Hyster-Yale, Inc. (HY) Stock Analysis and Metrics

Hyster-Yale

NYSE: HY

$33.17 ▲ +0.01 (+0.05%)

At close: Jul 24, 2026 · 3:59 PM UTC

Financial Ratios

Market Cap589.88 Mn

P/E-6.08

P/S0.16

Div. Yield0.04

ROIC (Qtr)0.00

Total Debt (Qtr)592.40 Mn

Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)-12.65

Add ratio to table…

About

Hyster-Yale, Inc. designs, engineers, manufactures, sells and services a comprehensive line of lift trucks, attachments, parts, fleet management services, technology and energy solutions. The company markets its products primarily under the Hyster®, Yale® and Nuvera® brand names through independent dealers and a direct sales program. Its Bolzoni subsidiary produces precision-engineered lift truck attachments, forks, masts and lift tables sold under the Bolzoni®, Auramo® and Meyer® brands. Headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio, the company operates as a globally integrated business with manufacturing and assembly facilities in the United States, Northern Ireland, China, the Netherlands, Mexico, the Philippines, Brazil, Japan, Italy and Vietnam. The company also designs warehouse equipment tailored to regional practices, with development centers in Greenville, North Carolina for the Americas market and in Masate, Italy for the European market.

Revenue is generated from the sale of lift trucks, parts, service and rental offerings, and Bolzoni attachment products. In 2025, lift trucks accounted for approximately 71% of total revenue, parts for 16%, service rental and other for 8%, and Bolzoni for 5%. Within lift truck sales, internal combustion engine models represented about 40% and electric models about 31% of revenue. The company also earns income from fleet management services, technology solutions and energy products such as those from its Nuvera fuel cell business. Additionally, the company provides parts under the HYSource™ and UNISOURCE™ brands to dealers for Hyster® and Yale® lift trucks and for servicing competitor equipment. Aftermarket parts and service revenue supports the large installed base of lift trucks currently in operation across various industries.

The company operates through the following segments.

• Bolzoni: Bolzoni designs, manufactures and markets precision-engineered lift truck attachments, forks, masts and lift tables for handling delicate and specialized loads, sold under the Bolzoni®, Auramo® and Meyer® brands and the Silver Line product portfolio, and also supplies components to lift truck manufacturers from facilities in Italy, the United States, China, Germany, Finland and Brazil, maintaining a strong presence in the global lift truck attachments market.

Hyster-Yale, Inc. ranks among the leading lift truck manufacturers globally, holding significant market share in the Americas and worldwide. The company competes with other major lift truck producers on factors such as dealer strength, brand loyalty, product quality, innovation and total cost of ownership. Its Bolzoni subsidiary holds a leading position in the lift truck attachment market, competing with a few global attachment manufacturers and numerous niche players. Competitive advantages include a broad product portfolio, strong dealer network, integrated service offerings and a diversified geographic manufacturing footprint that helps mitigate tariffs and freight costs. The company also faces competition from alternative power sources such as lithium ion batteries and hydrogen fuel cells, which are emerging in the lift truck market.

The company sells its lift trucks and attachments primarily through a network of independent dealers located in 111 countries and through a direct sales program serving major customers with centralized purchasing. In 2025, the direct sales program accounted for 28% of new lift truck revenues. Its end user base spans diverse sectors including retail, durable goods, food and beverage, industrial and logistics operations.

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case

Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. is positioned for significant margin expansion in the second half of 2026 as its modular and scalable product platform gains traction, particularly in the high-volume 1 to 3.5 ton segment where the company has achieved full transition to new internal combustion engine models in EMEA, North America, and Western and Eastern Europe, with legacy units now phased out except for niche emerging market applications, enabling standardized manufacturing, reduced component complexity, and improved production flexibility that lowers unit costs and supports competitive pricing without sacrificing target margins, as confirmed by management’s assertion that each new truck is designed to hit specific margin requirements and will positively impact overall profitability as volumes recover and dealer inventories normalize.
The company’s strategic shift toward value and standard truck configurations is not a temporary concession to cyclical weakness but a structural realignment that addresses a persistent market shift where customers increasingly prioritize fit-for-purpose, affordable solutions over premium features, allowing Hyster-Yale to capture growing demand in underserved segments like light manufacturing and retail where it previously over-served customers with high-margin premium trucks, thereby improving lifecycle economics, reducing earnings volatility across the cycle, and expanding its total addressable market by enabling participation in the value segment where it had minimal presence before, which management views as a key lever to improve mix and long-term profitability as fleet replacement activity accelerates with aging equipment and rising RFQs.
Hidden catalysts in the recent news and operational updates include the accelerated rollout of lithium-ion battery shipments beginning in North America at the start of Q3 FY26, which management identified as a significant part of the business by 2027, coupled with early wins in material handling as a service (MHaaS) for automated trucks demonstrated at MODEX and planned for customer deployment in Q3 FY26, creating recurring revenue streams and higher-margin technology attachment opportunities that are not yet reflected in current guidance but could meaningfully diversify earnings and reduce dependence on cyclical truck sales as automation and energy solutions scale over the next 12 to 18 months.
The company’s end-to-end digital enablement initiative is improving decision-making, execution speed, and life cycle management across product development, manufacturing, and commercial execution, which, while not quantified in the transcript, represents a structural advantage that enhances agility in responding to shifting customer preferences and tariff-induced cost pressures, allowing faster iteration on product configurations and tighter alignment between engineering, operations, and commercial teams under the integrated product line management model, thereby reducing time-to-market for new offerings and increasing the likelihood of successful conquest opportunities like the warehouse club safety technology deployment and Route Runner wins with beverage distributors, which validate the strategy’s ability to address real operational pain points and drive incremental order flow beyond traditional lift truck demand.
Despite near-term tariff headwinds, Hyster-Yale’s pricing and cost mitigation strategy—where roughly two-thirds of tariff impact is addressed through pricing (including embedded surcharges for Section 122 and IEPA tariffs) and one-third through supply chain adjustments—is expected to take effect in the second half of 2026 as the four- to six-month order-to-delivery cycle allows cost recovery to flow through, with management anticipating Q2 FY26 as the low point for operating profit before meaningful improvement begins, supported by rising bookings (up 7% sequentially from Q4 FY25 to $585M in Q1 FY26), rebuilding backlog, and ongoing cost reduction from 2025 restructuring actions, including Nuvera realignment and workforce reductions, which are already contributing to lower operating costs year-over-year and will yield greater margin benefits as volumes increase and fixed costs are absorbed over a larger base.

Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. is positioned for significant margin expansion in the second half of 2026 as its modular and scalable product platform gains traction, particularly in the high-volume 1 to 3.5 ton segment where the company has achieved full transition to new internal combustion engine models in EMEA, North America, and Western and Eastern Europe, with legacy units now phased out except for niche emerging market applications, enabling standardized manufacturing, reduced component complexity, and improved production flexibility that lowers unit costs and supports competitive pricing without sacrificing target margins, as confirmed by management’s assertion that each new truck is designed to hit specific margin requirements and will positively impact overall profitability as volumes recover and dealer inventories normalize.
The company’s strategic shift toward value and standard truck configurations is not a temporary concession to cyclical weakness but a structural realignment that addresses a persistent market shift where customers increasingly prioritize fit-for-purpose, affordable solutions over premium features, allowing Hyster-Yale to capture growing demand in underserved segments like light manufacturing and retail where it previously over-served customers with high-margin premium trucks, thereby improving lifecycle economics, reducing earnings volatility across the cycle, and expanding its total addressable market by enabling participation in the value segment where it had minimal presence before, which management views as a key lever to improve mix and long-term profitability as fleet replacement activity accelerates with aging equipment and rising RFQs.
Hidden catalysts in the recent news and operational updates include the accelerated rollout of lithium-ion battery shipments beginning in North America at the start of Q3 FY26, which management identified as a significant part of the business by 2027, coupled with early wins in material handling as a service (MHaaS) for automated trucks demonstrated at MODEX and planned for customer deployment in Q3 FY26, creating recurring revenue streams and higher-margin technology attachment opportunities that are not yet reflected in current guidance but could meaningfully diversify earnings and reduce dependence on cyclical truck sales as automation and energy solutions scale over the next 12 to 18 months.
The company’s end-to-end digital enablement initiative is improving decision-making, execution speed, and life cycle management across product development, manufacturing, and commercial execution, which, while not quantified in the transcript, represents a structural advantage that enhances agility in responding to shifting customer preferences and tariff-induced cost pressures, allowing faster iteration on product configurations and tighter alignment between engineering, operations, and commercial teams under the integrated product line management model, thereby reducing time-to-market for new offerings and increasing the likelihood of successful conquest opportunities like the warehouse club safety technology deployment and Route Runner wins with beverage distributors, which validate the strategy’s ability to address real operational pain points and drive incremental order flow beyond traditional lift truck demand.
Despite near-term tariff headwinds, Hyster-Yale’s pricing and cost mitigation strategy—where roughly two-thirds of tariff impact is addressed through pricing (including embedded surcharges for Section 122 and IEPA tariffs) and one-third through supply chain adjustments—is expected to take effect in the second half of 2026 as the four- to six-month order-to-delivery cycle allows cost recovery to flow through, with management anticipating Q2 FY26 as the low point for operating profit before meaningful improvement begins, supported by rising bookings (up 7% sequentially from Q4 FY25 to $585M in Q1 FY26), rebuilding backlog, and ongoing cost reduction from 2025 restructuring actions, including Nuvera realignment and workforce reductions, which are already contributing to lower operating costs year-over-year and will yield greater margin benefits as volumes increase and fixed costs are absorbed over a larger base.

▼ Bear case

Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. faces persistent and potentially worsening tariff headwinds that are not fully mitigated by current pricing and cost strategies, as management acknowledged an expected 6% increase in effective tariff rate for 2026 compared to 2025, with Section 232 tariffs now applying to the full import value of finished forklifts and steel derivatives, and while the company has applied for approximately $40M in IEPA tariff refunds and seeks $15M–$20M from suppliers, these recoveries are uncertain in timing and amount, represent only a fraction of the $130M in direct tariff costs incurred since Liberation Day 2025, and even if fully recovered would not offset ongoing costs, leaving the business exposed to margin erosion especially in Q2 FY26 when tariff impact is expected to peak before mitigation actions take hold, despite hopes for improvement in the second half.
The shift toward lighter-duty, lower-priced trucks, while framed as a strategic opportunity, poses a material risk to revenue quality and mix, as the company reported Q1 FY26 revenue of $795M driven by normalization of excess backlog and a move to standard/value configurations that reduced shipments of higher-priced traditional models, and although management claims this aligns with customer demand for affordability, it inherently lowers average selling price and could compress margins if cost savings from modular platforms fail to fully offset the revenue decline, particularly given that the 1 to 3.5 ton segment—now fully transitioned to scalable platforms—represents only about a third of volume, meaning the benefit of cost efficiencies may be limited to a subset of the business while premium and higher-tonnage segments continue to face pricing pressure from Asian competitors and weak industrial demand in North America and Europe.
Despite optimism around fleet replacement and aging equipment, there are signs of cautious customer behavior that may delay recovery, as management noted customers remain hesitant as they work through receipt of prior-period orders, and while RFQs and quoting activity are up, utilization remains down due to weak manufacturing in North America and Europe tied to broader economic uncertainty, including the Iran conflict, which suggests that any rebound in bookings may be slow and uneven, with the company itself acknowledging Q2 FY26 as the expected low point for operating profit and net income, and the reliance on dealer confidence and large customer plans for Q3–Q4 FY26 introduces execution risk if macroeconomic conditions do not improve as anticipated, potentially leaving the transformation initiatives underutilized during a prolonged soft patch.
The company’s push into automation and lithium-ion batteries, while promising long-term, carries significant execution and adoption risks that are not adequately addressed in the current narrative, as the MHaaS model for automated trucks is still in early customer deployment phase with only “a couple of really good wins” cited, and the full automation suite for reach and counterbalance trucks is not expected until 2027–2028, meaning near-term contributions will be minimal, while the lithium-ion battery rollout, though initiating in North America in Q3 FY26, depends on customer acceptance of in-house batteries over third-party alternatives and faces challenges in scaling production, securing supply chain advantages, and achieving cost parity, all of which could delay the anticipated 2027 business significance and leave the company investing in future growth areas without near-term payoff amid current profitability pressures.
Hyster-Yale’s transformation initiatives, including product evolution, operational restructuring, digital enablement, and commercial execution, are described as structural changes intended to improve performance as volumes recover, but there is limited evidence of early financial traction beyond year-over-year operating cost declines in Q1 FY26 from 2025 restructuring actions, with management conceding that the full benefits of manufacturing footprint optimization and modular platform rollout are expected in later periods, and the reliance on a four- to six-month order-to-delivery cycle means that current actions may not translate into improved shipments or revenue visibility for several quarters, creating a gap between strategic efforts and near-term financial results that could test investor patience if the anticipated second-half 2026 improvement fails to materialize on schedule, especially given the company’s history of navigating cycles through experience rather than guaranteed outcomes.

Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. faces persistent and potentially worsening tariff headwinds that are not fully mitigated by current pricing and cost strategies, as management acknowledged an expected 6% increase in effective tariff rate for 2026 compared to 2025, with Section 232 tariffs now applying to the full import value of finished forklifts and steel derivatives, and while the company has applied for approximately $40M in IEPA tariff refunds and seeks $15M–$20M from suppliers, these recoveries are uncertain in timing and amount, represent only a fraction of the $130M in direct tariff costs incurred since Liberation Day 2025, and even if fully recovered would not offset ongoing costs, leaving the business exposed to margin erosion especially in Q2 FY26 when tariff impact is expected to peak before mitigation actions take hold, despite hopes for improvement in the second half.
The shift toward lighter-duty, lower-priced trucks, while framed as a strategic opportunity, poses a material risk to revenue quality and mix, as the company reported Q1 FY26 revenue of $795M driven by normalization of excess backlog and a move to standard/value configurations that reduced shipments of higher-priced traditional models, and although management claims this aligns with customer demand for affordability, it inherently lowers average selling price and could compress margins if cost savings from modular platforms fail to fully offset the revenue decline, particularly given that the 1 to 3.5 ton segment—now fully transitioned to scalable platforms—represents only about a third of volume, meaning the benefit of cost efficiencies may be limited to a subset of the business while premium and higher-tonnage segments continue to face pricing pressure from Asian competitors and weak industrial demand in North America and Europe.
Despite optimism around fleet replacement and aging equipment, there are signs of cautious customer behavior that may delay recovery, as management noted customers remain hesitant as they work through receipt of prior-period orders, and while RFQs and quoting activity are up, utilization remains down due to weak manufacturing in North America and Europe tied to broader economic uncertainty, including the Iran conflict, which suggests that any rebound in bookings may be slow and uneven, with the company itself acknowledging Q2 FY26 as the expected low point for operating profit and net income, and the reliance on dealer confidence and large customer plans for Q3–Q4 FY26 introduces execution risk if macroeconomic conditions do not improve as anticipated, potentially leaving the transformation initiatives underutilized during a prolonged soft patch.
The company’s push into automation and lithium-ion batteries, while promising long-term, carries significant execution and adoption risks that are not adequately addressed in the current narrative, as the MHaaS model for automated trucks is still in early customer deployment phase with only “a couple of really good wins” cited, and the full automation suite for reach and counterbalance trucks is not expected until 2027–2028, meaning near-term contributions will be minimal, while the lithium-ion battery rollout, though initiating in North America in Q3 FY26, depends on customer acceptance of in-house batteries over third-party alternatives and faces challenges in scaling production, securing supply chain advantages, and achieving cost parity, all of which could delay the anticipated 2027 business significance and leave the company investing in future growth areas without near-term payoff amid current profitability pressures.
Hyster-Yale’s transformation initiatives, including product evolution, operational restructuring, digital enablement, and commercial execution, are described as structural changes intended to improve performance as volumes recover, but there is limited evidence of early financial traction beyond year-over-year operating cost declines in Q1 FY26 from 2025 restructuring actions, with management conceding that the full benefits of manufacturing footprint optimization and modular platform rollout are expected in later periods, and the reliance on a four- to six-month order-to-delivery cycle means that current actions may not translate into improved shipments or revenue visibility for several quarters, creating a gap between strategic efforts and near-term financial results that could test investor patience if the anticipated second-half 2026 improvement fails to materialize on schedule, especially given the company’s history of navigating cycles through experience rather than guaranteed outcomes.

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	CAT	Caterpillar Inc	414.02 Bn	43.90	5.85	24.70 Bn
2	DE	Deere & Co	164.89 Bn	35.14	3.48	21.56 Bn
3	PCAR	Paccar Inc	68.81 Bn	96.52	2.48	10.19 Bn
4	CNH	CNH Industrial N.V.	13.19 Bn	39.98	0.73	-
5	OSK	Oshkosh Corp	11.41 Bn	-58.94	1.09	0.59 Bn
6	AGCO	Agco Corp /De	8.50 Bn	11.85	0.82	3.03 Bn
7	TEX	Terex Corp	6.58 Bn	32.26	1.11	2.75 Bn
8	GP	GREENPOWER MOTOR Co INC.	3.53 Bn	-88,558.07	-	0.01 Bn

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password