ZBRA vs LITE vs KN Stock Comparison

Zebra Technologies, Lumentum Holdings and Knowles Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ZBRA Zebra Technologies Corp
$384.15 +3.8% 1M +24.4% 1Y
Market cap
$18.21B
P/E
33.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.85B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
5 wins
LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc.
$818.10 -13.1% 1M +356.3% 1Y
Market cap
$64.61B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.01B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
5 wins
KN Knowles Corp
$32.65 -13.0% 1M +36.0% 1Y
Market cap
$2.93B
P/E
40.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$666.10M
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Lumentum Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Lumentum Holdings 5, Zebra Technologies 5, Knowles 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionZBRALITEKNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $18.21B $64.61B $2.93B LITE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 33.8x -9.3x 40.8x ZBRA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.0x 38.5x 22.8x ZBRA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +12.7% +83.2% +16.1% LITE
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.2% -230.2% — ZBRA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.6% 8.1% — ZBRA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.4x -1.4x — LITE
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +24.4% +356.3% +36.0% LITE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.8%/yr +59.0%/yr +10.5%/yr LITE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 47.3% 98.8% 41.2% KN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 61/100 47/100 54/100 ZBRA

Percentile Scorecard

ZBRALITEKN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisZBRALITEKN
Valuation 63 #42 of 111 9 #101 of 111 45 #62 of 111
Growth 48 #57 of 108 80 #22 of 108 70 #33 of 108
Profitability 85 #17 of 104 40 #63 of 104 49 #54 of 104
Financial Health 18 #95 of 115 56 #51 of 115 –
Shareholder Returns 93 #7 of 81 48 #43 of 81 –
Overall 61 47 54
  • ZBRA ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • LITE ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • KN ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodZBRALITEKNSPY
1 month +3.8%-13.1%-13.0% -0.8%
3 months +45.2%+14.9%-12.6% +3.5%
6 months +73.8%-4.8%+4.7% +7.0%
Year to date +58.2%+122.0%+52.4% +12.2%
1 year +24.4%+356.3%+36.0% +13.0%
3 years +85.4%+2,168.1%+151.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year +22.9%+183.3%+35.9% +23.1%
5 years -25.8%+913.8%+64.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year -5.8%+59.0%+10.5% +11.0%
10 years +472.1%+1,912.5%+119.4% +258.0%
10 years, per year +19.1%+35.0%+8.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureZBRALITEKNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 47.3%98.8%41.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.0%100.3%42.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.693.151.89 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.523.610.88 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.8%-66.5%-49.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.8%-27.8%-23.7% -1.8%
52-week high $391.00$1,133.40$42.80 $779.14
52-week low $199.30$188.36$20.67 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleZBRALITEKN
P/E now vs peer median 34.0xmedian 32.0x -8.8xmedian 32.0x 39.0xmedian 32.0x
P/S now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 2.8x 24.0xmedian 2.8x 4.2xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 19.4xmedian 19.4x 89.7xmedian 19.4x —median 19.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 20.1xmedian 29.0x 241.5xmedian 29.0x 195.6xmedian 29.0x
P/B now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 2.9x 15.6xmedian 2.9x 3.5xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median -9.00median 1.13 0.03median 1.13 1.15median 1.13

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsZBRALITEKN
Revenue $5.85B $3.01B $666.10M
Gross profit $2.90B $1.26B $295.50M
Operating income $858.00M $524.80M $97.10M
Net income $539.00M -$6.94B $71.70M
Free cash flow $904.00M $300.10M –
R&D $622.00M $356.50M $43.90M
EPS (diluted) $11.20 $-92.99 $0.82
Cash & equivalents $157.00M $2.04B $46.60M
Total debt $2.77B $1.64B –
Shares (diluted) 48.13M 74.60M 87.90M
Enterprise value $16.76B $56.43B $2.93B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricZBRALITEKN
P/E 34.0x -8.8x 39.0x
P/FCF 20.1x 241.5x 195.6x
P/Operating cash flow 18.6x 96.5x 27.6x
P/S 3.1x 24.0x 4.2x
P/B 5.3x 15.6x 3.5x
P/Tangible book 6.7x 16.8x 4.2x
EV/EBITDA 19.4x 89.7x –
EV/EBIT 24.2x 136.0x –
EV/Revenue 3.6x 23.7x 4.2x
EV/FCF 23.0x 237.9x –
EV/Operating cash flow 21.2x 95.0x 27.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -9.00 0.03 1.15

Growth

14 metrics
MetricZBRALITEKN
Revenue growth (1Y) 12.7% 83.2% 16.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 2.1% 19.5% 25.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 14.9% 173.1% 20.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.2% 30.2% 13.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 8.1% 391.4% 62.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -0.9% 87.0% -33.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -1.6% -26,876% 71.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -6.1% -274.9% 33.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 4.8% -25,088% 70.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -3.8% -264.1% 34.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 5.8% 494.9% -15.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 63.5% 61.1% 7.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 6.0% 386.6% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 83.6% 80.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricZBRALITEKN
Gross margin 49.6% 41.7% –
EBITDA margin 18.3% 26.4% –
Operating margin 14.7% 17.4% –
Pretax margin 12.1% -238.0% –
Net margin 9.2% -230.2% –
FCF margin 15.5% 10.0% –
Operating cash flow margin 16.7% 24.9% 15.2%
Return on equity 15.6% -182.1% –
Return on assets 6.4% -96.8% –
Return on invested capital 10.6% 8.1% –
Return on capital employed 19.1% 11.2% –
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.4x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.8x -0.1x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 3.0% 5.6% 4.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricZBRALITEKN
Debt / assets 32.0% 22.4% –
Debt / equity 0.8x 0.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.4x -1.4x –
Debt / FCF 3.1x 5.5x –
Liabilities / assets 60.2% 36.5% –
Equity / assets 39.8% 63.5% 74.2%
Interest coverage – 24.1x –
Current ratio 0.5x 1.7x 2.9x
Quick ratio 0.3x 1.1x –
Cash ratio 0.0x 1.1x –
Altman Z-score 3.75 15.76 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricZBRALITEKN
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 5.0% 0.0% –
Shareholder yield 5.0% 0.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusZBRALITEKN
Forward P/E 17.0xFY2026 38.5xFY2027 22.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $22.59FY2026 $21.25FY2027 $1.43FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +42.6%FY2026 +145.1%FY2027 +28.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -4.5% +61.4% +21.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.35BFY2026 $6.52BFY2027 $712.60MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +17.7%FY2026 +116.6%FY2027 +20.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.2% +62.9% +12.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersZBRALITEKN
Held by institutions 100.0% 92.8% 100.0%
Institutions holding 644 1,316 340
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.5% +6.6% +0.5%
Institutions buying 309 903 198
Institutions selling 242 318 93
Buyers to sellers 1.28 2.84 2.13

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ZBRALITEKN
ZBRA 1.00 0.15 0.37
LITE 0.15 1.00 0.56
KN 0.37 0.56 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ZBRA, LITE and KN?

Lumentum Holdings (LITE) is the largest by market capitalisation: Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) $18.21B, Lumentum Holdings (LITE) $64.61B, Knowles (KN) $2.93B.

Which stock is cheaper, ZBRA, LITE and KN?

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 33.8x, Lumentum Holdings (LITE) -9.3x, Knowles (KN) 40.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) is cheapest (Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 17.0x, Lumentum Holdings (LITE) 38.5x, Knowles (KN) 22.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lumentum Holdings (LITE) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +12.7%, Lumentum Holdings (LITE) +83.2%, Knowles (KN) +16.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) has the highest net margin (Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 9.2%, Lumentum Holdings (LITE) -230.2%). On return on invested capital, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) leads (Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 10.6%, Lumentum Holdings (LITE) 8.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lumentum Holdings (LITE) returned the most: Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +24.4%, Lumentum Holdings (LITE) +356.3%, Knowles (KN) +36.0%. Over five years, Lumentum Holdings (LITE) compounded fastest (Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) -5.8%/yr, Lumentum Holdings (LITE) +59.0%/yr, Knowles (KN) +10.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Knowles (KN) has been the steadiest (Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 47.3%, Lumentum Holdings (LITE) 98.8%, Knowles (KN) 41.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ZBRA, LITE and KN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lumentum Holdings (LITE) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.