Hp (HPQ) Asset Writedowns and Impairment (2009 - 2017)
Hp (HPQ) posted Asset Writedowns and Impairment of -$2 million for fiscal Q1 2017 (quarter ended Jan 31, 2017), compared with $34 million a year earlier.
Hp (HPQ) Asset Writedowns and Impairment (2009 - 2017) Analysis & Trends
For the trailing twelve months through Jan 31, 2017, Asset Writedowns and Impairment at Hp was $59 million, down 78.5% year-over-year; for FY2016 (ended Oct 31, 2016), it was $95 million, down 68.9% from FY2015.
- Annual Asset Writedowns and Impairment shows a five-year compound annual growth rate of -36.0% (FY2011 to FY2016).
- In prior fiscal years, Hp's Asset Writedowns and Impairment was $305 million in FY2015 (+44.5%), $211 million in FY2014 (-23.3%), $275 million in FY2013 (-98.5%) and $18.04 billion in FY2012.
- Quarterly Asset Writedowns and Impairment has run from a low of -$15 million in fiscal Q2 2016 to a high of $9.19 billion in fiscal Q3 2012 over five years.
- On a year-over-year basis, Asset Writedowns and Impairment increased in three of the last six quarters, with growth averaging 6.2%.
- The strongest year-over-year quarter for Asset Writedowns and Impairment in the past five years was fiscal Q1 2013, with growth of 170.6%; the weakest was fiscal Q3 2013, with a decline of 99.5%.
- According to Business Quant data, Asset Writedowns and Impairment for the three prior fiscal quarters was $19 million (Q4 2016), $57 million (Q3 2016) and -$15 million (Q2 2016).
Peer Comparison
| # | Company | Market Cap | Enterprise Value | Gross Profit (Qtr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Apple | 5,028.22 Bn | 4,775.71 Bn | 54.77 Bn |
| 2 | Cisco Systems | 420.88 Bn | 356.80 Bn | 11.06 Bn |
| 3 | Dell Technologies | 293.18 Bn | 248.94 Bn | 9.83 Bn |
| 4 | Arista Networks | 230.46 Bn | 183.91 Bn | 1.91 Bn |
| 5 | Sandisk | 201.65 Bn | 190.18 Bn | 7.58 Bn |
| 6 | Sony | 148.11 Bn | 85.38 Bn | 6.53 Bn |
| 7 | Seagate Technology Holdings | 144.57 Bn | 139.56 Bn | 1.90 Bn |
| 8 | Western Digital | 121.56 Bn | 109.69 Bn | 2.03 Bn |
| 9 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise | 74.47 Bn | 52.35 Bn | 4.93 Bn |
| 10 | Hp | 27.78 Bn | 13.05 Bn | 2.95 Bn |
Historic Data
| Date | Value |
|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2017 | -2.00 Mn |
| Oct 31, 2016 | 19.00 Mn |
| Jul 31, 2016 | 57.00 Mn |
| Apr 30, 2016 | -15.00 Mn |
| Jan 31, 2016 | 34.00 Mn |
| Oct 31, 2015 | 78.00 Mn |
| Jul 31, 2015 | 92.00 Mn |
| Apr 30, 2015 | 71.00 Mn |
| Jan 31, 2015 | 64.00 Mn |
| Oct 31, 2014 | 45.00 Mn |
| Jul 31, 2014 | 67.00 Mn |
| Apr 30, 2014 | 38.00 Mn |
| Jan 31, 2014 | 61.00 Mn |
| Oct 31, 2013 | 53.00 Mn |
| Jul 31, 2013 | 44.00 Mn |
| Apr 30, 2013 | 86.00 Mn |
| Jan 31, 2013 | 92.00 Mn |
| Oct 31, 2012 | 8.85 Bn |
| Jul 31, 2012 | 9.19 Bn |
| Apr 30, 2012 | 56.00 Mn |
Hp Asset Writedowns and Impairment API
Pull this series into your own models, spreadsheets and apps with the Business Quant
Historical Metrics API. The request below matches the chart above — change the
frequency, period or values and it follows. Swap YOUR_API_KEY for your own key.
https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=asset-writedowns-and-impairment&ticker=HPQ&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEY
import requests
url = "https://data.businessquant.com/historic"
params = {"slug": "asset-writedowns-and-impairment", "ticker": "HPQ", "period": "max", "api_key": "YOUR_API_KEY"}
data = requests.get(url, params=params).json()
const res = await fetch("https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=asset-writedowns-and-impairment&ticker=HPQ&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEY");
const data = await res.json();