Jabil (JBL) Work In Process (2010 - 2018)
Jabil (JBL) posted Work In Process of $832.15 million for fiscal Q3 2018 (quarter ended May 31, 2018), up 15.1% from $722.83 million a year earlier but down 4.8% from the prior quarter.
Powered by 
Analysis
Jabil (JBL) Work In Process (2010 - 2018) Analysis & Trends
At the end of FY2017 (ended Aug 31, 2017), Jabil's Work In Process came in at $822.63 million, up 21.7% from FY2016.
- Annual Work In Process shows a five-year compound annual growth rate of 13.1% (FY2012 to FY2017).
- In prior fiscal years, Jabil's Work In Process was $675.87 million in FY2016 (-5.4%), $714.24 million in FY2015 (+33.0%), $537.03 million in FY2014 (+2.0%) and $526.48 million in FY2013 (+18.4%).
- Quarterly Work In Process has run from a low of $456.02 million in fiscal Q2 2014 to a high of $919.04 million in fiscal Q1 2018 over five years.
- On a year-over-year basis, Work In Process has increased in each of the last six quarters, with growth averaging 20.2% over the last eight quarters.
- The strongest year-over-year quarter for Work In Process in the past five years was fiscal Q1 2018, with growth of 44.3%; the weakest was fiscal Q2 2014, with a decline of 18.9%.
- According to Business Quant data, Work In Process for the three prior fiscal quarters was $873.83 million (Q2 2018), $919.04 million (Q1 2018) and $822.63 million (Q4 2017).
Peer Set
Peer Comparison
| # | Company | Market Cap | Enterprise Value | Gross Profit (Qtr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Apple | 5,053.06 Bn | 4,800.55 Bn | 54.77 Bn |
| 2 | Cisco Systems | 423.92 Bn | 359.85 Bn | 11.06 Bn |
| 3 | Dell Technologies | 311.26 Bn | 267.01 Bn | 9.83 Bn |
| 4 | Arista Networks | 229.96 Bn | 183.42 Bn | 1.91 Bn |
| 5 | Sandisk | 202.75 Bn | 191.28 Bn | 7.58 Bn |
| 6 | Seagate Technology Holdings | 152.73 Bn | 147.72 Bn | 1.90 Bn |
| 7 | Sony | 150.56 Bn | 87.83 Bn | 6.53 Bn |
| 8 | Western Digital | 128.70 Bn | 116.82 Bn | 2.03 Bn |
| 9 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise | 76.54 Bn | 54.42 Bn | 4.93 Bn |
| 10 | Jabil | 29.44 Bn | 22.75 Bn | 828.00 Mn |
Historic Data
Download Data
Historic Data
| Date | Value |
|---|---|
| May 31, 2018 | 832.15 Mn |
| Feb 28, 2018 | 873.83 Mn |
| Nov 30, 2017 | 919.04 Mn |
| Aug 31, 2017 | 822.63 Mn |
| May 31, 2017 | 722.83 Mn |
| Feb 28, 2017 | 658.69 Mn |
| Nov 30, 2016 | 636.76 Mn |
| Aug 31, 2016 | 675.87 Mn |
| May 31, 2016 | 531.96 Mn |
| Feb 29, 2016 | 556.51 Mn |
| Nov 30, 2015 | 644.22 Mn |
| Aug 31, 2015 | 714.24 Mn |
| May 31, 2015 | 545.41 Mn |
| Feb 28, 2015 | 551.72 Mn |
| Nov 30, 2014 | 542.26 Mn |
| Aug 31, 2014 | 537.03 Mn |
| May 31, 2014 | 458.52 Mn |
| Feb 28, 2014 | 456.02 Mn |
| Nov 30, 2013 | 495.50 Mn |
| Aug 31, 2013 | 526.48 Mn |
API Access
Jabil Work In Process API
Pull this series into your own models, spreadsheets and apps with the Business Quant
Historical Metrics API. The request below matches the chart above — change the
frequency, period or values and it follows. Swap YOUR_API_KEY for your own key.
https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=work-in-process&ticker=JBL&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEYimport requests
url = "https://data.businessquant.com/historic"
params = {"slug": "work-in-process", "ticker": "JBL", "period": "max", "api_key": "YOUR_API_KEY"}
data = requests.get(url, params=params).json()const res = await fetch("https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=work-in-process&ticker=JBL&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEY");
const data = await res.json();