Allurion Technologies (ALUR) EBITDA Margin (2022 - 2026)
Allurion Technologies (ALUR) posted EBITDA Margin of -120.80% for Q1 2026, up 6.06 percentage points from -126.86% a year earlier and up 47.81 percentage points from the prior quarter.
Allurion Technologies (ALUR) EBITDA Margin (2022 - 2026) Analysis & Trends
For the trailing twelve months through Mar 31, 2026, EBITDA Margin at Allurion Technologies was -203.39%, down 43.58 percentage points year-over-year; for FY2025, it was -191.56%, down 38.33 percentage points from FY2024.
- Annual EBITDA Margin has declined for three consecutive years, with a three-year change of -143.10 percentage points (FY2022 to FY2025).
- In prior years, Allurion Technologies' EBITDA Margin was -153.23% in FY2024 (-6.72 pp), -146.51% in FY2023 (-98.05 pp) and -48.46% in FY2022.
- The Q1 2026 figure stands as the highest quarterly EBITDA Margin since Q2 2024.
- On a year-over-year basis, EBITDA Margin increased in four of the last eight quarters, with an average year-over-year change of -20.64 percentage points.
- The strongest year-over-year quarter for EBITDA Margin in the past five years was Q4 2025, with a gain of 133.28 percentage points; the weakest was Q4 2023, with a drop of 258.63 percentage points.
- According to Business Quant data, EBITDA Margin for the three prior quarters was -168.61% (Q4 2025), -352.26% (Q3 2025) and -195.50% (Q2 2025).
Peer Comparison
| # | Company | Market Cap | Enterprise Value | Gross Profit (Qtr) | EBITDA Margin (Qtr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 250.84 Bn | 229.99 Bn | 4.88 Bn | 24.20% |
| 2 | Abbott Laboratories | 174.73 Bn | 145.82 Bn | 7.27 Bn | 21.86% |
| 3 | Danaher | 159.85 Bn | 143.67 Bn | 3.61 Bn | 28.51% |
| 4 | Intuitive Surgical | 146.79 Bn | 126.35 Bn | 1.96 Bn | 41.08% |
| 5 | Medtronic | 114.54 Bn | 80.41 Bn | 6.34 Bn | 25.55% |
| 6 | Stryker | 105.67 Bn | 91.79 Bn | 4.50 Bn | 29.67% |
| 7 | Boston Scientific | 63.93 Bn | 58.94 Bn | 3.85 Bn | 28.17% |
| 8 | Becton Dickinson | 50.12 Bn | 47.27 Bn | 2.32 Bn | 24.62% |
| 9 | Edwards Lifesciences | 50.06 Bn | 34.17 Bn | 1.35 Bn | 31.93% |
| 10 | Allurion Technologies | 16.94 Mn | -12.38 Mn | 1.23 Mn | -120.80% |
Historic Data
| Date | Value |
|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2026 | -120.80% |
| Dec 31, 2025 | -168.61% |
| Sep 30, 2025 | -352.26% |
| Jun 30, 2025 | -195.50% |
| Mar 31, 2025 | -126.86% |
| Dec 31, 2024 | -301.90% |
| Sep 30, 2024 | -225.94% |
| Jun 30, 2024 | -77.76% |
| Mar 31, 2024 | -117.55% |
| Dec 31, 2023 | -310.26% |
| Sep 30, 2023 | -142.82% |
| Jun 30, 2023 | -101.39% |
| Mar 31, 2023 | -97.04% |
| Dec 31, 2022 | -51.63% |
| Sep 30, 2022 | -73.18% |
| Jun 30, 2022 | -25.13% |
Allurion Technologies EBITDA Margin API
Pull this series into your own models, spreadsheets and apps with the Business Quant
Historical Metrics API. The request below matches the chart above — change the
frequency, period or values and it follows. Swap YOUR_API_KEY for your own key.
https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=ebitda-margin&ticker=ALUR&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEY
import requests
url = "https://data.businessquant.com/historic"
params = {"slug": "ebitda-margin", "ticker": "ALUR", "period": "max", "api_key": "YOUR_API_KEY"}
data = requests.get(url, params=params).json()
const res = await fetch("https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=ebitda-margin&ticker=ALUR&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEY");
const data = await res.json();