XELB vs GIL vs VFC Stock Comparison

XCel Brands, Gildan Activewear and V F Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
XELB XCel Brands, Inc.
$0.36 -56.1% 1M -74.1% 1Y
Market cap
$2.09M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$4.73M
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
1 win
GIL Gildan Activewear Inc.
$40.35 -1.5% 1M -33.2% 1Y
Market cap
$6.42B
P/E
30.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.72B
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
5 wins
VFC V F Corp
$16.93 +19.6% 1M +3.8% 1Y
Market cap
$6.67B
P/E
24.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.51B
Div. yield
0.02%
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

V F leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (V F 5, Gildan Activewear 5, XCel Brands 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionXELBGILVFCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.09M $6.42B $6.67B VFC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.1x 30.4x 24.3x VFC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 8.4x 15.4x GIL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -18.1% +38.0% +0.2% GIL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -362.5% 4.5% 2.9% GIL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -44.6% 5.2% 8.3% VFC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.3x 4.9x 3.3x XELB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -74.1% -33.2% +3.8% VFC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -51.7%/yr +2.3%/yr -24.9%/yr GIL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 116.6% 42.3% 48.9% GIL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 22/100 35/100 49/100 VFC

Percentile Scorecard

XELBGILVFC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisXELBGILVFC
Valuation 20 #37 of 46 33 #31 of 46 53 #22 of 46
Growth 43 #25 of 43 52 #21 of 43 76 #11 of 43
Profitability 5 #40 of 42 44 #24 of 42 59 #18 of 42
Financial Health 19 #43 of 53 29 #38 of 53 25 #40 of 53
Shareholder Returns – 18 #28 of 34 33 #23 of 34
Overall 22 35 49
  • XELB ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • GIL ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • VFC ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodXELBGILVFCSPY
1 month -56.1%-1.5%+19.6% -0.8%
3 months -71.7%-20.4%-1.1% +3.5%
6 months -84.3%-30.3%-12.6% +7.0%
Year to date -66.7%-35.4%-6.4% +12.2%
1 year -74.1%-33.2%+3.8% +13.0%
3 years -96.5%+47.9%+0.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year -67.3%+13.9%+0.1% +23.1%
5 years -97.4%+11.8%-76.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year -51.7%+2.3%-24.9% +11.0%
10 years -99.3%+57.1%-68.7% +258.0%
10 years, per year -38.9%+4.6%-11.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureXELBGILVFCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 116.6%42.3%48.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 118.2%44.6%50.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.371.211.67 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.64-0.790.08 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -98.3%-44.5%-87.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -85.2%-44.4%-21.4% -1.8%
52-week high $2.43$72.58$21.55 $779.14
52-week low $0.34$40.30$12.62 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleXELBGILVFC
P/E now vs peer median -0.1xmedian 16.6x 30.6xmedian 16.6x 24.2xmedian 16.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 0.7x 1.6xmedian 0.7x 0.7xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -1.5xmedian 9.7x 16.0xmedian 9.7x 11.1xmedian 9.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 12.2x 10.6xmedian 12.2x 10.6xmedian 12.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 2.2x 2.2xmedian 2.2x 3.8xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.00median 0.64 -1.41median 0.64 0.75median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsXELBGILVFC
Revenue $4.73M $4.72B $9.51B
Gross profit – $1.41B $5.23B
Operating income -$12.63M $380.85M $580.11M
Net income -$17.25M -$60.80M $274.18M
Free cash flow – $703.50M $628.20M
EPS (diluted) $-2.78 $1.32 $0.70
Cash & equivalents $399.00K $268.30M $670.06M
Total debt $49.59M $3.59B $3.51B
Shares (diluted) 6.16M 160.20M 392.11M
Enterprise value -$1.93M $5.34B $3.29B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricXELBGILVFC
P/E -0.1x 30.6x 24.2x
P/FCF – 10.6x 10.6x
P/Operating cash flow – 12.6x 8.8x
P/S 0.5x 1.6x 0.7x
P/B 0.2x 2.2x 3.8x
P/Tangible book -0.2x 21.5x 22.1x
EV/EBITDA -1.5x 16.0x 11.1x
EV/EBIT -1.1x 28.3x 16.4x
EV/Revenue 3.0x 2.3x 1.0x
EV/FCF – 15.3x 15.1x
EV/Operating cash flow – 18.2x 12.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.00 -1.41 0.75

Growth

14 metrics
MetricXELBGILVFC
Revenue growth (1Y) -18.1% 38.0% 0.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -39.5% 14.9% -4.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 10.9% 2.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 16.6% -2.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 34.8% -29.8% 70.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 19.3% -13.0% -14.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 25.5% -127.3% 680.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 6.9% -28.5% 32.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 71.0% -16.4% 677.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 34.0% -21.8% 32.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 273.6% 115.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 32.0% 96.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 141.2% 141.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 9.4% 60.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricXELBGILVFC
Gross margin – 30.0% 55.0%
EBITDA margin -191.4% 14.3% 9.0%
Operating margin -267.1% 8.1% 6.1%
Pretax margin -363.9% 7.6% 3.8%
Net margin -362.5% 4.5% 2.9%
FCF margin – 14.9% 6.6%
Operating cash flow margin – 12.6% 7.9%
Return on equity -108.4% 1.5% 15.2%
Return on assets -48.3% 0.5% 2.9%
Return on invested capital -44.6% 5.2% 8.3%
Return on capital employed -41.9% 4.8% 9.0%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.5x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – -9.7x 2.8x
Stock comp / revenue 16.5% 0.9% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricXELBGILVFC
Debt / assets 37.2% 35.7% 37.1%
Debt / equity 0.9x 1.1x 2.0x
Net debt / EBITDA -1.3x 4.9x 3.3x
Debt / FCF – 5.1x 5.6x
Liabilities / assets 57.3% 66.8% 81.4%
Equity / assets 42.7% 33.2% 18.6%
Interest coverage -2.8x 1.8x 3.8x
Current ratio 0.3x 1.9x 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.2x 0.6x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x 0.2x
Altman Z-score -5.46 1.65 1.73

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricXELBGILVFC
Dividend yield – 2.4% 2.1%
Net buyback yield – -3.7% –
Shareholder yield – -1.3% 2.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 51.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 22.4%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 0.5%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -39.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusXELBGILVFC
Forward P/E – 8.4xFY2026 15.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-1.59FY2026 $4.81FY2026 $1.10FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +37.0%FY2026 +31.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +17.3% +14.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.58MFY2026 $5.67BFY2026 $9.78BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +33.1%FY2026 +56.6%FY2026 +1.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +89.0% +11.5% -4.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersXELBGILVFC
Held by institutions 11.6% 100.0% 91.8%
Institutions holding 11 463 553
Change in shares held, QoQ -14.1% +7.8% +3.6%
Institutions buying 6 197 267
Institutions selling 3 149 182
Buyers to sellers 2.00 1.32 1.47

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

XELBGILVFC
XELB 1.00 0.03 0.12
GIL 0.03 1.00 0.36
VFC 0.12 0.36 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, XELB, GIL and VFC?

V F (VFC) is the largest by market capitalisation: XCel Brands (XELB) $2.09M, Gildan Activewear (GIL) $6.42B, V F (VFC) $6.67B.

Which stock is cheaper, XELB, GIL and VFC?

V F (VFC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (XCel Brands (XELB) -0.1x, Gildan Activewear (GIL) 30.4x, V F (VFC) 24.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Gildan Activewear (GIL) is cheapest (Gildan Activewear (GIL) 8.4x, V F (VFC) 15.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Gildan Activewear (GIL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: XCel Brands (XELB) -18.1%, Gildan Activewear (GIL) +38.0%, V F (VFC) +0.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Gildan Activewear (GIL) has the highest net margin (XCel Brands (XELB) -362.5%, Gildan Activewear (GIL) 4.5%, V F (VFC) 2.9%). On return on invested capital, V F (VFC) leads (XCel Brands (XELB) -44.6%, Gildan Activewear (GIL) 5.2%, V F (VFC) 8.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year V F (VFC) returned the most: XCel Brands (XELB) -74.1%, Gildan Activewear (GIL) -33.2%, V F (VFC) +3.8%. Over five years, Gildan Activewear (GIL) compounded fastest (XCel Brands (XELB) -51.7%/yr, Gildan Activewear (GIL) +2.3%/yr, V F (VFC) -24.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: XCel Brands (XELB) 0.00%, Gildan Activewear (GIL) 0.00%, V F (VFC) 0.02%. XCel Brands (XELB) and Gildan Activewear (GIL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Gildan Activewear (GIL) has been the steadiest (XCel Brands (XELB) 116.6%, Gildan Activewear (GIL) 42.3%, V F (VFC) 48.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, XELB, GIL and VFC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, V F (VFC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.