14.35	33.55 Bn
7	ET	Energy Transfer LP	70.48 Bn	17.14	1.00	69.36 Bn
8	TRGP	Targa Resources Corp.	60.56 Bn	28.40	3.66	19.03 Bn

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Product and Service Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Product and Service Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password