BROOKFIELD Corp /ON/ (BN) Stock Analysis and Metrics

Brookfield

NYSE: BN

$41.67 ▲ +0.47 (+1.13%)

At close: Jul 24, 2026 · 3:59 PM UTC

Financial Ratios

Market Cap1,236.60 Bn

P/E1,022.83

P/S16.33

Div. Yield0.00

ROIC (Qtr)0.00

Total Debt (Qtr)15.06 Bn

Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)3.54

Add ratio to table…

About

Brookfield Corporation is a leading global investment firm focused on building long-term wealth for institutions and individuals around the world. The company operates three core businesses—asset management, wealth solutions, and operating businesses—to invest in real assets that form the backbone of the global economy and deliver strong risk-adjusted returns to stakeholders. Brookfield Corporation leverages its global presence, deep operating expertise, and large-scale flexible capital to achieve strong returns across market cycles.

Brookfield Corporation generates revenue through management fees, performance fees, carried interest, and incentive distributions from its asset management business. The wealth solutions business earns revenue from insurance products and services such as annuities, life insurance, and property and casualty coverage. The operating businesses generate revenue from the ownership and operation of renewable power, infrastructure, private equity, and real estate assets, including base management fees, net operating income, and funds from operations.

The company operates through the following segments: Asset Management, Wealth Solutions, Renewable Power and Transition, Infrastructure, Private Equity, Real Estate, and Corporate Activities.

• Asset Management includes managing long-term private funds, perpetual strategies, and liquid strategies on behalf of investors and the company itself, earning contractual base management fees, incentive distributions, performance income, and carried interest, with over $1 trillion of assets under management as of December 31, 2025.

• Wealth Solutions includes an equity accounted interest in Brookfield Wealth Solutions, an investment-led insurance organization providing retirement services, wealth protection products, and tailored capital solutions to individuals and institutions.

• Renewable Power and Transition includes ownership, operation, and development of hydroelectric, wind, utility-scale solar, distributed energy, and sustainable solutions assets, primarily through a 45% economic ownership interest in Brookfield Renewable Partners.

• Infrastructure includes ownership, operation, and development of utilities, transport, midstream, and data assets, primarily through a 26% economic ownership interest in Brookfield Infrastructure Partners.

• Private Equity includes ownership and operations in business services and industrials sectors, primarily through a leading global owner and operator of essential products and services, with a combined 68% ownership interest in Brookfield Business Partners when combined with the wealth solutions business.

• Real Estate includes ownership, operation, and development of super core, core plus, value add, opportunistic, and North American residential properties, held via a 100% ownership interest in Brookfield Property Group.

• Corporate Activities include investment of cash and financial assets, management of corporate leverage, and allocation of certain corporate costs such as technology and operations to each operating segment based on an internal pricing framework.

Brookfield Corporation holds a differentiated business model due to its scale, stability, and diversification across asset classes and geographies, positioning it as a partner of choice for global infrastructure buildout, sustainable energy transition, and take-private opportunities, with competitive advantages derived from its Brookfield Ecosystem, deep operational expertise, and access to proprietary investment opportunities.

Brookfield Corporation serves some of the world’s largest and most sophisticated institutional investors, including sovereign wealth funds, pension plans, endowments, foundations, financial institutions, insurance companies, and individual investors, across its asset management and wealth solutions businesses, while its operating businesses serve a broad base of commercial and residential customers globally.

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case

Brookfield Corporation (BN) is positioned to capitalize on the structural shift toward real assets driven by digitalization, decarbonization, and deglobalization, which is creating durable demand for infrastructure investments that management is uniquely equipped to fund and scale. The company’s $614 billion of fee-bearing capital, growing at 12% year-over-year, provides a massive and stable base of recurring management fee income, which grew 11% to $772 million in the quarter. This capital base is being actively deployed into high-conviction themes such as AI factories, energy transition infrastructure, and domestic digital infrastructure projects, where Brookfield’s global origination capabilities and balance sheet strength allow it to act as a partner of choice for governments and enterprises. Unlike temporary market sentiment swings, these megatrends are multi-decade in nature and are being reinforced by policy tailwinds, such as the U.K.’s pension risk transfer market expecting £50 billion annually over the next decade, which BN is now directly tapped into via the Just Group acquisition. The $40 billion mandate from Just Group added immediate scale to BN’s insurance platform, expanding total insurance assets toward $200 billion and unlocking immediate pension risk transfer capability of approximately £5 billion annually. This is not merely an add-on but a strategic platform that enables BN to originate long-duration liabilities and pair them with its real asset investments, creating a self-reinforcing flywheel where insurance inflows fund infrastructure deployments that generate excess returns. Management’s disciplined approach to underwriting and portfolio rotation—evidenced by the 11% year-over-year growth in Wealth Solutions distributable earnings to $430 million and the deployment of nearly $15 billion into Brookfield Strategies over the past year averaging above 10% total returns—shows that the business is not just growing in scale but improving in quality. The entry into major bank distribution channels for annuities, currently underpenetrated relative to competitors, offers a material runway to expand retail origination and support the $25 billion new policy target for 2026, with early traction already visible as BN picked up 4 points of market share in a weakening U.S. annuity market. Furthermore, the ongoing corporate simplification—combining BN and Brookfield Wealth Solutions—will provide BWS with access to approximately $145 billion of incremental capital from BN’s permanent capital base, eliminating a key constraint on insurance growth and enabling BN to optimize its capital structure while enhancing policyholder certainty. This structural advantage, combined with Brookfield’s proven ability to compound capital at mid-teens returns over long periods, suggests the market is underestimating the durability and scalability of BN’s earnings power, particularly as realized carried interest—currently sitting at $11.8 billion in accumulated unrealized value—begins to ramp in the second half of 2026 as monetizations accelerate.
Brookfield Corporation (BN) is benefiting from a powerful and underappreciated dynamic in its core real estate portfolio, where limited new supply and rising replacement costs are creating structural pricing power that is translating into durable cash flow growth, independent of broader economic cycles. The company’s Super Core and Core Plus assets are over 95% occupied, with new office leases signed at average net rents 15% above expiring levels globally, and in the U.S., recent leases were more than double prior rents—evidence of a fundamental shift in pricing dynamics driven by the economics of new construction. As management highlighted, it would cost approximately $2,500 per square foot to rebuild a building like Manhattan West today, compared to BN’s original cost of just over $1,000 per square foot, making new supply economically unviable in prime markets. This is not a temporary cyclical rebound but a structural advantage rooted in the scarcity of high-quality, well-located assets in markets where demand for premier space remains very strong, particularly for buildings with strong ESG credentials, digital readiness, and resilience features. The same dynamic is playing out globally, as seen with 1 Leadenhall in London, which achieved the highest rents ever in the city within six months of completion due to limited new supply and intense demand for top-tier assets. This pricing power is further reinforced by the company’s active capital recycling—$17 billion in asset sales advanced during the quarter, including the $2.5 billion recapitalization of IFC Seoul, which realized a 17% IRR and a 2.4x multiple—demonstrating that BN is not only capturing value through rent growth but also monetizing mature assets at attractive returns to redeploy into higher-yielding opportunities. The operating segments cash flow showed a 19% year-over-year increase in operating FFO across infrastructure, private equity, and energy, reaching $360 million for the quarter and $1.5 billion trailing twelve months, underscoring the resilience and growth of BN’s non-real estate platforms. Crucially, management emphasized that exposures to pressured sectors like private credit and software are immaterial to BN, with “no software exposure and our credit portfolio is performing incredibly well,” insulating the company from the valuation pressures affecting peers. This combination of structural real estate pricing power, disciplined capital allocation, and immunity to transient market distortions allows BN to generate predictable, growing cash flows that support its dividend, buybacks ($598 million returned in the quarter, over $1 billion year-to-date), and reinvestment into long-term growth initiatives—factors the market is overlooking in favor of short-term noise around interest rates and geopolitics.

Brookfield Corporation (BN) is positioned to capitalize on the structural shift toward real assets driven by digitalization, decarbonization, and deglobalization, which is creating durable demand for infrastructure investments that management is uniquely equipped to fund and scale. The company’s $614 billion of fee-bearing capital, growing at 12% year-over-year, provides a massive and stable base of recurring management fee income, which grew 11% to $772 million in the quarter. This capital base is being actively deployed into high-conviction themes such as AI factories, energy transition infrastructure, and domestic digital infrastructure projects, where Brookfield’s global origination capabilities and balance sheet strength allow it to act as a partner of choice for governments and enterprises. Unlike temporary market sentiment swings, these megatrends are multi-decade in nature and are being reinforced by policy tailwinds, such as the U.K.’s pension risk transfer market expecting £50 billion annually over the next decade, which BN is now directly tapped into via the Just Group acquisition. The $40 billion mandate from Just Group added immediate scale to BN’s insurance platform, expanding total insurance assets toward $200 billion and unlocking immediate pension risk transfer capability of approximately £5 billion annually. This is not merely an add-on but a strategic platform that enables BN to originate long-duration liabilities and pair them with its real asset investments, creating a self-reinforcing flywheel where insurance inflows fund infrastructure deployments that generate excess returns. Management’s disciplined approach to underwriting and portfolio rotation—evidenced by the 11% year-over-year growth in Wealth Solutions distributable earnings to $430 million and the deployment of nearly $15 billion into Brookfield Strategies over the past year averaging above 10% total returns—shows that the business is not just growing in scale but improving in quality. The entry into major bank distribution channels for annuities, currently underpenetrated relative to competitors, offers a material runway to expand retail origination and support the $25 billion new policy target for 2026, with early traction already visible as BN picked up 4 points of market share in a weakening U.S. annuity market. Furthermore, the ongoing corporate simplification—combining BN and Brookfield Wealth Solutions—will provide BWS with access to approximately $145 billion of incremental capital from BN’s permanent capital base, eliminating a key constraint on insurance growth and enabling BN to optimize its capital structure while enhancing policyholder certainty. This structural advantage, combined with Brookfield’s proven ability to compound capital at mid-teens returns over long periods, suggests the market is underestimating the durability and scalability of BN’s earnings power, particularly as realized carried interest—currently sitting at $11.8 billion in accumulated unrealized value—begins to ramp in the second half of 2026 as monetizations accelerate.
Brookfield Corporation (BN) is benefiting from a powerful and underappreciated dynamic in its core real estate portfolio, where limited new supply and rising replacement costs are creating structural pricing power that is translating into durable cash flow growth, independent of broader economic cycles. The company’s Super Core and Core Plus assets are over 95% occupied, with new office leases signed at average net rents 15% above expiring levels globally, and in the U.S., recent leases were more than double prior rents—evidence of a fundamental shift in pricing dynamics driven by the economics of new construction. As management highlighted, it would cost approximately $2,500 per square foot to rebuild a building like Manhattan West today, compared to BN’s original cost of just over $1,000 per square foot, making new supply economically unviable in prime markets. This is not a temporary cyclical rebound but a structural advantage rooted in the scarcity of high-quality, well-located assets in markets where demand for premier space remains very strong, particularly for buildings with strong ESG credentials, digital readiness, and resilience features. The same dynamic is playing out globally, as seen with 1 Leadenhall in London, which achieved the highest rents ever in the city within six months of completion due to limited new supply and intense demand for top-tier assets. This pricing power is further reinforced by the company’s active capital recycling—$17 billion in asset sales advanced during the quarter, including the $2.5 billion recapitalization of IFC Seoul, which realized a 17% IRR and a 2.4x multiple—demonstrating that BN is not only capturing value through rent growth but also monetizing mature assets at attractive returns to redeploy into higher-yielding opportunities. The operating segments cash flow showed a 19% year-over-year increase in operating FFO across infrastructure, private equity, and energy, reaching $360 million for the quarter and $1.5 billion trailing twelve months, underscoring the resilience and growth of BN’s non-real estate platforms. Crucially, management emphasized that exposures to pressured sectors like private credit and software are immaterial to BN, with “no software exposure and our credit portfolio is performing incredibly well,” insulating the company from the valuation pressures affecting peers. This combination of structural real estate pricing power, disciplined capital allocation, and immunity to transient market distortions allows BN to generate predictable, growing cash flows that support its dividend, buybacks ($598 million returned in the quarter, over $1 billion year-to-date), and reinvestment into long-term growth initiatives—factors the market is overlooking in favor of short-term noise around interest rates and geopolitics.

▼ Bear case

Brookfield Corporation (BN) faces significant headwinds from the evolving regulatory and competitive landscape in the insurance sector, particularly as it integrates Just Group and seeks to scale its pension risk transfer (PRT) business in the U.K., where management’s confidence may be overstated given the increasing scrutiny from regulators and the potential for margin compression in a maturing market. While BN highlights its $20 billion of regulatory capital and A/A- ratings, the company acknowledged that annuity outflows are expected to total between $10 billion and $12 billion annually, in line with an average liability duration of 8 to 9 years—a figure that implies substantial and growing cash outflows as the insurance book scales. This creates a persistent reinvestment risk: as BN writes new long-duration policies to grow its asset base, it must simultaneously fund large and predictable outflows, which could pressure distributable earnings if investment returns fail to consistently exceed the cost of funds. The U.K. PRT market, though large in volume (£50 billion annually expected over the next decade), is becoming more competitive, with large insurers and reinsurers entering the space, and BN’s strategy to “move up market” into £500 million–£1 billion policies may be constrained by the need for deeper underwriting expertise and longer track records in complex corporate pension schemes—areas where Just Group’s historical strength in small schemes may not translate. Furthermore, the regulatory environment is actively shifting, as evidenced by the U.K. PRA’s scrutiny of funded reinsurance agreements with Bermuda captives, and while BN claims it does not use Bermuda today, the trend toward stricter capital and reserving requirements in the U.K. and Europe could limit the capital efficiency gains BN expects from its integrated model. The company’s reliance on leveraging its $180 billion of permanent capital as a layer of “additional protection” for its insurance business may be tested if regulators scrutinize the fungibility of capital between the investment and insurance arms, particularly as BN pushes for the BN-BWS combination. If regulators impose stricter separateness requirements or limit capital mobility, the anticipated $145 billion of incremental capital access for BWS could be significantly curtailed, undermining a core pillar of the bullish case. Finally, BN’s target to write approximately $25 billion of new policies in 2026 may be overly optimistic given the 9–10% year-over-year decline in U.S. fixed annuity demand noted in Q1, and while BN gained 4 points of market share in that weakening environment, sustaining that outperformance as the market potentially stabilizes or rebounds could prove difficult without aggressive pricing, which would undermine returns.
Brookfield Corporation (BN) is vulnerable to a potential correction in commercial real estate valuations, particularly in its office portfolio, where the current rent growth narrative may be masking underlying risks related to tenant concentration, lease rollover timing, and the long-term viability of hybrid work models, despite management’s emphasis on limited new supply and rising replacement costs. While BN highlights strong leasing activity—2.6 million square feet signed globally, including 761,000 square feet in Canada at rents 30% above expiring levels and 227,000 square feet in the U.S. at rents more than double prior levels—the company’s Super Core portfolio generated only 2% same-store NOI growth in the quarter, a modest figure that suggests the full benefits of higher rents on new leases are not yet flowing through to income due to the time lag between lease signing and occupancy, as well as the drag from lower-rent renewals and vacancies in older assets. The emphasis on “premium assets” and “best buildings in the best markets” risks creating a bifurcated portfolio where a small fraction of trophy assets drive outsized rent growth, while the broader portfolio—potentially including older Class B and C properties or secondary market holdings—faces stagnating or declining demand as tenants prioritize flexibility, suburban locations, or reduced footprints. This is especially relevant given BN’s global footprint; while markets like Manhattan and London may exhibit tight supply, other regions may not share the same dynamics, and the company’s aggregate occupancy of over 95% for Super Core and Core Plus assets could be masking weakness in non-core holdings. Furthermore, the company’s reliance on asset sales to drive earnings—evidenced by the $17 billion in monetizations advanced during the quarter, including the $2.5 billion IFC Seoul recapitalization—creates a dependency on transaction markets that could freeze if interest rates remain elevated or credit conditions tighten, turning a reported strength into a liability. Management’s assertion that “financing markets are much stronger” and that BN completed a $1.9 billion nonrecourse mortgage on Manhattan West at a 107-basis point spread to treasuries may not be replicable across the broader portfolio, particularly for assets with lower credit quality, shorter lease terms, or in less liquid markets. The $400 million in net cash generated from the Manhattan West refinancing, while impressive, is a function of that specific asset’s unique characteristics and financing structure—not a scalable model for the entire real estate book. If the market begins to reprice office assets based on long-term demand uncertainty rather than just replacement cost economics, BN’s reported NAV and the value of its carried interest pipeline ($11.8 billion in unrealized value) could face downward pressure, especially as the company expects 2026 to be an inflection point for carried interest realizations in the second half of the year—a timing that leaves it exposed to any near-term deterioration in asset values.

Brookfield Corporation (BN) faces significant headwinds from the evolving regulatory and competitive landscape in the insurance sector, particularly as it integrates Just Group and seeks to scale its pension risk transfer (PRT) business in the U.K., where management’s confidence may be overstated given the increasing scrutiny from regulators and the potential for margin compression in a maturing market. While BN highlights its $20 billion of regulatory capital and A/A- ratings, the company acknowledged that annuity outflows are expected to total between $10 billion and $12 billion annually, in line with an average liability duration of 8 to 9 years—a figure that implies substantial and growing cash outflows as the insurance book scales. This creates a persistent reinvestment risk: as BN writes new long-duration policies to grow its asset base, it must simultaneously fund large and predictable outflows, which could pressure distributable earnings if investment returns fail to consistently exceed the cost of funds. The U.K. PRT market, though large in volume (£50 billion annually expected over the next decade), is becoming more competitive, with large insurers and reinsurers entering the space, and BN’s strategy to “move up market” into £500 million–£1 billion policies may be constrained by the need for deeper underwriting expertise and longer track records in complex corporate pension schemes—areas where Just Group’s historical strength in small schemes may not translate. Furthermore, the regulatory environment is actively shifting, as evidenced by the U.K. PRA’s scrutiny of funded reinsurance agreements with Bermuda captives, and while BN claims it does not use Bermuda today, the trend toward stricter capital and reserving requirements in the U.K. and Europe could limit the capital efficiency gains BN expects from its integrated model. The company’s reliance on leveraging its $180 billion of permanent capital as a layer of “additional protection” for its insurance business may be tested if regulators scrutinize the fungibility of capital between the investment and insurance arms, particularly as BN pushes for the BN-BWS combination. If regulators impose stricter separateness requirements or limit capital mobility, the anticipated $145 billion of incremental capital access for BWS could be significantly curtailed, undermining a core pillar of the bullish case. Finally, BN’s target to write approximately $25 billion of new policies in 2026 may be overly optimistic given the 9–10% year-over-year decline in U.S. fixed annuity demand noted in Q1, and while BN gained 4 points of market share in that weakening environment, sustaining that outperformance as the market potentially stabilizes or rebounds could prove difficult without aggressive pricing, which would undermine returns.
Brookfield Corporation (BN) is vulnerable to a potential correction in commercial real estate valuations, particularly in its office portfolio, where the current rent growth narrative may be masking underlying risks related to tenant concentration, lease rollover timing, and the long-term viability of hybrid work models, despite management’s emphasis on limited new supply and rising replacement costs. While BN highlights strong leasing activity—2.6 million square feet signed globally, including 761,000 square feet in Canada at rents 30% above expiring levels and 227,000 square feet in the U.S. at rents more than double prior levels—the company’s Super Core portfolio generated only 2% same-store NOI growth in the quarter, a modest figure that suggests the full benefits of higher rents on new leases are not yet flowing through to income due to the time lag between lease signing and occupancy, as well as the drag from lower-rent renewals and vacancies in older assets. The emphasis on “premium assets” and “best buildings in the best markets” risks creating a bifurcated portfolio where a small fraction of trophy assets drive outsized rent growth, while the broader portfolio—potentially including older Class B and C properties or secondary market holdings—faces stagnating or declining demand as tenants prioritize flexibility, suburban locations, or reduced footprints. This is especially relevant given BN’s global footprint; while markets like Manhattan and London may exhibit tight supply, other regions may not share the same dynamics, and the company’s aggregate occupancy of over 95% for Super Core and Core Plus assets could be masking weakness in non-core holdings. Furthermore, the company’s reliance on asset sales to drive earnings—evidenced by the $17 billion in monetizations advanced during the quarter, including the $2.5 billion IFC Seoul recapitalization—creates a dependency on transaction markets that could freeze if interest rates remain elevated or credit conditions tighten, turning a reported strength into a liability. Management’s assertion that “financing markets are much stronger” and that BN completed a $1.9 billion nonrecourse mortgage on Manhattan West at a 107-basis point spread to treasuries may not be replicable across the broader portfolio, particularly for assets with lower credit quality, shorter lease terms, or in less liquid markets. The $400 million in net cash generated from the Manhattan West refinancing, while impressive, is a function of that specific asset’s unique characteristics and financing structure—not a scalable model for the entire real estate book. If the market begins to reprice office assets based on long-term demand uncertainty rather than just replacement cost economics, BN’s reported NAV and the value of its carried interest pipeline ($11.8 billion in unrealized value) could face downward pressure, especially as the company expects 2026 to be an inflection point for carried interest realizations in the second half of the year—a timing that leaves it exposed to any near-term deterioration in asset values.

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Asset Management

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	BN	BROOKFIELD Corp /ON/	1,236.60 Bn	1,022.83	16.33	15.06 Bn
2	BLK	BlackRock, Inc.	161.01 Bn	25.75	6.28	20.18 Bn
3	BX	Blackstone Inc.	97.77 Bn	16.04	6.62	13.28 Bn
4	APO	Apollo Global Management, Inc.	70.80 Bn	67.62	2.65	14.22 Bn
5	STT	State Street Corp	51.30 Bn	18.16	3.55	-
6	AMP	Ameriprise Financial Inc	48.54 Bn	12.46	1.74	0.20 Bn
7	NTRS	Northern Trust Corp	32.93 Bn	18.05	6.40	7.84 Bn
8	RJF	Raymond James Financial Inc	32.59 Bn	15.21	2.37	4.66 Bn

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Geographical areas [axis] Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Geographical areas [axis] Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password