YETI vs NWL vs UMAC Stock Comparison

YETI Holdings, Newell Brands and Unusual Machines Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
YETI YETI Holdings, Inc.
$44.21 +3.9% 1M +27.8% 1Y
Market cap
$3.27B
P/E
14.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.00B
Div. yield
–
Sporting Goods Consumer Discretionary
7 wins
NWL Newell Brands Inc.
$5.08 -4.5% 1M +3.0% 1Y
Market cap
$2.18B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$7.25B
Div. yield
0.06%
Home Appliances Consumer Discretionary
1 win
UMAC Unusual Machines, Inc.
$17.32 -30.5% 1M +8.9% 1Y
Market cap
$744.24M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$25.88M
Div. yield
–
Sporting Goods Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

YETI Holdings leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (YETI Holdings 7, Newell Brands 1, Unusual Machines 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionYETINWLUMACLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.27B $2.18B $744.24M YETI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.9x -9.9x -31.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.1x 7.1x — NWL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.8% -2.0% +236.0% UMAC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.0% -3.0% -91.6% YETI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 30.1% 2.2% — YETI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 10.0x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.06% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +27.8% +3.0% +8.9% YETI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -14.8%/yr -26.0%/yr — YETI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 39.7% 61.9% 126.0% YETI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 48/100 47/100 YETI

Percentile Scorecard

YETINWLUMAC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisYETINWLUMAC
Valuation 52 #17 of 34 55 #19 of 41 9 #31 of 34
Growth 81 #7 of 32 50 #21 of 41 74 #9 of 32
Profitability 100 #1 of 32 32 #26 of 38 13 #28 of 32
Financial Health 47 #18 of 33 10 #38 of 42 91 #4 of 33
Shareholder Returns – 92 #3 of 27 –
Overall 70 48 47
  • YETI ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • NWL ranked among 44 companies in Household Durables
  • UMAC ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodYETINWLUMACSPY
1 month +3.9%-4.5%-30.5% +0.7%
3 months -10.9%-1.2%-15.3% +3.7%
6 months +12.0%+24.5%+18.7% +7.1%
Year to date +0.1%+36.6%+35.9% +12.8%
1 year +27.8%+3.0%+8.9% +11.9%
3 years +7.5%-27.5%— +85.2%
3 years, per year +2.4%-10.2%— +22.8%
5 years -55.0%-77.8%— +67.6%
5 years, per year -14.8%-26.0%— +10.9%
10 years —-89.7%— +262.0%
10 years, per year —-20.3%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureYETINWLUMACSPY
Volatility, 1Y 39.7%61.9%126.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 38.3%66.6%116.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.151.264.06 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.700.050.07 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -75.0%-88.1%-75.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -16.1%-20.1%-48.9% -1.2%
52-week high $52.68$6.36$33.87 $779.14
52-week low $32.50$3.11$7.76 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleYETINWLUMAC
P/E now vs peer median 15.0xmedian 18.6x -9.8xmedian 15.8x -35.5xmedian 18.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.1x 0.3xmedian 0.7x 33.4xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 10.1x 14.6xmedian 9.6x -19.9xmedian 10.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 11.2x 18.3xmedian 12.1x —median 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 1.5x 0.9xmedian 1.2x 2.2xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.27median 1.04 -0.81median 0.63 —median 1.04

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsYETINWLUMAC
Revenue $2.00B $7.25B $25.88M
Gross profit $1.19B $2.57B $9.21M
Operating income $285.40M $164.00M -$29.72M
Net income $220.10M -$221.00M -$23.71M
Free cash flow – $118.00M –
R&D – – $625.44K
EPS (diluted) $2.90 $-0.51 $-0.49
Cash & equivalents $59.82M $209.00M $229.60M
Total debt $330.21M $5.01B –
Shares (diluted) 75.78M 430.20M 48.61M
Enterprise value $2.59B $1.34B $280.73M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricYETINWLUMAC
P/E 15.0x -9.8x -35.5x
P/FCF – 18.3x –
P/Operating cash flow – 6.5x –
P/S 1.6x 0.3x 33.4x
P/B 5.3x 0.9x 2.2x
P/Tangible book 8.4x 2.5x 2.2x
EV/EBITDA – 14.6x -19.9x
EV/EBIT 11.4x 42.4x -19.8x
EV/Revenue 1.6x 1.0x 22.7x
EV/FCF – 59.0x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 21.0x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.27 -0.81 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricYETINWLUMAC
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.8% -2.0% 236.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.0% -5.4% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 12.2% 1.4% 310.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 15.9% 2.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 21.0% 105.0% -19.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 46.8% 45.8% –
Net income growth (1Y) 24.2% 9.1% 40.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 49.1% 11.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) 36.8% 11.0% 73.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 56.2% 12.1% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 105.6% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -10.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 213.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -5.8% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricYETINWLUMAC
Gross margin 59.6% 35.5% 35.6%
EBITDA margin – 6.6% -114.1%
Operating margin 14.3% 2.3% -114.8%
Pretax margin 14.5% -2.5% -100.7%
Net margin 11.0% -3.0% -91.6%
FCF margin – 1.6% –
Operating cash flow margin – 4.6% –
Return on equity 34.9% -9.2% -9.3%
Return on assets 17.4% -2.0% -9.0%
Return on invested capital 30.1% 2.2% –
Return on capital employed 33.2% 2.0% -10.5%
Asset turnover 1.6x 0.7x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – -1.5x –
Stock comp / revenue 2.3% 1.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricYETINWLUMAC
Debt / assets 7.7% 45.3% –
Debt / equity 0.2x 2.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 10.0x –
Debt / FCF – 42.4x –
Liabilities / assets 53.2% 77.8% 2.4%
Equity / assets 46.8% 22.2% 97.6%
Interest coverage – – -37,148x
Current ratio 1.8x 1.1x 53.8x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.5x 41.6x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x 40.2x
Altman Z-score 6.27 0.49 55.65

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricYETINWLUMAC
Dividend yield – 5.5% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 5.5% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – -57.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 106.8% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 6.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -26.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusYETINWLUMAC
Forward P/E 15.1xFY2026 7.1xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $2.92FY2026 $0.72FY2026 $-0.29FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +17.7%FY2026 +26.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +18.2% -5.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.88BFY2026 $6.86BFY2026 $53.31MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +0.6%FY2026 -4.7%FY2026 +376.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +17.7% +15.0% +116.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersYETINWLUMAC
Held by institutions 93.7% 100.0% 59.7%
Institutions holding 457 421 183
Change in shares held, QoQ -3.3% +9.2% +23.8%
Institutions buying 222 234 134
Institutions selling 167 124 40
Buyers to sellers 1.33 1.89 3.35

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

YETINWLUMAC
YETI 1.00 0.30 0.05
NWL 0.30 1.00 0.00
UMAC 0.05 0.00 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, YETI, NWL and UMAC?

YETI Holdings (YETI) is the largest by market capitalisation: YETI Holdings (YETI) $3.27B, Newell Brands (NWL) $2.18B, Unusual Machines (UMAC) $744.24M.

Which company is growing faster?

Unusual Machines (UMAC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: YETI Holdings (YETI) +9.8%, Newell Brands (NWL) -2.0%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) +236.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

YETI Holdings (YETI) has the highest net margin (YETI Holdings (YETI) 11.0%, Newell Brands (NWL) -3.0%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) -91.6%). On return on invested capital, YETI Holdings (YETI) leads (YETI Holdings (YETI) 30.1%, Newell Brands (NWL) 2.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year YETI Holdings (YETI) returned the most: YETI Holdings (YETI) +27.8%, Newell Brands (NWL) +3.0%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) +8.9%. Over five years, YETI Holdings (YETI) compounded fastest (YETI Holdings (YETI) -14.8%/yr, Newell Brands (NWL) -26.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: YETI Holdings (YETI) 0.00%, Newell Brands (NWL) 0.06%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) 0.00%. YETI Holdings (YETI) and Unusual Machines (UMAC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, YETI Holdings (YETI) has been the steadiest (YETI Holdings (YETI) 39.7%, Newell Brands (NWL) 61.9%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) 126.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, YETI, NWL and UMAC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, YETI Holdings (YETI) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.