Peabody Energy BTU

NYSE BTU

$29.37 -0.08 (-0.27%)

As of: Sep 9, 2026 · 3:59 PM EDT

Key Stats

Market Cap3.59 Bn

P/E-21.59

P/S0.90

Div. Yield0.01

Total Debt (Qtr)339.00 Mn

Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)12.71

Add ratio to table…

About

Peabody Energy Corporation is a leading producer of metallurgical and thermal coal. The company owns interests in 16 active coal mining operations located in the United States and Australia. It focuses on extracting, processing and selling coal to serve global energy and steel markets. Peabody Energy Corporation generates revenue primarily from the sale of coal under long term supply agreements with electricity generators, industrial facilities and steel manufacturers. The…

Peabody Energy Corporation generates revenue primarily from the sale of coal under long term supply agreements with electricity generators, industrial facilities and steel manufacturers. The company also earns income from short term contracts and spot sales. Its revenue is driven by volumes of thermal and metallurgical coal sold and the pricing terms of its contracts.

The company operates through the following segments: Seaborne Thermal, Seaborne Metallurgical, Powder River Basin and Other U. S. Thermal.

Seaborne Thermal includes the Wilpinjong Wambo Open Cut and Wambo Underground mines in New South Wales Australia which produce thermal coal for export via ports such as Port Kembla Newcastle and Dalrymple Bay using surface and underground mining methods.
Seaborne Metallurgical comprises the Coppabella and Moorvale mines in Queensland the Shoal Creek mine in Alabama the Metropolitan mine in New South Wales and the Centurion development project in Queensland which together produce metallurgical coal for steelmaking using longwall and surface mining techniques.
Powder River Basin consists of the North Antelope Rochelle Caballo and Rawhide mines in Wyoming which supply thermal coal to domestic US power plants primarily through rail transportation.
Other U. S. Thermal covers the Bear Run Wild Boar Gateway North El Segundo Lee Ranch Twentymile and Francisco Underground mines located in Indiana Illinois Colorado and New Mexico providing thermal coal to industrial and utility customers via truck rail and barge transport.

Peabody Energy Corporation holds a significant position in the global coal industry as one of the largest producers of both thermal and metallurgical coal. It competes with major US producers such as Alliance Resource Partners American Consolidated Natural Resources Inc Core Natural Resources Inc Eagle Summit Foresight Energy Hallador Energy Kiewit and Navajo Transitional Energy Company LLC. Internationally it faces competition from Adaro Energy BHP Bumi Resources China Shenhua Energy Coal India Limited Drummond Company Glencore New Hope SUEK Whitehaven Coal Limited and Yancoal Australia Ltd. In the metallurgical market rivals include Anglo American BHP Core Natural Resources Inc Foxleigh Glencore Jellinbah KRU Oak Grove Mine Stanmore QCoal Warrior Met Coal Whitehaven Coal Limited and Yancoal Australia Ltd. The company’s competitive advantages stem from its diversified geographic footprint long term customer relationships extensive logistics infrastructure and a focus on operational efficiency and safety.

Peabody Energy Corporation serves electricity generators industrial facilities and steel manufacturers. While specific customer names are not disclosed the company notes that its five largest customers accounted for about twenty five percent of its revenue from coal supply agreements in 2025 with the largest single customer contributing roughly eight percent of that revenue.

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case

Peabody Energy Corporation is positioned to capitalize on a structural shift in U.S. power demand driven by AI data center expansion and manufacturing resurgence, which management explicitly linked to a potential 250 million ton increase in annual thermal coal demand if existing coal plants operate at optimal 70% utilization—a level not seen since 2008. This upside is not merely theoretical; U.S. coal generation rose 11% year-to-date while total electricity demand grew only 2%, indicating coal is filling the reliability gap left by intermittent renewables and delayed gas/nuclear builds. The company’s Powder River Basin (PRB) operations are already running at maximum capacity with no latent left to exploit without new investment, yet PRB volumes rose 10% year-over-year and EBITDA surged 53% due to margin expansion from 39% improvement, proving pricing power exists even at full output. Management’s confidence in sustaining max PRB output for the next two years, reinforced by customer contracting activity, suggests near-term volume stability is secured, and any further demand growth will require new capital investment—which Peabody is financially positioned to fund with $603 million cash and $950 million liquidity allows—without dilutive equity raises. The PRB’s scale advantage in rare earth element (REE) assessment, where Peabody is “already shoveling” 80 million tons of coal and moving 400 million cubic yards of earth annually, creates a unique, low-cost pathway to critical minerals production that competitors cannot replicate, turning a legacy coal asset into a strategic hedge against energy transition risks. This REE optionality, combined with the imminent ramp-up of Centurion South—expected to be the lowest-cost metallurgical coal asset in the portfolio over its 25-year life—provides dual upside: thermal coal benefits from domestic power tightness, while met coal gains from Centurion’s premium hard coking coal output and cost discipline across all five met operations. The recent $225 million convertible note offering at 0.50% interest, with proceeds earmarked to repurchase higher-cost 2028 notes and fund capped calls, reduces future interest expense and enhances shareholder returns through potential buybacks, all while maintaining a fortress balance sheet. Market is underestimating how these organic initiatives—PRB REE potential, Centurion ramp-up, and balance sheet optimization—will compound to generate outsized free cash flow as U.S. coal demand persists and global met coal prices trend toward $215/ton by next year’s curve.

Peabody Energy Corporation is positioned to capitalize on a structural shift in U.S. power demand driven by AI data center expansion and manufacturing resurgence, which management explicitly linked to a potential 250 million ton increase in annual thermal coal demand if existing coal plants operate at optimal 70% utilization—a level not seen since 2008. This upside is not merely theoretical; U.S. coal generation rose 11% year-to-date while total electricity demand grew only 2%, indicating coal is filling the reliability gap left by intermittent renewables and delayed gas/nuclear builds. The company’s Powder River Basin (PRB) operations are already running at maximum capacity with no latent left to exploit without new investment, yet PRB volumes rose 10% year-over-year and EBITDA surged 53% due to margin expansion from 39% improvement, proving pricing power exists even at full output. Management’s confidence in sustaining max PRB output for the next two years, reinforced by customer contracting activity, suggests near-term volume stability is secured, and any further demand growth will require new capital investment—which Peabody is financially positioned to fund with $603 million cash and $950 million liquidity allows—without dilutive equity raises. The PRB’s scale advantage in rare earth element (REE) assessment, where Peabody is “already shoveling” 80 million tons of coal and moving 400 million cubic yards of earth annually, creates a unique, low-cost pathway to critical minerals production that competitors cannot replicate, turning a legacy coal asset into a strategic hedge against energy transition risks. This REE optionality, combined with the imminent ramp-up of Centurion South—expected to be the lowest-cost metallurgical coal asset in the portfolio over its 25-year life—provides dual upside: thermal coal benefits from domestic power tightness, while met coal gains from Centurion’s premium hard coking coal output and cost discipline across all five met operations. The recent $225 million convertible note offering at 0.50% interest, with proceeds earmarked to repurchase higher-cost 2028 notes and fund capped calls, reduces future interest expense and enhances shareholder returns through potential buybacks, all while maintaining a fortress balance sheet. Market is underestimating how these organic initiatives—PRB REE potential, Centurion ramp-up, and balance sheet optimization—will compound to generate outsized free cash flow as U.S. coal demand persists and global met coal prices trend toward $215/ton by next year’s curve.

▼ Bear case

Peabody Energy Corporation faces significant near-term headwinds that the market is overlooking, particularly the structural decline in global metallurgical coal demand driven by China’s anti-involution policies, which have curtailed domestic steel production and left seaborne met coal prices stagnant at $184/ton for three consecutive quarters despite a recent uptick to $195/ton. Management acknowledged that 45 million tonnes—or 15% of global seaborne met supply—are currently earning unsustainable returns at these levels, indicating widespread industry distress that will pressure Peabody’s met segment even as Centurion ramps up, since the new mine’s premium hard coking coal output will still be subject to the same global benchmark pricing and Chinese import dynamics that are suppressing prices. The company’s reliance on U.S. thermal coal demand as a growth engine is fragile, as it hinges on coal plant life extensions totaling 46 GW (58 units), which management admitted represent only “more than a quarter of the installed base”—meaning over 75% of U.S. coal capacity remains unextended and vulnerable to retirement, especially as renewable saturation and gas plant backlogs eventually ease. While U.S. coal generation rose 11% year-to-date, this surge is largely attributable to temporary factors: natural gas prices averaged $3.45/MMBtu (down from prior spikes) and coal burn increased five times faster than electricity demand growth—a ratio unlikely to persist if gas prices rebound or if renewable/storage technologies accelerate deployment faster than anticipated. The Powder River Basin, despite its strong Q3 performance, is now operating at maximum capacity with no latent room for growth, meaning any further volume increases will require costly new capital expenditures—such as additional draglines, shovels, or rail infrastructure—that management refused to quantify, signaling uncertainty about the economics of expansion. Furthermore, the $54 million Q3 charge from the Anglo acquisition termination, while framed as a one-time catch-up, reveals ongoing legal exposure: CFO Mark Spurbeck confirmed $5 million annually in arbitration defense costs will persist for years, a recurring drain on cash flow that was not adequately stressed in the presentation. Finally, the rare earth element (REE) initiative in the PRB remains highly speculative; management refused to disclose element types or concentrations, admitted they are in “very early stages,” and offered no timeline for monetization beyond a vague year-end preliminary analysis, turning what could be a strategic advantage into a potential distraction that diverts focus from core coal operations without clear near-term financial payoff. The market is ignoring how these converging risks—persistent met coal weakness, fragile U.S. thermal demand tailwinds, capped PRB growth, and uncertain REE upside—could erode margins and cash flow generation faster than anticipated, especially if global steel demand remains subdued or U.S. power demand growth slows as AI buildouts face permitting or energy transition headwinds.

Peabody Energy Corporation faces significant near-term headwinds that the market is overlooking, particularly the structural decline in global metallurgical coal demand driven by China’s anti-involution policies, which have curtailed domestic steel production and left seaborne met coal prices stagnant at $184/ton for three consecutive quarters despite a recent uptick to $195/ton. Management acknowledged that 45 million tonnes—or 15% of global seaborne met supply—are currently earning unsustainable returns at these levels, indicating widespread industry distress that will pressure Peabody’s met segment even as Centurion ramps up, since the new mine’s premium hard coking coal output will still be subject to the same global benchmark pricing and Chinese import dynamics that are suppressing prices. The company’s reliance on U.S. thermal coal demand as a growth engine is fragile, as it hinges on coal plant life extensions totaling 46 GW (58 units), which management admitted represent only “more than a quarter of the installed base”—meaning over 75% of U.S. coal capacity remains unextended and vulnerable to retirement, especially as renewable saturation and gas plant backlogs eventually ease. While U.S. coal generation rose 11% year-to-date, this surge is largely attributable to temporary factors: natural gas prices averaged $3.45/MMBtu (down from prior spikes) and coal burn increased five times faster than electricity demand growth—a ratio unlikely to persist if gas prices rebound or if renewable/storage technologies accelerate deployment faster than anticipated. The Powder River Basin, despite its strong Q3 performance, is now operating at maximum capacity with no latent room for growth, meaning any further volume increases will require costly new capital expenditures—such as additional draglines, shovels, or rail infrastructure—that management refused to quantify, signaling uncertainty about the economics of expansion. Furthermore, the $54 million Q3 charge from the Anglo acquisition termination, while framed as a one-time catch-up, reveals ongoing legal exposure: CFO Mark Spurbeck confirmed $5 million annually in arbitration defense costs will persist for years, a recurring drain on cash flow that was not adequately stressed in the presentation. Finally, the rare earth element (REE) initiative in the PRB remains highly speculative; management refused to disclose element types or concentrations, admitted they are in “very early stages,” and offered no timeline for monetization beyond a vague year-end preliminary analysis, turning what could be a strategic advantage into a potential distraction that diverts focus from core coal operations without clear near-term financial payoff. The market is ignoring how these converging risks—persistent met coal weakness, fragile U.S. thermal demand tailwinds, capped PRB growth, and uncertain REE upside—could erode margins and cash flow generation faster than anticipated, especially if global steel demand remains subdued or U.S. power demand growth slows as AI buildouts face permitting or energy transition headwinds.

Product Or Service Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer group

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Coal

S.No.	Ticker	Company	match	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	HCC	Warrior Met Coal, Inc.	primary	5.51 Bn	26.83	3.28	160.06 Mn
2	CNR	Core Natural Resources, Inc.	primary	5.01 Bn	49.99	1.17	447.65 Mn
3	BTU	Peabody Energy Corp	primary	3.59 Bn	-21.59	0.90	339.00 Mn
4	ARLP	Alliance Resource Partners Lp	primary	3.43 Bn	15.82	1.58	579.59 Mn
5	AMR	Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.	primary	2.90 Bn	-62.86	1.40	11.40 Mn
6	METC	Ramaco Resources, Inc.	primary	0.80 Bn	-13.59	1.55	453.81 Mn
7	NC	Nacco Industries Inc	primary	0.31 Bn	17.68	1.10	103.60 Mn
8	AREC	American Resources Corp	primary	0.18 Bn	8.53	-575.41	0.97 Mn

Peabody Energy BTU

About

Investment Thesis

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Product Or Service Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password