Great Elm
NASDAQ: GEG
$2.18 ▲ +0.03  (+1.40%)
At close: Jul 24, 2026 · 4:00 PM UTC
Financial Ratios
Market Cap67.56 Mn
P/E-2.81
P/S3.73
Div. Yield0.00
ROIC (Qtr)0.00
Total Debt (Qtr)26.59 Mn
Add ratio to table…

About

Great Elm Group, Inc. is a publicly traded alternative asset management company that manages a diversified portfolio of long duration and permanent capital vehicles across credit, real estate, specialty finance, and other alternative strategies. As of June 30, 2025 the combined assets under management of its investment management subsidiaries were approximately $758.5 million. The firm seeks to generate recurring free cash flows through its investment management subsidiaries…

Read more ↓
Sector: Financial Services Industry: Asset Management CIK: 0001831096

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case
  • Great Elm Group's strategic repositioning of GECC's portfolio towards first lien investments, now comprising nearly 75% of the corporate credit portfolio, is a significant positive indicator. This shift towards senior secured positions enhances the portfolio's quality and reduces risk, positioning GECC for improved performance. The company's focus on rigorous underwriting and enhanced portfolio diversification is likely to yield durable performance, which the market may be underestimating. The strategic rotation of the portfolio and the elimination of near-term refinancing risk through deleveraging set a strong foundation for future growth. This disciplined approach to capital deployment and portfolio management is a key catalyst that could drive long-term value for Great Elm Group's shareholders.
  • The Monomoy platform's strong execution and growth across its real estate businesses present a compelling bullish case. Monomoy CRE's investment and property management fees grew over 20%, while Monomoy REIT closed five acquisitions totaling $28 million in the quarter, surpassing its full-year 2025 activity. The build-to-suit (BTS) segment delivered a third property to an investment-grade tenant, with a fourth project underway in Texas. These achievements highlight the platform's robust pipeline and high tenant satisfaction, which are likely to drive continued fee growth and AUM expansion. The market may be overlooking the significant growth prospects within the Monomoy platform, which could become a major driver of Great Elm Group's future earnings.
  • Great Elm Group's share repurchase program, increased by $15 million to a total of $40 million, signals strong management confidence in the company's undervaluation. The company has repurchased approximately 7.8 million shares at an average price of $2 per share, demonstrating a commitment to enhancing shareholder value. With $24.4 million of remaining capacity, the company's active participation in the repurchase program at current valuation levels could provide a significant boost to earnings per share and stock price appreciation. This capital allocation strategy underscores management's conviction in the business and its potential for long-term success, which the market may not fully appreciate.
  • The performance of the CoreWeave investment, with cumulative distributions of $6.8 million exceeding the initial $5 million investment, presents an underappreciated growth catalyst. CoreWeave's recent stock price rebound and successful capital raises indicate strong upside potential, which could translate into additional gains for Great Elm Group. The company's ability to identify and capitalize on high-growth investment opportunities like CoreWeave highlights its strategic acumen and potential for generating alpha. This aspect of the investment portfolio may be overlooked by the market, but it could significantly contribute to the company's future performance.
▼ Bear case
  • Great Elm Group's reported unrealized losses of $9.8 million, primarily related to GECC common stock and related SPVs, raise concerns about the company's exposure to market volatility. These non-cash mark-to-market losses highlight the risks associated with the company's investment portfolio and could signal potential future write-downs. The market may be ignoring the potential for further declines in the value of these holdings, which could negatively impact the company's financial performance and shareholder value. The significant unrealized losses underscore the need for cautious optimism regarding the company's near-term prospects.
  • The decline in fee-paying AUM by 7% and total AUM by 3% indicates pressure on managed assets, which could pose a challenge to Great Elm Group's revenue growth. The reduction in AUM suggests potential outflows or underperformance in the company's investment strategies, which may not be fully appreciated by the market. This trend could lead to lower management fees and reduced scale, impacting the company's ability to generate earnings. The sustained decrease in reported adjusted EBITDA further highlights the financial pressures facing the company, which could hinder its growth prospects.
  • The wind-down of the Great Elm Credit Income Fund and the exit of third-party investors raise questions about the sustainability of the company's private credit strategy. The orderly wind-down process, while managed effectively, indicates potential challenges in maintaining investor confidence and attracting new capital. The market may be overlooking the risks associated with the company's private credit fund and the potential for further investor redemptions, which could impact the company's asset management business. The focus on protecting and growing NAV above creating income highlights the company's defensive posture, which may not be fully appreciated by investors.
  • The heightened volatility across the BDC sector and broader concerns around private credit quality pose significant risks to Great Elm Group's performance. The company's exposure to the BDC sector through GECC makes it vulnerable to market fluctuations and potential declines in credit quality. The market may be underestimating the impact of these external factors on the company's financial results and investment portfolio. The need to reprioritize the protection and growth of NAV over creating income underscores the challenges facing the company in the current environment. These risks could limit the company's growth prospects and impact its long-term success.

Product and Service Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Consolidation Items Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Asset Management
S.No. Ticker Company Market CapP/EP/STotal Debt (Qtr)
1 BN BROOKFIELD Corp /ON/ 1,236.60 Bn1,022.8316.3315.06 Bn
2 BLK BlackRock, Inc. 161.01 Bn25.756.2820.18 Bn
3 BX Blackstone Inc. 97.77 Bn16.046.6213.28 Bn
4 APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. 70.80 Bn67.622.6514.22 Bn
5 STT State Street Corp 51.30 Bn18.163.55-
6 AMP Ameriprise Financial Inc 48.54 Bn12.461.740.20 Bn
7 NTRS Northern Trust Corp 32.93 Bn18.056.407.84 Bn
8 RJF Raymond James Financial Inc 32.59 Bn15.212.374.66 Bn