Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) Work In Process (2012 - 2018)
Kewaunee Scientific's Work In Process came in at $1.38 million for fiscal Q2 2019 (quarter ended Oct 31, 2018), down 32.5% from $2.04 million a year earlier but up 10.2% from the prior quarter.
Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) Work In Process (2012 - 2018) Analysis & Trends
At the end of FY2018 (ended Apr 30, 2018), Kewaunee Scientific's Work In Process was $2.28 million, up 16.8% from FY2017.
- Work In Process has increased in each of the last three fiscal years, with a five-year compound annual growth rate of 6.3% (FY2013 to FY2018).
- Going back by fiscal year, Work In Process was $1.95 million in FY2017 (+3.2%), $1.89 million in FY2016 (+32.8%), $1.42 million in FY2015 (-8.3%) and $1.55 million in FY2014 (-7.6%).
- The five-year range for quarterly Work In Process is $1.25 million (fiscal Q1 2019) to $2.28 million (fiscal Q4 2018).
- Year-over-year, Work In Process increased in four of the last eight quarters, with an average decline of 3.9%.
- The fastest year-over-year change in Work In Process over five years came in fiscal Q1 2017 (growth of 35.9%), and the weakest in fiscal Q1 2019 (a decline of 35.7%).
- Business Quant data shows KEQU's Work In Process at $1.25 million (Q1 2019), $2.28 million (Q4 2018) and $2.13 million (Q3 2018) in the three fiscal quarters before Q2 2019.
Peer Comparison
| # | Company | Market Cap | Enterprise Value | Gross Profit (Qtr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trane Technologies | 99.46 Bn | 94.20 Bn | 2.26 Bn |
| 2 | Johnson Controls International | 90.21 Bn | 87.98 Bn | 2.47 Bn |
| 3 | Comfort Systems Usa | 58.39 Bn | 53.64 Bn | 844.23 Mn |
| 4 | Carrier Global | 46.05 Bn | 40.68 Bn | 1.94 Bn |
| 5 | Otis Worldwide | 25.26 Bn | 21.87 Bn | 1.14 Bn |
| 6 | James Hardie Industries | 14.74 Bn | 13.47 Bn | 548.70 Mn |
| 7 | Masco | 13.48 Bn | 11.59 Bn | 868.00 Mn |
| 8 | Allegion | 13.22 Bn | 11.93 Bn | 517.50 Mn |
| 9 | Carlisle Companies | 12.99 Bn | 9.34 Bn | 568.40 Mn |
| 10 | Kewaunee Scientific | 98.49 Mn | 61.76 Mn | 19.64 Mn |
Historic Data
| Date | Value |
|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2018 | 1.38 Mn |
| Jul 31, 2018 | 1.25 Mn |
| Apr 30, 2018 | 2.28 Mn |
| Jan 31, 2018 | 2.13 Mn |
| Oct 31, 2017 | 2.04 Mn |
| Jul 31, 2017 | 1.94 Mn |
| Apr 30, 2017 | 1.95 Mn |
| Jan 31, 2017 | 2.10 Mn |
| Oct 31, 2016 | 2.05 Mn |
| Jul 31, 2016 | 2.22 Mn |
| Apr 30, 2016 | 1.89 Mn |
| Jan 31, 2016 | 1.63 Mn |
| Oct 31, 2015 | 1.89 Mn |
| Jul 31, 2015 | 1.63 Mn |
| Apr 30, 2015 | 1.42 Mn |
| Jan 31, 2015 | 1.41 Mn |
| Oct 31, 2014 | 1.57 Mn |
| Jul 31, 2014 | 1.41 Mn |
| Apr 30, 2014 | 1.55 Mn |
| Jan 31, 2014 | 1.26 Mn |
Kewaunee Scientific Work In Process API
Pull this series into your own models, spreadsheets and apps with the Business Quant
Historical Metrics API. The request below matches the chart above — change the
frequency, period or values and it follows. Swap YOUR_API_KEY for your own key.
https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=work-in-process&ticker=KEQU&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEY
import requests
url = "https://data.businessquant.com/historic"
params = {"slug": "work-in-process", "ticker": "KEQU", "period": "max", "api_key": "YOUR_API_KEY"}
data = requests.get(url, params=params).json()
const res = await fetch("https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=work-in-process&ticker=KEQU&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEY");
const data = await res.json();