ZBRA vs SPRS vs LFUS Stock Comparison

Zebra Technologies, Surge Components and Littelfuse Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ZBRA Zebra Technologies Corp
$384.15 +3.8% 1M +24.4% 1Y
Market cap
$18.21B
P/E
33.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.85B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
4 wins
SPRS Surge Components Inc
$3.22 -19.3% 1M +15.4% 1Y
Market cap
$18.47M
P/E
17.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.54M
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
2 wins
LFUS Littelfuse Inc /De
$364.03 -15.2% 1M +35.2% 1Y
Market cap
$9.72B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.61B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Littelfuse leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Littelfuse 5, Zebra Technologies 4, Surge Components 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionZBRASPRSLFUSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $18.21B $18.47M $9.72B ZBRA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 33.8x 17.2x -1,206x SPRS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.0x — 20.5x ZBRA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +12.7% +6.5% +15.4% LFUS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.2% 2.9% -0.3% ZBRA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.6% — 0.0% ZBRA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.4x — 0.0x LFUS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +24.4% +15.4% +35.2% LFUS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.8%/yr -2.4%/yr +5.5%/yr LFUS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 47.3% 49.6% 43.1% LFUS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 61/100 65/100 46/100 SPRS

Percentile Scorecard

ZBRASPRSLFUS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisZBRASPRSLFUS
Valuation 63 #42 of 111 98 #3 of 111 58 #47 of 111
Growth 48 #57 of 108 25 #81 of 108 28 #78 of 108
Profitability 85 #17 of 104 51 #52 of 104 50 #53 of 104
Financial Health 18 #95 of 115 84 #19 of 115 61 #45 of 115
Shareholder Returns 93 #7 of 81 – 35 #53 of 81
Overall 61 65 46
  • ZBRA ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • SPRS ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • LFUS ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodZBRASPRSLFUSSPY
1 month +3.8%-19.3%-15.2% -0.8%
3 months +45.2%-16.1%-9.7% +3.5%
6 months +73.8%-8.0%-9.7% +7.0%
Year to date +58.2%-5.3%+43.9% +12.2%
1 year +24.4%+15.4%+35.2% +13.0%
3 years +85.4%+17.5%+68.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +22.9%+5.5%+19.0% +23.1%
5 years -25.8%-11.3%+30.6% +68.6%
5 years, per year -5.8%-2.4%+5.5% +11.0%
10 years +472.1%+218.8%+165.7% +258.0%
10 years, per year +19.1%+12.3%+10.3% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureZBRASPRSLFUSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 47.3%49.6%43.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.0%61.8%44.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.69-0.141.84 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.520.310.82 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.8%-49.4%-54.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.8%-24.4%-25.6% -1.8%
52-week high $391.00$4.26$489.10 $779.14
52-week low $199.30$2.73$234.94 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleZBRASPRSLFUS
P/E now vs peer median 34.0xmedian 32.0x 17.1xmedian 32.0x -1,143xmedian 32.0x
P/S now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 2.8x 0.5xmedian 2.8x 3.5xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 19.4xmedian 19.4x 3.8xmedian 19.4x 39.6xmedian 19.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 20.1xmedian 29.0x 13.0xmedian 29.0x 20.8xmedian 29.0x
P/B now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 2.9x 0.8xmedian 2.9x 3.5xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median -9.00median 1.13 -0.86median 1.13 43.13median 1.13

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsZBRASPRSLFUS
Revenue $5.85B $37.54M $2.61B
Gross profit $2.90B $10.91M $1.03B
Operating income $858.00M $1.08M $95.49M
Net income $539.00M $1.08M -$8.06M
Free cash flow $904.00M $1.43M $444.35M
R&D $622.00M – $115.22M
EPS (diluted) $11.20 $0.18 $-0.31
Cash & equivalents $157.00M $4.72M $628.22M
Total debt $2.77B – $629.66M
Shares (diluted) 48.13M 5.98M 25.62M
Enterprise value $16.76B -$39.37M $7.23B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricZBRASPRSLFUS
P/E 34.0x 17.1x -1,143x
P/FCF 20.1x 13.0x 20.8x
P/Operating cash flow 18.6x 12.9x 18.1x
P/S 3.1x 0.5x 3.5x
P/B 5.3x 0.8x 3.5x
P/Tangible book 6.7x 0.8x 4.5x
EV/EBITDA 19.4x 3.8x 39.6x
EV/EBIT 24.2x 4.0x 96.8x
EV/Revenue 3.6x 0.1x 3.5x
EV/FCF 23.0x 3.0x 20.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 21.2x 3.0x 18.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -9.00 -0.86 43.13

Growth

14 metrics
MetricZBRASPRSLFUS
Revenue growth (1Y) 12.7% 6.5% 15.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 2.1% -1.9% 1.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 14.9% 9.7% 23.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.2% -0.9% 0.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 8.1% 2.1% -52.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -0.9% -24.8% -40.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -1.6% 19.6% -107.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -6.1% -18.8% -26.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 4.8% 16.5% -107.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -3.8% -19.9% -26.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 5.8% 36.2% 31.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 63.5% -14.1% 8.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 6.0% 52.6% 41.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 83.6% -13.9% 12.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricZBRASPRSLFUS
Gross margin 49.6% 29.1% 39.3%
EBITDA margin 18.3% 3.0% 8.9%
Operating margin 14.7% 2.9% 3.7%
Pretax margin 12.1% 4.0% 3.0%
Net margin 9.2% 2.9% -0.3%
FCF margin 15.5% 3.8% 17.0%
Operating cash flow margin 16.7% 3.8% 19.6%
Return on equity 15.6% 5.0% -0.3%
Return on assets 6.4% 3.8% -0.2%
Return on invested capital 10.6% – 0.0%
Return on capital employed 19.1% 4.8% 2.8%
Asset turnover 0.7x 1.3x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.8x 1.3x -63.5x
Stock comp / revenue 3.0% 0.4% 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricZBRASPRSLFUS
Debt / assets 32.0% – 15.7%
Debt / equity 0.8x – 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.4x – 0.0x
Debt / FCF 3.1x – 1.4x
Liabilities / assets 60.2% 24.0% 34.7%
Equity / assets 39.8% 76.0% 65.3%
Interest coverage – – 3.2x
Current ratio 0.5x 4.4x 2.8x
Quick ratio 0.3x 3.5x 1.8x
Cash ratio 0.0x 2.3x 1.1x
Altman Z-score 3.75 4.08 5.64

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricZBRASPRSLFUS
Dividend yield – – 0.8%
Net buyback yield 5.0% – -1.1%
Shareholder yield 5.0% – -0.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusZBRASPRSLFUS
Forward P/E 17.0xFY2026 – 20.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $22.59FY2026 – $17.78FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +42.6%FY2026 – +66.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -4.5% – +12.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.35BFY2026 – $3.11BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +17.7%FY2026 – +30.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.2% – +0.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersZBRASPRSLFUS
Held by institutions 100.0% – 99.4%
Institutions holding 644 – 606
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.5% – +1.6%
Institutions buying 309 – 295
Institutions selling 242 – 209
Buyers to sellers 1.28 – 1.41

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ZBRASPRSLFUS
ZBRA 1.00 -0.01 0.30
SPRS -0.01 1.00 -0.09
LFUS 0.30 -0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ZBRA, SPRS and LFUS?

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) $18.21B, Surge Components (SPRS) $18.47M, Littelfuse (LFUS) $9.72B.

Which stock is cheaper, ZBRA, SPRS and LFUS?

Surge Components (SPRS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 33.8x, Surge Components (SPRS) 17.2x, Littelfuse (LFUS) -1,206x). On next year's consensus earnings, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) is cheapest (Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 17.0x, Littelfuse (LFUS) 20.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Littelfuse (LFUS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +12.7%, Surge Components (SPRS) +6.5%, Littelfuse (LFUS) +15.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) has the highest net margin (Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 9.2%, Surge Components (SPRS) 2.9%, Littelfuse (LFUS) -0.3%). On return on invested capital, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) leads (Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 10.6%, Littelfuse (LFUS) 0.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Littelfuse (LFUS) returned the most: Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +24.4%, Surge Components (SPRS) +15.4%, Littelfuse (LFUS) +35.2%. Over five years, Littelfuse (LFUS) compounded fastest (Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) -5.8%/yr, Surge Components (SPRS) -2.4%/yr, Littelfuse (LFUS) +5.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Littelfuse (LFUS) has been the steadiest (Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 47.3%, Surge Components (SPRS) 49.6%, Littelfuse (LFUS) 43.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ZBRA, SPRS and LFUS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Littelfuse (LFUS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.