XNET vs ALAR Stock Comparison

Xunlei and Alarum Technologies Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
XNET Xunlei Ltd
$3.84 -23.4% 1M -58.7% 1Y
Market cap
$242.30M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$424.54M
Div. yield
–
Content Delivery Networks Technology
4 wins
ALAR Alarum Technologies Ltd.
$1.41 -20.8% 1M -90.1% 1Y
Market cap
$9.30M
P/E
0.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$45.33M
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Xunlei leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Xunlei 4, Alarum Technologies 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionXNETALARLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $242.30M $9.30M XNET
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -3.4x 0.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 20.1x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +40.4% +48.2% ALAR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -16.9% 145.1% ALAR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 1.4% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -58.7% -90.1% XNET
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.9%/yr -34.1%/yr XNET
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 52.8% 113.8% XNET
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 74/100 79/100 ALAR

Percentile Scorecard

XNETALAR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisXNETALAR
Valuation 100 #1 of 38 100 #1 of 124
Growth 46 #20 of 36 65 #40 of 113
Profitability 64 #13 of 34 79 #24 of 110
Financial Health 87 #6 of 38 73 #35 of 129
Shareholder Returns – –
Overall 74 79
  • XNET ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing
  • ALAR ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodXNETALARSPY
1 month -23.4%-20.8% -0.8%
3 months -33.7%-24.6% +3.5%
6 months -39.9%-78.8% +7.0%
Year to date -45.8%-83.6% +12.2%
1 year -58.7%-90.1% +13.0%
3 years +161.2%-54.5% +86.3%
3 years, per year +37.8%-23.1% +23.1%
5 years +32.9%-87.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year +5.9%-34.1% +11.0%
10 years -26.0%— +258.0%
10 years, per year -3.0%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureXNETALARSPY
Volatility, 1Y 52.8%113.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 57.4%131.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.771.65 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.11-0.79 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -68.7%-97.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -59.1%-91.3% -1.8%
52-week high $9.40$16.25 $779.14
52-week low $3.83$1.18 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleXNETALAR
P/E now vs peer median -3.3xmedian 29.6x 0.1xmedian 38.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 4.2x 0.2xmedian 4.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 24.2x —median 35.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 15.1x —median 27.1x
P/B now vs peer median —median 3.9x 0.3xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.04median 0.38 0.00median 1.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsXNETALAR
Revenue $424.54M $45.33M
Gross profit $230.55M $26.25M
Operating income $5.67M $683.00K
Net income $146.48M $1.15M
R&D $82.00M $8.46M
EPS (diluted) $-1.13 $50.66
Cash & equivalents $125.83M $14.06M
Total debt $270.21M $3.23M
Shares (diluted) 63.29M 1.30M
Enterprise value -$640.48M -$46.31M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricXNETALAR
P/E -3.3x 0.1x
P/FCF – –
P/Operating cash flow – –
P/S 0.6x 0.2x
P/B – 0.3x
P/Tangible book – 0.3x
EV/EBITDA – –
EV/EBIT 3.7x -5.2x
EV/Revenue 0.0x -0.1x
EV/FCF – –
EV/Operating cash flow – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.04 0.00

Growth

14 metrics
MetricXNETALAR
Revenue growth (1Y) 40.4% 48.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.0% 30.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 35.5% 18.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 13.4% 30.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 126.5% -84.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -7.0% 27.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -79.7% -75.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 108.8% -44.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -110.0% 22.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -88.7% 109.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricXNETALAR
Gross margin 54.3% 57.9%
EBITDA margin – –
Operating margin 1.3% 1.5%
Pretax margin -20.6% 3.8%
Net margin -16.9% 145.1%
FCF margin – –
Operating cash flow margin – –
Return on equity – 3.5%
Return on assets 11.3% 2.5%
Return on invested capital – 1.4%
Return on capital employed 0.5% 1.9%
Asset turnover 0.3x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – –
Stock comp / revenue – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricXNETALAR
Debt / assets 4.8% 1.8%
Debt / equity – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – –
Debt / FCF – –
Liabilities / assets 16.9% 25.6%
Equity / assets – 74.4%
Interest coverage 2.8x –
Current ratio 2.0x 2.6x
Quick ratio 1.9x 2.6x
Cash ratio 1.7x 1.5x
Altman Z-score 1.88 -0.99

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricXNETALAR
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield – –
Shareholder yield – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusXNETALAR
Forward P/E – 20.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +600.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +100.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $47.86MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +17.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +41.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersXNETALAR
Held by institutions 11.0% 4.2%
Institutions holding 52 25
Change in shares held, QoQ -8.7% +182.7%
Institutions buying 35 16
Institutions selling 14 4
Buyers to sellers 2.50 4.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

XNETALAR
XNET 1.00 0.13
ALAR 0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, XNET and ALAR?

Xunlei (XNET) is the largest by market capitalisation: Xunlei (XNET) $242.30M, Alarum Technologies (ALAR) $9.30M.

Which company is growing faster?

Alarum Technologies (ALAR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Xunlei (XNET) +40.4%, Alarum Technologies (ALAR) +48.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Alarum Technologies (ALAR) has the highest net margin (Xunlei (XNET) -16.9%, Alarum Technologies (ALAR) 145.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Xunlei (XNET) returned the most: Xunlei (XNET) -58.7%, Alarum Technologies (ALAR) -90.1%. Over five years, Xunlei (XNET) compounded fastest (Xunlei (XNET) +5.9%/yr, Alarum Technologies (ALAR) -34.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Xunlei (XNET) has been the steadiest (Xunlei (XNET) 52.8%, Alarum Technologies (ALAR) 113.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do XNET and ALAR move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.13, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, XNET and ALAR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Xunlei (XNET) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.