ZGN vs VNCE vs LANV Stock Comparison

Ermenegildo Zegna, Vince Holding and Lanvin Group Holdings Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ZGN Ermenegildo Zegna N.V.
$13.36 +4.9% 1M +27.5% 1Y
Market cap
$3.47B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
0.90%
Luxury Goods Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
VNCE Vince Holding Corp.
$11.22 -2.4% 1M +279.1% 1Y
Market cap
$145.00M
P/E
19.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$314.66M
Div. yield
–
Luxury Goods Consumer Discretionary
2 wins

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

Ermenegildo Zegna leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Ermenegildo Zegna 3, Vince Holding 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionZGNVNCELANVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.47B $145.00M $100.48M ZGN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 19.0x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 30.4x 8.4x — VNCE
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +8.0% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 2.4% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 9.4% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.7x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.90% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +27.5% +279.1% -61.4% VNCE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.9%/yr +4.8%/yr -39.4%/yr ZGN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 41.4% 104.8% 83.8% ZGN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 47/100 — –

Percentile Scorecard

ZGNVNCELANV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisZGNVNCELANV
Valuation – 75 #12 of 45 –
Growth – 60 #18 of 43 –
Profitability – 55 #19 of 41 –
Financial Health 51 #26 of 52 39 #32 of 52 2 #51 of 52
Shareholder Returns 12 #30 of 34 6 #32 of 34 –
Overall – 47 –
  • ZGN ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • VNCE ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • LANV ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodZGNVNCELANVSPY
1 month +4.9%-2.4%-26.6% -0.2%
3 months -10.9%+85.8%-36.5% +3.9%
6 months +13.3%+131.3%-47.0% +8.2%
Year to date +30.3%+175.0%-60.2% +12.9%
1 year +27.5%+279.1%-61.4% +12.3%
3 years +21.5%+938.9%-77.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year +6.7%+118.3%-38.8% +23.3%
5 years +33.4%+26.4%-91.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year +5.9%+4.8%-39.4% +10.9%
10 years —-78.8%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —-14.4%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureZGNVNCELANVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 41.4%104.8%83.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 38.7%85.3%85.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.161.16-0.17 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.662.66-0.73 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -61.4%-90.5%-92.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.4%-16.0%-63.6% -1.2%
52-week high $15.25$13.36$2.20 $779.14
52-week low $8.69$1.99$0.80 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleZGNVNCELANV
P/E now vs peer median —median 16.4x 19.0xmedian 16.4x —median 16.4x
P/S now vs peer median —median 0.7x 0.5xmedian 0.7x —median 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 9.9x 9.5xmedian 9.9x —median 9.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 12.0x 8.0xmedian 12.0x —median 12.0x
P/B now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 2.2x 2.5xmedian 2.2x -0.2xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.64 -1.07median 0.64 —median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsZGNVNCELANV
Revenue – $314.66M –
Gross profit – $165.27M –
Operating income – $13.43M –
Net income – $7.62M –
Free cash flow – $18.11M –
EPS (diluted) – $0.58 –
Cash & equivalents $258.95M $1.01M $30.19M
Total debt $256.76M $12.25M $454.21M
Shares (diluted) 261.47M 13.19M –
Enterprise value $2.28B $141.67M -$77.99M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricZGNVNCELANV
P/E – 19.0x –
P/FCF – 8.0x –
P/Operating cash flow – 7.3x –
P/S – 0.5x –
P/B 2.9x 2.5x -0.2x
P/Tangible book 2.9x 2.5x -0.2x
EV/EBITDA – 9.5x –
EV/EBIT – 11.6x –
EV/Revenue – 0.5x –
EV/FCF – 8.6x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 7.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -1.07 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricZGNVNCELANV
Revenue growth (1Y) – 8.0% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -0.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 13.0% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 8.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 178.1% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -4.7% –
Net income growth (1Y) – 145.5% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -16.2% –
EPS growth (1Y) – 144.7% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -17.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -7.8% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 44.5% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 19.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 42.5% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricZGNVNCELANV
Gross margin – 52.5% –
EBITDA margin – 5.2% –
Operating margin – 4.3% –
Pretax margin – 3.5% –
Net margin – 2.4% –
FCF margin – 5.8% –
Operating cash flow margin – 6.3% –
Return on equity – 10.7% –
Return on assets – 2.5% –
Return on invested capital – 9.4% –
Return on capital employed – 8.8% –
Asset turnover – 1.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.6x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricZGNVNCELANV
Debt / assets 7.3% 5.4% 90.8%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.2x -1.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.7x –
Debt / FCF – 0.7x –
Liabilities / assets 66.4% 74.3% 180.5%
Equity / assets 33.6% 25.7% -80.5%
Interest coverage – 4.4x –
Current ratio 1.5x 1.5x 0.2x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.4x 0.1x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.0x 0.0x
Altman Z-score – -4.48 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricZGNVNCELANV
Dividend yield 0.9% – –
Net buyback yield – -1.4% –
Shareholder yield 0.9% -1.4% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusZGNVNCELANV
Forward P/E 30.4xFY2026 8.4xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.44FY2026 $1.33FY2026 $-1.33FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -2.2%FY2026 +202.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +34.1% -6.8% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.22BFY2026 $373.95MFY2026 $247.95MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -1.5%FY2026 +24.6%FY2026 -12.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +17.4% +2.4% -7.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersZGNVNCELANV
Held by institutions 29.0% 14.2% –
Institutions holding 135 35 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +14.6% +98.6% –
Institutions buying 77 20 –
Institutions selling 39 6 –
Buyers to sellers 1.97 3.33 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ZGNVNCELANV
ZGN 1.00 0.15 0.09
VNCE 0.15 1.00 -0.01
LANV 0.09 -0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ZGN, VNCE and LANV?

Ermenegildo Zegna (ZGN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ermenegildo Zegna (ZGN) $3.47B, Vince Holding (VNCE) $145.00M, Lanvin Group Holdings (LANV) $100.48M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Vince Holding (VNCE) returned the most: Ermenegildo Zegna (ZGN) +27.5%, Vince Holding (VNCE) +279.1%, Lanvin Group Holdings (LANV) -61.4%. Over five years, Ermenegildo Zegna (ZGN) compounded fastest (Ermenegildo Zegna (ZGN) +5.9%/yr, Vince Holding (VNCE) +4.8%/yr, Lanvin Group Holdings (LANV) -39.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Ermenegildo Zegna (ZGN) 0.90%. Vince Holding (VNCE) and Lanvin Group Holdings (LANV) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ermenegildo Zegna (ZGN) has been the steadiest (Ermenegildo Zegna (ZGN) 41.4%, Vince Holding (VNCE) 104.8%, Lanvin Group Holdings (LANV) 83.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ZGN, VNCE and LANV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ermenegildo Zegna (ZGN) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.