Pacific Biosciences Of California (PACB) Work In Process (2011 - 2026)
Pacific Biosciences Of California's Work In Process came in at $20.58 million for Q2 2026, down 23.5% from $26.91 million a year earlier and down 24.8% from the prior quarter.
Pacific Biosciences Of California (PACB) Work In Process (2011 - 2026) Analysis & Trends
At the end of FY2025, Pacific Biosciences Of California's Work In Process was $16.45 million, down 25.8% from FY2024.
- Work In Process carries a five-year compound annual growth rate of 19.8% (FY2020 to FY2025).
- Going back by year, Work In Process was $22.17 million in FY2024 (-19.8%), $27.65 million in FY2023 (+96.7%), $14.06 million in FY2022 (+63.3%) and $8.61 million in FY2021 (+29.5%).
- The five-year range for quarterly Work In Process is $8.61 million (Q4 2021) to $27.88 million (Q3 2023).
- Year-over-year, Work In Process increased in three of the last eight quarters, with an average decline of 4.7%.
- The fastest year-over-year change in Work In Process over five years came in Q1 2023 (growth of 135.9%), and the weakest in Q3 2024 (a decline of 34.4%).
- Business Quant data shows PACB's Work In Process at $27.35 million (Q1 2026), $16.45 million (Q4 2025) and $25.19 million (Q3 2025) in the three quarters before Q2 2026.
Peer Comparison
| # | Company | Market Cap | Enterprise Value | Gross Profit (Qtr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 250.84 Bn | 229.99 Bn | 4.88 Bn |
| 2 | Abbott Laboratories | 174.73 Bn | 145.82 Bn | 7.27 Bn |
| 3 | Danaher | 159.85 Bn | 143.67 Bn | 3.61 Bn |
| 4 | Intuitive Surgical | 146.79 Bn | 126.35 Bn | 1.96 Bn |
| 5 | Medtronic | 114.54 Bn | 80.41 Bn | 6.34 Bn |
| 6 | Stryker | 105.67 Bn | 91.79 Bn | 4.50 Bn |
| 7 | Boston Scientific | 63.93 Bn | 58.94 Bn | 3.85 Bn |
| 8 | Becton Dickinson | 50.12 Bn | 47.27 Bn | 2.32 Bn |
| 9 | Edwards Lifesciences | 50.06 Bn | 34.17 Bn | 1.35 Bn |
| 10 | Pacific Biosciences Of California | 531.49 Mn | -559.51 Mn | 12.64 Mn |
Historic Data
| Date | Value |
|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2026 | 20.58 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2026 | 27.35 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2025 | 16.45 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2025 | 25.19 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2025 | 26.91 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2025 | 24.91 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2024 | 22.17 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2024 | 18.29 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2024 | 21.70 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2024 | 26.30 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2023 | 27.65 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2023 | 27.88 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2023 | 22.60 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2023 | 21.71 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2022 | 14.06 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2022 | 13.46 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2022 | 12.81 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2022 | 9.20 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2021 | 8.61 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2021 | 8.76 Mn |
Pacific Biosciences Of California Work In Process API
Pull this series into your own models, spreadsheets and apps with the Business Quant
Historical Metrics API. The request below matches the chart above — change the
frequency, period or values and it follows. Swap YOUR_API_KEY for your own key.
https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=work-in-process&ticker=PACB&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEY
import requests
url = "https://data.businessquant.com/historic"
params = {"slug": "work-in-process", "ticker": "PACB", "period": "max", "api_key": "YOUR_API_KEY"}
data = requests.get(url, params=params).json()
const res = await fetch("https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=work-in-process&ticker=PACB&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEY");
const data = await res.json();