Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD) Stock Analysis and Metrics

Goldman Sachs BDC

NYSE: GSBD

$8.65 ▲ +0.04 (+0.46%)

At close: Jul 24, 2026 · 3:59 PM UTC

Financial Ratios

Market Cap973.16 Mn

P/E2.60

P/S14.03

Div. Yield0.23

Total Debt (Qtr)1.90 Bn

Add ratio to table…

About

Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. is a specialty finance company focused on lending to middle-market companies. The company operates as a closed-end management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company (BDC) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and has also elected to be treated as a regulated investment company (RIC) for tax purposes. Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. originates and invests in secured and unsecured debt instruments, including first lien, unitranche, second lien, and mezzanine debt, as well as select equity investments, primarily in U. S. middle-market companies defined as those with $5 million to $200 million of annual EBITDA.

The company generates revenue primarily through interest income from its debt investments. Additional revenue sources include loan origination and other fees, dividends from direct equity investments, and capital gains from the sale of investments. Fees such as directors’ fees, consulting fees, administrative fees, and tax advisory fees received from portfolio companies are also collected by Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc., subject to applicable laws and exemptive relief when investments are made alongside other client accounts managed by its Investment Adviser.

The company operates through the following segments:

• Investment Portfolio: This segment encompasses the company’s core activity of originating and managing debt and equity investments in middle-market companies. As of December 31, 2025, the portfolio consisted of 564 investments across 171 portfolio companies in 40 different industries. The largest industry exposures were in Software, Health Care Providers & Services, and Health Care Technology, representing 17.6%, 8.8%, and 8.4% of the portfolio at fair value, respectively. The portfolio is predominantly composed of secured debt, with approximately 98.4% of investments in secured debt instruments, including first lien, unitranche (including last-out portions), and second lien debt, while unsecured debt, preferred stock, common stock, and warrants make up the remainder.

• Investment Strategy and Origination: This segment involves the direct origination and structuring of loans and securities in which the company invests, with a focus on holding investments to maturity. Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. seeks to lead negotiations and structuring of investments, often acting as the sole investor or seeking significant influence over investor rights when multiple parties are involved. The investment size typically ranges from $10 million to $75 million or above, with maturities of three to ten years, targeting companies with stable cash flows, experienced management, and defensible market positions.

• Portfolio Management and Monitoring: This segment includes the ongoing oversight of portfolio companies by the Investment Adviser, which monitors financial trends, adherence to business plans, and covenant compliance. The Investment Adviser employs an internal investment rating system grading investments from 1 to 4 based on credit risk, with Grade 1 indicating least risk and Grade 4 indicating substantially increased risk and potential for loss. Monitoring methods include periodic contact with management, board meeting participation, and review of financial statements and projections.

Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. operates in the competitive specialty finance and middle-market lending space, where it faces competition from other BDCs, commercial and investment banks, commercial finance companies, collateralized loan obligations (CLOs), private funds including hedge funds, and private equity funds. Despite some competitors having greater financial resources or lower costs of funds, the company differentiates itself through its direct origination platform, experienced investment professionals via the Goldman Sachs Asset Management Private Credit Team, deep relationships with financial sponsors, and a disciplined investment philosophy focused on capital preservation and risk mitigation through senior secured debt structures.

The company serves a diverse customer base of U. S. middle-market companies across various industries, using its capital to support organic growth, fund acquisitions, make capital investments, or refinance indebtedness. As of December 31, 2025, the portfolio included investments in 171 portfolio companies across 40 industries, with no specific customer names disclosed in the filing, but the borrowers span sectors such as software, healthcare, and technology, reflecting the company’s broad industry focus within the middle-market segment.

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case

Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. is executing a disciplined portfolio transition that is positioning the company for improved credit quality and higher future yields, with 58% of its portfolio now consisting of post-2022 originations that are performing in line with expectations and showing minimal credit deterioration. This strategic shift away from legacy assets—which account for over 99.5% of nonaccruals and 72% of current quarter losses—demonstrates effective deleveraging of higher-risk holdings, and the company’s ability to restructure legacy positions favorably post-quarter end (including one full par repayment and one improved seniority restructure) signals active value recovery rather than passive deterioration. The weighted average yield on debt and income-producing investments remains stable at 9.9%, and the continued top-line and EBITDA growth across portfolio companies on a weighted average basis underscores the underlying health of the operating businesses, even as market-wide spread widening creates temporary mark-to-market pressure. This fundamental resilience, combined with the company’s access to Goldman Sachs’ 30-year private credit ecosystem and differentiated sourcing, provides a durable competitive advantage in identifying and underwriting new opportunities that legacy competitors cannot match, especially as deal flow begins to normalize.
The company’s conservative capital structure and proactive liability management are creating significant optionality to capitalize on market dislocations, with a net debt-to-equity ratio of 1.37x, a laddered unsecured debt maturity schedule, and no near-term unsecured maturities reducing refinancing risk. The recent issuance of $400 million in three-year investment grade notes at a 5.1% coupon—hedged to floating rate to match assets—was met with 7.3x oversubscription, reflecting strong institutional confidence in GSBD’s credit profile and ability to access capital on favorable terms even during volatile periods. Furthermore, the amend-and-extend on the Truist revolving credit facility increased borrowing capacity to $974 million post-quarter end while extending maturity to May 2031 and reducing costs, enhancing liquidity flexibility. This financial strength allows GSBD to selectively deploy capital into wider spreads as market conditions improve, particularly given management’s expectation to reinvest proceeds from recent exits at more attractive risk-adjusted levels, turning temporary spread widening into a long-term yield enhancement opportunity rather than a threat.
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. is benefiting from a structural shift in private credit toward traditional cash flow–supported lending, having successfully reduced its exposure to annualized recurring revenue (ARR) loans from nearly 39% of the portfolio at Q3 2022 to under 10% today, aligning with broader market trends that favor EBITDA-based structures over revenue-dependent models. This deliberate de-risking is particularly valuable amid heightened scrutiny of AI disruption in the software sector, as the company’s framework has evolved to thoughtfully assess and mitigate such risks without overreacting to market sentiment, and its focus on senior secured loans (98.7% of the portfolio) provides inherent protection through fixed maturities and change-of-control provisions that generate par repayments. The low public market default rate for broadly syndicated loans at 1.44% as of March 2026—well below crisis levels—further supports the view that underlying credit fundamentals remain sound, and GSBD’s disciplined underwriting culture, rooted in its 30-year track record, positions it to outperform peers during periods of manager performance divergence by avoiding speculative lending and maintaining rigorous collateral coverage.

Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. is executing a disciplined portfolio transition that is positioning the company for improved credit quality and higher future yields, with 58% of its portfolio now consisting of post-2022 originations that are performing in line with expectations and showing minimal credit deterioration. This strategic shift away from legacy assets—which account for over 99.5% of nonaccruals and 72% of current quarter losses—demonstrates effective deleveraging of higher-risk holdings, and the company’s ability to restructure legacy positions favorably post-quarter end (including one full par repayment and one improved seniority restructure) signals active value recovery rather than passive deterioration. The weighted average yield on debt and income-producing investments remains stable at 9.9%, and the continued top-line and EBITDA growth across portfolio companies on a weighted average basis underscores the underlying health of the operating businesses, even as market-wide spread widening creates temporary mark-to-market pressure. This fundamental resilience, combined with the company’s access to Goldman Sachs’ 30-year private credit ecosystem and differentiated sourcing, provides a durable competitive advantage in identifying and underwriting new opportunities that legacy competitors cannot match, especially as deal flow begins to normalize.
The company’s conservative capital structure and proactive liability management are creating significant optionality to capitalize on market dislocations, with a net debt-to-equity ratio of 1.37x, a laddered unsecured debt maturity schedule, and no near-term unsecured maturities reducing refinancing risk. The recent issuance of $400 million in three-year investment grade notes at a 5.1% coupon—hedged to floating rate to match assets—was met with 7.3x oversubscription, reflecting strong institutional confidence in GSBD’s credit profile and ability to access capital on favorable terms even during volatile periods. Furthermore, the amend-and-extend on the Truist revolving credit facility increased borrowing capacity to $974 million post-quarter end while extending maturity to May 2031 and reducing costs, enhancing liquidity flexibility. This financial strength allows GSBD to selectively deploy capital into wider spreads as market conditions improve, particularly given management’s expectation to reinvest proceeds from recent exits at more attractive risk-adjusted levels, turning temporary spread widening into a long-term yield enhancement opportunity rather than a threat.
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. is benefiting from a structural shift in private credit toward traditional cash flow–supported lending, having successfully reduced its exposure to annualized recurring revenue (ARR) loans from nearly 39% of the portfolio at Q3 2022 to under 10% today, aligning with broader market trends that favor EBITDA-based structures over revenue-dependent models. This deliberate de-risking is particularly valuable amid heightened scrutiny of AI disruption in the software sector, as the company’s framework has evolved to thoughtfully assess and mitigate such risks without overreacting to market sentiment, and its focus on senior secured loans (98.7% of the portfolio) provides inherent protection through fixed maturities and change-of-control provisions that generate par repayments. The low public market default rate for broadly syndicated loans at 1.44% as of March 2026—well below crisis levels—further supports the view that underlying credit fundamentals remain sound, and GSBD’s disciplined underwriting culture, rooted in its 30-year track record, positions it to outperform peers during periods of manager performance divergence by avoiding speculative lending and maintaining rigorous collateral coverage.

▼ Bear case

Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.’s dividend sustainability remains under pressure due to a structural mismatch between earnings and payout, as evidenced by the Q1 2026 net investment income of $0.22 per share falling short of the declared $0.32 per share quarterly dividend, requiring the use of undistributed taxable net income to bridge the gap. While management cites a $94 million cushion of remaining undistributed taxable net income, this buffer is finite and relies on the assumption that future NII will recover to cover the dividend—a proposition made uncertain by the lingering drag of legacy assets, which continue to generate credit-specific losses and mark-to-market volatility, and the potential for incentive fee accruals to remain elevated under the three-year lookback structure if portfolio performance does not improve meaningfully. The company’s acknowledgment that it is “comfortable” using spillover to maintain the dividend in the near term, without defining a clear timeline or threshold for when coverage becomes unsustainable, suggests a reliance on accounting flexibility rather than organic earnings power, raising concerns about the long-term viability of the current dividend level if credit quality in the legacy book does not improve or if new originations fail to generate sufficient yield to offset ongoing drag.
The transition out of the legacy portfolio is progressing slower than management’s optimistic framing suggests, with only 58% of the portfolio consisting of post-2022 originations after nearly four years since the Goldman Sachs integration began in 2022, indicating that the pace of asset rotation is constrained by limited prepayment activity, difficulty in selling legacy positions at acceptable prices, or ongoing workout efforts that tie up capital. Tucker Greene’s admission that repayments were “relatively light” in Q1 despite an acceleration noted in Q2—coupled with the fact that over 53% of Q1 repayments came from pre-2022 vintages—highlights that the company is still heavily reliant on collecting from older, lower-yielding assets rather than recycling capital into new, higher-spread opportunities. This slow runoff delays the full realization of benefits from the enhanced sourcing and underwriting capabilities of the OneGS ecosystem, prolongs exposure to idiosyncratic credit risks in the legacy book (as demonstrated by the two new nonaccruals—1GI LLC and 3SI Security Systems—both legacy names), and increases the risk that market-wide spread widening or economic softening could exacerbate losses in the legacy segment before it is fully exited.
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. is increasingly exposed to interest rate and spread volatility through its growing reliance on floating rate liabilities, despite efforts to hedge new issuances, as 62.5% of total principal debt outstanding was in unsecured debt at quarter end, and the company’s strategy of matching floating rate assets with floating rate liabilities via swaps does not eliminate basis risk or reset frequency mismatches. While the recent $400 million note issuance was hedged from fixed to floating, this approach assumes perfect correlation between the loan portfolio’s reset index and the swap’s floating rate, which may not hold during periods of market stress or liquidity dislocations, potentially creating unanticipated funding cost pressures. Furthermore, the weighted average interest coverage ratio of portfolio companies declined slightly to 1.9x from 2.0x, and the weighted average net debt to EBITDA increased to 6.0x from 5.9x, signaling a subtle but measurable deterioration in the credit metrics of the underlying borrowers—even if management attributes this to rounding or attributes strength to top-line and EBITDA growth—suggesting that the portfolio’s ability to withstand additional economic headwinds may be weakening, particularly if the anticipated recovery in middle-market M&A and sponsor activity remains delayed or fails to materialize as hoped.

Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.’s dividend sustainability remains under pressure due to a structural mismatch between earnings and payout, as evidenced by the Q1 2026 net investment income of $0.22 per share falling short of the declared $0.32 per share quarterly dividend, requiring the use of undistributed taxable net income to bridge the gap. While management cites a $94 million cushion of remaining undistributed taxable net income, this buffer is finite and relies on the assumption that future NII will recover to cover the dividend—a proposition made uncertain by the lingering drag of legacy assets, which continue to generate credit-specific losses and mark-to-market volatility, and the potential for incentive fee accruals to remain elevated under the three-year lookback structure if portfolio performance does not improve meaningfully. The company’s acknowledgment that it is “comfortable” using spillover to maintain the dividend in the near term, without defining a clear timeline or threshold for when coverage becomes unsustainable, suggests a reliance on accounting flexibility rather than organic earnings power, raising concerns about the long-term viability of the current dividend level if credit quality in the legacy book does not improve or if new originations fail to generate sufficient yield to offset ongoing drag.
The transition out of the legacy portfolio is progressing slower than management’s optimistic framing suggests, with only 58% of the portfolio consisting of post-2022 originations after nearly four years since the Goldman Sachs integration began in 2022, indicating that the pace of asset rotation is constrained by limited prepayment activity, difficulty in selling legacy positions at acceptable prices, or ongoing workout efforts that tie up capital. Tucker Greene’s admission that repayments were “relatively light” in Q1 despite an acceleration noted in Q2—coupled with the fact that over 53% of Q1 repayments came from pre-2022 vintages—highlights that the company is still heavily reliant on collecting from older, lower-yielding assets rather than recycling capital into new, higher-spread opportunities. This slow runoff delays the full realization of benefits from the enhanced sourcing and underwriting capabilities of the OneGS ecosystem, prolongs exposure to idiosyncratic credit risks in the legacy book (as demonstrated by the two new nonaccruals—1GI LLC and 3SI Security Systems—both legacy names), and increases the risk that market-wide spread widening or economic softening could exacerbate losses in the legacy segment before it is fully exited.
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. is increasingly exposed to interest rate and spread volatility through its growing reliance on floating rate liabilities, despite efforts to hedge new issuances, as 62.5% of total principal debt outstanding was in unsecured debt at quarter end, and the company’s strategy of matching floating rate assets with floating rate liabilities via swaps does not eliminate basis risk or reset frequency mismatches. While the recent $400 million note issuance was hedged from fixed to floating, this approach assumes perfect correlation between the loan portfolio’s reset index and the swap’s floating rate, which may not hold during periods of market stress or liquidity dislocations, potentially creating unanticipated funding cost pressures. Furthermore, the weighted average interest coverage ratio of portfolio companies declined slightly to 1.9x from 2.0x, and the weighted average net debt to EBITDA increased to 6.0x from 5.9x, signaling a subtle but measurable deterioration in the credit metrics of the underlying borrowers—even if management attributes this to rounding or attributes strength to top-line and EBITDA growth—suggesting that the portfolio’s ability to withstand additional economic headwinds may be weakening, particularly if the anticipated recovery in middle-market M&A and sponsor activity remains delayed or fails to materialize as hoped.

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Asset Management

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	BN	BROOKFIELD Corp /ON/	1,251.90 Bn	1,035.48	16.53	15.06 Bn
2	BLK	BlackRock, Inc.	163.76 Bn	26.19	6.39	20.18 Bn
3	BX	Blackstone Inc.	101.88 Bn	16.71	6.89	13.28 Bn
4	APO	Apollo Global Management, Inc.	73.13 Bn	69.84	2.74	14.22 Bn
5	STT	State Street Corp	51.60 Bn	18.27	3.57	-
6	AMP	Ameriprise Financial Inc	49.37 Bn	12.67	1.77	0.20 Bn
7	NTRS	Northern Trust Corp	33.59 Bn	18.37	6.53	7.84 Bn
8	RJF	Raymond James Financial Inc	33.19 Bn	15.49	2.41	4.66 Bn

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Investment, Issuer Affiliation Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Investment, Issuer Affiliation Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password