Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) FCF Payout Ratio Growth (1y) (2016)
Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) FCF Payout Ratio Growth (1y) (2016) Analysis & Trends
Powered by 
Peer Comparison
| # | Company | Market Cap | Enterprise Value | Gross Profit (Qtr) | FCF Cover Growth (1y) (Qtr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pampa Energy | 1,836.33 Bn | 900.18 Bn | 109.00 Mn | - |
| 2 | Honeywell International | 145.45 Bn | 134.13 Bn | 3.54 Bn | -149.74% |
| 3 | 3M | 85.14 Bn | 81.04 Bn | 2.46 Bn | 193.90% |
| 4 | Valmont Industries | 11.12 Bn | 10.97 Bn | 316.88 Mn | 2,779.22% |
| 5 | Seaboard | 4.59 Bn | 3.45 Bn | 217.00 Mn | 14.00% |
| 6 | Otter Tail | 3.66 Bn | 3.25 Bn | 239.49 Mn | -124.20% |
| 7 | Tetra Technologies | 1.37 Bn | 1.37 Bn | 38.23 Mn | - |
| 8 | Deluxe | 1.04 Bn | 1.01 Bn | 279.40 Mn | -6.08% |
| 9 | Matthews International | 826.85 Mn | 790.76 Mn | 101.98 Mn | 87.28% |
| 10 | Mammoth Energy Services | 147.89 Mn | 43.08 Mn | 11.78 Mn | - |
Historic Data
Download Data| Date | Value |
|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2016 | -1,508.27% |