Millerknoll (MLKN) Cost of Revenue (2009 - 2026)
Millerknoll (MLKN) reported Cost of Revenue of $538.1 million for fiscal Q1 2027 (quarter ended Aug 29, 2026), down 8.4% from $587.6 million a year earlier and down 11.6% from the prior quarter.
Millerknoll (MLKN) Cost of Revenue (2009 - 2026) Analysis & Trends
Over the twelve months ended Aug 29, 2026, Millerknoll's Cost of Revenue came in at $2.3 billion, down 0.3% year-over-year; for FY2026 (ended May 30, 2026), it came in at $2.35 billion, up 4.7% from FY2025.
- Cost of Revenue has a five-year compound annual growth rate of 9.2% (FY2021 to FY2026).
- By fiscal year, Cost of Revenue came in at $2.25 billion in FY2025 (+1.7%), $2.21 billion in FY2024 (-16.9%), $2.66 billion in FY2023 (+2.5%) and $2.59 billion in FY2022 (+71.3%).
- The fiscal Q1 2027 figure ranks as the lowest quarterly Cost of Revenue since fiscal Q1 2025.
- Year over year, Cost of Revenue gained in six of the last eight quarters, with growth averaging 3.1%.
- The high point for year-over-year Cost of Revenue in five years was fiscal Q3 2022 (growth of 91.9%); the low point was fiscal Q1 2024 (a decline of 20.8%).
- Per Business Quant data, the three fiscal quarters before Q1 2027 came in at $608.6 million (Q4 2026), $573.7 million (Q3 2026) and $583 million (Q2 2026).
Peer Comparison
| # | Company | Market Cap | Enterprise Value | Gross Profit (Qtr) | Cost of Rev (Qtr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SharkNinja | 25.73 Bn | 23.40 Bn | 860.34 Mn | 905.14 Mn |
| 2 | Somnigroup International | 13.04 Bn | 12.59 Bn | 817.20 Mn | 1.01 Bn |
| 3 | Hni | 3.38 Bn | 2.95 Bn | 647.20 Mn | 825.20 Mn |
| 4 | Newell Brands | 2.30 Bn | 1.46 Bn | 812.00 Mn | 1.18 Bn |
| 5 | Sonos | 2.09 Bn | 992.71 Mn | 189.31 Mn | 185.95 Mn |
| 6 | Whirlpool | 1.97 Bn | -1.51 Bn | 442.00 Mn | 3.08 Bn |
| 7 | Corsair Gaming | 1.49 Bn | 1.04 Bn | 104.29 Mn | 210.05 Mn |
| 8 | Arhaus | 1.45 Bn | 529.52 Mn | 172.07 Mn | 212.82 Mn |
| 9 | Millerknoll | 1.39 Bn | 754.60 Mn | 385.30 Mn | 538.10 Mn |
| 10 | Cricut | 1.37 Bn | 340.40 Mn | 116.41 Mn | 39.88 Mn |
Historic Data
| Date | Value |
|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2026 | 538.10 Mn |
| May 30, 2026 | 608.60 Mn |
| Feb 28, 2026 | 573.70 Mn |
| Nov 29, 2025 | 583.00 Mn |
| Aug 30, 2025 | 587.60 Mn |
| May 31, 2025 | 584.90 Mn |
| Mar 1, 2025 | 543.80 Mn |
| Nov 30, 2024 | 593.40 Mn |
| Aug 31, 2024 | 525.20 Mn |
| Jun 1, 2024 | 536.50 Mn |
| Mar 2, 2024 | 535.30 Mn |
| Dec 2, 2023 | 577.50 Mn |
| Sep 2, 2023 | 559.60 Mn |
| Jun 3, 2023 | 602.00 Mn |
| Mar 4, 2023 | 649.10 Mn |
| Dec 3, 2022 | 699.30 Mn |
| Sep 3, 2022 | 706.70 Mn |
| May 28, 2022 | 718.00 Mn |
| Feb 26, 2022 | 690.00 Mn |
| Nov 27, 2021 | 673.30 Mn |
Millerknoll Cost of Revenue API
Pull this series into your own models, spreadsheets and apps with the Business Quant
Historical Metrics API. The request below matches the chart above — change the
frequency, period or values and it follows. Swap YOUR_API_KEY for your own key.
https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=cost-of-revenue&ticker=MLKN&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEY
import requests
url = "https://data.businessquant.com/historic"
params = {"slug": "cost-of-revenue", "ticker": "MLKN", "period": "max", "api_key": "YOUR_API_KEY"}
data = requests.get(url, params=params).json()
const res = await fetch("https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=cost-of-revenue&ticker=MLKN&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEY");
const data = await res.json();